Blogs and Stories
The Next Meltdown
Richard Drew / AP Photo
Obama came to Wall Street today to chide it for ignoring lessons, but it’s Washington that’s embracing the current system, reinflating the bubble—with taxpayer dollars, writes Nomi Prins.
President Barack Obama was right today to remind us how cataclysmic things were exactly one year ago, the day Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. Credit had died, huge banks were tanking, remaining players clambered to Washington to get cash while stomping on their competitors’ faces, all while politicians were calculating how to win elections and save global markets at the same time.
And he was right to talk about how things are improving. Fast forward a mere year and consider the following: Power banks like Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan Chase recently posted record profits, their stock prices are soaring, and they’ve paid back billions of dollars in TARP money.
At least before the meltdown banks were ostensibly creating their own capital, borrowing from each other or their investors. Now they’re playing with the taxpayers’ stash.
Where he missed the mark, though, was the target he went after, in terms of making sure we don’t fall back toward those dark days. Obama talked about “some in the financial industry” falling back into old, risky habits, when calling for a series of wide-ranging, but incremental reforms. First, he should have said “all.” And second, the problem right now isn’t just on Wall Street, but also in Washington, which now essentially owns our banking system, with all its misplaced risk—the exact same system that gave us the meltdown we’re currently enjoying.
• William Cohan: The Unnecessary Meltdown Specifically, the Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have dumped $19.3 trillion into the banking system—$17.5 trillion of which went to financial institutions in the form of capital injections (like an adrenaline shot to the heart of a bank overdosing on its own risk), general market backing, federal guarantees, and cheap loans from eight major new Fed facilities in return for quasi-toxic collateral. That makes last year’s $700 billion in TARP money a mere 4 percent of the full subsidization of Big Finance and the havoc it wreaked on the rest of the economy.
And that means the next financial bubble to burst will be the federal bailout itself.
All these subsidies were supposed to prop up the biggest financial firms in order to keep them from unleashing further devastation on the general economy during last fall’s crisis period. We were told this would stabilize the banks and loosen credit for small businesses and individuals.
The exact opposite happened. Banks continued to go belly up and credit became tighter, “systemically important” banks were consolidated courtesy of the Fed and Treasury Department, and bank fees increased. And the financial goliaths that inhaled our money got their soaring stock prices, profits, and bonuses. But that part is an illusion. Even the profits themselves, announced in July, aren’t what they seem. They came from using federal capital to take more risk.
Last quarter, J.P. Morgan Chase reported record fees and revenue from its fixed-income market division, the one that does the most trading. Consumer divisions lagged behind and the company was hampered by credit problems. It paid back $25 billion of TARP funding, but retains an additional $70 billion of federal goodies—and those don’t even include whatever loans the bank received from the very secretive Fed. Goldman Sachs also announced a record $13.8 billion in revenue, $6.8 billion of which came from the division that does its trading—the risky one. The firm paid back $10 billion of TARP loans, but held onto an additional $54 billion in public gifts. Wells Fargo posted a record profit, but also showed a decrease of $20 billion in lending compared to the first quarter, and a decline in asset values.









Taxpayers bailing out greedy Wall Street,
so they can deny us loans with OUR MONEY.
Taxpayers bailing out greedy incompetent Government,
wasting OUR MONEY only to demand even more.
Like getting screwed from both ends.
sophia5: This is what you get for voting for Bush. I just wish the rest of us didn't have to get screwed along with you.
AlanD2
How many times do I have to say it,
I voted for Gore, then Kerry, supported Ron Paul, but voted for Obama.
I NEVER voted for Bush.
The problem with you far lefties, and the far righties
is you're incapable of ANY OBJECTIVITY.
I said Cheney was evil, and the Iraq war was about Halliburton,
and George Bush was the worst President ever, worse than
Hugo Chavez loving Jimmy Carter.
Got news for you.
Corruption exists in both parties on a monumental scale.
You just can't help yourself from seeing everything
through your far left filter.
If you think there's no greed or corruption in the Democratic
Party, you're hopeless.
Viva La France.
sophia5: You express such conservative views here that I can't help but believe you are a conservative. Forgive me. (I'm sure I'll make this mistake again, so I ask for absolution in advance. Nothing personal - an overloaded mind in an aging body.)
AlanD2 - It's trickery. I get the sense that you yourself are a fiscal centrist while being a social liberal.
Trust me, I attended Yale School of Management and I saw the source of this absurdity. You are and will continue to get screwed from both ends. One end professes to be more compassionate and service-oriented but in today's economy both ends are looking to save their $$$. In your inquiries, follow the money. In your life, keep your money.
Are bankers really that lovable? Especially given their apparent disregard of the government's success in rescuing the economy? Stephen Kerr made it clear that we must reward what we expect. Don't expect bankers to regulate themselves. If you do, history has another lesson for you!
Yes, and I think Obama gets the fact that the incentives in the financial industry are in the wrong places. He also (correctly) alluded to misaligned incentives with respect to health insurance companies.
I do want to clarify one minor point in the article. Don't rag on big financial companies for taking on "risk" without more specific info. There are two kinds of risk. One is good for all of us. Investment in growth in the form of credit (like stocks and bonds) is a prerequisite to a full economic recovery. This gives investors, both individual and institutional, long-term return for long-term growth. There is no investment return without taking measured risk.
The second kind of risk is speculation, and this is what sank the economy. Here you're not investing in potential growth, you're speculating on price movement of commodities, insurance contracts, mortgages, and the like. Speculation has always been on the fringes of the investment market, but when it became too big a part of the market, it not only created a bubble on the fringe, but it took investment dollars away from actual growth. The dotcom bubble could also be described as a fringe bubble, as well as the junk bond/S&L crash of the 1980s. It's this kind of fringe investment that has to be limited by regulation.
How com Zsa Zsa Huffington hates the obama financial team?
Obama: Wall Street is 'Ignoring' Lessons
Did he give the same lecture to Congress ?
sophia5: Probably. You conservatives never seem to learn.
dick
The Lunatic Fringe is so crazy but they are also quite hilarious.
Today they are bragging about their stumbling around the Capital on Saturday,
They want us all to believe that at least two million and maybe two and a half million assholes came out in force.
When the Parks Board said NO WAY, probably not one over fifty thousand, the Lunatic Fringe sent pictures of the enormous crowds.
Yeah, Right. The pictures are dated back to 2004,some smart person noticed a new building that was being erected in 2004 in the photos the Lunatic Fringe released.
Honestly, I wonder if in all the rabblerousers there is one cell of honesty. I wonder what Jesus thinks about all this. Ha Ha
Why bring this up? This is no rational discourse anymore, just hate the opposition. You sound just like those you criticize.
September/14/2009
During Bushe's previous 8 years.George W.Bush decided
--- because the banks gave him astronomical campaign
contributions --- to allow the banks do whatever they wanted
to do.The result is that Nomi Prins's article is completely
correct,everthing is true.The USA public got screwed.The banks's CEOs got millions and millions of dollars as 'bonuses"
( here bonus=stealing).Bush/Cheney and these crooked
bankers are still free ---> nobody prosecuted these crooks!
Bush lied to the public about Saddam Hussein
being loaded with nuclear weapon!George W.Bush needs to be
prosecuted!.
Bush/Cheney caused the USA to be known as
number one torturer country,These two crooks abused their
power!They need to be prosecuted for abuse of power!.
First ---> Pass the Public Health Care Bill!
Second ----> Reform this banking fiasco --- the
whole banking system is a failure
their CEOs are crooks!
Third --------> reform the military,reinstate the draft,
et cetera.
Fourth -------> Start prosecuting the greedy crooks
that are causing these problems.
END!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------
Congress doesn't have the balls to discipline the banksters. Neither does the silver tongued huckster and his butt boys, Summers and Geitner etc. The courts on the other hand are starting to send some of these miscreants to the Whitney suite in Singsing. Move over Bernie Madoff, a few Goldman Sucks MDs will be joining you soon! George Patton
They donated $50 to both parties this year alone--60% to the Dems and 40% to the Repukes. That tells you all you ever need to know about the system in this country. They bribe "our" representatives in Washington with "our " money.
Of course, this government doesn't represent us in any way, and there is more evidence for that every day.
We need to break them up.
We need to limit what politicians can spend so they are not constantly in fundraising mode.
The one thing they seem not to be telling us is that for world trade to exist on the scale that it does we need these "too big to fail" financial institutions to keep the money flowing. If this is true, then I believe Obama's circuit breaker idea is very reasonable. If not, why are we not breaking them up?
neverlate - We need to break them up.
Iwould take it a step further. As a pro business conservative I would put Wall Street out of business. it has become nothing but a gambling casino and is part of the problem.
neverlate - Or figure out how to turn it into a true investment tool rather than a speculative one. Modest greed rather than ravenous greed.
What we need are a set of rules. Okay, let's call them laws.
What we need are a set of laws that would #1, allow Grand Juries, comprised of our peers to issue indictments against any corporation that is complicit in causing inordinate stress to our Commonwealth. And our Commonwealth must now be considered, not only our National Parks, but our Economic System - the trough, as it were, that feeds all of us pigs.
And #2, a law that holds the corporate officers personally responsible for the violations of The Corporation. Under this type of rule, (alright already LAW), not only could the CEO of Citigroup be held responsible for paying $100,000,000 in a 2009 bonus to their star energy-derivatives trader, for his performance during 2008, but also
This #2 law would allow for that energy trader, Andrew Hall, and his brethern to be sent to join the GPatton Sing-Sing sing-a-long Choir.
each & every time,
when you peel enough away -
there sits goldman,
at the bottom of it all.
True dat
If a young punk steals $17 dollars from a convenience store and is caught by police, he is tried, convicted and sent to jail.
If a punk on Wall St. or the punk CEO of a bank that's "too big to fail" steals trillions of $$$ (cost of the melt-down estimated at $20 trillion in lost pension funds, stock portfolios, etc.), they are bailed out, and given more money in salary and bonus than before.
There's something wrong with this system, and I think if we treated the grand larceny committed by the rich with the same zeal that we prosecute the petty larceny of the poor, we might get some justice and some investment markets that behave with sense and sensibility.
Right now, they are still playing Monopoly only with government money, and yes, I think they are headed for another crash.
I think their "profits" were all a lot of hot air, and so was most of the stuff they were selling--just an updated version of watered stock and swamp land.
If they crash again, let them stay crashed, and then build a new banking system with a strong public sector.
My favorite new form of big league gambling with our money are the derivatives they are now planning: First, they buy large amounts of life insurance policies -preferably form the elderly. You know, you have a policy that will pay 500 grand, and they snap it up for 200,000 now. Then they bundle these policies together like they did the sub-prime mortgages, and offer them to investors. If the old folks die in a timely fashion, the investors make big bucks.
Talk about sick, we should just ship these thieves to Hollywood and let them write/produce horror flicks instead of the real thing, via Wall Street!
The BBC radio, heard in some areas through PRI, is on midnight to 5AM here.
2 weeks ago they had a good investigative story about this subject.
Shame you have to go to a no frills foreign radio staion to get actual news.
Can not count how many stories i find out about weeks ahead of the American press from the BBC.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.