Blogs and Stories

Sandra McElwaine

The New, Improved John Kerry

BS Top - McElwaine John Kerry Bizuayehu Tesfaye / AP Photo Back from Afghanistan and Pakistan, the senator is relaxed, confident—and blunt. In an interview with The Daily Beast's Sandra McElwaine, Kerry dishes about everything from Gen. McChrystal’s troop request to the latest gossip about Richard Holbrooke.

In an interview in his photo-filled inner sanctum in the Capitol, Sen. John Kerry is careful, reflective in his statements, and usually PC. But suddenly, he becomes surprisingly candid. We are talking about one of the most contentious issues facing the country today: Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s recommendation to send an additional 40,000 troops to help quell the insurgency in Afghanistan. Although Kerry views the general as “a great warrior and a top soldier,” he is quick to point out that McChrystal’s purview is limited in both command and scope.

The senator seems to suggest the general is sidelined because he is not involved in the big picture of the war. “He’s got a specific task—commander of the International Security Afghan Forces—and he does not go beyond that,” said Kerry. “His responsibility is to view and win his theater, and he's looking at that, which why there’s not a lot of mention of Pakistan.”

Members of his entourage have noticed a change in their boss. Many believe Kerry has come into his own as a high-powered diplomatic negotiator, has exorcized the ghosts of the past and finally found his niche.

But isn’t Pakistan the crux of the whole situation?

“Exactly the point,” Kerry responds. "The president's job is to view all of the theaters, particularly the Pakistan impact.”

Such directness isn’t typical for the senator. But after a few minutes with him, you notice the stiffness and formality are gone. He seems confident in his roles as the new senior senator from Massachusetts and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. And since his recent headline-making foray to Pakistan and Afghanistan, even members of his entourage have noticed a change in their boss. Many believe Kerry has come into his own as a high-powered diplomatic negotiator, has exorcized the ghosts of the past and finally found his niche. “He’s not bound by protocol or any large bureaucracy,” says one observer. “He’s really free and able to move around the world.”

Sliding into a colorfully upholstered wing chair, Kerry, in shirtsleeves, sits back, one arm casually draped over the side of the chair, and puts a positive spin on the chaotic situation in Afghanistan. The U.S. is at "a moment of opportunity,” he says. “Hamid Karzai has won a term and the ability to win a new legitimacy, and it’s very important for him to take steps to do that.’’ What’s crucial for Karzai, Kerry says, is to “step up, put the right people in positions, remove those who need to be removed, go after the corruption, and change the governance. Karzai has the ability to be a good partner if he commits to that path.”

When questioned about reports that he forged a close bond with Karzai while special envoy Richard Holbrooke did not—and in fact were at each other's throats—Kerry demurs. “I'm not going to comment. I don't want to suggest that Holbrooke didn't [forge a bond]. Don't believe everything you read,” he advises, explaining that his relationship with the beleaguered Afghan leader goes back many years. “We have a good rapport, we’ve known each other in previous visits, and worked on these issues,” Kerry says of Karzai. “We have a mutual respect and the ability to deal. I’m not saying that as any comment on anybody else. I don’t think it’s appropriate. Dick Holbrooke put a good team together. He’s done a lot of good stuff, and some people in Washington are picking on him.”

Kerry also downplays the rumors that swirl around National Security Adviser Jim Jones—that he's on his way out. "Not to my knowledge," says Kerry. "I've heard the Washington chitchat, people who speculate. I don't speculate or get into that. He was there when I met with the president when I came back from Afghanistan. I think he's doing a terrific job. I like him, have confidence in him and am confident the president does, too.”

Back to Top
November 9, 2009 | 10:53pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

johnmcenroe

As always Kerry comes across slightly more competent and thoughtful than W. Just slightly.

Respect.

(both for Kerry the man, as for W. to win that election)

|
|
Reply
|
9:21 am, Nov 11, 2009

Plantagenet

John Kerry forged a "special bond" with the corrupt ruler of Aghanistan and that is supposed to be a good thing?

Wouldn't it be better if Kerry would stand up to a corrupt clown like Karzai rather then befriending him and endorsing him after the rigged Afghanistan election?

|
|
Reply
|
12:56 pm, Nov 11, 2009

johnmcenroe

I don't know where to start. Not even if I want to. But let's just say:
Mousharraf. Putin. Special bond.

Kerry speaks with Karzai because that's politics, my friend. It's not because he wants to befriend him. You know that, we all know that. It's a slightly more effective approach than 'either you're with us, or against us'.

|
3:40 pm, Nov 11, 2009

Jess1911

I don't think we will get anything done by wasting our time speculating if Karzai won the election. His opponent withdrew and Karzai was declared a winner by the UN. So let's form a startegy with that going forward.

|
4:25 pm, Nov 11, 2009

dana64

Kery has been underestimated.........had he won in 2004...............we would be swell.!
coruption has become the poltical ay of lf .............everywhere EVERYWHERE.........
are you so naive to think it is possible not to be corrupt in Afghanestan ?
of course corruption is relative...............

|
9:39 pm, Nov 11, 2009

johnwr3

Kerry was sent in to Afghanistan because Holbrooke isn't doing the job. Why is it that liberals want to hold hands with corruption while our troops are dying? Shoot Karzai in the head already. Why can't liberals get anything done?

|
|
Reply
|
1:37 pm, Nov 11, 2009

johnmcenroe

Please, without liberals we'd still be living in the 20's. If you want to criticize, do it fairly.

|
3:42 pm, Nov 11, 2009

Jess1911

Yea shooting Karzai in the head is such a brilliant idea and that a so called Right wing republican can come up with. Have fun playing with the idea all you want.

|
4:27 pm, Nov 11, 2009

briansays

yes we did that or green lighted doing that to Diem in South Vietnam
how'd that turn out?

|
6:18 pm, Nov 11, 2009

Glenda1976

Aw Lurch is back.

|
|
Reply
|
9:55 am, Nov 11, 2009

diamondgirl

LOL

|
|
Reply
10:56 am, Nov 11, 2009

milarepa

Aw look, the Republitard children have come out to play. Now ya'll go outside and teabag each other while the adults take care of business... the business ya'll left unfinished for seven years.

|
|
Reply
2:06 pm, Nov 11, 2009

Vetinari

I wouldn't be so condescending about it, but yeah, the Republicans had their chance. You have to deal with reality, you can't just kill people and hope that will solve things.

|
|
Reply
5:56 pm, Nov 11, 2009

beachmom

Actually Senator Kerry has been thoughtful on foreign policy for many years. See his Iraq plan (the Kerry/Feingold amendment of June 2006) which Obama and Clinton used as their campaign platform on Iraq.

I realize the media, which has gunned for Kerry for years, have to make up some narrative as to why he is not the stuffy phony they claimed him to be for years. So, we have these "improved" "transformed" articles coming out. I'm not going to complain that you guys have finally woken up to Senator Kerry's unique abilities, but ... he hasn't changed. It is you who has changed, seeing him with fresh eyes.

|
|
Reply
6:25 pm, Nov 11, 2009

readerinamherst

"He's not bound by protocol or any large bureaucracy," says one observer. "He's really free and able to move around the world." Presumably the observer is not a citizen of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which Kerry ostensibly represents. He ought to be bound by that "protocol" instead of haring off to Afghanistan. He's never done a thing for Massachusetts, and his staff is as arrogant and unresponsive to constituents as he is. Birds of a feather.

|
|
Reply
8:22 pm, Nov 11, 2009

dana64

Kerry should have won in 2004.........and we would be in a much better state now.

|
|
Reply
9:44 pm, Nov 11, 2009

gameon

Kerry is an arrogant, rich, elitist.Of course karzai likes him,he has no spine.Obama and kerry are getting played.It's the only way to explain the way this is being mishandled.
I laughed my butt of when kerry says"do not put a party label,or insert any party considerations into the issue of war and peace." isn't that all the dems. did for 7 years with pres. Bush?Now that Pres. obama has the ball kerry's singing a differrent tune, and all you Dems. are dancing along.I've never seen a party or pres. pat themselves on the back so much and get so much media praise for accomplishing nothing at best,and most likely just making things worse.

Just watch,Kerry will win the Nobel Peace Prize next year for his meeting with karzai.

|
|
Reply
10:55 pm, Nov 11, 2009

Bettie

To the author,, I don't know how on earth you sat thru a whole interview with this boring man. I tried to watch him explaining himself on CNN and he put me to sleep. I have never seen a worst speaker.
Good for you for hanging in there.

|
|
Reply
12:51 am, Nov 12, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

The New, Improved John Kerry

by Sandra McElwaine

Info
RSS
Sandra McElwaine
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |