Blogs and Stories

Adam Clymer

Teddy's Catholic Pain

I interviewed Kennedy many times for a biography, but we rarely talked about his faith. But early on, I asked him what led a man in his comfortable circumstances to be so interested in the poor and the sick and people down on their luck. He spoke of his grandfather’s instruction and his father’s commendation of public service and then added in the syntax that sometimes failed him, “You know I was thinking, stronger were my mother’s basic religious beliefs, Sermon on the Mount, those obligations that we all had.” And there was that verse from Luke: “of everyone to whom much has been given, much has been expected.”

The Daily Beast's Complete Kennedy Coverage: Tributes, Photos, and Videos Meanwhile, on the issue of getting a prompt replacement for Kennedy in the Senate, there has been some movement. Gov. Deval Patrick, a Democrat, said he would sign legislation that gave him a temporary appointment before a special election. That election, five months off, is the only element in current law, and Kennedy last week released a letter to Patrick and legislative leaders urging a change to provide for an interim appointment who could provide a 60th, filibuster-killing vote in health care.

There was no clear signal of what the Massachusetts legislature might do, though members professed to be embarrassed at seeming hypocritical by changing the law so quickly after they acted in 2004 to thwart a Republican governor from appointing a replacement for presumptive President John F. Kerry. Efforts to determine when the Massachusetts legislature last felt embarrassed were unavailing.

Adam Clymer is a former chief Washington correspondent of the New York Times and author of Edward M. Kennedy: A Biography.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.

Back to Top
August 26, 2009 | 11:27pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

aperturemad

Oh Sky Cake why do you have to taste so good!?

|
|
Reply
7:10 am, Aug 27, 2009

larry278

I wonder if a friend who is a divorced & remarried former Roman Catholic who devoutly wishes to return to the Roman Catholic Church will read this. Some of former RC's have exceedingly bad memories of Holy Mother, the Church which preclude any return to the RC's. This isn't the time to bore others with a laundry list of our gripes that always become bigoted screeds.

|
|
Reply
|
9:17 am, Aug 27, 2009

cbeenthere

I agree, the RCC can bring bad memories.

|
|
Reply
6:01 pm, Aug 29, 2009

cbeenthere

Well, you are correct larry, it turned into a screed just a few posts down.

|
|
Reply
6:03 pm, Aug 29, 2009

larryfromkansas

In my neck of the woods, Kennedy (Whom people out here hate anyway and have been telling Chapaquiddick and nephew Willie Smith jokes since his passing.) would be damned for receiving an annulment.

It's sad that people forget their own faith when talking about someone else's beliefs. Here we see a man obviously immersed in the faith his mother gave him, losing it to ambition, drink and women, then finding that faith again.

This is a great story of a contrite heart. Those out my way who are so filled with hate toward Ted Kennedy could learn a thing or two from him.

|
|
Reply
|
9:28 am, Aug 27, 2009

swkidder

Thank you. I agree wholeheartedly. Some say that we are given two lives - the first in which we learn, and the second in which we move forward and make something of ourselves. Ted Kennedy is a shining example of someone who made a huge contribution to the lives of millions in this country, and that is how I shall remember him.

|
|
Reply
11:11 am, Aug 27, 2009

gak001

Hear, hear!

|
|
Reply
|
11:52 am, Aug 27, 2009

southernyankee

Swkidder, what a lovely thought. I think its sad that the so called religious people are judging Kennedy yet it is God's place to judge not ours. I have a feeling that god will weigh all sides of his life and I have a feeling he will get to heaven alot faster than someone who said God picked him to be president. Just sayin

|
3:30 pm, Aug 28, 2009

jptryan

One minor detail. Senator Kennedy was the recognized leader of the pro-abortion movement in the Senate. As such he did everything in his power to ensure "legal" protection for the killing of tens of millions of innocent children. I hope and pray that he repented of that sin, but saw no mention of that by the good Father. When I die I will consider myself an abject FAILURE if Planned Barrenhood laments my passing as it does Senator Kennedy http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/planned-p arenthood-federation-america-mourns-loss-senator-edward-kennedy-30074.htm May God have mercy on his soul.

|
|
Reply
|
1:53 pm, Aug 27, 2009

Bergen

Obviously, Senator Kennedy felt compassion for the tragic young women who found themselves unable to support children, or understood the futility of bringing profoundly defective children into the world only to suffer greatly and die within hours or days. I am always struck by the singular lack of human compassion of anti-abortion activists...recently, to the point of murder. The self righteousness of this group is breathtaking.

|
7:32 pm, Aug 27, 2009

Theophanis

Not until yesterday did l find out through the news that Senator Edward Kennedy was a devoutly religious man.
Unlike many politicians and Presidents such as, Reagan, Bush sr., Clinton, Bush jr., and even Obama, did l ever hear Ted Kennedy say, "God bless you". "God bless America", May God bless you and may God bless America". "You are in my prayers",etc, etc, etc and etc.
This was also true of his brothers John and Robert.
Their religion was between themselves and their God.
THOROUGHLY ADMIRABLE!
Did not the constitution designate separation of church and state?
Too many citizens and politicians are justifying horrific actions in the name of religion.
CEASE AND DESIST AMERICA!

|
|
Reply
|
11:14 am, Aug 27, 2009

jptryan

That no one knew that he was a religious man leaves that claim suspect at best.

What "religious man" would champion the killing of millions of innocent children?

Or is your criticism that the good Senator justified this horrific action (supporting the demise of these children) in the name of religion? I'm confused.

|
|
Reply
2:52 pm, Aug 27, 2009

jptryan

The author seeks to contine the myth of Camelot. Senator Kennedy's career was a self-imposed tradegy. Very sad when you think of what he could have done with such and awesome opportunity. That would explain why the author sugar-coated the reason the Senator will not have his funeral Mass at the Cathedral- to prevent the scandal of the Church honoring the most pro-abortion former member of the Senate (an honor he shares with the President).

May God have mercy on his soul.

|
|
Reply
|
1:57 pm, Aug 27, 2009

southernyankee

I don't think you need to worry about his soul. Everyone has good and bad things happen to them. Just look at the republican party today with cheating husbands. Do you think that these men that live in The Family religious house in DC is going to get to heaven any faster than you or me or even Senator Kennedy. Please friend don't judge. Everyone blames the senator for the death of the girl. Yes he was responsible. But where was her responsibility going out with a married man. She was an adult. She new he was drinking. Why did she contribute to her own death?

|
|
Reply
|
3:37 pm, Aug 28, 2009

jptryan

You say don't judge and then turn right around and blame Mary Jo for being killed by the drunk driving Senator Kennedy. Now that's cold. As cold as was the water the Senator left her in to drown that night while he hightailed it back to the Kennedy compound to take care his career. For all he knew she was in an air pocket gasping for breath waiting for the help the Senator did not seek for her, and dying a most terrifying death- alone... abandoned by the married man who drove her into her watery grave. And perhaps worse, he never took responsibility for killing her, instead giving a self-serving speech to salvage his career in which he rambled on for over five minutes and never once mentioned Mary Jo's name. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2324755/posts

|
1:57 am, Aug 29, 2009

ardeth

Pious, huh? Well, nobody's perfect.

|
|
Reply
2:00 pm, Aug 27, 2009

hoosierbrad

Adam, it is not the divorce which prevented Sen. Kennedy from participating in communion, it was his re-marriage to another woman, before his first marriage was annuled by the Church

|
|
Reply
|
2:59 pm, Aug 27, 2009

cbeenthere

That is correct hosierbrad, just backing you up

|
|
Reply
6:05 pm, Aug 29, 2009

TK798999

It would have been great to see Teddy and other Kennedy family members speak publicly about their beautiful Catholic faith which will sustain them during this time of sorrow. The church could use some good PR (I say this as a Catholic) given the growing anti-Christian, anti-Catholic sentiment today in the media and in public education.



It's the end of an era with the passing of Sen. Edward Moore Kennedy. May he eternally rest in peace alongside his brothers.

Obama doesn't appear to be "mourning" the loss of his "friend" and major endorser (even though the Kennedy endorsement had little effect coming just before Super Tuesday primaries in 08 when Hillary won ALL of the major states handily and should be our President). Weird. As reported on ABC Obama "continues his vacation today (yesterday), going out for lunch and posing for photos". Huh?

Obama appeared cold and lacking in feeling as he spoke of his "friend" Sen. Ted Kennedy's passing today in comparison to Biden who seemed genuinely upset. Obama didn't appear to be "heartbroken". Strange and interesting. I don't see Obama giving a very heartfelt eulogy for Teddy, someone else should speak from the heart.

Teddy made a huge mistake in betraying the brilliant Clintons for the unqualified Obama. Teddy's judgment was not always the best...

Thank you Teddy for a lifetime of public service. I was a Kennedy volunteer in the 1980 Kennedy Presidential campaing. It was audacious for Ted to try to take down a sitting President of his OWN party in 1980 and lead to Pres. Carter's eventual defeat to Reagan. Wow. Ted accomplished many good things but did many bad things as well. The same notorious womanizer and boozer Teddy helped bring us Title 9, ADA, and SCHIP and No Child Left Behind with Bush. He was a man of contradictions personally and professionally.

Teddy lived a life of privledge and tragedy on a scale most of us will never experience.

May God forgive him his sins and Bless Him for his good works. May God rest his soul.

Condolences to his family
and may their beautiful Catholic faith sustain them in this time of great sorrow. Peace, all

******************************************

|
|
Reply
|
4:03 pm, Aug 27, 2009

weonfiretonight

It's Cardinal Bernard Law, not Bernard Cardinal Law.

|
|
Reply
8:35 am, Aug 28, 2009

fredv55

Ted Kennedy was a Catholic in name only. I don't appreciate so called Catholics like him who don't follow the Church's teachings. May God have mercy on him and may he rest in peace.

|
|
Reply
10:07 am, Aug 30, 2009

jleachesq

I'm guessing Senator Kennedy's Catholic faith is not the same right-wing conservative intolerant reactionary Catholic faith that Newt Gingrich just signed on with.

|
|
Reply
|
6:33 pm, Aug 27, 2009

jptryan

You're right there. His was the "Catholic" faith that allowed him to champion the modern day slaughter of the innocents we call abortion. Instead of celebrating his "accomplishments" those who stood side by side with Senator Kennedy would do well to join those of us who opposed his leadership of the pro-abortion movement on our knees as we pray for the repose of his soul and for the souls of the millions of innocent children he spent his career betraying to their deaths.

|
|
Reply
1:39 am, Aug 29, 2009

RobbyS

TK798999:

I don't know the state of his soul at the time of his death. I need to worry about my own first. However, I do not see how any Catholic can champion the most liberal abortion law in the western world, one which allows mothers to kill child at will. It may be he was deceived by his religious tutors, such as Father Drinan, who was, after all, by a considerable factor , smarter than the unintellectual senator. It maybe that the dissolute life he led, possibly because his faher and his brothers-lived such lives also, led to moral confusion of the worst sort that could lead him to believe that offering free abortions is actually a kindness. Well, Roe v. Wade liberated far more men than women, freeing them from any thought of obligation to the women they impregnated.

|
|
Reply
12:50 am, Aug 28, 2009

BellaFurie

The state of Teddy Kennedy's soul at the time of his death is between him and God. But he contributed to the impression that eminent Catholics could obtain privilege in the same way that favours could be purchased before the Reformation.

The annulment of his marriage did not appear to meet the stringent requirements that ordinary Catholics endure. - Both he and Joan were baptized, they were free to marry, and the marriage was consummated. Was he or Joan oblivious to the commitment required by marriage when they wed? Was either of them insane at the time?

It seems most likely that some slippery interpretation of a mature understanding of marriage was endorsed by his pals in the Church. No wonder people regard the Church as corrupt.

|
|
Reply
|
2:20 am, Aug 28, 2009

janet1003mn

I do not know under what conditions Ted and Joan Kennedy were granted their annulment. I do know that there is a complex set of rules governing annulment in the Roman Catholic church; it seems presumptuous to question whether or not their annulment was within those rules of a "privilege" that the Kennedy family "purchased." For more information about reasons for annulment this web site contains a lot of information:

http://home.earthlink.net/~rickpen16/catholicmarriages/id17.html

If you Google "reasons for annulment" you'll find many additional sources.

|
|
Reply
5:22 pm, Aug 29, 2009

cbeenthere

Bella and janet
The RCC grants annulments freely now, but will not abandon the intrusive process, and leave it to the conscience of those involved. Kennedy did not have any more clout than others, none needed.

|
|
Reply
6:11 pm, Aug 29, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Teddy's Catholic Pain

by Adam Clymer

Info
RSS
Adam Clymer
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |