Blogs and Stories

Tunku Varadarajan

Punking the White House

What do the White House crashers have in common with Balloon Boy? Tunku Varadarajan on their bizarre pursuit of the American dream. Plus, photos of the couple cozying up with Joe Biden.

A woman named Michaele Salahi and her husband, Tareq, gatecrashed the State Banquet at the White House on Tuesday, and then promptly posted their photographs from the event on Facebook. The photos—so eye-catching, so immodest—tell a story that goes well beyond that of an impudent night out in which a woman and her husband talked their way through security at America's most impenetrable address. What follows, however, are not my thoughts on that breach of security—there will be thorough investigations into that, I'm sure, and some uncomfortable answers. Instead, I offer a sort of theater review, and attempt to address the question of why some Americans (the parents of Balloon Boy, the Salahis, and the others who will surely come in train) put themselves on display in the way they do.

Click Image Below to View Our Gallery of the White House Crashers in Action

Article - White House Crashers Gallery Launch

What is so striking about the behavior of the Salahis is not the vulgarity of it all, it is the tenacity of that vulgarity. This determination, this drive, is evident in the photographs: Plain to see on Michaele's face, and Tareq's, is a sense of acme, of achievement. They have scaled a pinnacle in public—and have the pictures to prove it. Witness Michaele's picture with Joe Biden, vice president of the United States of America. Her left hand rests on his swelling chest; his left arm is snaked around her cheerleader's waist; her blond head leans into his gray temple. Yet in all this proximity, this physical melding of vice president and gatecrasher, their smiles stand apart: his is a red-blooded, "isn't-life-good-to-me" smile; hers, by contrast, appears calculating, algebraic. This picture isn't just going up on Facebook; it's going straight on to her C.V.

The Daily Beast interviews the gatecrashers’ mom The crashers' photos go on, with Michaele—a lean-limbed female Zelig—parked right next to Indra Nooyi, Ed Royce, Katie Couric, Rahm Emanuel, Adrian Fenty, and A.R. Rahman. Her husband—a ruddy, hearty chap who wouldn't attract a second glance in a D.C. full of men who answer to that description—is in some of the photos. But the occasion is clearly Michaele's to exploit; he is her prop.

Shortly after the story of the Salahis' presence at the banquet broke, it emerged that Michaele has been pushing hard for a place on a reality-television show, The Real Housewives of D.C. It has since been reported, also, that there was a camera crew from Bravo filming the Salahis as they arrived at the White House. So the charge of exhibitionism against them isn't merely plausible, it's irrefutable. And yet, their audacity apart, one is left with the disquieting sense that the Salahis aren't necessarily bizarre outliers—and that they embody a potent American strain of self-promotion, one that has been spawned by the limitless opportunities for self-display on television and social media.

Americans are exhibitionists by nature, and have been so for generations, perhaps as an ongoing, unresolved reaction against the country's original Puritanism, which censured blusterers and showoffs. This is a large and competitive country, in which the most reliable way to catch the eye, or to rise above the throng is… to catch the eye and rise above the throng. Of course, when an entire throng is trying to rise above itself, an epidemic of free-form vulgarity and solipsism ensues. It doesn't help that our schools regard inhibition in children as a sin far worse than an inability to read and write, and that these same children are immersed at the earliest possible age in a culture of showbiz and television. (I find it less disturbing that some American children start to wear makeup at 10 or 11 than that they start to roll their eyes dismissively at 3 or 4.)

Witness Michaele's picture with Joe Biden, vice president of the United States of America. Her left hand rests on his swelling chest; his left arm is snaked around her cheerleader's waist; her blond head leans into his gray temple.

John Hancock, et al., set great store by "the pursuit of happiness," by which they meant the pursuit of a decent, fulfilling life (not that far removed from Aristotle's concept of "eudaimonia," but with a less obsessive focus on "virtue" than the old Greek had). That idea—which was always likely to come to grief in a modern, materialistic society in which religion recedes into the background—has morphed, for many Americans, into the vigorous pursuit of kicks and highs, quick hits and rapid pleasure.

Michaele Salahi pursues happiness by snuggling up to a vice president who hasn't a clue who she is, and derives her amour-propre from a place on The Real Housewives of D.C. For those of us to whom her life's program is outlandish, Michaele is a species of unicorn to be gawked at briefly, in puzzlement. The alarming thought in all this, of course, is that there are millions of Americans now rooting for her to fulfill her dream. In the end, crashing that state banquet may have been a stroke of tawdry genius.

Tunku Varadarajan is a national affairs correspondent and writer at large for The Daily Beast. He is also a research fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution and a professor at NYU’s Stern Business School. (Follow him on Twitter here.)

For more of The Daily Beast, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.


View as Multiple Pages
Back to Top
November 27, 2009 | 3:06pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

piktor

She's a babe. What is the problem?

|
|
Reply
|
4:25 pm, Nov 27, 2009

crymeariver

A "babe"? An overly-bleached blond ex-cheerleader who looks dried up and old? You must have really LOW standards. Just because someone looks like a "babe" to YOU does not mean that they should be allowed to behave as this woman did.

Eitherway, what they did was a crime. It's a felony to lie to federal officials, and I'm sure going to the White House grounds uninvited is considered breaking and entering. They bypassed the background checks which require checking into criminal background, funding of foreign nations, connection with terrorist groups, etc. Once you get on the other side of the security check points, you have access to knives, forks and glassware. Things that can be easily used as a weapon against either OUR government or the PM of India.

Do you know what the consequences would have been if something happened to the leader of a foreign country while he is visiting OUR COUNTRY? We have men and women serving right next to India. Want to see the fury of that country turned against our soldiers along with the Taliban and Al Qaeda?

This couple should be treated just as the "balloon boy" family and get time in front of a judge and possible jail time. This was not a funny joke, it was a state dinner done in honor of a respected friendly country.

|
|
Reply
|
9:39 pm, Nov 27, 2009

yankeechamp2009

you are right in everything you say, but but we have to consider that just because they got passed the front door and had access to knives, forks and glassware, if they had done something stupid they would've been shot and possibly killed by the secret servicemen inside. There's a secret service man always near the president everywhere he goes. And that same extended security gets assigned to guests who are powerful such as the leader of India. So it would really would had been very difficult for this couple to do something.
But it is embarrassing for this to happen in our own white house. I 'm glad you feel the way you feel because I am sure the right-wingers are saying that they did nothing wrong as they did when people were showing up armed with guns to Obama speeches.
It is obvious that what Michele Salahi was doing was all for The Real Housewives of DC. Had she had no motive, I can assure you she would have been locked up. I'm sure the secret service will assign the proper punishment under these circumstances.

|
10:56 pm, Nov 27, 2009

Glenda1976

She spent hours at the salon to look like that?

|
|
Reply
|
1:04 am, Nov 28, 2009

roadhunter

Nah. She went to the groomer.

|
6:56 am, Nov 28, 2009

JediJerry

It's all about their overinflated egos. They are both spoiled rotten to the core Toys R Us kids and they need to grow up and get a life. In their minds the world revolves around them but the world doesn't know them yet. They love the press whether it be good or bad because hey, press is press and if it's all about them it's all good.

|
|
Reply
1:52 pm, Nov 29, 2009

iconklee

SHE'S A: "B A B E" ... are you referring to that porcine character of the same name?
By NO STRETCH could she be considered anything but street slime. LOOK at her in her strategically POSED photos! WHO NEEDS to be validated by a photo standing NEXT TO "someone TRULY FAMOUS" ? She does. He does.
The sad fact is: they are such climbers and wanna-bes ... they don't see themselves for what they are (really) portraying: sad people of no SELF-worth who desperately seek FAME BY ASSOCIATION.
If you don't EARN IT yourself -- what GOOD is it? For them, since they are INCAPABLE of "earning it" they have to rely on SUBTERFUGE. And sneaking into places they would never be invited to.

|
|
Reply
5:05 pm, Dec 10, 2009

eat5vegetables

They should do some time behind bars. It doesn't matter the reason is grotesque narcissism. Lying to security should be a matter that causes you to go to jail.

|
|
Reply
|
4:50 pm, Nov 27, 2009

crymeariver

It was FEDERAL officers manning the security. So if they lied to federal officers, it's a felony.

|
|
Reply
|
9:01 pm, Nov 27, 2009

roadhunter

You're mistaken. It would make it a FEDERAL crime, but not necessarily a felony. The jurisdiction of the officers does not change a crime from a misdemeanor to a felony.

|
6:57 am, Nov 28, 2009

silverglate

This piece touches a raw nerve in me. For years now I've had this uncomfortable feeling that too many prominent figures in public life think that they are acting in some kind of play, where the consequences are limited to audience approval or disapproval. But now you present an alternative reality, which is even more discomfiting.

|
|
Reply
|
5:06 pm, Nov 27, 2009

laDivaG

Agreed.

I would add that the attitude is complimented by a sitcom mentality that if we can just get to the end of the episode all our problems will be solved and we can begin again next week without suffering consequences.

|
|
Reply
1:37 am, Nov 29, 2009

ortega

Great! Security at the WH is also practising the new cool aproach. Or maybe they are still thinking about let them pass or not.

|
|
Reply
|
5:13 pm, Nov 27, 2009

alkisailor

This couple should be PROSECUTED. Yes, the secret service dropped the ball, but imagine if someone got in with anthrax or other biological agent. These two are arrogant and self-serving and should face jail time for their hijinks

|
|
Reply
|
6:37 pm, Nov 27, 2009

MaliciousDisorder

One can only hope for hope and change.

|
9:35 am, Nov 29, 2009

RegisteredIndependent

Thats really funny, Ortega. Of course, they're using the new "incrementalist" approach that this White House is becoming so famous for.

|
|
Reply
8:30 am, Nov 28, 2009

Persefunny

This is a beautifully written piece, a pleasure to read. I like a smart writer with a full vocabulary, one who has read an important book or two. We read, we learn. Thanks, TV.

|
|
Reply
6:42 pm, Nov 27, 2009

Persefunny

PS I don't think Americans are exhibitionist by nature, but I do think exhibitionists cluster in America.

|
|
Reply
|
6:45 pm, Nov 27, 2009

iconklee

WELL STATED, PERSEFUNNY, kudos for the astute observation. In Europe, they would be considered TACKY EXHIBITIONISTS.
In China, they would be publicly EXECUTED.

|
|
Reply
4:59 pm, Dec 10, 2009

Jaygim

Terrific, cogent article. Your comment -- that its the sheer vulgarity of [nameless blonde's] tenacity -- is stingingly true.

The Salahi's are the cretin of all cretins. Look that word up Mr. and Miss, if you don't have a clue as to what 'cretin' means -- your facebook photo will appear right next to the dictionary entry.

|
|
Reply
|
7:09 pm, Nov 27, 2009

roadhunter

I'm thinking you might be the one who needs a dictionary. She's horse-faced ugly, but I don't think she's a cretin.

cretin [%u02C8kr%u025Bt%u026An] n: a person afflicted with cretinism: a mentally retarded dwarf with wide-set eyes, a broad flat nose, and protruding tongue

|
|
Reply
|
7:02 am, Nov 28, 2009

Jaygim

According to Merriam-Webster: "a stupid, vulgar or insensitive person."
I'd say their bravado was vulgar. As far as insensitivity? Crashing a dignified state dinner -- an understatement.

|
8:04 am, Nov 28, 2009

crypto

Punished??? I don't think so. The adminstration and the secret service should thank these people. With a hole that big who penetrates security next.. And that was a big hole. Making it into any government office where the nations decisions are made or secrets are kept is bad enough. But to just walk up and shake hands with the prez and cozy up to the vice prez. Now that's a BIG hole.

|
|
Reply
|
7:22 pm, Nov 27, 2009

Hotfrostins

I agree crypto, having worked at mnumerous military bases as a contractor over the years I have always been impressed with the tenacity of those in charge of securing Government facilities, its hard for me to imagine that they just walked in without some sort of forged documents or impostering. It is a huge hole.

|
|
Reply
10:57 pm, Nov 27, 2009

mzkitti

Ugly Americans...l alive and still on the premises.
.
They exhibit themselves because they know they are losers. Next week they might commit suicide in their bathtub.

|
|
Reply
|
7:24 pm, Nov 27, 2009

crypto

OK, I'm leaving now. I think you're comtaminated.

|
|
Reply
7:51 pm, Nov 27, 2009

activeduty

I want some of whatever you are inhaling.

|
|
Reply
6:51 pm, Nov 29, 2009

category5

During GWB's last year, my 12 year old daughter took a field trip to DC with about 50 classmates. There was a tiny possibility that they would get in to the WH. The Secret Service required photocopies of birth certificates and social security cards of all the children two months in advance.
Something tells me these two attention whores did not just bluff their way in. Someone pulled strings.

|
|
Reply
|
7:55 pm, Nov 27, 2009

yankeechamp2009

Maybe i'm mistaken, but are you anticipating that the president is in charge of the hiring and firing of the secret service? You say "during GWB's last year" as if GWB made better choices in hiring secret service men than Obama. If someone pulled strings, it was because someone knew someone in the secret service, has nothing to do with Obama. He doesn't choose the staff. You can blame Homeland Security or whoever is in charge of that.

|
|
Reply
|
10:39 pm, Nov 27, 2009

category5

Sorry, not what I intended to imply. George "Bin Laden determined to strike inside US" Bush did not make better shecurity choices. I just meant to show that SS takes visitors seriously if even 8th graders subjected to such scrutiny. I don't believe that has changed with Obama in WH. SS protocol probably does not change much depending upon who is president.

|
8:44 am, Nov 28, 2009

category5

And notice how she always is leaning her head toward the other person in the photo? Well, take a look at photo 8 and photo 10. Racist? And she is probably the only known person to take a photo with her hand on the VP's chest. This episode is almost as disgusting as hiding your kid in an attic and pretending he is in a runaway balloon.

|
|
Reply
|
8:00 pm, Nov 27, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--Bubblehead
|
|
Reply
1:39 am, Nov 28, 2009

RegisteredIndependent

Racist? You've got to be kidding me. Is every white person in America racist now???? Maybe its time for another beer summit............

|
|
Reply
8:33 am, Nov 28, 2009

CommonSensePleeze

What they have in common?
Bravo TV

It is Bravo that is encouraging this kind of behavior...
It was Bravo's Camera Crew that was following the Couple around

I think Bravo television should take some Responsibility
for this

for anybody that cares
Bravo TV: http://www.bravotv.com/contact

|
|
Reply
9:30 pm, Nov 27, 2009

Hotfrostins

Maybe the vast right wing conspiracy left them in.

|
|
Reply
11:05 pm, Nov 27, 2009

DakLak

What a waste of an article on a couple of airheads.

One thing, for sure, they won't be back.

(I read somewhere the woman spent all day getting ready? Given her sorry state in these pictures either she was is in a hell of a mess in the morning or it was a wasted effort.)

|
|
Reply
1:06 am, Nov 28, 2009

octavio


This week in one of the tabloids ( gossip newspapers,National
enquirer ?,Globe ? et cetera ) there was a couple of pages about a homosexual that looks ( a 100% look alike ) like this
crasher Salahi.This gossip newspaper is saying that this
homosexual had a love affair with Barack Obama.Is this Salahi
the same homosexual?.

Seems like Barack Obama is sorrounded by enemies.Did one
of these enemies allowed all of this to happen?

The head of the secret service should be fired on the spot.He also should be investigated.This Salahi couple needs to be investigated and prosecuted.

About the gossip newspaper saying ( implying ) that Barack
Obama is a homosexual.If Barack Obama manages to fullfill all
his campaign promisses and he starts prosecuting all lobbyists
seen around Whashington D.C.Then,who cares if Barack Obama was born in the moon or if he is a homosexual or if he is a communist?

We already know that the crooked republican senators
( large companies whores ) will dislike and oppose anything that Barack Obama does.Since senators have a great deal
of influence is possible that one of those crooks is trying
to make Barack Obama look bad.

The crooked republican senators do not care about the USA,
they are only interested in fullfilling the wishes of their masters
the giant USA corporations.

|
|
Reply
|
1:31 am, Nov 28, 2009

DakLak

But what does your comment have to do with bottle blonds waaaaaaay past their prime?

|
|
Reply
1:38 am, Nov 28, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Punking the White House

by Tunku Varadarajan

Info
RSS
Tunku Varadarajan
Emails
|
print
Multiple Pages
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |