Blogs and Stories

Kim Masters

Meet the Movie Theater of the Future

BS Top - Masters Hollywood Reed Saxon / AP Photo Forget waiting in line—studios are exploring new systems to deliver films whenever you want, on whatever device you choose. Kim Masters on Hollywood’s biggest gamble.

Let's say you were dying to see New Moon but you didn't want to spring for a babysitter, tickets, and overpriced popcorn. What would you have paid to watch it at home on the same day it opened in theaters? Or say you’re crazy about Harry Potter. What would it be worth to watch the next installment even before it’s in theaters?

These are the questions being asked by Hollywood executives every day now—and they are not hypothetical. Because the studios are poised to make revolutionary changes in the way we watch movies.

The studios are gathered on the edge of the new-technology pool, trying to figure out how to dive in without breaking their necks.

The signs are everywhere. If you couldn’t wait to buy your own copy of G.I. Joe: The Rise of the Cobra, then surely you were thrilled to find it on Wal-Mart shelves earlier this month—about four weeks sooner than a studio would normally release a DVD.

But even if you wouldn’t watch G.I. Joe for free on a cross-country flight, Paramount’s decision to speed up its release date was a dramatic move—perceived by theater owners as an act of naked aggression, since they expect the studios to protect their interests by waiting the usual four months before releasing movies on DVD. Thus G.I. Joe became a foot soldier in an escalating battle over the future of the business.

Literally every day seems to bring another announcement about studios hastening the release of major films, on DVD and on-demand. Last week, the studios filed a petition asking the federal government for permission to disable certain outputs on your television so that they will be enabled to stream movies to you on-demand with less risk of piracy. And when will they make those on-demand movies available? Sony just announced that for $24.95, it will stream its animated hit, Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs, to customers with Internet-enabled televisions and certain Blu-ray players on December 8—less than three months after it was released in theaters and well before it makes the movie available on DVD.

The studios are scrambling for a new approach because DVD sales—for years now, the life blood of the business—have started to dry up. (Retailers are slashing prices; Wal-Mart, for example, will offer this summer’s big movies, including Star Trek and the latest Harry Potter, for less than $10 this holiday season.) After all, why buy DVDs when they can be rented cheaply through Netflix and Redbox? So the studios are looking to replace that critical lost income through on-demand viewing and other new approaches. What’s not clear is whether these new strategies will generate enough money to support their business. You might say the studios are gathered on the edge of the new-technology pool, trying to figure out how to dive in without breaking their necks.

And some Hollywood veterans fear these game-changing ideas are fraught with tremendous risk. “You’ve got people at the top of these companies that don’t understand how the business works,” says producer Bill Mechanic, former head of the Fox studio (and producer of the upcoming Academy Awards telecast). “They’re going to end up in a place that may not be good for them.”

Back to Top
November 12, 2009 | 11:42pm
Comments ()
evan2442

Whether the studios like it or not, movies will eventually be sent straight to your home. The speed at which high quality video can be sent wirelessly and the costs of going to the movie theater rising every time you go it seems, will only make movies straight to the home inevitable. What the theaters and studios needed to do and have failed for the last decade at doing, is come to a financial compromise at creating an experience in the theater that cannot be duplicated in the home: aka digital cinema. The theaters couldn't afford the transformation from old to new and wanted studios to pitch and they of course wouldn't even though they would save money on distribution costs as well as being able to release films worldwide at the same time, helping the fight against piracy. Just like the newspapers, music, and TV industry, the failure to act quick with innovation and compromise has resulted in their demise.

|
|
Reply
11:41 am, Nov 13, 2009
snicks

Personally, I will always prefer to see certain movies in the theater. But I think this is all about what the consumers want. And like any industry, the entertainment industry must listen and respond to their customers. That is who their loyalty should lie with.

|
|
Reply
12:26 pm, Nov 13, 2009
NickyJ

Why would I pay more to Comcast to see a movie at home that I can already download on the internet for free??? THE SAME DAY IT"S RELEASED. I go to the movies with my friends and family to get OUT of the house. It's never the same experience at home. Always better in the theater! I think studios are shooting themselves in the foot.

|
|
Reply
10:45 am, Nov 14, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Meet the Movie Theater of the Future

by Kim Masters

Info
RSS
Kim Masters
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |