Blogs and Stories
The End of Single Women
Blockbuster memoir Eat, Pray, Love was the ultimate story of a woman finding freedom, so why did Elizabeth Gilbert get married? Lizzie Skurnick on the new marriage problem.
Given our culture’s fascination with getting to the happily ever after, why is it always so unsatisfying to hear from someone already there? Is it that details prized from the circumspect spouses are almost belligerent in their banality? (See Michelle Obama on Barack’s morning breath.) That the narratives themselves are so ludicrously one-gendered? (When’s the last time you saw a husband wrestle in print about a marital bed he still enjoys?) Or that a genuinely frank admission peskily seems always to herald a union’s complete demise? (Commence countdown on the wife half of the recent Times piece who admitted in the first paragraph to hating French kissing.)
Perhaps it’s the problem of writing about marriage at all—since there’s no greater act of hostility to a character than to saddle her with anything so tedious as a devoted spouse. Before Bridget Jones, works from Madame Bovary to Main Street to Heartburn to Terms of Endearment did their readers the favor of treating marriage as a many-gated prison, ringing with the plaints of aggrieved detainees, rather than a pleasant destination which, once reached, requires no further act of carnage than ripping the seal off the seat.
No matter how many gelatos we eat or ashrams we enjoy, we are always steering our liberated little ship away from one altar and toward another.
Allegedly, Committed, by Eat, Pray, Love author Elizabeth Gilbert, is one such work. But in fact it is the final death knell to the single girl—our Mary Tyler Moore, our Annie Hall, our Kelly Taylor (“I choose me!”). A decade of chick lit, self-help, confession, and how-to have crushed Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore and One Day at a Time to smithereens, and we are condemned to drift in Gilbert’s oeuvre, where, no matter how many gelatos we eat or ashrams we enjoy, we are always steering our liberated little ship away from one altar and toward another.
Committed: A Skeptic Makes Peace with Marriage. By Elizabeth Gilbert. 304 pages. Viking. $26.95.
When Eat, Pray, Love leaves off, Gilbert has just unearthed her soulful soulmate, Felipe. Followers of such extended-edition romances as Sex and the City know it is customary for a sequel at such time to contrive to nix the gentlemen in question from the plot, lest a narrative propelled by uncertainty and turmoil suddenly grind to a halt, alienating fans. Excising your soulmate from a memoir about your relationship is difficult to pull off, but Gilbert is delivered a plot twist courtesy of the U.S. government, which revokes Filipe’s visa in the name of Homeland Security.
Now, in his absence, a new, unencumbered journey can begin! Because, though dueling statuses had already reduced their time together to 90-day stints in a rented house in Philly, and though the couple cannot tolerate an itinerant life abroad, Gilbert is nonetheless unable to wrap her head around Xeroxing a dossier to put her country’s stamp of approval on the man to whom she’s already pledged, in a private ceremony, her eternal soul.
Why Gilbert is so desperately undone by the notion of the green-card marriage is ostensibly the author’s question to herself, but it increasingly becomes one for the reader. Even a Homeland Security officer, as he takes Felipe away, feels compelled to explain the obvious. “No, seriously—what’s the problem?” asked Officer Tom. “You two have obviously been cohabiting already. You obviously care about each other, you’re not married to anyone else… you could always sign a prenuptial agreement… I mean, if you’re worried about going through all the financial mess of a divorce again. Or if it’s the relationship issues that scare you, maybe some counseling would be a good idea.”
It would—although a work in which one “unravel[s] the history of monogamous Western marriage in order to better understand my inherited assumptions, the shape of my family’s narrative, and my culturally specific catalog of anxieties” seems more in order for readers accustomed to seeing Gilbert get her insights on the go. Having made a living privileging her own qualms and elations to their flesh-and-blood sources, it is an easy trick for Gilbert to sidestep the question of her own suitability to her fiancé, on which she spends two pages, in order to bring us among the Hmong, where she discusses arranged marriages, or to her matrilineal forebears, where she finds meaning in a grandmother’s cut-up coat.







cmhandy
Lizzie,
The next time you are writting an article and you ask yourself "is that sentince too long?", just assume that it is. Also, please return your college diploma, someone who can actually write is probably looking for it.
brando
I bet there are too many big words for you as well. By the way, what's a "sentince?" And since when does punctuation go outside the quotation mark? And your last sentence - sorry, sentince - should have been two. Ignoramus. Shut up.
ohheygreat
Some people are not very good at spelling. Or type quickly and make ridiculous errors.
But punctuation is a different story. The rules are more complicated than you seem to think, and they also differ depending on location - America has one set of rules, Britain another. Canadian publishers usually follow American styles, altho some follow British - and some use both. The point is that in some places and in some cases, the punctuation does go outside the quotation mark.
Would hate for you to look like an ignoramus too.
amblurry
Too funny. I was thinking ... have I not just had enough coffee this morning ... this is a hard read! I do have a degree in writing .. and I applaud anyone who actually gets out there and does it ... seems like those in glass houses ...
Good job ohheygreat.
Peace to all...
Trunk-Monkey
yeah, that first paragraph was pretty bad. Clarity was lost and her convoluted examples left a lot to interpretation (a husband 'wrestling' with a bed he likes? Obama's breath forming an image of Michelle? What?).
Oh, and brando... a period or comma can be placed outside quotation marks when it belongs not in the quoted matter but to a larger unit *containing* the quoted matter.
JalapenoBob
Finally, a blogger who is not limited to sentences with a maximum of ten short words and two long ones! Thank you for using your vocabulary and skills!
Genni2002
Lizzie, I really wanted to like this article, but have to agree with cmhandy.. it was just hard to read? maybe the long sentences? Don't know? It was a grind about a book that I generally liked part 2 continuation and now am not sure that I should bother with it...
Margot62
I just finished reading this review and have no plausible idea what the article was trying to say. The problem with blogging is that style has taken over substance. It's soooo important to write with a "punch," with that sexy, authoritive, "I'm so smart" tone that something gets lost in translation.
I really wanted to learn something about Gilbert's new book. So, after I tried reading this review, I googled another review---having gained nothing whatsoever from this one.
To the author: Just plain old English works well sometimes.
aninigma
ditto. I was really curious to see what would be said on the marriage topic and now I really don't know at all what this was trying to say. I don't even really know what the book was about. Or which book, come to think of it.
briansays
Liberation and tolerace becomes license and entitlement when in a society full of ADD narcisists
susieQ
Ditto to all of the above - I'm exhausted from reading this article! Perhaps you are a "journalist", but your writing style is nothing short of pretentious. Was this article intended for the reader to gain some insight and knowledge? I think not. It was a showcase for your ridiculous phrasing and pontificating. Ugh!
Jaygim
The article was postmodern deconstruction of classical journalism, masquerading as narcissistic hipster blogging -- obviously
- E. Gilbert
irish119
I find this article almost unreadable.
ohheygreat
I too was a bit worn out by the end of this article. I'm not here to bash - just felt that a trimming of some of the more overwrought phrases might have made it a more enjoyable read. Well, to be honest, I'm not sure what the final point of the article was. How exactly is this the end of the single woman? The two halves the piece don't seem to connect entirely.
Would have liked to hear more thoughts about your point re: Gilbert hiding the whopping two page discussion of the couple's suitability - the two people actually getting married - amidst the pontificating and wisdom-making. I felt that was something she did in E,P,L. A lot of "look! see how I tell you these VERY PERSONAL THINGS" which on second pass are not so personal at all, but more macro-level revelations about her experiences, the people in her life, her travels, and so forth. A lot of hand waving to distract you that nothing truly deep and personal about *her* and her inner workings are being revealed, all while you think they very much are. Have yet to read the new book but from the brief point you make, it sounds like it's much of the same.
Well, except for all the caveats and hesitations, which reveal more inner workings than she probably ever realized.
reardongalt
I couldn't get through two sentences of this crap, but my first impression is that she hates men, never had a loving relationship in her life, was pushed into the bushes when she was a kid, boys made fun of her small breasts, didn't get invited to the prom, never got laid in the back seat of a Chevy (Calvins in a bunch on the front seat), always had to sit there watching her friends make out and never had parties at her house.
I gleaned that all from the first couple sentences. I could tell you more about Lizzie if I finished reading the article, but I might throw up.
whipmawhopma
OMG, reardongalt. I read the whole thing and it reminded of the year I spent in French II in high school and had no idea what the hell the teacher was saying about 80% of the time. I didn't throw up but I got some kind of headache trying to figure out what Lizzie Skurnick was carrying on about, in fact my head is spinning.
Dolmance
All relationship problems are caused by not getting enough sleep. Get enough sleep and you'll be fine.
joyceweath
you are a very funny person. Thanks for the laugh.
DCVixen
Y'all are crazy; this was a hilarious and very well-written review. This bits about the Hmong were a riot. Well done, Ms. Skurnik!
Badger1492
I got to the end of the first page and said, "huh?" I guess I'm not the only one that finds this review unfocused and confusing.
simone
Elizabeth G. is a successful author.
rogerpark
I signed up for DB just to defend this review--it's great. Very funny and a fast read. And the point was very clear: Gilbert avoids dealing with serious issues head-on (such as whether she actually wants to be married) in order not to alienate her lucrative fan base. Well done.
Jaygim
i.e., she's fit to run for public office.
beaglebeagle
Purchase a copy of Strunk & White's 'The Elements of Style'. It is available cheaply on Amazon.'Omit needless words' is one of the many gems you find in this invaluable work. Read it several times and put its time tested advice into practice. Your writing style will improve and your readers will understand what the hell you are trying to say.
Hedda-Harlowe
Amen!
nkadzi
Ditto~~
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.