Anywhere but Fort Hood

Getty Images The Texas base wasn't supposed to be the scene of a massacre: It just launched a "resiliency" center, as part of a bold Army plan to reverse a spike in post-combat disorders.

This was not the Army post where soldiers should have been on guard against a coordinated massacre by another soldier. Fort Hood this fall had just launched a new “Resiliency Campus.” It is the Army’s first such facility, designed to help soldiers and their families become “inoculated” against the sense of emotional helplessness, as they are routed through multiple redeployments. Many return to Fort Hood after being shot at or shooting others for a year in Iraq or Afghanistan, only to start retraining for the next combat deployment, in a year or less.

Their superiors acknowledge these warriors are engaged in “perpetual warfare”—but a massacre of soldiers by another soldier wasn’t supposed to happen at Fort Hood.

Until the shooting Thursday, which left 13 dead, 30 wounded, and the gunman injured but alive, the Fort Hood Resiliency Campus was a proud experiment as part of a massive turnaround in Army training, ordered by Gen. George Casey, Army chief of staff, in an attempt to reverse the dramatic spike in suicides, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and family breakup that is sapping so many returning combat veterans.

Their superiors acknowledge these warriors are engaged in “perpetual warfare”—but a massacre of soldiers by another soldier wasn’t supposed to happen at Fort Hood.

Col. Bill Rabena, who oversees the Resiliency Campus, was particularly proud of its Spiritual Fitness Center, designed to reduce anxiety, depression, and the uncertainty around redeployments. Col. Rabena promised that his center would address “the mind, body, and spirit.”

It didn’t work for the gunman, Major Nidal Malik Hasan.

• Reihan Salam on the collateral damage to Muslims

• Mimi Swartz: Fort Hood’s Bleak World The darkest news yet from the shootings of as many as 43 soldiers is that Hasan, 39, was an Army psychiatrist. At Walter Reed Army Medical Center, he had treated soldiers returning from war with combat stress and PTSD, and according to his cousin Hader Hasan, had heard horrifying stories. He had not seen combat himself, but, according to Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, was facing his first deployment overseas, to Iraq or Afghanistan, which his cousin described to Fox News’ Shepard Smith as “his worst nightmare.”

The Fort Hood horror is unfolding in the face of a historic change in the Army’s approach to the emotional impact of combat. Last spring, Gen. Casey decided to try a bold experiment in acknowledging the emotional assaults of warfare. Instead of the usual suck-it-up philosophy, the general’s aim is to create an Army that is just as psychologically fit as physically fit. He turned to Martin Seligman, father of “positive psychology,” and had to convince the psychologist to help design an innovative training program. The idea is to move the bell curve of reactions to the “catastrophic stress” of combat, from “post-traumatic stress disorder” to “post-traumatic learned resilience.”

Seligman was aware of the extreme level of pathology showing up in returning veterans from these wars, where “victory” is an outmoded term and waiting for “withdrawal” is like Waiting for Godot. Seligman’s response was: “If you put the emphasis only on those soldiers who break down, you have the tail wagging the dog. We’re already devoting tremendous resources to vets with PTSD. The big picture is the dog. By training the whole force in resilience, you cut down on pathology but you also improve the resilience of the whole force and move the distribution curve toward growth.”