Blogs and Stories

Douglas Rushkoff

Google's Velvet Rope

Think of what it must be like for them to watch the way people line up overnight outside Apple stores for the privilege of being among the first to dish out $200 or $300 for the latest iPhone (not to mention another couple of thousand over the next two years for an AT&T contract). Apple enjoys Harry Potter-like adoration and queues because it sells physical objects, limited by the pace of assembly lines in China. To own is to have, to have is to hold, and to hold is to show off.

Google's “invite” strategy one-ups Apple on the social-marketing scale. Getting behind the velvet rope—being the person who has gotten in—empowers that user to get others in, and so on. It's like having an iPhone that can create others for your friends. For the next week or so, until the geometric progression of three friends telling three friends, and so on, and so on, takes effect, owning invites will earn social currency for more than a few Google loyalists.

Google loyalist. It's an odd construction at that. Unnecessary even, given that a company's strength in today's virtual marketplace doesn't derive from its exclusivity but its accessibility. Google is in a position where it doesn't even have to strive to become a hip, conscious choice. Brands are temporary fads. Functionality is forever. Google just has to “be,” and everyone will end up there sooner or later. Sure, anyone who wants Google Voice service will be able to get it in another couple of weeks anyway, and this momentary frenzy may be understood as the marketing tactic it really is. Those who have dished out social favors for the privilege of a Google Voice account will feel like those silly people who beg to get into the nightclub—only to learn that the place was virtually empty.

Douglas Rushkoff, a professor of media studies at The New School University and producer and correspondent for the PBS Frontline Digital Nation project, is the author of numerous books, including Cyberia, ScreenAgers, Media Virus, and, most recently, Life Inc.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.

Back to Top
October 14, 2009 | 11:11pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

commonsense247

naw... settle down. they did this with google mail and other services as well, remember? it's an easy IT way of ramping up involvement while building infrastructure and support to handle the volume. take an advil and a nap.

|
|
Reply
|
11:46 pm, Oct 14, 2009

rushkoff

Exactly. That's in the third paragraph, as well as an explanation of why this might be different. I think you'd like this piece.

|
|
Reply
7:58 am, Oct 15, 2009

ncopas

True. Read whole article first...

|
|
Reply
11:14 am, Oct 15, 2009

Rdschenkel

You waste my time, and others, by commenting on an article that you DIDN'T READ.

|
|
Reply
12:46 pm, Oct 15, 2009

Oliverpet

This entire article is completely incorrect. Anyone can request and get an invite. Go to the Google Voice home page and just request one! I got my "invite" in June; my husband got it a week after he requested it. I know no one at Google.

|
|
Reply
|
10:05 am, Oct 15, 2009

maluminse

Did it dawn on you that you are the demographic they are seeking? That others will be denied. Because two people requested and received all will?

|
|
Reply
|
10:55 pm, Oct 15, 2009

mattdoman

I'm nobody special and I had no trouble getting an invite as well. perhaps it was based on my use of other google services... regardless, getting behind the velvet rope on this one was really no big deal.

|
10:30 am, Oct 20, 2009

Skiptel

Well, I for one, salivate to the possibilities o making money ridding on their platform and selling my services through their cloud. I can see why there is a "static" charge around open apps whenever they enable us to bypass the big man's expensive infrastucture and compete with them. Love you Google. Only hope you can one day help us bypass the banks.

|
|
Reply
10:14 am, Oct 15, 2009

stephschiff

I certainly don't have an "in" with Google and was not a Grand Central user, but I got my invite about a month ago. I'm not sure how exclusive this really is - could it be that Google has an in with the Daily Beast? Sounds like this article is just trying to create buzz.

|
|
Reply
|
11:57 am, Oct 15, 2009

akamarkman

Ah yes, the anti-market market. Perfected by Bill Hicks not long ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDW_Hj2K0wo

|
|
Reply
12:40 pm, Oct 15, 2009

Rdschenkel

OOOOOhhhh, you got an invite!

***backing up so as to give stephschiff room***

|
|
Reply
12:47 pm, Oct 15, 2009

rushkoff

Hiya Steph - I've come to recognize your posts.

|
|
Reply
|
1:17 pm, Oct 15, 2009

stephschiff

Hiya Rush - recognize yours as well!

Rdschenkel - the point was that it ISN'T a big deal to get one. I'm not wealthy, have no "in" to anyone in the industry, am not a social network "hub," etc. I can think of no reason I would get one if it isn't easily accessible to everyone.

I thought my post made it pretty clear that I did not find my invitation special - the whole point of my post was that TDB was trying to create buzz and that velvet rope where none exists.

|
12:01 am, Oct 16, 2009

TerpLaw8

You can request an invite on the Google Voice page. I did it a week ago and was emailed a link to create an account last night.

I suspect that Google's invite program is some sort of social marketing drive.

Depending on where the google voice service is in terms of beta testing and bug fixing, google probably wanted to limit use of the program to those who actively show an interest in it, and are thus more likely to provide feedback to them.

|
|
Reply
|
4:47 pm, Oct 15, 2009

rushkoff

And a week is a decade in Internet years....

|
|
Reply
9:54 pm, Oct 15, 2009

rushkoff

I think it's a social marketing drive, too. And really the only kind of marketing they can do if they don't want to resort to ads (which I don't think they should).

Google Wave is even more restricted right now, though the service seems like it would be easier than Voice to support.

|
|
Reply
|
9:52 pm, Oct 15, 2009

jordo37

The Velvet Rope, from my use of both of these services, has very little to do with marketing and a great deal to do with application maturity. I have tried to use both Google Voice and Wave in my everyday process and neither product is mature enough to be a)reliable and b)without odd non-vital glitchtes. This is the sort of environment that is perfect for beta testers and users - people who are willing to put up with crap in order to experience the possibility rather than the full-fleshed product. Both programs are massive new directions for the company, which brings with it massive hardward and software based overhead. Yes, the velvet rope is there and it absolutely helps google in the market, but it is not artificial and is necessary to avoid having a bumrush of people try these product and pass them off as useless or shoddy because they just aren't done yet.

|
|
Reply
12:23 pm, Oct 19, 2009

maluminse

google is elitist. You cant contact them to save your life. Their search returns incorrect results and I have tried and tried to get them to correct this using their "dont call us will call you" web form. Repeated denials tho the problem still exists.

|
|
Reply
10:57 pm, Oct 15, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Google's Velvet Rope

by Douglas Rushkoff

Info
RSS
Douglas Rushkoff
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |