Blogs and Stories

Gerald Posner

Mohamed Atta's Successor

Shukrijumah AP Photo "Jafar the Pilot," leader of al Qaeda’s post-9/11 ambitions for a nuclear attack, is on the move again. The Daily Beast’s Gerald Posner reports that he may be using a Saudi diplomatic passport.

One of the world’s most wanted terrorists, with a $5 million bounty on his head and a suspected desire to attack the United States with nuclear weapons, has been traveling across the Middle East recently with relative impunity, courtesy of a Saudi diplomatic passport, a U.S. intelligence source tells The Daily Beast. 

Five-foot-four Adnan Gulshair el Shukrijumah was selected after 9/11 by Osama bin Laden to be the terror group’s next Mohamed Atta for any second wave of attacks on America. The Saudi-born el-Shukrijumah was the son of a radical Muslim cleric who moved his family to the U.S. in 1985 and settled eventually in Miramar, Florida, a Fort Lauderdale suburb. There he became friends with José Padilla, who was later arrested as an “enemy combatant,” and also with Mandhai and Shueyb Mossa Jokhan, who were jailed for plotting to blow up Florida power plants, a National Guard armory, and Jewish businesses. Adnan attended flight schools in Florida and Oklahoma, and within al Qaeda was dubbed Jafar al-Tayyar (“Jafar the Pilot”).

As a 22-year-old in 1997, Adnan participated in an "English as a Second Language" class. The FBI obtained a videotape of him giving a presentation to the class about how to jumpstart a car. His fluency in English worried FBI analysts, since it meant he could more easily slip in and out of western countries without possibly raising a red flag that a heavily accented Middle Easterner might.

Four months before 9/11, Adnan, who had by then become a naturalized American, also obtained an associate’s degree in computer engineering from Broward Community College. According to published reports, he had accumulated at least five passports, including one from Saudi Arabia, and had traveled in the months leading up to 9/11 to the Caribbean and Panama, where intelligence officials believe he met with other al Qaeda members.

Gerald Posner: The Man Who Saved the Capitol

John Avlon: Bush Wrecked 9/11
For the longest time, American intelligence did not know the real identity of Jafar the Pilot. An FBI file was mistakenly opened in one of Adnan’s aliases, Mohammed Sher Mohammed Khan. The first detainee to give up any information about him was Abu Zubaydah, sometime after May 2002, maybe even as late as August when Zubaydah was waterboarded. He told his interrogators that Jafar the Pilot would deliver a so-called American Hiroshima, an ambitious plan to detonate dirty bombs (conventional explosives filled with radioactive material) inside America. But Zubaydah did not know Jafar’s real name. It wasn’t until interrogators got hold of Khalid Sheik Mohammad—who had met Adnan in Pakistan—that they discovered he had been a Florida resident for 16 years. U.S. military officials realized they had been finding Adnan’s name in “pocket litter”—documents and scraps taken from prisoners and dead al Qaeda soldiers—but did not know who he was.

Samuel P. Jacobs: 9/11 Novels Worth ReadingAfter identifying him, the U.S. government put a $5 million reward on his head. In 2004, Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller named Adnan as one of seven al Qaeda members planning terrorist attacks for that summer or fall. Ashcroft alleged that Adnan had personally scouted targets in New York City and the Panama Canal. In 2007, the New York Post broke the news that Adnan was "al Qaeda's operations leader on a nuclear terror plot targeting the United States" stating that bin Laden had picked him "to detonate nuclear bombs simultaneously in several U.S. cities."

A senior CIA intelligence analyst told The Daily Beast that the agency had tracked Adnan “somewhere in late spring to early summer” on several trips in the Middle East. On those travels, he used an alias—which the analyst did not disclose—and traveled with relative impunity on a Saudi diplomatic passport.The news of Adnan’s travels was alarming to the American intelligence community because it had previously concluded he was in Pakistan, coordinating the fight against Western forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. A U.S. counterterrorism official summarized to me the mainstream U.S. intelligence view: “It is generally believed that El Shukrijumah stays in the tribal areas of Pakistan—where he probably thinks he’s more secure—and does not travel abroad.”

According to the same analyst, who disclosed the discovery of Adnan’s travels on a Saudi diplomatic passport, the CIA requested “offline” that the State Department make an official inquiry of the Saudis about the passport to determine its authenticity. The CIA provided the State Department both the passport number and the alias. According to the CIA analyst, the State Department refused, telling the agency that its information was “not reliable enough” to question the Saudis.

When contacted for on-the-record statements, the CIA declined to comment. A State Department official told me, “It would be inappropriate for the department to comment about the reliability (or not) of the information you have been provided on the activities of the CIA.” The Saudi Embassy ignored telephone calls and emails seeking a comment, as well as information about their own checks and controls over the issuance and use of diplomatic passports. Nor would the Saudis disclose the number of diplomatic passports they have issued—said to be very large since many of the several thousand royal family members prefer to travel with them.

The last official Saudi statement about Adnan is from a September 5, 2003, press release in which the Washington embassy said that he was “not a Saudi citizen.” In the short statement, the ministry of interior announced “that Shukrijumah is not, and never has been, a Saudi citizen. His father, Gulshai El Shukrijumah, worked in Saudi Arabia for 27 years as an expatriate employee until 1986 when the family moved to the United States. The father did not have Saudi citizenship. His son, Adnan El Shukrijumah, is also not a Saudi citizen and if he is traveling using a Saudi passport, then he has obtained it and is using it illegally.”

“It’s better when some like el-Shukrijumah stays contained in the tribal areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan,” says the CIA analyst who provided the information about his travels. “It’s when he starts moving again that everyone starts to take notice.”

Gerald Posner is The Daily Beast's chief investigative reporter. He's the award-winning author of 10 investigative nonfiction bestsellers, ranging from political assassinations, to Nazi war criminals, to 9/11 and terrorism. He lives in Miami Beach with his wife, the author Trisha Posner.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.


Back to Top
September 11, 2009 | 12:07am
Comments ()
Nuld001

This article from Mr. Posner gives me the creeps. "It's better when some(one) like el-Shukrijumah stays contained in the tribal areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan," says the CIA analyst who provided the information about his travels. "It's when he starts moving again that everyone starts to take notice." So we can logically infer that the CIA knows where this guy is approximately. Or is this just another "best guess"? Let's hope he's not really hiding in the U.S. I'm sure the conspiracists will love this one.

|
|
Reply
5:22 am, Sep 11, 2009
downbytheriver00

Isn't this why we have the CIA? If they know where he is then why haven't they killed him yet?

|
|
Reply
|
6:19 am, Sep 11, 2009
WestVillager

Because it removes the potential to learn anything.

|
|
Reply
8:03 am, Sep 11, 2009
crymeariver

Come on Daily Beast, do you really have to use the
picture of the burning twin towers for an article today
of all days? Some people still have PTSD and seeing
that picture today is not so nice to them. Can you
take it down until 9/12?

|
|
Reply
6:59 am, Sep 11, 2009
mesquito

Let me get this straight. We know who this guy is and we have him on the run because we waterboarded a couple of his colleagues? Somebody needs to go to jail, obviously.

|
|
Reply
7:38 am, Sep 11, 2009
jaguarxjs

Fantastic! I fully believe this srticle after all CIA sources can't be wrong. I mean their astute intelligence gathering prevented 9/11, captured Osama Bin Laden and found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Come on, the CIA leaks bull like this to continue to justify their own existence.

|
|
Reply
9:27 am, Sep 11, 2009
Martyz42

I think we should get the George Bush Crime Family back, maybe bring in Cheney & Rice & put them in charge of something, then we invade Saudi Arabia, kill every one who claims they are part of the royal family & turn over the oil fields to Exxon...

The bottom line here is really simple IF in fact the CIA knows where this killer is he should be picked up & arrested & brought back to the US in chains & kept that way. (Of course if he resists, them BLOW HIS BRAINS OUT)

In the mean time we should make a deal with the bad guys & help them take over Saudi Arabia & let them kill the whole royal family. Osama is not a heck of a lot worse then the royals in Saudi, hell they fund more horrors against people then Osama anyway. The only difference between them is they claim to be royal. OR maybe give Saudi to the Palestinians, heck they are non religious & a little oil money would go a long way. They could leave Israel & keep Saudi, now that's a deal they would love..

Of course if all else fails take the last chapter of "The Crash of 79" & that would also take care of the Saudi's...

|
|
Reply
10:22 am, Sep 11, 2009
Johnnyappleseed

Threat, what threat Obama has assured us all is well in the mid-east.
He's more concerned with where Israel are building houses.

|
|
Reply
|
11:51 am, Sep 11, 2009
robwriter

"Where Israel are building houses"? And since when did President Obama assure anyone that "all is well" in the Middle East? Off your meds again, Johnny?

|
|
Reply
1:49 pm, Sep 11, 2009
talis13

Johnnyappleseed that is a lie.
Obama hasnt assured us of any such thing.

|
|
Reply
|
1:52 pm, Sep 11, 2009
biglover

Facts mean nothing to the thugs.

|
7:57 pm, Sep 11, 2009
sophia5

If Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen believe 9/11
was an inside job by the U.S. Government, maybe
they don't see a guy like "Jafar" as a threat.
Maybe the three of them can do lunch ?

|
|
Reply
10:56 pm, Sep 11, 2009
robwriter

Hmmmm. A "Saudi DIPLOMATIC passport" did you say? And here I thought all our enemies were in Iraq and Afghanistan. Perhaps I was misinformed. Maybe we should have invaded Saudi Arabia in the first place since that was were most of the 9/11 hijackers came from. Where the Bin Ladin family comes from. From where radical Islamic propaganda had been spreading for decades thanks to the funding of the Saudi "royal family," good friends to our own "royal family," the Bushes.

|
|
Reply
|
1:09 pm, Sep 11, 2009
woolyfire89

The terrorists have come from Saudi Arabia because of the troops that we have had stationed there for the last decade. Suicide terrorists in particular have overwhelmingly come from countries where American troops are stationed. If we want them to stop, we need to leave, not invade more countries and breed more generations of these people.

Read
Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism
It's an eye opener.

|
|
Reply
|
3:53 pm, Sep 11, 2009
robwriter

I certainly agree that stationing troops in Muslim countries is a provocation. It also appears true that funneling billions (or trillions) of dollars into these countries over decades has produced a parasite society in which many people are essentially paid by the state to be idle. Most of the people who do actual work in these countries are foreigners imported from around the world.

|
12:11 pm, Sep 12, 2009
ncc81701

Yeah we could invade, we could clamp down on the Saudis... if we want to pay 7 or more bucks a gallon for gas at the pump. Until we wean ourselves off our dependence on oil, it's not going to happen.

|
|
Reply
|
3:59 pm, Sep 11, 2009
robwriter

My "suggestion" that we invade Saudi Arabia was, of course, sarcastic. We would never invade the territory of our great pals the Saudi royal family. If you want a crystal clear example of "paling around with terrorists" look at some of the old footage of George Bush holding hands (yeah, creepy) with guys in white dresses. At the end of the day, the Saudis have no choice but to sell us oil. It's the only commodity (besides whacko religion) that they have and handing out largesse to their subemployed population is what keeps them in power ( an internal security force that makes Dick Cheney get a wet spot on his pants). Our opportunity to get some measure of energy independence has sailed. Our response to tightening oil supplies and price manipulation was to build psycho trucks and Hummers. Frankly, Americans just aren't all that bright and it's time we owned that fact.

|
12:19 pm, Sep 12, 2009
bfrank53

robwriter has hit the nail on the head.

|
|
Reply
3:15 pm, Sep 11, 2009
VictorErimita

Why the concern? If President Obama just would talk to the guy, because, I mean we should not be afraid to talk with our "enemies," and apologize for all the things America has done wrong----which is everything---then, I'm sure this freedom fighter will love us and be thus disarmed. Maybe we could throw in a Medal of Freedom as a sweetener.

|
|
Reply
|
6:03 pm, Sep 11, 2009
biglover

Pretty stupid and pathetic comment victor erimita

|
|
Reply
|
8:01 pm, Sep 11, 2009
bobbyr

Not too stupid, considering that is The Idiots approach to working with our enemies. Ever heard of the Manchurian Candidate?

|
9:40 am, Sep 12, 2009
jimors

I agree that this is a frightening article if it can be taken on face value. Unfortunately, everything is off-the-record. Therefore this entire story is conjecture. Has the Beast become another NY Post that is quoted within as a source? What's next, being scooped by the National Emquirer? Pitiful.

|
|
Reply
|
11:49 pm, Sep 11, 2009
comncents

I totally agree. Tis article is a joke. One only need to review the evidence presented by Mr Posner. The pathetic youtube video of a guy with a heavy middle eastern accent, talking about jumstarting a car, with a community college education supposedly threatening the US with a nuclear device. If we ask our intelligence services to follow these goof ball insinuations of Mr Posner, surely we are all doomed to perish out of stupidity.

|
|
Reply
1:07 am, Sep 12, 2009
comncents

"His fluency in English worried FBI analysts, since it meant he could more easily slip in and out of western countries without possibly raising a red flag that a heavily accented Middle Easterner might."

Are you kidding me. This guy has a very heavy middle eastern accent. If you live on planet earth and you cannot tell this guy is an arab you are probably not suited for a job in Airport security, let alone the intelligence services. In short you should not put intelligence and your name on the same sentence. This story is joke, the dude is talking about jump starting a car for cryin out loud and he's a student of a community college. Not MIT for god's sake. The last time i checked Broward Community College did not have a course teaching nuclear weopons development. "Off the record" anonymous sources. WTF. This is the most blantantly non factual article I have ever read on the daily beast.

|
|
Reply
|
1:02 am, Sep 12, 2009
kfergi

If you do more research you'll find he had access to nuclear facilities in Ontario. "In preparation for this mission, Adnan, along with fellow al Qaeda sleeper agents Anas al-Liby, Jaber A. Elbaneh, and Amer el Maati, was sent to McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, a facility that boasted a five-megawatt nuclear research reactor, the largest reactor of any educational facility in Canada."
And exactly how educated were the guys who hit us on 9/11? They took flying lessons and never learned to fly for pete's sake. And as for robwriter, how can we not have forces in Muslim countries and still protect our own? How many countries are NOT Muslim these days?

|
|
Reply
11:24 am, Sep 16, 2009
STARpod

My personal (limited) experience is that sources either from CIA, or contracted to CIA, will only speak "off the record," "on deep background," or not at all. When they do speak one must remain on guard because there is always an unknown agenda lurking in the background.

|
|
Reply
2:59 pm, Sep 15, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Mohamed Atta's Successor

by Gerald Posner

Info
RSS
Gerald Posner
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |