Blogs and Stories

Kim Masters

Inside Scientology's Big Defection

BS Top- Masters Scientology What led Crash director Paul Haggis to leave the church after 35 years? Kim Masters reports on how Scientology aided his career—and then tried to milk his success.

Maybe Church of Scientology leader David Miscavige had a premonition. Or maybe he’s not much of a talent spotter.

But a few years back, Miscavige apparently wasn’t keen on using writer-director Paul Haggis for a series of films based on treatments by the late Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. This was before Haggis, who made news recently with his angry renunciation of Scientology had back-to-back turns as an Oscar magnet in 2005 and 2006. (Haggis wrote and directed Crash and adapted the screenplay for Million Dollar Baby. Both won Best Picture.)

“I was told he was not to be approached because he was a crappy TV writer who did Facts of Life and Diff’rent Strokes,” Headley recalls.

Marc Headley worked in Scientology’s film-production studio from 1989 until 2005, when part of the mission was to come up with scripts for movies intended to introduce newcomers—“raw meat,” in church parlance—to the teachings of Scientology. Headley says his instructions were not to pursue Haggis as a writer.

“I was told he was not to be approached because he was a crappy TV writer who did Facts of Life and Diff’rent Strokes,” Headley recalls. “The only other person I heard that about was Jenna Elfman.” Elfman is now the star of the CBS sitcom Accidentally on Purpose but this was before she had established her career on Dharma and Greg. “David Miscavige kept rejecting her because he thought she looked like Linda Blair,” Headley says. “Who wants to see The Exorcist in a Scientology movie?”

Plus: Read Kim Masters on Scientology’s New Face Headley has fallen away from the church—he recently published Blown for Good about his own defection—and is now suing the organization. His account is disputed by Scientology spokesman Tommy Davis, who says he’s confident Miscavige would never disparage a church member like that. (Other former Scientologists have accused Miscavige of physical abuse and other misconduct; he has vehemently denied those allegations.)

Haggis is still not talking about his departure from Scientology. In a letter to Davis that made its way onto the Internet, Haggis listed several reasons for his disillusionment after 35 years, including the church’s failure to denounce California’s anti-gay-marriage Proposition 8 and the church’s policy of “disconnection”—requiring members to cease contact with friends and family members who run afoul of Scientology or its policies.

According to former Scientologists who know or knew Haggis, he became involved with Scientology after he and his sister Kathy moved from Canada to Los Angeles in the mid-1970s. Kathy was the first to enter the church’s doors; she became committed enough to join the Sea Org, Scientology’s demanding management operation, and worked in the church’s Celebrity Centre. (Kathy Haggis did not respond to a request for comment.) It seems clear that she could not have remained in the Sea Org since it demands round-the-clock dedication and she has a number of writing credits that would be incompatible with that level of commitment. Among those credits are many in collaboration with her brother. In the 1990s, for example, she worked as a writer-producer on Due South, a Canadian police comedy-drama series created by Paul.

According to a former Scientologist who worked in the Celebrity Centre, in the early days Paul Haggis was committed enough to rise relatively rapidly to the level of OT 3, or Operating Thetan 3. (An operating thetan is a relatively high-level Scientologist.) According to this former insider, Haggis spent a great deal of money—largely at the urging of his then-wife—on the church’s courses.

Skip Press is another former Scientologist who worked in the Celebrity Centre in the ‘70s and who finally left the church in 1996. Early in Haggis’s career, he says, Haggis was eking out money writing animation scripts in collaboration with some fellow Scientologists (Haggis wrote for Hanna-Barbera and Ruby-Spears on shows like Richie Rich and Heathcliff.)

Back to Top
November 4, 2009 | 10:54pm
Comments ()
Hedda-Harlowe

Your subhead, "What lead Crash director Paul Haggis to leave the church after 35 years?" should read "What LED Crash Director Paul Haggis to leave the church after 35 years?" Led is the past tense of lead. This is particularly sad in an article about writers and writing.

|
|
Reply
|
9:25 am, Nov 5, 2009
samcooke

God bless and keep you to call out future generations who depend on spell-check and think it catches everything. As this misstep clearly shows, it doesn't...

|
|
Reply
10:32 am, Nov 5, 2009
rod179

Surely the question is why does ANYONE buy into the drivel that scientology spouts? It's comically ridiculous until you look at the amount of money involved, then it becomes more than a bit sinister.

|
|
Reply
10:21 am, Nov 5, 2009
dooreen

I think it is one thing to question self serving biases of organized religion, but another not believing in anything, well you have to.

You have to have some philosophy, and ability to frame some kind of strength, especially now when people are so cut throat to each other.

This horrible thought police stuff going on, which on its own merit, even though it is just a pseudo science not evidence based, is a religion similar to what drove the crusades.

To not believe anything, not to have the ability to consider philosophies, that help us function at a higher level, can lead to a culture which is unable to process thoughts independently.

And without an expert helping, leaves people crippled inside I think, while giving experts, power almost of a small "g" God.

|
|
Reply
|
10:35 am, Nov 5, 2009
SantaFromTheNorth

Just because you use a life philosophy does not mean you have to believe in Xenu, god, or a flying spaghetti monster for that matter.

There are several philosophies that do not appeal to an invisible boogeyman in order to keep a person's self destructive tendencies in check.

I would say check out the Philosophy section at a real book store or on Amazon. You will find several philosophers' systems that do fine in providing an ethical underpinning for doing good for your fellow man without resorting to "wait until {insert deity of choice} gets you" as a stalking horse.

|
|
Reply
|
1:37 pm, Nov 5, 2009
Jaygim

Ethical underpinnings don't breed in a black hole: hence, belief, or, if you will, the need to "adopt authority."

Everybody does it -- rationalists, orthodox believers, Xenu lovers. The question is not some naive need to appeal to "boogeyman," the question is which authority one chooses to adopt. Kant, Christ, Gandhi, Hubbard. Mohammed, etc. Now that's a discussion worth having. Otherwise, we're back to ad hominem square one.

|
1:53 pm, Nov 6, 2009
deegeezee

What led to his defection? How about what led to his joining that cracked cult to begin with? They make David Koresh look reasonable.

|
|
Reply
6:45 pm, Nov 5, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
7:45 am, Nov 6, 2009
RosyGlass

Kim: Highly recommend reading Headley's book, "Behind the Iron Curtain of Scientology. You have here not one story to report on, but a whole series. Absolutely mind boggling. In fact, this would make an explosive movie, Paul.

|
|
Reply
12:27 pm, Nov 6, 2009
janeycat57

Scientology i just another name for a cult that some old man created and used his own thoughts about how he wanted to live then took a bunch of thoughts from other cult leaders and there you have it.as like most cults they have a leader that controls the others and teaches them that they are above other people , cuts them off from their family,they study the beliefs of the head man and live and work to support the cult.Tom Cruise is a good example of this.
I just hope they don't wind up like the other cults do.. they usually end in disaster ....

|
|
Reply
8:23 pm, Nov 6, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Inside Scientology's Big Defection

by Kim Masters

Info
RSS
Kim Masters
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |