Blogs and Stories

Nicholas  Ciarelli

The iTunes Killer

BS Top - Ciarelli iTunes Killer Spotify dancing Apple's worst nightmare, and a music lover's best friend, is about to cross the Atlantic. Spotify offers free, infinite music—and it's all legal.

The European online music service Spotify offers six million tracks—a practically limitless catalog spanning Aaron Copland to ZZ Top—in an interface as polished and intuitive as Apple’s iTunes. And unlike the pay-per-song iTunes, Spotify’s entire library is free for the taking, assuming users can tolerate an occasional advertisement.

The service is presently confined to Europe, where it’s available in the U.K., France, Spain, Norway and Sweden—but it is planning a U.S. launch for early 2010. The prospect is surely creating a little anxiety at Apple’s Cupertino, California, headquarters.

Inside the tech world, the summer days have been flush with news of Spotify’s rise. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg proclaimed Spotify “so good” amid chatter that the two companies have been secretly negotiating a partnership. The Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing confirmed that he had invested an undisclosed sum in the startup. And if back-of-the-envelope math is to be believed, Spotify is now valued at €170 million, or about $244 million.

When Spotify arrives in the U.S., Apple may find it difficult to compete with “free.”

In Europe, Spotify has shown itself a keen competitor. In August, the head of Universal Music in Sweden said Spotify has become the label’s largest source of online revenue in the country, overtaking iTunes. Now Spotify is turning its sights to the U.S., where a spokeswoman says the company plans to launch in “early 2010.”

So when the service crosses the Atlantic, will it unseat iTunes, or is it destined for the graveyard, like so many other ambitious music startups before it?

Test-driving Spotify turns even the most hardened cynic into a believer. Like iTunes, Spotify downloads onto a PC or Mac, offers access to a vast library of music (more than six million tracks, compared to Apple’s 10 million), and enables users to organize songs into playlists. The crucial difference, of course, is that with iTunes, songs must be purchased and stored on a computer’s hard drive, while with Spotify all the songs are free and stream instantly over the Internet. It’s not difficult to understand why bloggers have called Spotify “the best desktop music player we’ve ever used.”

In exchange for bathing in Spotify’s sea of music, users listen to short advertisements that play once every half-hour. For about $15 a month, depending on the country, users also may upgrade to a premium service that removes the ads and plays higher-quality audio. A subscription also allows consumers to use Spotify on a smartphone; otherwise, it’s not possible to access the music on the go, somewhat diminishing Spotify’s appeal. (A forthcoming iPhone app allows users to play Spotify playlists even without Internet access. Following speculation that Apple would reject the app, the iPhone maker last week approved Spotify for listing in the App Store.)

The fine print of Spotify’s agreements with the major record labels is unknown, but the startup presumably has to pay them royalties each time their music is streamed. (The labels own a substantial stake in the company, which some commentators have speculated amounts to an advance on those royalties.)

Back to Top
August 31, 2009 | 11:15pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

bravian

Apple doesn't make money off iTunes. Or least not much. It makes money off the hardware. So your point is ... well ... pointless as its meaningless to Apple's bottom line.

|
|
Reply
|
12:10 am, Sep 1, 2009

deegeezee

so, apple makes no money from their dollar-per-song fee? hmmm... that doesn't make sense... since they've been sued for those nonexistent profits in europe.

of COURSE they make money.

|
|
Reply
|
2:52 am, Sep 1, 2009

sophia5

What are the odds the U.S. government gets it's hands on the new
service and starts taxing for downloads ? FREE ?

|
9:40 am, Sep 1, 2009

joymars

Oh, sophia5!

You are such a trip!

|
12:01 pm, Sep 1, 2009

njdelc

I believe Apple makes about 30¢ per song, but their costs are very close to that. They make a little profit on the store, but not much. iPhones and iPods are where they make their profit.

|
1:43 pm, Sep 1, 2009

SkiTrader

I think he means they don't make much profit on iTunes (this is true). Apple does get revenue per song but most of it is passed to others. Its a loss leader for Apple's hardware products (IPod etc.). Spotify is OK but like Pandora and other streamers you need to be connected to the internet to use it. The songs are streamed and not physically downloaded. Not so good for listening offline which is what most people do most of the time. No iTunes killer here - sorry.

|
12:04 am, Sep 2, 2009

BransoMo

My fear, sopia5, is that an ACORN Death Panel will get there even before guvment has a chance to tax it.

|
4:40 pm, Sep 2, 2009

AmericaRocks

Lulz to Bravian's "point."

First, Apple cares about the desirability of iTunes use. The iTunes platform is what drives ipod hardware purchases and in part apple computer purchases. Although the revenue stream from selling songs is minor compared to that generated through other Apple verticals, the platform itself is part of the value package of a hardware purchase.

Secondly, this is not Pandora. Although I am less than convinced by a Zuckerberg endorsement, this is something new. Su2illy is right. You can choose your songs and make a playlist. It is a mobile application for anyone with a phone. Apple exceeded its 10 million iphone sales goal last year correct? As an iphone user I am already more inclined to open up Pandora than iTunes. I would be even more inclined to do so if I could choose individual songs. The market for free music players has changed since the time of Kazaa etc.

|
|
Reply
|
10:17 am, Sep 1, 2009

sanagelosia

pandora is not the only one.....you should try out www.last.fm

|
2:11 pm, Sep 1, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
10:35 pm, Sep 1, 2009

deegeezee

wow. they've invented... internet radio. again.

|
|
Reply
|
2:50 am, Sep 1, 2009

lx-Isaac

dont be stupid, remind me the last time u can choose songs for radios

|
|
Reply
|
2:58 am, Sep 1, 2009

mhmck05

don't be insulting. songza & lastfm.

|
10:31 am, Sep 1, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
10:36 pm, Sep 1, 2009

deegeezee

thank you, mhmck05. this is just more hype; like the myriad "iphone killers" and "ipod killers" we've already seen. frankly, i wish there *were* more competition.

|
11:08 pm, Sep 1, 2009

ZerMongo

They already tried this with Ruckus. Same model - choose the songs you want, listen to some advertising, even a pay-for-download option if you wanted the MP3.

The problem?

NO ONE WANTS TO BE TETHERED TO THEIR COMPUTER.

That's why God himself forged the iPods out of Jesus' bones, so that we might listen to our music from our pockets. Spotify requires you to have the desktop application running and doesn't transfer songs to iTunes.

I know there's an iPhone app coming, but it's really going to be limited as far as audience goes. Most people won't want to stream over 3G as it costs them, so they'll be relegated to WiFi-and I think for $10 they'd rather just buy the damn album off iTunes or Amazon.

|
|
Reply
3:17 am, Sep 1, 2009

nicfulton

Bravian - last time I checked the details Apple was making at least a 10% margin on iTunes, although they claim that it's barely break even. They've sold over 6 billion songs so that's a big chunk of change.

|
|
Reply
4:15 am, Sep 1, 2009

Dimlah

I heard there's a website where you can watch streaming video that includes music. I think it's called "Youtube"

|
|
Reply
6:12 am, Sep 1, 2009

chucketal

Hmmm... sounds like Pandora and Slacker, doesn't it?

|
|
Reply
|
6:46 am, Sep 1, 2009

choptop13

Nope. Pandora and Slacker serve you the music that they choose to based on what you like. This service serves you the exact artists/songs you choose.

|
|
Reply
9:39 am, Sep 1, 2009

WeaponOfChoice

Let me get this straight - free music, but you can't take it portable? How the hell is that an iTunes killer? 90% of my music listening is done on the iPod, not iTunes.

|
|
Reply
|
6:55 am, Sep 1, 2009

Dahveed

True Dat! Most of my listening is done in the car and out and about. Not at my desktop. So, self programable internet radio doesn't really do anything for me.

|
|
Reply
9:57 am, Sep 1, 2009

dcminyard

And so how is this different from Imeem or Pandora? Your article is misleading. In the excerpt, it says unlimited free downloads, but the article then goes on to say music from Spotify streams from the desktop player.

|
|
Reply
7:03 am, Sep 1, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
|
7:51 am, Sep 1, 2009

su2lly

Because unlike Pandora (which I love as well) you choose the exact song you want to hear. You can store it ( on their servers) in a play list. So you open the program (not the web page) and you pull up what song(s) or list of songs you want to hear. Pandora only lets you bring up an artist or artist similar to the artist you entered. The free version works on your computer ( if you don't have your computer hooked up to your home stero, it's time you did so) For a fee you will be able to run Spotify on your iPhone, iPod Touch, Android Phone, Black Berry, Palm Pre or a phone running Windows Mobile. I see this ending Pandora and taking a chunk out of iTunes. But as far as being an iTunes killer? That's a cult that's not going away anytime soon.

|
|
Reply
|
8:43 am, Sep 1, 2009

choptop13

I doubt it will kill Pandora... a lot of people choose Pandora specifically because it lets them hear bands they've never heard of, songs they didn't expect, and gives you instant variety in general.

|
9:40 am, Sep 1, 2009

Dahveed

You can only use this on your phone if you have internet access. So if your out in an area where reception is spotty or without 3G or wifi, you are SOL. And subscription based music services (which this will be to get it on your phone) have been very slow to take off in the US.

|
10:00 am, Sep 1, 2009

JDK-JDK

Pandora is an EXCELLENT online music player, but you don't pick the songs played, just rate songs and genrest ogive it an idea of what to play next.

I love Pandora. And it's all free with no commercials.

|
|
Reply
|
9:15 am, Sep 1, 2009

mhmck05

False. Pandora has started employing commercials. But you're right about its excellence--it won't go away any time soon because of the new music discovery aspect.

|
|
Reply
|
10:49 am, Sep 1, 2009

Synaesthete

In addition to commercials, they are limiting radio use to 40 hours a month. That takes away the appeal for those that prefer listening to songs without worrying about creating playlists (like myself).

|
11:58 am, Sep 1, 2009

flyoverland

I showed this to my 15 year old daughter this morning right before she took off on her bike equipped with an ipod speaker. She was still laughing when she rounded the corner.

|
|
Reply
|
9:30 am, Sep 1, 2009

rpupkin

f*cking tremendous

|
|
Reply
|
11:18 am, Sep 1, 2009

flyoverland

I had to buy her the speaker (which fits on the frame like a water bottle) because I knew she would wear earbuds if I didn't. It is controlled by a remote on the handle bars. Works like a champ.

|
12:16 pm, Sep 1, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
9:42 am, Sep 1, 2009

FingBruges

Umm HAI welcome to internet radio. It's called grooveshark, and you can choose any song you want.

|
|
Reply
9:55 am, Sep 1, 2009

veryneatmonster

This is by no means an Itunes killer. From the description in his article, Spotify is just like connecting to someone's shared library on Itunes; a very huge library, but a shared library nontheless.

People want to own their music. They want to burn CD's and import the songs on mp3 players. Spotify will be great for people with passive relationships with music, but for people who like to own their music, this will NOT kill Itunes or any other mp3 store.

If anything, this Spotify will become popular for previewing a song or album. Other than that, I can't really see a point to it.

|
|
Reply
9:59 am, Sep 1, 2009

robjh1

Sorry bud but it's not free if you have to pay a fee. Perhaps you should have said for a fee you get unlimited access to music. Plus the music isn't portable. Try again buddy. No need to create or generate mass hysteria on this.

"and we are not saved..."

|
|
Reply
10:17 am, Sep 1, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

The iTunes Killer

by Nicholas Ciarelli

Info
RSS
Nicholas  Ciarelli
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |