Blogs and Stories
Al Gore's Climate Plea
Eric Jamison / AP Photo
Hopes for a major climate change treaty in Copenhagen in December are fading. But Al Gore, speaking to the Clinton Global Initiative, says that even small steps add up.
President Obama may have been the highlight of Day One of the Clinton Global Initiative. But Day Two belonged to Al Gore, who declared the United States Senate to be ground zero in the crusade for climate change.
"The crucial step in solving the climate crisis is actually now to get the United States Senate to pass legislation," Gore said at a plenary session held at Manhattan's Sheraton Hotel. "The United States must play a crucial role and in order to do so the president has to be able to go there with a credible bargaining position based on the prospect of imminent legislation if not the achievement of legislation," he said.
On Tuesday, President Obama delivered a major speech on climate change at the United Nations, in which he bluntly warned that "there should be no illusions that the hardest part of our journey is in front of us" in working out a solution to the issue." Many are concerned, however, that the political will to achieve his goals is in short supply. Obama's hard-fought campaign to pass health-care legislation, already behind schedule, might pale in comparison to the kind of partisan warfare involved in approving a climate change bill. The House has already approved a climate bill, but wavering Senate Democrats in states with key industries that might be affected—combined with Republican opposition—might thwart the effort.
Nonetheless, Gore said that any treaty at Copenhagen, even a weak one, would at least be a step in the right direction and provide the basis for future negotiations.
"It's very important that we get a deal in Copenhagen," he said. "It's not necessarily crucial that the deal be perfect in every respect and include absolutely everything." Spoken like a former U.S. senator.
Gore pointed to treaties in the 1980s addressing the hole in the ozone layer as a model, saying that initially week agreements were eventually strengthened as countries and businesses gained momentum in their efforts to address the problem.
Despite his modest goals for the meeting, Gore insisted that time was of the essence as "there are several thresholds we are in danger of crossing" including the melting of the polar ice caps, which could have major consequences around the world.
He sounded a much more upbeat note, however, in assessing progress on the technological innovations needed to address carbon emissions, saying that "it's very clear we have all the tools we need to solve three or four climate crises and we only have to solve one. The missing ingredient has been political will, but we are seeing a big sea change around the world."
Gore was not above a little lobbying, leaning on the influential audience assembled for his former boss’s annual ideas party to reach out to their friends on Capitol Hill.
"Everyone here who has a relationship with, a friendship with, a member of the U.S. Senate...you personally can play a meaningful role in getting on the telephone or meeting in person and communicating the message as forcefully as you can you want them to pass legislation," he said.
Benjamin Sarlin is a reporter for The Daily Beast. He previously covered New York City politics for The New York Sun and has worked for talkingpointsmemo.com.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.








crngndmhm
Conservation is a good idea regardless of what side of the fence you sit. Even if you don't believe in climate change taking steps to decrease your carbon footprint is just a smart thing to do. Many of the steps can save you money not alot but every little bit helps. And think if climate change is a hoax you'll still have saved some money, if it's not a hoax maybe we'll have done enough to make some sort of positive impact before it's too late.
gak001
Exactly. And there are still other benefits for preserving or rebuilding the beauty of nature for future generations.
sophia5
"But Al Gore, speaking to the Clinton Global Initiative, says that even small steps add up."
"Small steps Al ?"
Al, how about the small step of giving up your carbon foot print wasting private jet,
and some of your energy wasting homes ?"
Always a good idea to put your money where your
mouth is.
wingsabre
Conservative argument to fight climate change. Several states, including Kansas and other agricultural states are experiencing droughts. Decreased water supply will decrease food yield. Decreased supply, with continual demand from a growing population will result in increased cost for food.
Decreased level of water will additionally result in increased monthly bills. This will translate to consumers, but it'll also affect business. Restaurants and food manufactures will have to increase prices.
From a foreign policy perspective, our reliance on fossil fuel will give greater leverage to unstable country in the Middle East, and Venezuela. If we invest in something like alge, we can decrease our independence from it, and get fuel from every state. Drilling will only benefit coastal states, green energy will benefit every state, giving people more independence.
Additionally, pollution will lower the cost of property values, meaning illegals will be able to buy homes easier.
writerforhire
Al "I was robbed of the presidency" Gore has only one thing on his mind and it is the common thread of every politician who has presidential aspirations: "How do I get [back] to the Whitehouse."
His commitment is only as good as the traction it gives him. If it didn't net him Hollywood gold and other perks of the industry he would have abandoned it long ago along with anything else that got in the way of the road to the Whitehouse.
And now, he is down for the count. With the possibility of eight Obama years and Hillary next; the only thing he can do is make himself an expert to gain access and get Hollywood entranced and preoccupied.
The message is needed; this messenger is not.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.