Blogs and Stories

Olivia Cole

London's Guerrilla Art

George Clooney, Damien Hirst, and Charles Saatchi turn out for a controversial exhibit—including a crucified ape—as the Frieze Art Fair begins. VIEW OUR GALLERY.

With more tiers than a wedding cake, Wednesday’s VIP and VVIP previews for the Frieze Art Fair took place. Meaning that hedge-funders, film stars, and the odd stray supermodel were meandering around London’s Regent’s Park. But that Kevin Spacey, Damien Hirst, and even George Clooney should be at a satellite show just over the road in an 18th-century church was strange. By dusk, 1,400 people had gone through the doors to see The Age of the Marvellous and the works that its Wunderkammer ("cabinet of curiosities") houses.

Click the Image Below to View Our Gallery

HP Main - Cole Marvellist

Shaun Curry, AFP / Getty Images Staged in Sir John Soane’s Holy Trinity church, The Age of the Marvellous, is not for the fainthearted. In the altar, there’s Paul Fryer’s sensationally bold The Privilege of Dominion, featuring an ape on a crucifix, rising from a pyre of trees, his head on one side, nestling among the stained glass. The title gives a clue to its ecological preoccupations—for Fryer it’s a work about the fate of the Western Lowland gorillas. Flying toward the sad-faced ape—an emblem, Fryer maintains, of man crucifying the planet—is Departures by Polly Morgan, inspired by a drawing in a book of Victorian inventions. Like balloons, the birds were meant to be able to carry a human aloft in a gilded cage. The contradiction that appealed to her (chiming with Fryer’s tortured animal) is that as the inventive human takes flight, the birds’ freedom is sacrificed.

Art Beast: The Best of Art, Photography, and DesignFryer might be vulnerable to the charge of sacrilege but his work is already in the collection of French billionaire Francois Pinault. Morgan, too, already has her fair share of fashionable fans (collectors include Kate Moss) but when Departures sold yesterday, it went for around £100,000—three times what her pieces usually sell for. Around these works are pieces by Alastair Mackie who, with Morgan (who only taxidermies animals that die of natural causes) and Fryer, shares a strong eco-aware streak. His Sphere is a perfect round structure made of tiny delicate mouse skulls.

The Age of the Marvellous is curated by London-based American Joseph LaPlaca. His touchstone is E.O. Wilson, the molecular biologist whose 1998 book Consilience argued for art and science as intimately related. Also key is his wish to return to the idea of a gallery as a collection of wonders instead of a freak show. “P.T. Barnum, who of course ran the world’s most famous circus, had a sense of a museum as a place of shock and horror” he says. “That idea was very important to the YBAs [Young British Artists]. I wanted to get away from that, back to a sense of a collection as the sum of all of man’s knowledge—a cause for wonder and awe." The “marvellous,” then, can be scientific, religious, or philosophical. Alyson Shotz’s Ice Network makes a slender breakable sculpture out of the molecular pattern of ice. Martin Sexton’s film of the moon waxing and waning, casting shadows over the face of Socrates, sounds ridiculous, but is hauntingly lovely. The oldest known composition plays. The carpe diem sentiment of the lyrics takes on an extra moving dimension learning that the philosopher’s face is actually made from a 4.5 billion-year-old meteorite.

It’s perhaps at this point (using a meteorite as raw material?) that you might start to "marvel" at the production costs of these works. The scope and ambition comes down to big backing as well as big ideas. LaPlaca’s business partner at his art "producing" company AVA is Mike Platt, co-founder of the BlueCrest hedge fund. Since 2008, they’ve commissioned new works, hoping to build a leading collection. That’s the marvelous fact that explains why the Marvellists are being given the freedom to cast insects in amber (as in Alastair Mackie’s chess set) and make apes with the help of the team from Madame Tussaud’s. In an unusual move, LaPlaca and Platt have applied a movie-producing mentality to the old artist/patron relationship.

Back to Top
October 15, 2009 | 10:04pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

DakLak

Wonderful! Refreshing!

Unlike some modern art, the lay person can even 'interpret' the works without someone telling you what they represent.

|
|
Reply
6:09 am, Oct 16, 2009

Ozone69

Is someone trying to one-up the crucifix in a glass of urine? How creative! I sure hope the creator of this masterpiece received tax dollars to do such compelling and important work.

Here's an idea; Maybe the artist can degrade Islam in a similar fashion. I wonder what the reaction would be from all the Muslim art lovers around the world would be?

|
|
Reply
7:28 am, Oct 16, 2009

Federalist

Where's the "art" that mocks Muslims, hmm?

|
|
Reply
|
8:22 am, Oct 16, 2009

HiredGoons

In Danish newspapers.

|
|
Reply
12:37 pm, Oct 16, 2009

OldHeathen63

If your religion can't take a joke, just how strong is your god anyhow?

Islam is just as open to ridicule as any other, it is high time the muslims get use to it.

|
|
Reply
9:14 am, Oct 16, 2009

sophia5

Isn't that an old prop from the movie " Planet Of The Apes ? "

Bringing awareness to the inhumane
treatment of these animals is admirable.

But C'mon, does it really take Huge Balls
to "spoof" Christianity these days ?

Would the artist EVER attempt to
use animal imagery
with NOT so VEILED, pardon the pun, references to Allah ?

|
|
Reply
11:32 am, Oct 16, 2009

whipmawhopma

There is no sadder or funnier parody of 'christianity' than the people that claim to follow Christ, yet follow something else, generally something like it but missing the mark.

Any 'christian' shocked by this should be more concerned with what Christ thinks of her or him, rather than this trifle.

As for Islam, it has nothing quite like the cross as a symbol. Nothing that represents the incredibly painful death of Christ as a death substitution sacrifice for the sins of all mankind.

The Roman Empire used crucifixion to instill terror in its subjects and slaves. It generally worked, since it's up there with being drawn and quartered alive in terms of pain.

In any case, the 'artist' was off on another tangent rather than spoofing real Christianity. His ape on a stick represents the natural world being crucified by mankind's sins or something like that. Some that should instill terror or at least great concern in all of us.

|
|
Reply
|
12:46 pm, Oct 16, 2009

pricklypear

Thank you for explaining it.

|
|
Reply
|
4:35 pm, Oct 16, 2009

whipmawhopma

Any time.

|
4:44 pm, Oct 16, 2009

nortonclybourn

I'm with Bill Hicks - does Jesus really want to see a cross again? "they're still wearing crosses dad, screw 'em, i'm not going back yet, uh-uh, no way!"

|
|
Reply
12:33 pm, Oct 18, 2009

Ozone69

Christ would say this about the artist;

Hate the sin but love ther sinner.

Nice spin but this is blasphemy no matter how you slice it.

|
|
Reply
12:46 pm, Oct 18, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

London's Guerrilla Art

by Olivia Cole

Info
RSS
Olivia Cole
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |