A few points: most were fully dressed; richest guys in baseball is sort of equal when you factor in biology (case in point: every guy's success rate at a bar or club will be much higher in nice clothes than in shorts and a tank top;) and finally, and there are already two positive comments on the article, so there's obviously an audience for it. It is well within reason to say the story isn't newsworthy and therefore shouldn't be on TDB, but it will be somewhere if people want it, or if anyone thinks people want it. To say that it shouldn't is hardly progressive.

It is demeaning. Were it not demeaning, they would have had shots of men in similar half-dressed and sexually compromising positions. Men think that they shouldn't be placed in similar demeaning positions. That's EXACTLY what you are saying.

You as a male are too good to be demeaned and you would prefer dollars signs next to your fully dressed image. Well women would prefer to also be fully dressed with dollar figures next to their images instead. Your justification for the objectification of women is simply that, justification.

If you put up porn on the site you will also get positive comments. However, that's not what the daily beast is about.

I'm with crymeariver. I don't care how much money men make. I want them to be good men, who respect women, see us as equals and can be fellow human beings with us.