Blogs and Stories

Matthew Dakotah

Sachs on the Fight Against World Hunger

Jeffrey Sachs Jay Directo, AFP / Getty Images Green Giants: Conversations with Global Environmental Leaders

Jeffrey Sachs talks with The Daily Beast about world hunger, the development models he hopes to see included when President Obama meets with African leaders Tuesday—and why everyone should quit criticizing Madonna for her Malawi adoptions.

Xtra Insight: Read more of Sachs’ talk with The Daily Beast about how Obama must act on the environment.

In 2005 you traveled to Kenya with Angelina Jolie to visit the first Millennium Village, a program developed by The Earth Institute and the U.N. aimed at ending extreme poverty and promoting sustainable development. What have you learned, and have you been able to expand the number of villages, as you originally hoped?

In 2005 we started with 5,000 people in this project, and we are now at half a million. And there is also interest from the Nigerian government to raise the coverage by an additional 20 million—not exactly the same project, but the idea of integrated rural development, which focuses on five areas: agricultural, health, education, infrastructure, and business development. The core hypothesis—that there are very practical, low-cost things to do that can make a huge difference in the well-being of poor people—has been validated. In Kenya we’ve had vastly improved harvests resulting in a decisive decline in hunger and childhood stunting, a decisive improvement of nutritional status, school attendance, and performance, and a huge decline—90 percent—in malaria.

“People are unaware of just how generous, bold, and consistent Madonna has been. I see it with my own eyes. And what people don’t know is that she’s saved the lives of these kids.”

Via insecticide-treated mosquito nets?

It’s a combination of the nets and medicines being available and community health workers who can give them or get sick people to the clinic, and so on. Everything we’re doing is systems-based, as you rarely have one magic bullet. But we’re seeing a tremendous amount of progress. I believe that we’re going to have a significant uptake of the project in Haiti, New Guinea, and Laos. And I’m discussing it with the Obama administration because I think the basic template of community-based, integrated development using cutting-edge technologies—whether it’s better seed varieties or mobile phones and the services that they can provide—is a better approach to the kind of poverty and instability that we’re facing in so many places in the world.

Tony Blair and Nicholas Stern: Now Is the Best Chance for a Climate DealAnd what response are you getting from the administration?

A lot of interest. I’m on my way to Haiti in a couple of weeks, and if we do this project, I’m counting on the support of the U.S. government, which has announced a significant increase in support for Haiti’s development. This would be one way to use those resources in a very effective and transparent way.

Your initial target for the U.N. Millennium Project was very ambitious: cutting in half the number of people who live on less than a dollar a day by 2015? Can you meet that?

If you take it on a global scale, yes, but it’s a little bit shady because you get to count the reductions of poverty in India and China. But in Africa, it’s a difficult situation because it’s only in the last two or three years that African economic growth rates have started to break the 5 or 6 percent in which poverty would start to come down. It’s hard to know exactly how much the economic crisis will put the skids on, but it looks like it’s going to be a significant adverse effect. At the same time there has been a lack of follow-through on aid commitments made by the rich countries, and the global recession makes it even tougher.

On top of all that, the frequency of climate shocks seems to be rising. I don’t think we could prove it systematically yet, but I bet that’s the case. We’re seeing a lot more droughts and flooding—ironically, in the same places that are getting hit by drought—because you get fewer but more intense episodes of rainfall. So we’ve definitely gone backward in the last year with the number of people in hunger rising.

Back to Top
September 21, 2009 | 10:53pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Sachs on the Fight Against World Hunger

by Matthew Dakotah

Info
RSS
Matthew Dakotah
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |