Blogs and Stories
Marilyn Minter's Dirty World
Madonna and Jay-Z collect the artist’s erotic photographs, celebrating feminine power. VIEW OUR NSFW GALLERY of her new show of Pamela Anderson nudes.
Marilyn Minter almost gave me bangs. At the end of our interview at Regen Projects in Los Angeles, where her show runs through December 5, Minter looked at my mousy hair. “Let’s do it right now,” she said, eyeing the table for scissors. “It’ll look great.” A blonde employee with newly-shorn Minter bangs looked on, laughing.
Minter is an artist who cares about human detail. She cares about the way bangs fall on a face, freckles dance across a nose, or socks hug a calf. “I love the idea of making images of the parts of the body that we all have, but that no one pays attention to, like the soft area underneath your nose,” she wrote in her monograph. The human body has, after all, become the focus of her work: it’s the subject of her new Mouth Series, large-scale carnal paintings and photographs. “I looked for models with really long tongues,” she says.
Click The Image Below To View Our Gallery

![]()
The mouth paintings will be on view next to the Pam Series—pop-erotica paintings and photographs of a makeup-free Pamela Anderson lathering herself in soap. “I thought if I took off all her makeup—she’s a really pretty girl,” Minter said of Anderson, whom she originally photographed for Parkett magazine in 2007. “So I took off all her makeup and gave her bangs.”
• Art Beast: The Best of Art, Photography, and DesignAnderson is not the first celebrity Minter has worked with. Madonna chose Minter’s current masterpiece, Green Pink Caviar—a hypnotic nine-minute video of luscious-lipped models licking and sucking glass covered with ultra-bright goo—as the backdrop for a song during her recent “Sticky & Sweet” tour. And Jay-Z and Beyoncé have also recently commissioned a large-scale painting. But instead of creating a literal portrait of the couple, Minter cryptically says that she will paint “the fission between the two of them,” and play with the “space between them” in her art.
Fabienne Stephan, the director of Salon 94, a New York gallery where Minter had a show in the spring, didn’t disclose the price of the commission. But she said that Minter’s large-scale paintings cost up to $400,000. Since this work is a commission—rare for Minter—it is likely that Jay-Z and Beyonce’s work will sell for much more than that. (Until the painting arrives, Stephan said, the pair has a large-scale photograph by Minter hanging as a “place holder” in their home.)
This is, finally, Marilyn Minter’s moment. Over the course of a 40-year career, Minter has experimented with different art movements—her haunting early photographs were inspired by Diane Arbus; her work in the 1970s took a cue from Pop artists such as Tom Wesselmann and Andy Warhol; she participated in the artists’ community that spawned Jeff Koons and Jean-Michel Basquiat on the Lower East Side in the 1980s; she dabbled with the disjointed voyeurism of Neo-Expressionism in the 1990s. But as the millennium dawned, something clicked: Marilyn Minter became a sum of all her previous parts—and came distinctly into her own.
Perhaps most unique about Minter is her technique—she’s both a Luddite and a new-media pioneer. Minter takes photographs with analog film (she believes digital degrades the image), which she then blows up. These photos serve as unadulterated “drawings.” To create a painting however, the process is completely different: Minter begins with a photograph, which she scans and then manipulates using Photoshop. She applies more sparkles on an eye, more beads of sweat on an upper lip, more freckles on a chin. “I got more and more of what I wanted,” Minter says of the process of inserting more “reality” into a photo. “I realized—I don’t need any of it. I can change the whole photo. I can get exactly what I want.” From the new digital images, Minter and her six-person team create massive paintings on enamel and then soften the paint with their fingertips. In this sense, she sees herself as a “photo-replacer” rather than a photo-realist. Although she’s injecting “reality” into her work by soiling feet or adding sweat, the image she’s working from is entirely artificial. “I am an illusionist,” Minter says. “That’s why I create art.” She pauses to paraphrase Picasso: “You have to tell lies to tell the truth.”








She seems shockingly untalented.
Talent is a combination of originality, hard work, a little bit of luck, and difficulty in duplicability.
As all of those qualities are present here, I find it hard to call the artist talentless.
You could fault her on choosing an unoriginal subject for her photos; however, I've never seen Pamela Anderson nudes presented quite like this and I, like most of America, have seen a lot of naked Pamela Anderson.
Actually, that would be your artistically bereft attempt at a clever critique. Fail.
Loved them and got new insight to Pam, It's so bubbles...
past my bedtime; curious to see how images appear in the grey of dawn...colors are wonderful.
Pam A. isn't just ugly, she's also fake.
The only people who need to worry about this being NSFW are elementary school teachers. Only the first shot is worthy of mention.
WOW!!! these comments are out there they demonstrate the problem with our educational system including just about every college and university in north america ; art is all about artists vision craft and technique take aback seat to that. Pop stars are generally lacking any vision whatsoever. Madonna Jay Z uneducated pretetious asses whose sole vision encompasses how much money they can make to support their collective jonze for conspicuous consumption. Thorsten Veblin, WF Buckley JK Galbraith Gore Vidal must all be spiining in their graves.
Wow - pardon the snark, but if your issue is education, then try improving your spelling, grammar, and command of the facts, e.g., Mr. Vidal might be surprised to learn he has a grave to be "spiining" in...
Fabulous photos of a true sex symbol.
these are all really beautiful.
I would say they're technically well done photos, but run-of-the-mill poses: nice colors and use of bubbles, but Natacha Merritt's pics are wayyyyyyy more sexy, and the video doesn't do much remind me of Andrew Blake's music in his movies.
But no, the photographer is not talentless. YOU ever try getting just the right light, then going into the dark room and developing the negs?
Whats more disgusting Pam Anderson spiting or Ms. Minter cutting hair. Lets hear it for the talentless!
It seems PopArt is under-appreciated by some readers. I wonder if they make the same "talentless" remarks about Andy and Jeff....
Art is what the viewer makes it. To some (like me) I think this is crap. To others, its amazing. That's just the way it goes. What's "talentless" is bitching about someone else's opinion of it.
Art just is.
I think these pictures are fun. Why all the negativity guys? Yes, Pamela has in someways become a tired subject, but I like the raw feel of these photographs. They're different, evocative, and sexy in a vulgar way. And let's face it, vulgar is a lot more interesting than prim and proper.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.