Blogs and Stories

The Daily Beast Video

November 8: Top 8 Moments from Sunday Talk

Joe Lieberman is ready to filibuster, Michael Steele almost gets physical, and Rachel Maddow says a magic troop number won’t placate the GOP. That and more in our Sunday roundup.

Lieberman to Filibuster Public Option as ‘Matter of Conscience’

Here’s one hurdle that the Democrats may have to clear to go forward with health reform. On Fox News Sunday, Sen. Joe Lieberman, who could play an integral role in the Senate vote, reaffirmed his previous statements and made it clear that he would not support any bill coming out of the House that includes a public option. He says he’s concerned by the House bill that passed Saturday night, which was pushed for by “people who really want the government to take over all of health insurance.”

Bob Schieffer Goes on the Offensive Over Fort Hood

President Obama may have issued a statement this week asking everyone to wait for all the facts before jumping to conclusions on the Fort Hood incident, but Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer did just that. He criticized the Army for shuffling off problems by transferring Major Nidal Malik Hasan to Fort Hood from Walter Reed, and charged that it does “not take protecting soldiers’ mental health as seriously as it does training them to shoot.”

Lindsey Graham: That House Health-Reform Bill? It’s D.O.A.

The House may have passed a health-care bill Saturday, but Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham isn't exactly interested in seeing it pass the Senate. Appearing also on Face the Nation, Graham tells Bob Schieffer the bill is "dead on arrival.”

Back to Top
November 8, 2009 | 3:40pm
Comments ()
BOKOBOT

Maddow is not so wise on these matters. Nobody thinks a 'magic number' will placate anyone. It's disturbing when Washington insiders reveal that they really do think all decisions revolve around party politics. Embarrassing, childish moment for her. BOKO

|
|
Reply
|
5:19 pm, Nov 8, 2009
cbeenthere

Rachel Maddow is indeed wise, the Republicans have been defiant and oppositional since the new administration took over. The Democrats have had enough of this nonsense from the Republicans and she has them figured out. Too bad you don't like it boko.

|
|
Reply
|
6:10 pm, Nov 8, 2009
irishlad

Not sure how the Republicans have been defiant when they have been shut out at almost every turn when it comes to negotiating bills. How do you defend the Saturday night meeting when the Dems locked the door to all Republicans when they were discussing the health bill? Didn't Obama run his campaign on having both sides at the table?????

|
10:36 pm, Nov 8, 2009
cbeenthere

irishlad
How bout that amendment that 176 Republicans and 64 Democrats got together on to defund women's health issues in the hc bill. Why question my stmt. when you have made up your mind, It has been quite obvious to me.

|
12:40 am, Nov 9, 2009
connie47

Baloney, irishlad. The Republicans have been asked over and over and over and over and over to come to the table. They have chosen instead to posture, running a nationwide campaign to stop all progress. Are you actually saying that when the Democrats caucus, they must admit Republicans, who quite correctly hold their caucuses in private, too?

|
7:15 am, Nov 9, 2009
AlanD2

irishlad: You seem to forget that Republicans added a total of 183 GOP amendments to the first four health care reform bills that passed out of committee.

I would hardly call this being "shut out".

Stop repeating Fox News talking points, please.

|
11:06 am, Nov 9, 2009
sophia5

Any Bill that's two thousand pages long is troubling and irresponsible,
because how many of them actually read the Bills they pass ?

Is that why Congress garners respect on the level of used cars salesmen and trial lawyers ?

|
12:45 pm, Nov 9, 2009
Konchster

Hatch blurted out the truth inadvertently I am sure when he said Republics have to stop health care reform because if it passes it will be so popular a republic might never get elected again
Irishlad we'll cut you slack and assume your drunk thinking the dems should invite republics to their caucus We already have Lieberman there

|
1:38 pm, Nov 9, 2009
jaydeekay

Maddow is a Rhodes scholar with a Doctorate of Philosophy in politics.

What are you?

|
|
Reply
10:10 pm, Nov 8, 2009
AlanD2

BOKOBOT: The truth hurts, does it?

|
|
Reply
|
11:03 am, Nov 9, 2009
deweydecible

You're a moron.

She didn't pull this idea of a "magic number" out of her ass. She was reacting to something Gov. Haley Barbour said. Did you even read the lead-in to the video?

"MSNBC's Rachel Maddow isn't buying what Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour is selling, promising that the GOP will back off Obama as long as he commits to sending in more troops to Afghanistan."

So is it that she isn't wise, or is it that you can't understand the context of her statement because you only watched the video and assumed she just made this up herself?

|
2:49 pm, Nov 9, 2009
AlanD2

Are you referring to me, deweydecible, or did you reply to the wrong comment?

I am a fan of Rachel.

|
4:20 pm, Nov 9, 2009
wbishop12

Wrong again BOKO. She nailed it.

There is NOTHING this administration can do that will stop the republican'ts from their lying, obstructionist political terrorism.

|
|
Reply
|
5:49 pm, Nov 8, 2009
OOOWWW

GOP = Grandstanding, Oppose, Pretend,

|
|
Reply
|
8:04 pm, Nov 8, 2009
roger37

Grungy, Old, Poopypants.

|
11:37 pm, Nov 8, 2009
hdtinkler

The republicans are only hurting themselves with their obstructions and stalling on everything. They have become the party of NO and everyone's grandchild is going to be hurt because of their defiance of everything.

|
|
Reply
7:03 pm, Nov 8, 2009
outwithSenShelby

Ms Maddow told the truth.

|
|
Reply
7:05 pm, Nov 8, 2009
sadie101

Madow is good at one thing: divisive speech. She is the Glen Beck of the Left. Centrists long for reasonable voice, and Maddow is obnoxious and divisive just as is Beck. Both make me cringe.

|
|
Reply
|
8:03 pm, Nov 8, 2009
Llplo99

I think Maddow is dead on and very smart. I like her a lot.

|
|
Reply
9:10 pm, Nov 8, 2009
jaydeekay

Bill Maher represents the center.

|
|
Reply
10:19 pm, Nov 8, 2009
YogiBarrister

That's just about the dumbest comparison I've ever read. One of them is brilliant, gracious, and scrupulous, the other is a stupid, weepy douchebag. See if you can tell us who's who.

|
|
Reply
10:46 pm, Nov 8, 2009
roger37

So you don't like Rachel Maddow? Is that because she backs up ALL her statements with FACTS in the form of videos, direct quotes, or other checkable sources? Does that mean you can't HANDLE the truth?

And it doesn't matter that Rachel is a Ph.D. in Political Science and Beck barely graduated from High School and has a background in zoo radio?

Says more about you than about her.


|
|
Reply
|
11:42 pm, Nov 8, 2009
cbeenthere

Why is it conservatives despise smart woman?

|
12:56 am, Nov 9, 2009
sadie101

I say the Maddow is smarter than Beck sure, but that is beside the point. both refuse to do more than bash the other side. seriously. If ppl can't see that both are there to whip up resentment against the other side there is little hope. Maddow is a predictable as Beck and that to me is not very smart at all.
Bill Maher is too sexist for my taste.

|
10:20 am, Nov 9, 2009
roger37

sadie, you're not even close! I did NOT say that she was smarter than Beck. When you get to the Ph.D. level at Oxford you're dealing with a lot more than native intelligence.

If you bothered to listen to Maddow (even if you disagree with her) you would see that she does not bash the other sides, and she certainly doesn't call them names or use guilt by association like Beck does.

It's an insult to equate Maddow and Beck in the same sentence, fahchrissake. I make myself look at Beck, and I see an arrested adolescent with zero mental discipline and no training in logical, deductive or inductive reasoning. It really says volumes about Americans who believe anything he says because it is so dishonest.

|
10:54 pm, Nov 9, 2009
cbeenthere

At least Maddow knows her stuff, she knows that an amendment was signed for the benefit of the religious right by 176 Republicans to deny abortion funds in the health care bill, and didn't confuse that issue with the final vote on the health care bill. I don't think you can say that, I believe you to be a most confused third waver who knows zilch, you are no centrist, and you do nothing for women's issues, plain lazy.

|
|
Reply
|
12:47 am, Nov 9, 2009
nightdragon09

I find it completely hilarious and ironic that support for abortion, which...

1: Became practice in society when the wealthy ruling class of the day realized they didn't want any little bastards running around while they were out busy "sowing their royal oats" with the woman of their choosing, and...

2: Was utilized in just about every totalitarian government of the past century, from Nazi Germany to the Soviet Union, in order to "purge" their cultures of "imperfections" (i.e. the disabled or mentally challenged in layman's terms) and eliminate or control certain ethnic groups of the population...

is today the cornerstone of "women's rights issues."

|
3:34 am, Nov 9, 2009
cbeenthere

No one supports abortion as you would like to imply in the context of your post, and as long as we are talking history consider Planned Parenthood's beginnings.
Women's health issues are not hilarious, maybe only to you, chauvinist pig.

|
9:45 am, Nov 9, 2009
sadie101

let's see if I say i don't support a bill because it restricts abortion and then I vote for a bill that limits abortion in the most egregious fashion I can claim purity? This was a final vote on a bill that INCLUDED screwing women over the issue of abortion. only one republican voted for the bill that made this abortion restriction codified.
Cheenthere you have way too much hate for women.
And you are far too willing to excuse bigoted votes.
If aids care was denied to gays you would never suggest those who voted for it in the end are blameless.
Maddow is great at telling us that Democrats are not really screwing over women when they are! Cheenthere is great at hating women who stand up for themselves.

|
10:25 am, Nov 9, 2009
cbeenthere

Your thought process makes us cringe, femisexless sadie.

|
|
Reply
|
12:50 am, Nov 9, 2009
cbeenthere

Well,well, sadie, I hope it is finally beginning to sink in that Bachmann, Foxx, Bono-Mack and whoever else your Republican women in Congress are, are the ones that have sold you down the river with the Stupak Amend that femisex pretends to know nothing about, and today has the nerve to bash Democrat Stegette. And nice job by you on Rachel Maddow too. What did you and your harridans do to fight the Stupak Amend.? Play dumb. The beauty of the middle my a**.

You have my gender dead wrong (another tribute to your astute judgment and intellect), and I am one mad as hell woman. Women of the seventies worked too hard to have you third wavers (isn't that what you call yourselves) trash genuine women. Have a nice life, sadie.

|
1:11 am, Nov 10, 2009
cbeenthere

Diane Degette

|
1:26 am, Nov 10, 2009
connie47

Whether one agrees with Rachel Maddow or not, she is very, very smart. She has a degree in Public Policy from Stanford. She was awarded the John Gardner Fellowship and a Rhodes Scholarship. She has a PhD from Oxford.

Beck is a buffoon who graduated from high school in 1982. The lack of a college degree is not what makes Beck a buffoon, but rather his clownish, often irrational behavior and dishonesty. (FEMA concentration camps, for one example). You may not like her conclusions, but you will not find RM lying.

|
|
Reply
7:26 am, Nov 9, 2009
AlanD2

If you believe this, Sadie, you are so far to the right that you can barely see the center, and the left is completely invisible to you.

Maddow is smart, polite, and truthful (I have seen her apologize for her mistakes on-air many times).

Since Glenn Beck is none of these, your comparison with Beck is totally wrong.

|
|
Reply
|
11:09 am, Nov 9, 2009
sadie101

I say that Maddow is smart but very divisive. Beck is less smart but functions as does Maddow --to be divisive. one can be very smart or very dumb and be very divisive.
But you see, I am also capable of seeing that Bush and Obama are equally divisive. If you live on the far right or far left you will not admit this truth.


|
12:48 pm, Nov 9, 2009
AlanD2

sadie101: You are absolutely right. I cannot see that "Bush and Obama are equally divisive".

Obama has reached out repeatedly to Republicans. (He has gotten little or nothing in return.)

With Bush, it was "My way or the highway."

|
4:18 pm, Nov 9, 2009
sadie101

That is the beauty of living in the middle. Polls show this country more divided than ever on politics since Obama took office. Bush reached out in exactly the same way (all show, no substance) as Obama. They are both my way of the highway guys, it is just that Bush put a more honest face on his divisve tactics. Obama smiles and says one thing and then locks out any meaningful bipartisan efforts.
Tort reform is an example of this. Boy we really need tort reform says Obama one of his gussied up speechs but then locks out all Red effforts at meaniful tort reform.
Bush sneered as he divided, Obama smiles as he divides. Living in the center I can recognize both.

|
6:11 pm, Nov 9, 2009
cbeenthere

tort reform sadie you should know saves very little, per the CBO, the favorite of the conservatives, until he doesn't say what they want him to.

|
1:13 am, Nov 10, 2009
cbeenthere

And by the by sadie the stupak amend. was voted for by your conservative friends 15mins. before the final vote for the health bill. In other words your conservative sisters sold you down the river by inserting what you call the egregious part into the final bill right before the final vote. They pulled the wool over your eyes, but you weren't even watching. You are from crazytown, and enough people have told you here. How Embarrassing for you.

|
1:36 am, Nov 10, 2009
cbeenthere

That was a total of 176 Republican votes that sold you down the river with only 64 conservative dems voting with them.

|
2:00 am, Nov 10, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
8:15 pm, Nov 8, 2009
matthewbenzor

Ms Maddow is "HOT" and the Wizard of Oz Lollipop kid re-publican Lindsey Graham needs a stool to stand on ,know wonder john Mclost the race McCain liked him because he's taller than him and its make John feel like a big man standing next to shorty ,He's as tall as Kim Jong il maybe shorter.....! Lindsey has issues over his height......!

|
|
Reply
|
8:23 pm, Nov 8, 2009
Konchster

I think he also has issues about where his mouth as been

|
|
Reply
1:45 pm, Nov 9, 2009
whipmawhopma

I suspect but don't know that Bob Schieffer is right in criticizing the "Army for shuffling off problems by transferring Major Nidal Malik Hasan to Fort Hood from Walter Reed".

Lots of organizations 'solve' problems by transferring them and hope it works out. From department to department, location to location.

|
|
Reply
8:30 pm, Nov 8, 2009
Ronym5

Maddow is right the GOP will attack Obama no matter his decision on Afghanistan.

Liebermann doesn't have a soul much less a conscience.

And Tim can take Mike.

|
|
Reply
|
8:33 pm, Nov 8, 2009
sadie101

And Maddow will attack the GOP on any decision they make. There is a reason Cambell Brown is not selling to the peeps. She is too centered for the loonie fringes who tune into Maddow or Beck.

|
|
Reply
|
6:13 pm, Nov 9, 2009
Emmazon

I feel very sorry for you. I mean if you REALLY think Rachel is like Beck, I sympathize...critical thinking is not available to you.

|
6:34 pm, Nov 9, 2009
sadie101

no need for sympathy. I won't be sold a bridge in Brooklyn, but sadly you are very likely to be duped as you are blinded by love for Maddow. Rachel shills for the liberals and Beck for Conservatives. Each has a job to do: undercut what the other says. I know you really like Maddow, but that doesn't change her job description. Beck is God awful, but Maddow does the same thing in a more civilized manner. Beck's fans are just like you: blind to the partisan sniping that is Maddow and Beck.

|
8:19 pm, Nov 9, 2009
roger37

Sorry, sadie. If you really think Rachel Maddow is anything like Beck, then you have severe learning disabilities, and you really aren't worth debating.

|
10:59 pm, Nov 9, 2009
fromthehip

I love how Steele spins the GOP into this "we the people" party. This is the first time the party ever approached anyone below upper class donors. Where were they when everyone wanted to raise the minimum wage or insulate the middle class from back room deals with the credit card industry (and then mask it as reform!).

|
|
Reply
|
10:40 pm, Nov 8, 2009
Downriver

It is amazing to watch the fringe loonies manipulated with such success by the GOP.

|
|
Reply
2:28 pm, Nov 9, 2009
mdargo

I'm with Bob Schieffer. I wish he'd also take on the Arlington Cemetery story that's been on Salon flying under the MSM media.

|
|
Reply
3:15 am, Nov 9, 2009
Juniusforte

False, fleeting Joe Lieberman is at it again. Either you pay me or I will create problems for you. Talking about doubledealers. How can the people of the lovely state of Connecticut put up with this creep. Get him out. Send him to Israel where he belongs.

|
|
Reply
12:41 pm, Nov 9, 2009
boredwell

It's all politics for the good of the party not the people. Enuf already!

|
|
Reply
|
3:21 pm, Nov 9, 2009
AlanD2

You expected anything else from Republicans, boredwell?

Unfortunately, many Democrats are in the same boat.

|
|
Reply
4:22 pm, Nov 9, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

November 8: Top 8 Moments from Sunday Talk

by The Daily Beast Video

Info
RSS
The Daily Beast Video
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |