Blogs and Stories

Rebecca Dana

The ABC's of Diane's Deal

Diane Sawyer David Montgomery / Getty Images Diane Sawyer finally got her dream job. Rebecca Dana reports on the palace intrigue—including a "livid" Charles Gibson—that led to her coronation. Plus, her life in pictures.

There’s a story people at ABC News tell about the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. Diane Sawyer and Charlie Gibson were cozily ensconced in the Good Morning America studio when the first plane crashed into the World Trade Center. Being seasoned newsmen both, they sprang into action, covering the tragedy side by side for about 10 minutes until Peter Jennings—stately, stoic, impeccably tailored—settled into his anchor chair.

For the rest of the morning, Sawyer rarely saw the red light of a live camera trained her way. Surrounded by flowers on the cheery Good Morning America set, she waited for her chance to go on. “Diane’s available,” producers said. “She’s standing by.” Nothing.

Charlie Gibson made no direct reference to Sawyer in his public statement about his departure, and a source close to the anchor described him as “livid” that Sawyer is succeeding him.

For two decades, Sawyer has been standing by at ABC, waiting for her chance to run the show. Now, at last, she finally will. It’s not the prize it once was, but it’s hers: anchor of World News, the once towering, now considerably diminished evening broadcast, which, like its competitors on NBC and CBS, keeps soldiering on in the face of looming irrelevance.

If nothing else, Sawyer’s new job carries with it the promise of sweet revenge, a chance to finally win a ratings race against her old rival Katie Couric, who used to beat her every morning as anchor of NBC’s Today and who capped off the winning streak in 2006 by becoming the first ever solo female anchor of a national network newscast. ABC News President David Westin told me he offered Sawyer the job last week, and she called him at seven Tuesday evening and said, “It’s a go.”

How much of a “go” it is for ABC remains to be seen. Good Morning America is the only news program that makes serious money for the network, and Sawyer’s anchoring is pretty much the only thing keeping it from drifting off into deep space. Come January, she’ll leave behind three talented but utterly chemistry-free co-hosts to hold down the lucrative broadcast for the network, owned by Disney, which is not exactly a charitable enterprise. Sawyer’s new gig at World News, by contrast, may be the most prestigious seat in the house, but on days when there hasn’t been a national triumph or tragedy, it’s really just 22 minutes of old news, watched by 7 million old people—and hardly a cash cow.

View Our Gallery of Diane's Life in Photos

HP Main - Diane Sawyer Gallery

AP Photos

For his part, Gibson left as he came: humbly and with lots of admirers. When he took the reins in 2006, after the ill-fated pairing of youngsters Bob Woodruff and Elizabeth Vargas fell apart six months after it began, he told me he got the job by happenstance. “I was the guy still there by the candy machine,” he said (with no mention of the gal standing there next to him).

Gibson didn’t do interviews this time, but said in a statement that his “heart is full of gratitude.” Although they worked closely for more than a decade, Gibson makes no direct reference to Sawyer in the statement, and a source close to the departing anchor described him as “livid” that she’s succeeding him. An ABC executive called this “nonsense,” and Westin said he told Gibson from their earliest conversations about his retirement that Sawyer would be his replacement.

No other anchors were even considered for the job. Westin said it’s too early to predict how Sawyer’s presence will change the show, but that after his abortive earlier effort to bring in a younger pair of anchors, he’s given up trying to reinvent the evening newscast. He praised Sawyer’s long career, highlighting her interviews with all the presidents since George H.W. Bush and her documentaries on the American underclass.

“She has paid her dues and then some,” Westin said, “and it seemed that she’d waited her turn and this was the right time for her, if Charlie was to step down.” Which he did, despite Westin’s (and everyone else’s) best efforts to stop him.

It may not be the unequivocal endorsement Sawyer envisioned for her final ascent, but there is at least the comfort that justice has been done. After all her years as a good soldier for ABC, she deserves this. The broadcaster, a former beauty queen and Nixon communications aide who is married to director Mike Nichols, got her start on television in the 1980s at CBS. She began where women did at the time, as a blond, silky, self-possessed presence on the morning show, then graduated to a plum job as a correspondent for top-rated news magazine 60 Minutes. After a few years there, she moved over to ABC to host the evening news magazine Primetime Live. Then it was back to the chipper pre-work hours as host of Good Morning America. From morning to night, night to morning, she’s been circling the 6:30 p.m. time slot for 30 years, even as the show itself slipped further down the drain.

Sawyer—who almost never gives interviews—was mum as usual on the day of her coronation, but Couric offered a tepid welcome. “Diane is one of the hardest-working people I know,” she said through her publicist, “and this new assignment is the latest achievement in an already accomplished and illustrious career. And as I did, I’m sure she’ll quickly find that she doesn’t miss that early morning alarm clock.”

As I did. It was the first volley in the revival of TV news’ most delicious rivalry. Couric, who is gamely hanging on as the anchor of the CBS Evening News, is all smiles and warmth and live colonoscopies to Sawyer’s dignified cool. The CBS anchor, 52, may have paved the way for the ABC anchor, 63, but Sawyer inherits a broadcast that typically draws a million more viewers a night than Couric’s. The CBS Evening News, meanwhile, is plagued by one major disadvantage that has nothing to do with the host herself—a pathetically weak affiliate group—but has otherwise been going strong in the wake of Couric’s blockbuster election coverage.

Brian Williams’ NBC Nightly News is the most-watched of the three and is likely to remain so, but if Sawyer can hold on to most of Gibson’s viewers, it will be a career triumph. If she sinks beneath CBS, it will be a crushing defeat. Either way, it’s one reason to watch the evening news next year.

Rebecca Dana is a culture correspondent for The Daily Beast. A former editor and reporter for The Wall Street Journal, she has also written for The New York Times, The New York Observer, Rolling Stone and Slate, among other publications.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.


View as Multiple Pages
Back to Top
September 2, 2009 | 10:48pm
Comments ()
nobuskidotcom

This is like having the best seat on the Titanic. Congrats Diane. You go girl!

|
|
Reply
|
3:27 am, Sep 3, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
|
4:43 pm, Sep 3, 2009
NYC180

Really....you are going with that insane comment? Clearly she is so far out of your league you can't understand what she is saying.

|
5:30 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Straelbora

I'm glad I'm not the only one who had the word 'smarmy' pop into his head when thinking of Diane Sawyer. I've always thought she's exactly like the character William Hurt played in "Broadcast News"- a vapid empty vessel.

Then again, who cares? I haven't watched any television news other than the BBC for years.

|
11:04 am, Sep 4, 2009
EdmondDantes

Or is it like having window seats on the Hindenburg?

She's always struck me as a lightweight socialite who also works in television. I trust her less than the other clowns. I think Elizabeth Vargas is a better choice, quite frankly.

|
|
Reply
12:33 am, Sep 4, 2009
oakely

Diane Sawyer is one of the few journalists with no ax to grind. If she has any bias, it's impossible to tell. What a great package of brains, beauty, and professionalism. She deserved the anchor job ahead of Gibson who exposed his bias during that now-infamous primary debate between Hillary and Obama.

Yeah, you go Diane indeed.

|
|
Reply
|
6:48 am, Sep 3, 2009
roadhunter

Very well stated. I couldn't agree more.

|
|
Reply
9:20 am, Sep 3, 2009
Maezeppa

That old Nixon lover? You've got to be kidding!

|
|
Reply
|
10:22 am, Sep 3, 2009
Picachu

True that bro (or sis). Anybody who schilled for Tricky Dicky will never have my trust.

|
12:03 pm, Sep 3, 2009
sophia5

What's up with the old glamour shot ?
Twenty, thirty years ago ?

|
1:50 pm, Sep 3, 2009
southernyankee

She did work for Nixon. But hell even Nixon comes off looking like a liberal. I like her. Sorry to see her leave Good Morning America. I love the people on that show. They all seem to like each other. I am sure she will do a great job.

|
|
Reply
3:49 pm, Sep 3, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
8:17 am, Sep 3, 2009
roadhunter

You're a shallow, hateful human being, and should be ashamed of yourself.

|
|
Reply
9:20 am, Sep 3, 2009
Maezeppa

Oh, I see. You hate Couric because of her looks. Nice.

|
|
Reply
10:24 am, Sep 3, 2009
alacazem

Cool rap, alamadus! I'm alacazem and feel exactly the same way! Right on!

|
|
Reply
10:41 am, Sep 3, 2009
Picachu

You're insights are as full of depth as you must be.

|
|
Reply
12:04 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Margot62

Oh, the drama!

As we report on the minutuae of American life--"Who will be the next anchor?!"----lest we forget what is really important in life?

Come on folks. Crack open your shells and focus on something of value. The future of this world depends on it. Volunteer somewhere. Help a neighbor. Support a child.

The tabloid world will cheapen you...

|
|
Reply
|
8:57 am, Sep 3, 2009
vulgrin

and yet, you are here reading and commenting on the article.

|
|
Reply
|
10:36 am, Sep 3, 2009
Bettie

tee hee

|
2:10 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Ritarita

Diane Sawyer
Will undoubtedly lend
Her Stepford smile to the
ABC Nightly Newscast-
Along with the overly sincere
Megadose of concern that gives
Such a creepy quality to every
Story she reports on.
I don't want profound news-
I just want the news.

|
|
Reply
|
9:13 am, Sep 3, 2009
cvillekid

I agree with Rita. There is something creepy about Sawyer, and "Stepford-like" is an apt way to frame it. Be that as it may, as someone else noted, who watches any of these people? At 6PM most days, after a Heineken or two, I'm watching Seinfeld reruns and tracking down Plantman, MalD and other miscreants on TDB. Different strokes, perhaps.

|
|
Reply
7:23 am, Sep 5, 2009
Ritarita

Diane Sawyer
Will undoubtedly lend
Her Stepford smile to the
ABC Nightly Newscast-
Along with the overly sincere
Megadose of concern that gives
Such a creepy quality to every
Story she reports on.
I don't want profound news-
I just want the news.

|
|
Reply
|
9:15 am, Sep 3, 2009
Ritarita

Is there
An echo in here?
No idea why that went up
Twice.
Sorry folks.

|
|
Reply
11:04 am, Sep 3, 2009
deegeezee

redundancy
lends no strength
to unfair commentary
and neither does
indentation

|
|
Reply
|
11:16 am, Sep 3, 2009
Ritarita

It's not unfair
To say she creeps me out.
Indentation did wonders
For your comment.

|
11:25 am, Sep 3, 2009
deegeezee

Stepford =
killer fembots
a woman
at the pinnacle
of her field =
subject to misogyny

|
1:05 pm, Sep 3, 2009
shle896

I applaud Sawyer's new assignment. She is one of the best things ABC News has going for it and it's high time they pay her the respect she has earned over the course of her amazing career. Kudos!

|
|
Reply
9:40 am, Sep 3, 2009
adkrim

I kinda wish they'd given the gig to her husband...

|
|
Reply
9:55 am, Sep 3, 2009
alacazem

I am so happy to hear that Diane will be anchoring the ABC nightly news broadcast, World News! Charlie G. is so unappealing to look at and a real bore. Brian Williams is a dolt and Katie Couric is a sickeningly sweet cheerleader with a hidden agenda. Excellent move, I think she'll beat 'em all!

|
|
Reply
|
10:39 am, Sep 3, 2009
Bettie

I agree with you 100%. I have always loved Diane Sawyer, who cares if what's his name is livid? Nobody wanted him there in the first place. She should have had the job after Peter Jennings died. Katie Couric is a first rate bi***, her hair is ugly, and she has no teeth or lips. And she really should keep her legs covered. Brian Williams has lost all credibility for reporting news, he truly has become a lightweight. All fluff pieces.
I will actually watch the evening news at 5:30 on ABC now, instead of the last 30 min of Wolf Blitzer.

|
|
Reply
2:05 pm, Sep 3, 2009
cvillekid

"Katie Couric is a sickeningly sweet cheerleader." Close alacazem, close. Actually, Katie is the eternal, sickeningly-sweet sorority girl, Tri-Delt version.

|
|
Reply
7:27 am, Sep 5, 2009
MatKen

Seems like I've been pining over Diane Sawyer my whole life. Good for her.

|
|
Reply
11:35 am, Sep 3, 2009
lkemw12

Yawn.

The Network Evening News?! Do people still watch that?

|
|
Reply
11:56 am, Sep 3, 2009
ThinkAgain

She comes across as being genuinely engaged in stories from the most trivial to the heaviest topics. The best way to get people interested in something is to be interested yourself.

|
|
Reply
12:00 pm, Sep 3, 2009
TK798999

It's great to have another woman leading a major newscast. It's long past time.

Best of luck to Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric.

Come on women, we MUST support each other and cease to be our own worst enemies.

Hillary would be President (and should be President) if only women had banded together.

ALL of government, including judges should be a reflection of our population, majority female. We must vote for women, no matter the political party until this parity happens. It's about the seat at the table.

Women can and should rule the world. We have the numbers, we need to find the will.

*********************************************************************

|
|
Reply
|
12:10 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Bettie

As a woman and supporter of women, I would have supported Katie Couric, but when she decided her legs were her best feature and started exposing herself more and more, I lost all respect for her.

|
|
Reply
2:07 pm, Sep 3, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
3:37 pm, Sep 3, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
6:27 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Picachu

Diane Sawyer is nice to look at, and that seems to be a requirement to sit in an anchor's seat. Those who seek to fill the shoes of Walter Cronkite have a daunting task, and though there have been many attempts nobody has risen to the occasion. Rather than make tepid assessments based on her past work I will say only let's wish her luck and see how well she steps up to the plate. For those who feel compelled to deride Katie Couric all the time I think she is growing in the job and I will give Sawyer the same opportunity. I dare say no prior experience can truly prepare any reporter to make this leap.

|
|
Reply
|
12:10 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Ritarita

I totally agree
With the notion that
Katie Couric is growing
On the job.
And even though I won't be able
To watch Diane Sawyer in the anchor chair
For reasons stated above-
I wish her luck.

|
|
Reply
12:26 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Mhussein

Nixon's little girl is all grown up....what a crock!
NBC hires hairhead Jenna Bush, ABC promtes the blond girl....
I am so lucky I no longer watch the 6:30 news.

|
|
Reply
12:31 pm, Sep 3, 2009
eurydice9276

Well, good for her. It's too bad she's getting her shot now that nobody cares about network news. Or, probably, that's why she got it - otherwise, some manly man would have the job. Pretty much she'll be announcing all the stuff that was on the internet the day before, but at least we'll have the feud with Couric to look forward to.

|
|
Reply
12:46 pm, Sep 3, 2009
ghudson68

Good for Sawyer, but the whole issue brings into question the fine line between anchor- he/she that delivers news- and anchor- he/she whose personal life you know about and who you watch loyally not because you think they deliver to new well but because you just like them better than the other person. What's more important, the news or the person reporting it?

|
|
Reply
2:26 pm, Sep 3, 2009
TedSoxNation

That there's still a nightly show produced to give us the news for 22 minutes at 6:30pm is really a quaint notion. Still, I guess it provides a service to shut-ins w/o computers. Great demographic.

|
|
Reply
2:54 pm, Sep 3, 2009
carollr

Great news! I quit watching ABC news and George S.' Sunday morning show after the terrible primary hosting job done by these two. Whenever I see either one of them, my mind pictures them giggling, trying to trip Obama up with a stupid question.

|
|
Reply
3:05 pm, Sep 3, 2009
maduceone

Diane Sawyer is probably a good choice. The network news shows demographic can be seen through their advertisers - mostly drug companies and products aimed at my generation, the leading edge of the boomers and older. Most of the younger generations don't watch and don't care. The future of news is here - on the Internet.

|
|
Reply
3:27 pm, Sep 3, 2009
jgansch

Good for Diane. I hope they lose the "soft focus" and celebrate her mature beauty as a testament to her wisdom and years of experience. I do wonder who will be left to do the morning show at ABC. Robin Roberts is annoying. The curly headed guy is so forgettable I've forgotten his name. And Sam the Weatherman is a pretty face but not-ready-for-the-networks.

|
|
Reply
3:32 pm, Sep 3, 2009
kratsrd

Why is Gibson livid?

|
|
Reply
|
3:34 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Ritarita

That was
Just a trashy ploy
To get you in here.

|
|
Reply
|
8:34 pm, Sep 3, 2009
cvillekid

Exactly, Rita. And if the future of news is "here", as maduceone says, we're in deep shit. Rebecca Dana--and what's the deal with that embarrassing photo above--claims to "report" that Gibson was "livid", but she gives us zero background and no reasons for his supposed reaction. Talk about lightweight fluff. Another one of Tina's little acolytes, I assume.

|
7:40 am, Sep 5, 2009
goldiesgirl

what should it matter to Gibson who replaces him?? I am puzzled why he should be "livid".

|
|
Reply
|
4:00 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Uncommonsense

I think he was forced to retire and was livid about that. Then he apparently doesn't like Ms. Sawyer as evidenced by his omitting her name from his statement.

|
|
Reply
|
12:16 am, Sep 4, 2009
marticampbell

I hope you are right that he was forced out. I have been so incensed by him ever since he put on that hatchet job of a performance at the Hillary/Obama debate that I vowed not to watch anything he was on. I'll watch Ms. Sawyer, however, whenever I do watch network news.

|
3:39 am, Sep 4, 2009
rain39

I haven't watched ABC since Charlie showed his GOP bias in the last election. I mostly watch PBSnewshour and then tape Rachel to watch when I have time with no commercials.

|
9:49 pm, Sep 4, 2009
cvillekid

Exactly goldie, and Rebecca Dana, who "reports" to us on TDB, couldn't be bothered to elaborate. Maybe, she's busy packing for the long weekend in the Hamptons or practicing new poses for her next photo shoot.

|
|
Reply
7:44 am, Sep 5, 2009
DancingQueen

I have always like Diane Sawyer and I think she will do a great job as anchor - She'll be missed at GMA - She'll have some big shoes to fill after Peter Jennings, but I am sure she will do fine. Since Peter's death I haven't watched much of the Evening News but I will now. Good luck to Diane!!

|
|
Reply
4:34 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Donnieann

Couric's election coverage is less than stellar. As she was interviewing Joe Biden, she gazed at him with adoring eyes as he told her "You have to go on television like Roosevelt did during the Great depression." Except for the fact that there was no television during the Great Depression and Hoover was President, not Roosevelt. Come on, Katie You were too busy dissing Palin to pay attention to your facts!

|
|
Reply
|
4:35 pm, Sep 3, 2009
Uncommonsense

Yes Ms. Couric sure asked Sarah some tough questions, like what newspapers do you read? Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

|
|
Reply
12:17 am, Sep 4, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

The ABC's of Diane's Deal

by Rebecca Dana

Info
RSS
Rebecca Dana
Emails
|
print
Multiple Pages
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |