Blogs and Stories
The Deal to Disarm Iran
Ho New / Reuters
Tomorrow the U.S. will meet with Iran to seal the deal that could take the country's uranium away. Michael Adler on why the moment is the ultimate test of Obama's engagement policy.
After a meeting in Geneva that was the first fruit of President Obama’s policy of engagement on Iran comes a new encounter in Vienna. The meeting with Iran in the Austrian capital Monday is technical, with the goal of getting enriched uranium shipped out of the Islamic republic. It is also an “Audacity of Hope” moment in foreign diplomacy, a potentially transformative development which few expected and most doubt is possible. The Iranians agreed, in principle, in Geneva on October 1 to send uranium that can be used to make atom bombs to a safe place outside of the country. This would reduce the threat that Iran could use the uranium for a nuclear weapon and give time for non-proliferation talks. The question Monday is: Will the deal go forward, collapse, or perhaps what is worse, die of a thousand cuts as it is delayed?
Diplomats say they expect a firm decision in Vienna, where the meeting, joining the United States, Russia, France, and Iran, under the auspices of the U.N. watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency, starts in mid-afternoon. Yet there is no deadline for decision-making. The goal is to get in writing what was promised in Geneva. Details can come later. As for the timing of the actual shipments, France would like to see all the uranium out of Iran by the end of the year. But such ambitions might not be met. The end result could be that shipping only starts at year’s end.
If Iran follows through with the deal, it would no longer have enough enriched uranium to make an atomic weapon. For now, that is.
This of course leaves daylight for the Iranians, who are brilliant at getting the world to march to their timetable, which so far has seen them develop an industrial capacity to enrich uranium despite five U.N. Security Council resolutions calling on them to suspend enrichment. Diplomats note that Obama has given until the end of the year to decide if engagement is working. The United States continues to work on a dual track, negotiating but at the same time laying the groundwork for sanctions if diplomacy fails. One reason for this is that the only way to get recalcitrant allies Russia and China aboard with punitive actions is for the fullest measure of diplomacy to be tried.
There is a lot of cynicism about Iran. People feel the Islamic republic, which resolutely insists its atomic program is a peaceful effort to generate electricity, will turn any deal to its advantage, or just delay finalizing a deal in order to gain time. There is concern that Iran is concealing even more nuclear facilities, perhaps even enrichment sites, than have already been uncovered. There is wariness Iran would give up most of its stockpile only because its uranium is contaminated, and it needs advanced technology it does not yet have to process the uranium into a usable form.
This is the dark side. It has marked this crisis since Iran was first discovered hiding secret sites in 2002.
The bright side is what the United States and other major powers are going for in Vienna. They want Iran to send some 80 percent of the uranium it has enriched out of the country. It would go to Russia to be refined further and then to France to be made into fuel for the Tehran research reactor that makes radio-isotopes used for medical procedures. The fuel Argentina gave Iran for this reactor in 1993 is running out.
If Iran follows through with the deal, it would no longer have enough enriched uranium to make an atomic weapon. For now, that is. Iran continues to enrich, although only to low levels of 3.5 percent, well below the 90 percent highly enriched levels needed for nuclear weapons. Iran would be able in about a year, depending on how many centrifuges it used, to re-stock, up to the 1,500 kilograms of low-enriched uranium (LEU) it currently has. This figure is also the number of kilograms needed to produce enough highly enriched uranium (HEU) to make one bomb.









It would be surprising if this fascist regime in Iran was serious about any negotiations, or that it would keep any agreements that it made.
Of course, we aren't playing that strong a hand, either, given our weakened economic condition.
Agree with you on this one MC. Remember, they are Persians and they invented chess. Think rationally here, if you got the stuff and this makes you a player, why would you give it up unless you already have the stuff you need. Anything Iran gives up is suspect...meaning, they already have enriched uranium for what they need whether it be fuel grade or weapons grade. They sacrifice a pawn or two and it opens up the board for their queen to move about more freely-think chess.
Or, they've hit a roadblock and don't quite know how to fully enrich the stuff. If it is going first to Russia, then France and then back to Iran, be assurred that Iran will investigate the changes that have occurred seeking to reverse engineer whatever is returned to them and which will provide further clues into the technology itself.
Obama has already given up on stopping Iran's nuclear program. The Russians and Chinese told him they were not going to support even the most mild sanctions, and there is no plan b. Any face saving effort is for Obama not for the Iranians.
The sublime irony! Obama is brilliantly reprising Neville Chamberlain's role, negotiating with a nation hell bent on the total destruction of the ONLY country on the planet that articulated its commitment to Western (and yes, civilized) values (at the UN), on the soil of a country so contrite for its central role in the holocaust it elected a committed Nazi as its president.
"The headquarters of Iran's armed forces blamed the bombing on "terrorists" backed by "the Great Satan America and its ally Britain," Fars News Agency was quoted by Reuters."
Kiss the deal goodbye to ship LEU to others for enrichment.
Michael, do you think for ten seconds that Iran is going to give up either its uranium or its nuclear program?
Yours and this administration's naivete is cosmic in scale.
After thinking up the Bush/Cheney doctrine of pre-emptive war and botching Iraq the chicken hawk neocon right is in no position to pass judgement on anybody's policy or naivete.
Do you think that the only alternative to Obama is neoconism. Do you even know what a neocon is. A neocon is just a lib in republican clothing. I am a conservative and want nothing to do with neocon posers. It is from this position that I say both neocons and full on libs have lost their minds and souls and are VERY dangerous to the peace and saftey of the world. Iran is hell bent on doing evil. They think they are righteous. They are on a crusade. They will not turn back. They will not relent. To do so would be to admitt that what they intend to do is indeed evil. They will never do this. If you think there is any chance of turning Iran around you are a fool. No matter what Iran says or commits to, in the end they will do what they want. And what they want is to do evil! (this is not opinion. this is stated fact. look up what Iran has said it wants to do. i believe them.)
This agreement is suppose to make the jewish state sleep better at night? It would be interesting to see if they throw their whole support behind this plan.
Neo cons and Rethugs SHUT UP Bush allowed The Iranian regime to go from 0 centerfuges to over 3000; Their policy failed misearbly; watch how Obama's smart hard diplomacy supported by the likes of George Schultz, Henry Kissinger, Brent Scrowcroft and James Baker produces results and stops Iran from gaining a nuke.( Idiot Righties)
The cat's out of the bag on this and you can't really blame Bush, et al on this. Programs such as this type are done over many years. The planning for this was probably started at least 10-12 years ago while NO ONE was paying attention and the French (along with the Americans) were educating these guys while they were in college in the field of nuclear physics. The first facility has been known to us for 4-5 years which means that building on this probably started 8-9 years ago. These types of facilities are not exactly Wal-marts and Lowes and can be built overnight. They are intricate things. You can blame Bush or you can blame Clinton, but all of this is beyond the fact right now. They have the knowledge and the means and they mean to exercise it.
Do you think that the only alternative to Obama is neoconism. Do you even know what a neocon is. A neocon is just a lib in republican clothing. I am a conservative and want nothing to do with neocon posers. It is from this position that I say both neocons and full on libs have lost their minds and souls and are VERY dangerous to the peace and saftey of the world. Iran is hell bent on doing evil. They think they are righteous. They are on a crusade. They will not turn back. They will not relent. To do so would be to admitt that what they intend to do is indeed evil. They will never do this. If you think there is any chance of turning Iran around you are a fool. No matter what Iran says or commits to, in the end they will do what they want. And what they want is to do evil! (this is not opinion. this is stated fact. look up what Iran has said it wants to do. i believe them.)
Less than a year and this is the ultimate test. Either Adler is giving the administration too much credit too soon or he's setting it up for failure seems like. Yet, the article actually acknowledges progress. Silly summaries.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.