Blogs and Stories
New Jersey's Obama Wannabe
Jeff Zelevansky / Reuters / Landov
Chris Christie rode to victory in New Jersey by grabbing the president's change mantra. Lee Siegel on the GOP governor-elect's audacity of hope.
The Wrong One won in New Jersey Tuesday. He did it through the audacity of hope that things could change, the belief that the era of business-as-usual was over, the claim that the arrogance and mistakes of his predecessor had brought the state to the brink of economic collapse. Yes we can, he told his passionate followers, and he rode a wave of indignant fury to the governor’s mansion. Meet Chris Christie, the Garden State’s very own Obama.
There is one constant in American politics right now: an atmosphere of crisis and confusion. It got Obama elected. It got Chris Christie elected. It threatens to undo Obama, and it will quickly undo Christie if it does not subside (if the Democrat-controlled state legislature doesn’t get him first). Dire material circumstances, anger, and fear explain why independents and Democrats who voted for Obama voted for Christie and still claim allegiance to Obama. We are now in a moment that is as ripe for a Republican rebirth as for a progressive renaissance.
This is not to say—this is really not to say—that Christie has anything in common with the president. At a time when voters seem more pragmatic than guided by party values, the difference between Christie and Corzine was almost rudimentarily ideological.
Christie played on blind rage against the incumbent in just the same way as Obama did.
The tax-and-spend liberal governor who could not tame the beast of property taxes was defeated by the Republican challenger, who promised to cut income taxes, shrink government and, yes, tame the beast of property taxes. How he was going to cut the state income tax for residents and businesses in New Jersey while at the same time reducing property taxes—which municipalities use to pick up the slack left by low or diverted state income taxes—Christie hasn’t said. These could well be the worst four years in the state’s history.
All politics is indeed local and Christie’s victory was, to a great degree, a replay of Christine Todd Whitman’s much slimmer triumph over the tax-and-spend liberal Democratic governor Jim Florio in 1993 (which ushered in four of the worst years in the state’s history). And just as the Democrat Bill Clinton had one year before been elected by an electorate fed up with the economic policies of his Republican predecessor, the Republican Whitman got elected in New Jersey by an electorate equally fed up with the economic policies of her Democratic predecessor.
In both cases, then and now, the same anxious atmosphere created an identical political logic that produced two completely different ideological results.
• Mark McKinnon: The GOP Surge Isn't Obama's Fault
• Peter Beinart: Behind the Democratic Wipeout
• Linda Hershman: Get Gay Marriage Off the Ballot
• Max Blumenthal: How the Right's Point Man Went Down in Ny-23
• More Daily Beast writers on the election results The climate now, however, is far more precarious, and so politics is going to be more determined by circumstances than by any particular political personality or philosophy. Never mind that the well-intentioned Corzine could not be more different from the criminally stupid George W. Bush. Christie played on blind rage against the incumbent in just the same way as Obama did.
We are in a new age, that’s for sure. But the thing about a new age is that it is open to all comers. In the same way that we update our handheld technology by the month, or that some of us abandon lovers as soon as they no longer satisfy our needs, we are guided by the principle of perpetual change—rather than by ideology or even perception of character—in our political choices. No one should be surprised that while Republicans took the governorship in New Jersey and Virginia, a Democrat won the (wonderfully bizarre) congressional election in upstate New York, in a Republican district that had not voted for a Democrat since the 19th century. Whirling, jarring, briefly gratifying change is king.
A whirling economy and a whirling society and culture have given impatience its own political mandate. The hopeful and new now gets failed and old in nanoseconds. We are in the midst of revulsion, not revolution. No single figure has the market on this tumultuous condition, and everything—and everyone—is up for grabs.
Lee Siegel has written about culture and politics and is the author of three books: Falling Upwards: Essays in Defense of the Imagination; Not Remotely Controlled: Notes on Television; and, most recently, Against the Machine: Being Human in the Age of the Electronic Mob. In 2002, he received a National Magazine Award for reviews and criticism.
For more of The Daily Beast, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.








The criminally stupid George W. Bush? You think that by repeating rubbish like this at infinitum that somehow it will become truth? It is simply disrespectful and frankly unacceptable, puts you in the same league as he rest of these leftist radical phonies who comment their filth every day on here. It is so pathetic to see that the feeble existence of you repulsive neo-democrats and all your fellow leftist liberal brothers and sisters worldwide, was only held together by your twisted collective hatred of a good man. Yes, a very good and decent man, who was a great president and is missed dearly. Why don't you brake ranks and try to be a little human yourself Mr. Siegel?
osea65: I guess you don't like the truth. Too bad. George W. Bush was certainly stupid - his two unwinnable wars and adding $5 trillion to our national debt are good indications that he was not very smart. Didn't you see George H. W. Bush crying, presumably in reaction to something stupid done by W.?
As for criminal, he authorized torture, which is against our own laws as well as the Geneva Conventions.
Historians already rank him as one of the worst Presidents in our history. With the passage of more time (and as more facts about his presidency become available), I think he has a good chance of hitting rock bottom.
George W. Bush was stupid as a fox maybe!!!! How much is the anointed one going to add to our national debt? You don't have to answer that, we all know it's going to make Bush look like a miser. As for George senior crying, what can I say to something so incredibly off the wall? He loves his son very much that's all I know. He authorized torture to keep us safe you infantile moron. What historians? Out of work New York Times writers? Oh and finally, rock bottom is exactly where should should start to get used to, cause that's where your kind is going to stay for a very long time.
osea65: So you like torture - a criminal action - to keep us safe?
"Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither." -- Benjamin Franklin.
The rage directed at Bush that got Obama elected was justified. The same directed at Corzine was not. Nevertheless, misinformed, misdirected rage unfortunately got N.J. a corrupt Bush Republican governor.
Christie needs to re negotiate the union deals Cozine made, and cut waste in the State government. Turn Trenton upside down....Cozine hired more government employees in his 4 years, which made taxes go up... get rid of them ASAP and freeze spending and hiring.
osea65: You tell 'em, I'll hold your coat.
Love 'im or don't Christie took it in spite of big ears and his side kick. Between the two of 'em they spent over $750,000 of our tax dollars flying up to Jersey to try to reelect a washout.
Can you possibly get less insightful?
Christie needs to LOWER property taxes in NJ. Everyone who can moves out of state. The clowns in office screw up then come back to the taxpayer to raise taxes. Enough is enough- seriously is it totally necessary to have property taxes at 25k-300k per year? Hopefully change will not mean CHANGE IN DIFFERENT POCKETS!! Everyone is absolutely revolted by lawyers and politicians. NJ needs to combine services in smaller towns. And let's take a look at pensions of police and toll collectors etc. retiring at age 40 taking in 250K per year give me a break. No wonder the state is bankrupt! Teachers who dont and cant teach should be bounced. Renegotiate the unions- THE TAXPAYERS BACKS HAVE BROKEN- I personally do not want to support anyone else- I have 2 jobs and can just about support myself after taxes!!
Well said. It's going to take big cajones; I hope Christie is up to it, regardless of party.
It seems "criminally Stupid" to me to think that yesterday wasn't an indictment of the far left politics of Obama.If it didn't matter that much ,why did Pres. Obama take time from his busy golfing schedule to go to N.J. five times?Obama talks the talk but can't walk the walk and the american people are beginning to wake up!
Pres. Obama's irrational arrogance will lead to his downfall.
The flaw in your point, however, is that New Jerseyans ultimately do not elect Republicans for the same reason other states elect Republicans -- they elect Republicans because they want to reduce government spending and corruption. In this case, both are so out of control that reduction is a bipartisan issue. Furthermore, Corzine was so unpopular that most independents gave up their vote for, say, Daggett, in order to vote AGAINST Corzine. Finally, exit polls even showed that 60% of voters said that their votes had nothing to do with sending any sort of message to Obama, they were more concerned with the running of the state.
In conclusion, please don't lump our fair state with whatever you think is going on in your state. That's a fiscal conservative in the governor's mansion, not a "pure" conservative, and in any case, no amount of stardust from anyone, Obama or otherwise, was going to get Jersey voters past their distaste for Corzine.
The liberal idealogy of big gov.,big taxes is what lost yesterday.Ideals Pres. Obama promotes and relies on for all his social/economic policies.People no longer swoon when Obama comes to town and that has to worry the Dems.,at least a little bit.Using your numbers 40% voters were sending a message to Obama yesterday,thats a pretty high percentage of protest votes, conservatism is certainly off to a good start.
The foundation of conservatism is responsible gov. spending.The foundation of liberalism is tax/spend,print/spend,borrow/spend.Obama will be popular until he stops giving away the treasury,then a conservative will be needed to clean up the mess.
Despite the liberal spin,losing is never a good thing for a party,and it was Dems. who lost yesterday.
I'm afraid you're right!!! The great problem with that is, that his downfall means ours too at this point. He is our President for now, so I can only hope that he realizes that he has to change very quickly and be the leader he promised he was going to be. We can't afford to waste any more time!!!!!
Yeh you're right. He's got to become the president and stop playing Mr. Pelosi. He has fallen into the same old quagmire so many politicians do. Stay on the outskirts of problems and keep clean for himself. I don't care about this health plan or most of the other questionable dealings. But I do care about our troops. Obama needs to step up and send them what is needed to get this done and keep them as safe as possible while doing it. Hell he can bring 'em all home next week but they need help NOW!!
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.