Blogs and Stories

Max  Blumenthal

Did Women Beat the Right's Point Man?

BS Top - Blumenthal Hoffman Seth Wenig / AP Photo Limbaugh and the Tea Party crowd drove out the moderate woman, but Conservative Doug Hoffman still lost his race. Max Blumenthal says far right's virulent attacks are what really did him in.

On a night when conservatives expected a landmark victory in New York’s 23rd congressional district, the movement’s anointed candidate, Doug Hoffman, instead went down in a startling defeat to Democrat Bill Owens. The official Republican candidate, Dede Scozzafava, had dropped out days before and thrown her support to Owens after the conservative movement backed Hoffman in a campaign to destroy her, attacking her as a closet socialist with a cynical, hidden agenda—the same terms they have used to demonize President Barack Obama.

Hoffman’s rejection by rank-and-file voters in a solidly Republican district dampened the conservatives’ mood on an otherwise upbeat night and raised serious questions about the movement’s attempt to purge moderates from party ranks. Now, many of Hoffman’s right-wing cheerleaders are struggling to explain their dubious gambit, while others fear repercussions for their zealotry.

“Watch [Owens’ victory] be spun as a defeat for Sarah Palin and the hateful extreme right-wing of the Republican party,” National Review online editor Kathryn Jean Lopez  warned on the conservative magazine’s blog. She added: “(Hi! See George Pataki standing next to me?),” referring to the moderate Republican former New York governor and failed presidential candidate who basked in publicity after endorsing Hoffman.

The five percent protest vote that Scozzafava garnered, even though she dropped out, will almost certainly contain signs of a female backlash.

With endorsements from the National Rifle Association, the National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican Party elders Newt Gingrich and New York Rep. Peter King, Scozzafava was assured an easy victory. Then Hoffman declared his candidacy on the Conservative Party line. Hoffman was a lawyer and Tea Party activist who did not live in the district and, according to the local Watertown Daily-Times, “showed no grasp of the bread-and-butter issues pertinent to district residents.” Offered as his only selling point: ideological purity.

Hoffman instantly became the point man for the national conservative movement, dedicating himself to fulfilling the right’s dream of a complete purge of moderate elements in the GOP. Campaigning in a local constituency of mostly Republican regulars, Hoffman behaved as though he were running in a presidential primary. He slammed Scozzafava for supporting abortion rights and gay marriage, substituting the hot button issues that had electrified the national Tea Party movement rather than the bread and butter concerns of the working class district he campaigned to represent.

Mark McKinnon: The GOP Surge Isn't Obama's Fault

Peter Beinart: Behind the Democratic Wipeout

Max Blumenthal: How the Right's Point Man Went Down in Ny-23

More Daily Beast writers on the election results
Hoffman’s appeals to cultural resentment attracted zealous support from a who’s who of far-right icons, from Fred Thompson to Glenn Beck, from Rush Limbaugh to Sarah Palin. The former Republican vice presidential nominee recorded a robocall for him a week before Election Day. Tim Pawlenty, the Republican governor of Minnesota, sought to establish his conservative credentials in advance of an expected 2012 presidential run by endorsing Hoffman. The National Organization for Marriage, an anti-gay religious right group, commissioned a poll supposedly proving Scozzafava’s support for gay marriage had doomed her (the sample size was only 318 likely voters). Meanwhile, cash poured into Hoffman’s coffers through conservative outfits from the Club For Growth to the American Conservative Union.

As Hoffman surged in the polls, right-wing bloggers worked themselves into an ecstatic lather. Jonah Goldberg wrote in the National Review that Hoffman’s victory, together with gubernatorial victories in New Jersey and Virginia, would prove that those who urged restoring the big tent philosophy of the GOP were “incandescently wrong.”

By imposing themselves on a parochial-minded electorate, however, the outside conservative who seemed to have lifted Hoffman’s chances had in fact set the stage for his demise. When the Watertown Daily-Times endorsed Owens, its editors predicted that “Northern New York will suffer” if Hoffman fulfilled his anti-government campaign promises. Thus the right-wing teabaggers pouring into New York’s 23rd were perceived as carpetbaggers.

When Scozzafava was forced to quit the race and cast her support to Owens after possible lobbying by Democratic congressional leaders, the right’s rhetoric took on an increasingly vitriolic tone. The National Review’s Jim Geraghty called Scozzafava “the most amoral, underhanded, unprincipled and craven creature to crawl out of New York state politics since…well, Eliot Spitzer 18 months ago.” Then, at a Hoffman rally the night before election night, country singer John Rich mocked Scozzafava in a tirade laced with sexist overtones, calling her “Dede Schizophrenic” and remarking, “There was a fox in the hen house, but you know what? We smoked that fox out.”

Back to Top
November 4, 2009 | 8:53am
Comments ()

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
9:42 am, Nov 4, 2009
NormBlon

Could you expand on that a bit, Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms Collapse? Is there one leading Republican who can say "Come to me, moderates, let's save the G.O.P." There must be civil war between small-c conservatives and the religious lunatics who hve hijacked the G.O.P. Moderates must come together and prevail agaionst these poorly educated boobs.

|
|
Reply
11:35 am, Nov 4, 2009
saesho

i guess we all know how norcalgladiator feels, but could you be more specific?
the tea-party folks have shot themselves in the foot, along with their republican used-to-be friends. they are down here in SC running adds against Senator Graham, and he's not even running! i mean the guy is okay and has strong ties in important committees, and they are trouncing him. ah Sarah-glen-rush, how we love thee, let me count the ways

|
|
Reply
12:01 pm, Nov 4, 2009
maspring

Holy f---ing sh--!

|
|
Reply
12:14 pm, Nov 4, 2009
mzkitti

Hoffman, the Lunatic Fringe's candidate... losing to a Democrat! how HILARIOUS! ! ! Thank you, thank you, LOL.

|
|
Reply
|
12:15 pm, Nov 4, 2009
Granite

Agreed!

"This is a huge win for conservatives," Erickson declared. "...we did exactly what we set out to do - crush the establishment backed GOP candidate."

Losing to a democrat and calling it a victory! Pretzel logic! Losing is the new winning!

|
|
Reply
|
2:28 pm, Nov 4, 2009
johnnyapplecd

We can only hope for more of such logic from the right.

|
7:08 pm, Nov 4, 2009
djanimaequeen

It just goes to show how stupid these wing-nuts are that they would happily cut off their nose to spite their face. Hey I'm not complaining, I'll take my blessings as they come.

|
7:11 pm, Nov 4, 2009
AlanD2

Right, johnnyapplecd. For example, Palin's loss in 2012 can be spun as a victory because she doesn't have to resign in 2014.

|
2:37 am, Nov 5, 2009
Spartann

Hey mzkitti litter girl...

Check this out.. it's even funnier than your thread..... The Jersey voters hated the liberal candidate so much they decided to let the GOP's doughboy roll over Obama's Lackey......Come on laugh,,,that's FUNNY right??

Here's one more ....If you really wanna bust a gut take a real good look at Virginia.... cause you're gonna be hard pressed to find one liberal SOB that got voted in.... Now that's what ya call "Effin Funny."

|
|
Reply
|
7:06 pm, Nov 4, 2009
politicalpam

I think it pretty "Effin Funny" that the new VA gov ran without identifying himself as a Republican. NO R's on his posters. Also ran as a moderate.

|
8:39 pm, Nov 4, 2009
AlanD2

politicalpam: I vaguely remember some recent Republican who wanted his party affiliation not shown on the ballots, but the courts ruled against him.

|
2:39 am, Nov 5, 2009
UltimateFitz

Holy f---ing sh--!

|
|
Reply
1:43 pm, Nov 4, 2009
CitizenBloggerX

Now I'm not Kreskin but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once and I'm making a prediction !! Mr Hoffman is going to be vilfied by the likes of Palin, Limbaugh, and Beck because he didn't deliver for them !! Just keep this prediction in mind over the next few days

|
|
Reply
2:00 pm, Nov 4, 2009
ganeshas

Is it just me or does Hoffman have Runaway Bride eyes?

|
|
Reply
2:07 pm, Nov 4, 2009
gobydoc

Considering Dems were not overly optimistic about victories in VA and NJ, this win in an historically heavily republican district, is a significant indication that this country has not lost its bearings, just 15-20% of it...

|
|
Reply
|
3:13 pm, Nov 4, 2009
jojo12

gobydoc: You hit the nail on the head with your comment.
The Democratic win in the NY Republican 23rd is a message to all the fruit cakes in the Republican Party. Their 15 minutes of fame ended on election night 11/2008.

|
|
Reply
5:55 pm, Nov 4, 2009
crypto

I think the most significant is the NJ results. Neither candidate was very impressive but the incumbant. backed so heavily by the president and vice should have brought more of his supporters out. What takes the cake though is this Dede Scuzlaball. That's really the bottom of the barrell.

|
|
Reply
|
6:06 pm, Nov 4, 2009
Emmazon

Is little "crypto baby" afwaid of the big, bad woman? BWAHHHHHHHHH!

|
6:35 pm, Nov 4, 2009
ncc81701

I would not read too much into NJ and VA governor race as a referendum on the president's job approval. I don't know about how other people vote, but I don't vote for someone just because of party affiliation or big shot endorsements even though the candidate's party may be more in-line with my political views. From my friends in VA the (D) candidate was hopelessly incompetent from the start and NJ incumbent was no better at running NJ than my governator running CA. Even Jesus can't help those who doesn't want to help themselves.

|
9:05 pm, Nov 4, 2009
kurtmudgeon

Meanwhile, in the real world:
Hoffman was running a lame #3rd.
Weekend before election #2 drops out
and endorses #1. #3 gets 45% of the vote.

If you don't hear the footsteps, I'm sure the
Republican party does; and the Blue Dogs
do; and even Harry Reid probably gets it.

|
|
Reply
|
5:35 pm, Nov 4, 2009
AlanD2

Nice spin, kurtmudgeon. I doubt Scozzafava would have dropped out if she was polling in second place, close to Owens.

The conservative extremists that trashed her also trashed her poll numbers.

|
|
Reply
|
2:43 am, Nov 5, 2009
kurtmudgeon

Just what is a conservative extremist? Does he hide in your closet at night,
and cast a scary shadow across your bedroom? Do I need a liberal
extremist to cancel it out? How do I tell the difference between a conservative
and a conservative extremist? Can I be conservative and not a CE?

Are you at all embarrassed that you are repeating a liberal diss phrase?

|
7:49 am, Nov 5, 2009
crypto

Continued; this small election becoming so large should make a few take notice on the healthcare bill. Surely the house members won't allow Madame Pelosi to force them into risking their jobs in 2010. She is beginning to take on the image of Monica L. anyway.

|
|
Reply
6:11 pm, Nov 4, 2009
crypto

EMMAZON: No I'm not afraid of anybody. Love to have a go at your mother though. Your iq tells me that a few people have already been there.

|
|
Reply
7:44 pm, Nov 4, 2009
socialworklady

Holy F*cking Sh!t.

HA!

Purge on You The People, Purge On!

|
|
Reply
7:52 pm, Nov 4, 2009
magicman

If facts mean anything in life, they certainly mean nothing to Max Blumenthal. It is sort of like seeing your name spelled incorrectly in the local newspaper boxscore about a Football Game you never played in.

Doug Hoffman is an ACCOUNTANT, and a CPA, not a Lawyer. He also ran on the Conservative Party Line, not the Republican one. You will find the Conservative Party Line on Row 4, below Democratic Party, which comes first, followed by Republican, then Independent, and just above Communist Worker's Party, which is listed on the 5th Row. There is no Ballot listing for "Progressive Republican Who Quit The Race And Then Endorsed The Democrat", but if you did, my guess is it would be found just below Communist Worker's Party in Row 6. That Scozzafava quit the race, endorsed the Democrat Bill Owens, and then still received 6,500 votes from both The Republican Party and The Independent Party, would make Scozzafava the spolier and not Hoffman, as was claimed by Pundits the world over and by Scozzafava herself earlier on in the contest.

The Watertown Daily Times is in Scozzafava territory, a 'tainted' view to begin with. What did the Press-Republican have to say from Plattsburgh, or The Adirondack Daily Enterprise from Saranac Lake? Who did the MATH on this? No one? Scozzafava still received 6,500 votes, a result which can be as much attributable to her ballot position and not to any position she took on any of the issues in this race, while Hoffman lost by only 3,500 votes out of nearly 120,000 cast in total.

Hoffman's Campaign centered around ACCOUNTING. Doug Hoffman was simply pointing out that the Bonfire of Stimulus Stupidity burning at the corner of Broad and Wall wasn't in The Public interest. The most recent example being the INCINERATION of 2.8 Billion by CIT Financial once it declared Bankruptcy on Sunday. We'll never see that money again, that is until we have to pay it back WITH INTEREST. Certainly, for those of us who produce things, instead of trade and incinerate money, there simply appears to be no light at the end of this tunnel. Certainly it is reminiscent of the Stimulus Spending in this District which amounts to nearly the equivalent of a campfire, whose burning embers exhaust under the light a full moon, not unlike the same as occurs in your town and neighborhood.

With The US Treasury and Wall St. INCINERATING all of our Public Money, the day draws near when there simply isn't any more of it left. How smart is that, really?


|
|
Reply
9:09 pm, Nov 4, 2009
menckenlite

Calling the woman candidate moderate is deceptive. Supporting ACORN and the Working Families Party is moderate in Havana. Praising a politician who betrays her party shows how infantile these comments are. She has a future only in the Deceptocrat Party. Seeing this as a feminist issue indicates irrational thinking. Do you mean liberal women? Conservative women are not women I'm told.

|
|
Reply
|
12:14 am, Nov 5, 2009
nortonclybourn

Thanks for regurgitating those lies. You can read the real story in the interview with her here, but you probably won't bother. It's easier to wait for Rush to tell you what to spew. Of course, anyone who supports the right to abortion cannot be a true Republican, because conservatives are about government control of people's personal lives, right?

|
|
Reply
9:07 pm, Nov 5, 2009
fenngibbon

It's funny: holy f****** s*** is the exact phrase that came to me reading this piece. As in "Holy f****** s***, this is an unbelievably stupid piece! Blumenthal is a f****** idiot."

The 23rd is a district that voted for Obama last year. Obama nominated John McHugh as Secretary of the Army in part in hopes of being able to flip the district for the Democrats.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/23225.html

Check the date: June 2nd. Long before anyone heard of Dede Scozzafava or Doug Hoffman.

So the Democrats have, long before any of the drama, a clear chance of winning the district (not this "Scozzafava was assured an easy victory" swill Blumenidiot is pushing). The Republican chairs in the district then helped the Democrats along by nominating the worst candidate in NY since Pierre Rinfret, a candidate far beyond the leftmost fringe of the Repubican Party.

Be honest: if you were told a person was pro-gay marriage, pro-choice, pro-stimulus, pro-card check, and had been backed in the past by the ACORN affiliated Working Families Party and then asked what party they belonged to, "Republican" woud be the last thing you'd think.

The fact that Scozzafava exhibited decidedly weird behavior while on the campaign trail (calling the cops on a reporter, for example) is only icing on the cake.

If Hoffman were the right-wing looney that the Left is trying to spin him as, then how the hell did he end up nearly winning, after being in single digits a month ago?

The district was seen by all as low hanging fruit, and the GOP decided to pick that fruit and deliver it on a platter to the Democrats.

Furthermore-- wait. Why am I pointing all this out? Why do I want a bunch of Far-Left nitwits to really understand what's going on? There's a risk (admittedly a vanishingly small one) that what I'm saying might actually penetrate their thick skulls and they would then avoid making really stupid assumptions about the next election that would benefit conservatives.

You know, forget everything I said. Blumenthal, Hirshman, Batchelor, all you people, you're absolutely right. Your analysis was spot on and should help shape Democratic strategy for 2010 and beyond.

Good work, guys. Keep it up.

|
|
Reply
1:26 am, Nov 5, 2009
mgardener

Actually, Max is right, fengibbons and you are wrong.
As a resident of the 23rd and a volunteer for the Owens campaign, you need to understand the residents.
People to not like being told they are too stupid to 'choose' the right candidate.
People like palin, and beck, did they ever live or visit this district? No. They just decided that Hoffman should be the candidate for the people living here because they like his ideas.
Max was also right. Again. Hoffman refused to debate the other 2 candidates last week. Any pop up on the internet was for pro marriage/anti gay.
We here are a very tolerant people., especially in Plattsburgh where we decidedly rebuffed Rev. Phelps and his crew. He decided to visit us because we had elected a gay, Republican Mayor.
Again, we do not like to be bullied. 95% of Hoffman's money came from outside the district and believe me there was a lot of it.
I think that this is a serious mistake on the part of the tea baggers and all the other RW Conservatives to decide that they should interfere with local politics.
Bullying people is not a good way to make friends and influence people!

|
|
Reply
|
1:58 am, Nov 5, 2009
fenngibbon

Just to set the record straight, until recently, I lived in Canton, which is about 10 miles west of Potsdam, and about a hour's drive west of Watertown on Rt. 11 (for those unfamiliar with the area).

But, you're right. Blumenthal is right. Hirshman is right. Batchelor is right. Pelosi is right. All the liberal pundits and prognosticators are absolutely right, and their wisdom should help shape the Democrat's strategy in 2010.

|
|
Reply
11:51 pm, Nov 5, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Did Women Beat the Right's Point Man?

by Max Blumenthal

Info
RSS
Max  Blumenthal
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |