Politics

More Politics

What Is (and Isn't) in the Health-Care Bill

by The Daily Beast Info

 The Daily Beast
 
  • Share

BS Top - TDB Health Care Pass Larry Downing / Reuters Will pre-existing conditions be covered? What's the fine for not having insurance? Which states got sweetheart deals? A crib sheet to the health-care bill that passed the House Sunday.

What’s in the Bill

• The health-care bill covers 32 million uninsured—1 million more people than the Senate version of the bill would have, but 4 million fewer than the House’s original bill. While reform will cost $940 billion over the next 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office reports that it will reduce the deficit by $130 billion over the next decade, and by $1.2 trillion in the decade after that.

• The bill will take effect in stages, and some of the most popular measures take effect within the first six months of its passage. Within six months, insurers will no longer be allowed to refuse coverage to kids because of pre-existing conditions. Nor will they be allowed to dump customers because they got sick. And they will be prohibited from capping how much coverage one person can get in a lifetime. Another provision that will become active within six months: Young people can continue to be covered under their parents’ health insurance until they’re 26.

• By 2014, insurers will not be allowed to refuse coverage to anyone of any age because of pre-existing conditions. The year 2014 will also see the opening of state insurance exchanges, in which people can "comparison-shop" to buy health coverage. These plans would have to meet a minimum standard of benefits and would face new, stricter limitations on how much they could vary their premiums based on age. For instance, premiums for the elderly could cost no more than three times the price of plans for young people.

• Compared to the Senate bill, the subsidies for buying insurance are bigger for families making between 2.5 and four times the federal poverty level. Aid will be offered on a sliding scale—families making less would pay less. A family of four making $44,000 would have insurance premiums limited to about 6 percent of the household’s income.

Big Fat Story: How to Still Stop Health Care

The 11 Heroes of Health-Care Reform

Sean Wilentz: Nancy Pelosi, Heroine of the Hour
• House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the “Cadillac” tax becomes the “platinum Rolls-Royce” tax under the new plan. This excise tax on premium insurance policies—the cushy policies that cover much more care than average ones—has been tailored to affect fewer people and will go into effect later. Now, plans valued at $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families will be taxed starting in 2018. Those numbers will be indexed to the rate of inflation, meaning, the point where these plans begin to be taxed will inch upward as the same amount of money, because of inflation, gradually buys less stuff.

• The bill imposes new taxes on wealthier people. Individuals making more than $200,000, and families making more than $250,000, will have to give up more of their paycheck to the Hospital Insurance payroll tax. Instead of paying 1.45 percent like most workers, they’ll pay 2.35 percent. And a new 3.8 percent tax will be added to income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and rents.

• The bill also imposes penalties on people who opt not to have health insurance. If you don’t buy insurance, starting in 2014 you will have to pay an annual fine of $95 or 1 percent of your income, whichever is greater. By 2016, that fine will rise to $695 or 2.5 percent of your income. For an insurance-free family, the fee is $2,085 or 2.5 percent of household income.

• Employers who don’t offer their employees insurance will also pay a penalty: $2,000 per employee. Tax credits will help small businesses offer coverage (and those with less than 100 employers can join insurance exchanges), and businesses with less than 50 workers are exempt. Employers will have to say how much a worker’s health plan costs on their W-2 tax form.

March 20, 2010 | 7:35pm
  • Share
Comments ()

Tiger01

Wow, it's almost as if this bill is perfect. Guaranteed coverage, lower costs, health care quality remains high, government pays for my coverage if I can't afford it. What's not to love? .....Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha...oh you libtards are priceless.

|
|
Reply
|
9:35 pm, Mar 20, 2010

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
10:00 pm, Mar 20, 2010

piktor

AAAALL ABOAAARD!! THE HISTORY EXPRESS IS LEAVING STATION !!

CHOOOOOOOOOOOO CHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

|
1:04 pm, Mar 21, 2010

reardongalt

"...oh you libtards are priceless."

I guess they think it's all coming from Obama's stash.

|
|
Reply
11:31 pm, Mar 20, 2010

FarLeftFist

Take it easy guys, it's obvious your weak-minded brains have been co-opted by the RW fear-machine. It's only healthcare reform, calm down.

|
|
Reply
|
12:47 am, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

flf-obviously your weak-minded brain has been co-opted by the low life back door wheeling,dealing bought off, no morals crowd,and we will see if it is indeed "only health care reform"

|
10:46 am, Mar 21, 2010

JTS1021

This is pretty hilarious considering the original poster probably believes in the free-market deregulation that was personally responsible for one of the worst global economic crashes of the modern era.

Hey let's go back to what crashed the economy and ruined millions of lives! That sounds like a perfectly legitimate response!

Oh, wait, haven't you guys convinced yourselves that it happened because of the exact opposite reason it did: because of too much regulation? And you think WE'RE delusional? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

|
|
Reply
|
2:09 am, Mar 21, 2010

clearthinker

get the government tit out of your mouth lefty. Some people have to pay for this. I know you won't have too because you are smoking crack in the hood living off the government dime. Be sure and thank me for that great life you have.

When 5% of Americans pay 50% of the taxes in this county I want you to ask yourself why you don't have a job. You don't have a job because the 5% isn't going to hire anymore. They are going to stop hiring, stop promoting, stop expanding, and, if anything, LAY OFF PEOPLE.... Good luck with that "jobs program" Obama.....

|
2:44 pm, Mar 21, 2010

johnstafford

One "LOL" would be enough to make your point, Tiger01.

|
|
Reply
|
3:45 am, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

By calling people "libtards" you show that you are a person who completely ignores everything people have say based on what political side they are on. This kind of ugly name calling is typical of a grade school bully, and is the same thing practiced by racists and homophobes - once you apply a derogatory name to a person you can view them as less human, less intelligent and worthy of abuse.

How about growing up.

And hasbro - responding to insults with insults is pointless and eventually leads to unreadable threads.

|
8:37 am, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

Oh heaven forbid-libitard is an ugly name calling dig,please and your typical grade calling statement,practised by racist and homophobes is pure old passe nonsense,how about growing up.

|
10:52 am, Mar 21, 2010

clearthinker

yourmama: I have no idea what you said.

|
2:44 pm, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

Clearthinker-Hello,I was responding to -Cymatic,I agree with your post.


|
4:49 pm, Mar 21, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
|
10:10 am, Mar 21, 2010

heaveho

Please, go on in some valuable detail -- what are we missing that you seem so crystal clear on? Right now your comment is so broad and vague you're not really making much of a point here. What are trying to say or have your run out of words?

|
11:24 am, Mar 21, 2010

clearthinker

you're right mcmchugh, Americans are going to learn the hard way.

|
2:45 pm, Mar 21, 2010

xlntcat

And, of course, if they do we will be absolutely helpless to amend the law and reign them in. The CBO concluded that this will reduce rates but, of course with your fiancial expertise, we are sure that you have a mathematical model that is superior to theirs. Not.

|
3:03 am, Mar 22, 2010

GavinStrick

"the insurance companies will milk this for all it's worth, just like auto insurance."

Bad example, Auto Insurance has never been more reasonably priced for good drivers--counter to your suggestion, the History of Auto Insurance is a fine example of what leveling the playing field (and ensuring that there are fewer monopolies, and actual competition, unlike the current Health Insurance scheme), has accomplished. Healthcare Reform will hold Insurance Cos accountable for the obscene upward spiral of premiums for the first time in 100 years, and I actually expect, much like the Auto Insurance Cos, for rates to level out instead of increasing exponentially.

|
11:50 am, Mar 24, 2010

camfield

Now that the human race has almost "replenished" the earth to the point that it's uninhabitable, I find it insane and ironic that the biggest stumbling block to a plan to help us survive has to do with abortion rights. And we're talking at the moment about encumbrance by members of the more liberal of the two major political parties.

If abortion can't be accommodated in any way, how about we provide an outright bonus to those getting vasectomies? That would be more efficient anyway and would not involve the insanity of arguments on the abortion issue. It also would eliminate much of the damage done to society by no-good, hit-and-run fathers.



|
|
Reply
|
11:01 am, Mar 21, 2010

HollyK64

camfield This plan has nothing to do with your survival. Do you really think you'll get the kind of medical attention that translates into a healthy life? Do you really think you'll get it for free? As taxes on everything go up on everything you do, you'll end up paying more for your free coverage then you would have if you bought one of the existing insurance policies.

|
12:58 pm, Mar 21, 2010

melpol

If abortion can't be accommodated in any way, how about we provide an outright bonus to those getting vasectomies?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
YES!!! It should be the number one program of the UN.


|
1:34 pm, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

melpol, the average cost for a vasectomy is $200. -- $600. I am all for paying for the procedure but forget the monetary bonus from taxpayers.

|
4:24 pm, Mar 21, 2010

kitkat

Well, sounds more and more like China. I'm all for birth control- but when will it become mandatory? Should it be mandatory for those who continue to have children without a job and who live on taxpayer benefits? Where do you draw the line in the sand? Ethical delimas to face..

|
1:01 pm, Mar 23, 2010

heaveho

Tiger01, you sound like a moron. have you even been following this closely enough to comment. Its people like you, who think they're in the loop who kill it for everyone else. Here's to you becoming very ill and then trying to find the time to realize this bill contains many things that would most likely keep you covered with health insurance. You sound like a clueless child with this comment. Post something of value & substance. I suppose you're repubtard?

|
|
Reply
|
11:21 am, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

heaveho=- tiger01 can post and say whatever he wants ,with your childish comment you sound like a dimtard..

|
11:43 am, Mar 21, 2010

Hippievet

I don't know the process or even if it's viable but I think Idaho, Texas, Alabama, South Carolina and all the other states with convincing majorities of constituents that hate the federal government and elect government hating politicians... SHOULD secede.

The more moderate and progressive citizens in those states would have to decide whether they want to remain in the Republic of Texas, or the Commonwealth of the KKK, or move to one of the remaining United States of America.

Don't you wing nuts understand that most of the poorest districts in America are red states and are presently represented by pious, hypocritical politicians making a fortune off your ignorance? Can you not see you're being duped?

Can you formulate an answer without spewing Rush or Glen's venom? Have you ever had an original thought? Do you all correspond with each other and decide who will go berserk on TBD today? Who will do the phishing? Or is it all off the cuff stuff? Whoever gets there first gets to be the ignorant, racist, republican apologist of the day.

You must realize that a rational conversation always elicits facts that disprove your fear-mongering BS, so rational conversation is replaced with screaming, adolescent name calling and spewing republican talking points, ad nauseam.

If you are attempting to persuade someone here to join your position, your political persuasion or your philosophy would you not attempt to be concise, accurate and agreeable?

Just a thought. I don't want you to think I'm advising you.

|
|
Reply
|
12:38 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Johnnyappleseed

Hippievet, your second paragraph says it all, they may be the poorest in terms of money and goods provided by mama government, but richer in life with core values, trust in God, love of country and a dependency on government to feed them, we are satisfied not to be like those in New york, Boston, Detroit, Los Angeles, Chicago with crime, corruption, and no sense of person.
Good point, I'm glad you made it.

|
2:17 pm, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

hippivet ,who are you speaking to? If it is me,you do not know what you are talking about,as for me I am an embarrassed democrat that is ashamed of what the party has become .

|
6:55 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Chicago48

I agree. If those states don't like being part of the U.S. -- GET OUT!

|
8:02 pm, Mar 21, 2010

bamabellablue

Did you forget what happened the last time states tried to secede from the Union? Around the 1860s? Or were those years of total war not in your history book?

|
2:38 am, Mar 22, 2010

rmharris126

Johnnyappleseed, You and the rest of your comrads are out of touch with reality. I am from the south, born in Alabama, raised in Mississipp and the one thing that i can say is that the south is full of Godless hippocrates who portray themselves as more patriotic and God-fearing than the rest of the country when in reality, they are just as, if not, more sinful, more Godless and dissobedient than
Alabama, Mississippi, Tenn. Kentucky...majority of the southern states are some of the poorest in the country. People are suffering down here....AND YOU ALL KNOW IT.....so stop with the negativity and the "Obama" bashing and let us all, as Americans, whether you be a Republican, Dems, Southerners, Northerners or whatever you like to call yourself. lets work together and fix this broken system. If you guys know anything about God, then you would know that He is not pleased with all trash talking. Let us all pray for lour country and our president. This is not an easy job or position for anyone to be in so lets pray for our leaders instead of being ready to throw them to the wolves.

|
12:31 pm, Mar 23, 2010

DicedPeas

If you had two brain cells to rub together and could think, you might be able to give us a list of the problems and shortcomings of this bill. But since you don't really understand any of it, and you are obedient to the masters you allow to think for you, all you can come up with is an overabundance of ha ha ha's and the term libtard.

You are soooo proud of yourself aren't you? You nailed them 'cause there is no comeback to ha ha ha, right? Yup, you sure showed them.

Since you are not capable of educating yourself to the pros and cons of the reform bill, you should stop posting drivel and return to whatever mindless tasks you are capable of.

|
|
Reply
2:14 pm, Mar 21, 2010

MYMILLIONSITE

THIS IS A PETITION TO THE UNITED STATED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
FOR A INDIVIDUAL OPT OUT REQUEST FOR HEALTH CARE
We The Undersigned Wish To Convey By Their Signatures Below That They Wish To Have The Same Rights Under The Current Health Care Legislation. That Allows The Individual States That If This Would Place An Economic Burden On That State They Have The Option To Opt Out Of This Mandate.
Currently Over 35 Of The 50 States Have Or Will File A Legal Action Against Washington To Claim This Is An Unconstitutional Bill.
If The States Are At 35 against and 15 Not Yet Heard From, It Would Seem That
"We The People" Are More That 51% Against This Health Care Bill.
THIS WOULD BE A CLEAR STATEMENT THAT IF AN UP OR DOWN VOTE WAS HELD TODAY BY THE GENERAL POPULATION OF REGISTERED AMERICAN VOTERS THIS BILL WOULD NOT EVEN SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY AND ANY LEGAL ACTION FILED BY THE INDIVUDAL STATES WOULD NOT EVEN BE REQUIRED.
IF THIS BILL WOULD Place A ADDITIONAL ECONOMIC BURDEN ON THE STATE,
If Would Seem Logical That It Should Also Be AVAILABLE TO THE INDIVIDUAL PERSON AS WELL.
We the Undersigned Wish To Opt Out Of The Average
$12,000.00 Per Year Price Tag
The Current System We Have In Place by Law Already Mandates That Any Hospital Cannot Refuse Medical Treatment to Anyone That Is In Need Currently Any One Who Asks For Help Will Receive It
This Bill Will Be Imposed By A Federal Mandate On Each Man, Woman, Child, And Even Unborn Children That Live In This The United States If This Bill Passes.
That This Mandate Is Actually an Unconstitutional Bill in Many Ways
The Federal Government Does Not Have the Right to Mandate that it's Citizens Will Have to Purchase a Product Such As Health Insurance Policy.
To Mandate That An Unborn Child Will Have To Purchase This As Well Is The Same Taxation Without Representation.
We As Citizens Are Now Already Over Taxed the Federal Government It Takes the First 4 Months of Our Income
The States Take Another Two Months Of Our Income.
If You Live You Pay Sales Tax on All Purchase's And Even More On Other Taxes Such As Property Taxes, City Taxes, Cigarettes, Alcohol, Death Taxes, And Soon Even A Carbon Tax On Breathing.
At The Present Time With All Of The Visible Taxes And The Taxes That Are Hidden In Every Item That Is Purchased We Are Taxed At If Not More Than 50% Of Our Income's An Additional $1000.00 Per Month $12,000.00 For A Federal Health Care Product That Once Implemented Will Only Cover 60% Of Medical Expenses After An Already High Deductable This Will Place A Large Burden On Any If Not All United States Citizen's.
WE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST TO OPT OUT OF THE CURRENT HEALTH CARE BILL
PLEASE COPY THIS AND EMAIL TO ALL OF YOUR CONTACTS THEN ON SUNDAY SEND THIS TO
THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE AT: http://www.speaker.gov/contact
THE SENATE ADDRESS PAGE IS AT: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
AND THE WHITEHOUSE AT http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
HTTP://MYMILLIONSITE.COM

|
|
Reply
|
2:22 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

Is this michael levinson again?

BTW - you don't need to press enter after every sentence. It leads to a bizarre looking statement. Generally after every paragraph. No big deal, but those interested in reading your long posts would enjoy it more if there were paragraphs instead of every sentence being treated as one.

|
12:46 pm, Mar 22, 2010

judyjetson

Ever thought that the Preamble to the Constitution that you love also says that the government should "provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty"? Sounds like HEALTH CARE to me. I'm more likely to die of a heart attack than a terrorist attack. Or I may die from a gun shot wound sense you second amendment afficionados are so set on making the world a "safer" place.

Whoa... the second amendment sort of mandates health care as I see it!

|
6:31 pm, Mar 22, 2010

NinjaSauce

When Rush Limbaugh leave the country...where would you guys be getting your talking points from?

|
|
Reply
|
2:24 pm, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

ninja-you need to get off the sauce.

|
6:57 pm, Mar 21, 2010

xlntcat

Do you know if Rush needs any help packing?

|
3:04 am, Mar 22, 2010

robertell

Dear Repubs....how come you have so few seats in the senate and house?

The People have spoken........You LOSE!

|
|
Reply
2:51 pm, Mar 21, 2010

xlntcat

Healthcare remains high? What universe are you living in? We now have the second highest infant mortality rate among industrialized nations and twice as many women die from complication of pregnancy and delivery as did 20 years ago. We are nineteenth in preventable deaths due to physician error, medication error, and antibiotic resistant bacterial infections. Being confined to a U S hospital is a leading cause of death and if you have been in a U S hospital within the past five years you will have to pay higher life insurance rates. That is high quality!

|
|
Reply
3:00 am, Mar 22, 2010

Term Limits

why did leave out the about Medicare Advantage!!!!
This is a big deal to people who have this insurance plan.

"if you like the plan you have you can keep it" Obama

|
|
Reply
1:30 am, Mar 23, 2010

anghiari

hahahahahaha....forget about what is in this bill...show of hands of all those who have great healthcare insurance, who can spout a list of their benefits and deductibles...can't do it can ya?:)) I know nobody who knows how to read their policy and walk away with a clear understanding of what it says. And these are people who have had the same insurance for years....

|
|
Reply
2:20 pm, Mar 23, 2010

HollyK64

All this time and this is their big idea? Force people to buy insurance (that's unconstitutional) and tax those who make over two hundred thousand. In other words tax the middle class and offer more people government run health care which sounds to me a whole lot more damaging to your health than smoking a carton of cigarettes a day. That's the best they could come up with? And they call themselves smart?

|
|
Reply
|
9:53 pm, Mar 20, 2010

FarLeftFist

People that make over 250k represent only 2% of the nation, I would hardly call that 'the middle class'. But then again judging from all of your posts I would hardly call you intelligent.

|
|
Reply
|
12:41 am, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

FLF-you of all people should not say anything about some ones intelligent posts.

|
10:54 am, Mar 21, 2010

HollyK64

farleftFist

It depends where you live. In certain cities in this country 200 hundred thousand a year for a single person, 250 for a couple (family) is most definitely middle class.

|
12:16 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Johnnyappleseed

fisty, you full of it again, 200K is where even the smallest business gross income lies, you see there are approximately 25 million small business folks in the USA, which are sole proprieters, sub-chapter S corporations that this will affect, so when these clowns in the Democratic party wrote this piece of trash called health care reform, it was designed to get the producers of jobs, taxes and goods in this country to pay for this bill, they may have killed the goose that lays the golden egg, sad for America, and tough on those that really support the American economy.
So get a job, and find out how things really operate on ground level.

|
2:27 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

appleseed - please state a source for the taxation of small businesses that make over $250,000. From what I read it was a tax on individuals making over $250,000.

|
3:35 pm, Mar 21, 2010

JTS1021

Holly, are you serious? "Middle class" doesn't change based on location. If you make the least money in the $5 million per unit luxury complex you own in the Hamptons, that doesn't make you lower class.

Middle class is roughly $45,000 PER HOUSEHOLD. For an individual, it's around $35,000. Meaning you could put FIVE middle class families together and they still wouldn't have to pay this increase in taxes.

But I love how you keep going around saying "OBAMA HATES THE MIDDLE CLASS".

If you have to be so pathetically dishonest and use numbers so laughably wrong, how can anyone take your entire HCR BS seriously? But by all means, continue. I'm sure there's someone out there stupid enough to believe your lies and that's all that counts right?

|
9:03 pm, Mar 21, 2010

CheckerboardStrangler

$250K middle class, that's a knee slapper.
Could you at least modify the fuzzy math if you're going to be a paid shill, it's rather insulting to our intelligence and you should be mightily embarrassed now that everyone knows which bubble you live in.
HINT: It's somewhere near the top of the elite pyramid of concentrated wealth, as the real middle class is $120K and below, $70K being the bottom rung.
Anything lower than approx. $40K for a family of four is bordering on lower middle class or poverty level, because college tuition is impossible at that wage, and FORGET decent health care, which runs almost $20K for the family, if you're thinking of having real actual USEABLE health care and not on paper only.

$250K annually means your "middle class" home likely exceeds five thousand square feet, your car payment is in excess of $600 a month, and your kids are attending a Big Ten or Ivy League university or equivalent, you belong to a country club, your gym membership exceeds the annual salary of the guy that does your landscaping, and you don't flinch at the thought of picking up season tickets for the NFL team of your choice.
And YOUR health insurance is GOLD PLATED.
Heart transplant? No problem! (except that you don't have one to begin with)
If that's middle class, all I can say to you is, "on which planet do you spend the majority of your time?"

|
|
Reply
|
1:17 am, Mar 21, 2010

miajoon

A bubble? You are wrong on almost every front. I make more than $250k and have for years, as a small business man. My house is larger than 5000 sf, but it has no mortgage. I have no car payments- on my Ford, my Dodge, and my VW. My kids will go to State schools when they finish public high school. Never joined a country club and dont play golf. No gym, no season tickets- they are too expensive. I do all of my own yard work. My health insurance is basic, with a $5000 deductable. No heart? Only an idiot would judge an entire class of people with such a comment. Who do you think funds most of the charities in America- poor people? My father was a small cotton farmer with a 7th grade education. I have been able to go to college (public) and build a successful business, chasing the American dream. I have to work 7 days a week, but I have made that choice. I dont live in a bubble. You live in a bubble- or pure ignorance

|
7:46 am, Mar 21, 2010

stephschiff

While we're just at the high end of middle class, I still thought I should respond. Not everyone that makes a bit more than average throws their money away or is "evil." Some of us live well below our means (especially those of us that were raised blue collar) and use that extra money to provide a better education for our children, help our parents and extended family, and put money away so we won't be a burden on our children or society later. We're also very generous with those less fortunate.

When you've worked hard to get where you are and don't waste money having to have the biggest house you can afford or brand new cars (stupid waste of money with the depreciation when you drive off of the lot), or throw money away on country club memberships, it's a whole different story. Granted I don't know many people that live like we do, but that's probably because we still live in our blue collar neighborhood and mostly spend our time with family and friends we've known since childhood.

I'm tired of people demonizing those whose who have made some smart choices and worked hard to get where we are. We don't get those big corporate bonuses, we don't have anything handed to us, and some of us vote to help those that are less fortunate.

|
10:42 am, Mar 21, 2010

CheckerboardStrangler

Stephschiff, sometimes it's not about smart choices.
Sometimes it's about choices being made for you without your knowledge or consent. What most in opposition do not realize is that most of them are ticking health insurance time bombs waiting to go off.
You can squirrel away a hundred thousand or even more in your excellent practice of thrift and common sense and still see it all go "POOF!" in the space of a month if a catastrophic illness befalls you or a member of your family and your health insurance decides that they will deny you.
There is no way to describe this sort of helplessness except to remind you that all the things you say have been expressed by millions like yourself, except in PAST TENSE:
"We did everything right, we lived well below our means, we put money away so we wouldn't be a burden, we were generous with those less fortunate, we worked hard to get where we were at, we didn't buy the biggest house or the fancy cars or country club memberships, and suddenly all of it was GONE."

|
11:23 am, Mar 21, 2010

ittybittykitty

To stephschiff. Thanks for your post. Not everyone who makes a comfortable living is evil. I might point out though, that it is not just smart planning that separates those who have more from those who have less, but circumstances and luck play a huge part too. I know people who have done all of the "correct" planning who are struggling right now.

|
11:35 am, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

ittybitty, What is wrong with struggling?

|
4:28 pm, Mar 21, 2010

xlntcat

The other thing is that taxes are assessed on net income not gross income and if you have a net income of $250,000 you are in the top 5% of the nation and are making considerably more than $250,000. Warren Buffet stated that he pays about 17% on bilions. Under duress, Cindy McCain finally release her 2007 income tax return and she paid less than 5% on 4 million dollars. Any large corporation who didn't pay far less percentage wise than the average median income family would fire their accountants. Teabagger don't pay taxes on their government checks.

|
3:10 am, Mar 22, 2010

heaveho

Wow, in your world the middle class make over $200,000/year -- where do you live? Its glaringly inaccurate comments like this can get you elected to public office in America. ARE YOU SERIOUS OR CLUELESS, OR BOTH?

|
|
Reply
|
11:25 am, Mar 21, 2010

HollyK64

Move to New York City and see what two hundred thousand a year gets you and your children. It doesn't get you a fancy life. Already the taxes on 200 are astronomical. So when you subtract all of that , plus state taxes etc. it's not a lot to live on if you want to live in a safe neighborhood.

|
12:21 pm, Mar 21, 2010

TheSimulacra

HollyK64 - That's a laugh. $200k/year is more than enough to live in Manhattan comfortably. If it isn't, then you're doing it wrong. And if you're paying more than 20% in taxes, fire your accountant.

|
1:10 am, Mar 24, 2010

ittybittykitty

Do you drive? Are you not "forced" to buy car insurance if you do? Are you unhappy that other drivers out there are "forced" to buy car insurance? If you want to eliminate not insuring those with pre-existing conditions, then you have to insure everyone. If you didn't require everyone to be insured, then people would just wait to until they were ill and needed insurance before they bought it. This is a complicated issue and should have been addressed years ago. I'm sure this bill isn't perfect, but at least it is a first step.

|
|
Reply
|
11:28 am, Mar 21, 2010

HollyK64

ittybittykitty

I understand the concept behind forcing everyone to but insurance but I still think it's unconstitutional. I also think this idea that so many on this blog have which is that people who work hard to have a good job and make a decent living owe everyone else a piece of their wages. Sorry but communism and socialism are not "isms" I believe in.

|
12:24 pm, Mar 21, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
2:06 pm, Mar 21, 2010

liberatorquest

Itsybitsyspider, good points, and if not now , when? If not them , who? They will never have this kind of majority ever again, hopefully it will be a good thing for Americans, I really hope it is, in fact I pray it is, but somehow it's probably just another huge overblown and ineffective piece of legislation, which is basically the only kind they can spit out in Washington!!!

|
3:10 pm, Mar 21, 2010

oolalach

I hope this "reasoning" of relating mandatory auto insurance to forcing individuals to purchase health insurance never comes up again. The reason you are required to provide auto insurance is because you have the potential to physically harm another motorist with your own actions. if this occurs, you are then resposible for ensuring that those that you have inflicted damages upon are compensated. I don't hear this "defense" often, but when I do I just roll my eyes....

|
12:26 pm, Mar 23, 2010

ittybittykitty

Also, since when are people who make over $200,000 a year middle class? That is almost 5 times what I make.

|
|
Reply
|
11:30 am, Mar 21, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
8:22 pm, Mar 23, 2010

superdad

The down fall of our country brought to you by the Democrats.

|
|
Reply
|
10:05 pm, Mar 20, 2010

marvbehar@aol.com

where have you been for the last 9 years, on another planet? If I hear one more blast from the rightous right about communism or socialism, I'll know their brains are empty, go look in your closet, it's full of communist made goods, awe, you speaketh with quad forked tongue, we owe China one and one half trillion dollars because of the Bush league years, we gave our industrial base to all the third world countries, that's why we are broke, I'll bet you are a Wall mart Shopper

|
|
Reply
|
11:19 pm, Mar 20, 2010

isabella

Where have YOU been for the last 30 years marvbehar? I know libtards blame Bush when their toilets don't flush, but American jobs have been shipped overseas for decades and failed presidents Carter and Clinton shipped their share.

|
10:01 pm, Mar 21, 2010

S-von-K

no superdud,

not the downfall of our country, but instead it's liberation!

GoNancy!

|
|
Reply
|
11:30 pm, Mar 20, 2010

HollyK64

S-von-K

Liberation? Liberation from what? You are a slave to the system. More so now than ever before. The Dems treat you like a trained seal, tossing you something to eat now and then and watching you behave the way they've taught you. How do you have a shred of self-esteem?

|
12:25 pm, Mar 21, 2010

piktor

HollyK64: "How do you have a shred of self-esteem? "

Saying NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO sure does show esteem for... what, exactly?

How does persistent naysaying bring progress?

|
2:30 pm, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

The United States as many of us older folks knew it is dead. If you are young you have no clue what that means. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

|
4:35 pm, Mar 21, 2010

FarLeftFist

Oh no that happened under a man named Reagan.

|
|
Reply
|
12:41 am, Mar 21, 2010

AlanD2

Don't forget to give George W. Bush a lot of credit too, FarLeftFist.

And (shudder) Dick Cheney.

|
1:24 am, Mar 21, 2010

pennsykid2000

Reagan did make huge deficits OK. Just ask Dick Cheney. But, I'd have to give the title of "father of the nation's downfall" to W. No one damaged more aspects of the country so thoroughly as George W, from the federal deficit, to straining the military, to miring us in Iraq, to alienating our allies, to ignoring the consequences of lax regulation and of cronies in powerful positions (Heckuva job, Brownie. You, too, W).

|
12:39 pm, Mar 21, 2010

ChanRobt

It combines the horror and fascination of witnessing an ocean liner torpedoed and sinking.

The mordant spectacle unfolds with the House of Represenatives standing on the abyss, the Democrats compelling an entire nation to join them in their suicide pact.

It is Jim Jones writ large.

|
|
Reply
|
10:37 pm, Mar 20, 2010

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
11:10 pm, Mar 20, 2010

marvbehar@aol.com

The suicide pack was created by the Repubs when we sold our industrial base down the river to china and all the other 3rd world countries, and the right wing indebted us by a war that was not justified, you put us in debt more then 9 trillion before the Dems got in. Go look in your closet and tell me who made all your close, yep communists

|
|
Reply
|
11:23 pm, Mar 20, 2010

isabella

You misrepresent the facts. Between 1992 and 1997 of the Clinton Administration, the Defense industry alone laid off 795,000 workers. Democrats also shipped American jobs overseas.

|
10:11 pm, Mar 21, 2010

FarLeftFist

Whoa, lay off the conspiracy sites for a while, it's only healthcare, calm down.

|
|
Reply
12:43 am, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

It's amazing these guys can't even admit ONE good point about the bill. I can't believe in the humanity of people who actually oppose the reforms that make it illegal for insurance companies to refuse people for pre-existing conditions. That alone is HUGE.

|
|
Reply
|
8:41 am, Mar 21, 2010

HollyK64

Cymatic Obama has used basic manipulation techniques to get you to fall into line. By demonizing the insurance companies he's gotten you to think that he's the good guy come to save you. You seem to have some idealized version of people with pre-existing conditions getting lots of TLC by a skilled staff of medical experts. This is what you'll get instead... a long wait to see mediocre doctors and the equivalent of russian roulette when it comes to the treatment they offer. You would have been better off going to an emergency room. .

|
12:33 pm, Mar 21, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
2:11 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

Actually Holly - I currently live in a country where 100% of the people are covered - preexisting conditions or not. It's Taiwan, and they actually take care of everyone, and they aren't Socialist at all. Before I lived in Canada, where the idea of people being bankrupted and not being able to get treatment because of a preexisting condition seems downright barbaric. So excuse me, I think you are the one who is naive. You seem to think it beyond the means of America to achieve something that is so incredibly BASIC that every other industrialized nation has figured it out. Every Canadian and Taiwanese person I've ever talked to thinks it is heartless and totally insane to deny medical coverage to the sick.

|
3:43 pm, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

Cymatic, since you don`t even live in the US , what right do you think you have to be pushing your agenda down our throats?

|
4:38 pm, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats, Republicans, EVERYONE!!



To President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature, It is now official you are ALL corrupt morons:



The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 234 years to get it right and it is broke.


Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 74 years to get it right and it is broke.



Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 71 years to get it right and it is broke.


War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 45 years to get it right; $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the poor" and they only want more.



Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 44 years to get it right and they are broke.


Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 39 years to get it right and it is broke.



The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil.


It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we import more oil


Than ever before. You had 32 years to get it right and it is an abysmal failure.



You have FAILED in every "government service" you have shoved down our throats while overspending our tax dollars AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM???

|
10:39 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

iamone - I have hundreds of close relatives living in America. I care a lot about their health and welfare.

And since when is offering an opinion the same as shoving something down people's throats?! How about just once, just once - you actually respond to the content of posts.

|
12:49 pm, Mar 22, 2010

THINKNIUM

iamone3, he has the right exactly !, because he has actual life experience comparisons, not ill-info from right wingnut medias. Those words "down our throats" came from rightwing whacko medias over and over again, I'm glad you repeated their words though, shows what your are. The moron you are speaking of, is yourself. I don't see how what Cymatic posted can be an agenda.

|
8:40 pm, Mar 23, 2010

CommonSensePleeze

President Obama's

"OFF the CUFF" Speech to House Dems
it was not prewritten it was off the cuff and amazing

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Everybody, please have a set.

To Leader Reid, to Steny Hoyer, John Larson, Xavier Becerra, Jim Clyburn, Chris Van Hollen, to an extraordinary leader and extraordinary Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, and to all the members here today, thank you very much for having me. (Applause.) Thanks for having me and thanks for your tireless efforts waged on behalf of health insurance reform in this country.

I have the great pleasure of having a really nice library at the White House. And I was tooling through some of the writings of some previous Presidents and I came upon this quote by Abraham Lincoln: "I am not bound to win, but I'm bound to be true. I'm not bound to succeed, but I'm bound to live up to what light I have."

This debate has been a difficult debate. This process has been a difficult process. And this year has been a difficult year for the American people. When I was sworn in, we were in the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression. Eight hundred thousand people per month were losing their jobs. Millions of people were losing their health insurance. And the financial system was on the verge of collapse.

And this body has taken on some of the toughest votes and some of the toughest decisions in the history of Congress. Not because you were bound to win, but because you were bound to be true. Because each and every one of you made a decision that at a moment of such urgency, it was less important to measure what the polls said than to measure what was right.

A year later, we're in different circumstances. Because of the actions that you've taken, the financial system has stabilized. The stock market has stabilized. Businesses are starting to invest again. The economy, instead of contracting, is now growing again. There are signs that people are going to start hiring again. There's still tremendous hardship all across the country, but there is a sense that we are making progress -- because of you.

But even before this crisis, each and every one of us knew that there were millions of people across America who were living their own quiet crises. Maybe because they had a child who had a preexisting condition and no matter how desperate they were, no matter what insurance company they called, they couldn't get coverage for that child. Maybe it was somebody who had been forced into early retirement, in their 50s not yet eligible for Medicare, and they couldn't find a job and they couldn't find health insurance, despite the fact that they had some sort of chronic condition that had to be tended to.

Every single one of you at some point before you arrived in Congress and after you arrived in Congress have met constituents with heart-breaking stories. And you've looked them in the eye and you've said, we're going to do something about it -- that's why I want to go to Congress.

And now, we're on the threshold of doing something about it. We're a day away. After a year of debate, after every argument has been made, by just about everybody, we're 24 hours away.

As some of you know, I'm not somebody who spends a lot of time surfing the cable channels, but I'm not completely in the bubble. I have a sense of what the coverage has been, and mostly it's an obsession with "What will this mean for the Democratic Party? What will this mean for the President's polls? How will this play out in November? Is this good or is this bad for the Democratic majority? What does it mean for those swing districts?"

And I noticed that there's been a lot of friendly advice offered all across town. (Laughter.) Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Karl Rove -- they're all warning you of the horrendous impact if you support this legislation. Now, it could be that they are suddenly having a change of heart and they are deeply concerned about their Democratic friends. (Laughter.) They are giving you the best possible advice in order to assure that Nancy Pelosi remains Speaker and Harry Reid remains Leader and that all of you keep your seats. That's a possibility. (Laughter.)

But it may also be possible that they realize after health reform passes and I sign that legislation into law, that it's going to be a little harder to mischaracterize what this effort has been all about.

Because this year, small businesses will start getting tax credits so that they can offer health insurance to employees who currently don't have it. (Applause.) Because this year, those same parents who are worried about getting coverage for their children with preexisting conditions now are assured that insurance companies have to give them coverage -- this year. (Applause.)

Because this year, insurance companies won't suddenly be able to drop your coverage when you get sick -- (applause) -- or impose lifetime limits or restrictive limits on the coverage that you have. Maybe they know that this year, for the first time, young people will be able to stay on their parents' health insurance until they're 26 years old and they're thinking that just might be popular all across the country. (Applause.)

And what they also know is what won't happen. They know that after this legislation passes and after I sign this bill, lo and behold nobody is pulling the plug on Granny. (Laughter.) It turns out that in fact people who like their health insurance are going to be able to keep their health insurance; that there's no government takeover. People will discover that if they like their doctor, they'll be keeping their doctor. In fact, they're more likely to keep their doctor because of a stronger system.

It'll turn out that this piece of historic legislation is built on the private insurance system that we have now and runs straight down the center of American political thought. It turns out this is a bill that tracks the recommendations not just of Democrat Tom Daschle, but also Republicans Bob Dole and Howard Baker; that this is a middle-of-the-road bill that is designed to help the American people in an area of their lives where they urgently need help.

Now, there are some who wanted a single-payer government-run system. That's not this bill. The Republicans wanted what I called the "foxes guard the henhouse approach" in which we further deregulate the insurance companies and let them run wild, the notion being somehow that that was going to lower costs for the American people. I don't know a serious health care economist who buys that idea, but that was their concept. And we rejected that, because what we said was we want to create a system in which health care is working not for insurance companies but it's working for the American people, it's working for middle class families.

So what did we do? What is the essence of this legislation? Number one, this is the toughest insurance reforms in history. (Applause.) We are making sure that the system of private insurance works for ordinary families. A prescription -- this is a patient's bill of rights on steroids. So many of you individually have worked on these insurance reforms -- they are in this package -- to make sure that families are getting a fair deal; that if they're paying a premium, that they're getting a good service in return; making sure that employers, if they are paying premiums for their employees, that their employees are getting the coverage that they expect; that insurance companies are not going to game the system with fine print and rescissions and dropping people when they need it most, but instead are going to have to abide by some basic rules of the road that exemplify a sense of fairness and good value. That's number one.

The second thing this does is it creates a pool, a marketplace, where individuals and small businesses, who right now are having a terrible time out there getting health insurance, are going to be able to purchase health insurance as part of a big group -- just like federal employees, just like members of Congress. They are now going to be part of a pool that can negotiate for better rates, better quality, more competition.

And that's why the Congressional Budget Office says this will lower people's rates for comparable plans by 14 to 20 percent. That's not my numbers -- that's the Congressional Budget Office's numbers. So that people will have choice and competition just like members of Congress have choice and competition.

Number three, if people still can't afford it we're going to provide them some tax credits -- the biggest tax cut for small businesses and working families when it comes to health care in history. (Applause.)

And number four, this is the biggest reduction in our deficit since the Budget Balance Act -- one of the biggest deficit reduction measures in history -- over $1.3 trillion that will help put us on the path of fiscal responsibility. (Applause.)

And that's before we count all the game-changing measures that are going to assure, for example, that instead of having five tests when you go to the doctor you just get one; that the delivery system is working for patients, not just working for billings. And everybody who's looked at it says that every single good idea to bend the cost curve and start actually reducing health care costs are in this bill.

So that's what this effort is all about. Toughest insurance reforms in history. A marketplace so people have choice and competition who right now don't have it and are seeing their premiums go up 20, 30, 40, 50 percent. Reductions in the cost of health care for millions of American families, including those who have health insurance. The Business Roundtable did their own study and said that this would potentially save employers $3,000 per employee on their health care because of the measures in this legislation.

And by the way, not only does it reduce the deficit -- we pay for it responsibly in ways that the other side of the aisle that talks a lot about fiscal responsibility but doesn't seem to be able to walk the walk can't claim when it comes to their prescription drug bill. We are actually doing it. (Applause.) This is paid for and will not add a dime to the deficit -- it will reduce the deficit. (Applause.)

Now, is this bill perfect? Of course not. Will this solve every single problem in our health care system right away? No. There are all kinds of ideas that many of you have that aren't included in this legislation. I know that there has been discussion, for example, of how we're going to deal with regional disparities and I know that there was a meeting with Secretary Sebelius to assure that we can continue to try to make sure that we've got a system that gives people the best bang for their buck. (Applause.)

So this is not -- there are all kinds of things that many of you would like to see that isn't in this legislation. There are some things I'd like to see that's not in this legislation. But is this the single most important step that we have taken on health care since Medicare? Absolutely. Is this the most important piece of domestic legislation in terms of giving a break to hardworking middle class families out there since Medicare? Absolutely. Is this a vast improvement over the status quo? Absolutely.

Now, I still know this is a tough vote, though. I know this is a tough vote. I've talked to many of you individually. And I have to say that if you honestly believe in your heart of hearts, in your conscience, that this is not an improvement over the status quo; if despite all the information that's out there that says that without serious reform efforts like this one people's premiums are going to double over the next five or 10 years, that folks are going to keep on getting letters from their insurance companies saying that their premium just went up 40 or 50 percent; if you think that somehow it's okay that we have millions of hardworking Americans who can't get health care and that it's all right, it's acceptable, in the wealthiest nation on Earth that there are children with chronic illnesses that can't get the care that they need -- if you think that the system is working for ordinary Americans rather than the insurance companies, then you should vote no on this bill. If you can honestly say that, then you shouldn't support it. You're here to represent your constituencies and if you think your constituencies honestly wouldn't be helped, you shouldn't vote for this.

But if you agree that the system is not working for ordinary families, if you've heard the same stories that I've heard everywhere, all across the country, then help us fix this system. Don't do it for me. Don't do it for Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid. Do it for all those people out there who are struggling.

Some of you know I get 10 letters a day that I read out of the 40,000 that we receive. Started reading some of the ones that I got this morning. "Dear President Obama, my daughter, a wonderful person, lost her job. She has no health insurance. She had a blood clot in her brain. She's now disabled, can't get care." "Dear President Obama, I don't yet qualify for Medicare. COBRA is about to run out. I am desperate, don't know what to do."

Do it for them. Do it for people who are really scared right now through no fault of their own, who've played by the rules, who've done all the right things, and have suddenly found out that because of an accident, because of an ailment, they're about to lose their house; or they can't provide the help to their kids that they need; or they're a small business who up until now has always taken pride in providing care for their workers and it turns out that they just can't afford to do it anymore and they've having to make a decision about do I keep providing health insurance for my workers or do I just drop their coverage or do I not hire some people because I simply can't afford it -- it's all being gobbled up by the insurance companies.

Don't do it for me. Don't do it for the Democratic Party. Do it for the American people. They're the ones who are looking for action right now. (Applause.)

I know this is a tough vote. And I am actually confident -- I've talked to some of you individually -- that it will end up being the smart thing to do politically because I believe that good policy is good politics. (Applause.) I am convinced that when you go out there and you are standing tall and you are saying I believe that this is the right thing to do for my constituents and the right thing to do for America, that ultimately the truth will out.

I had a wonderful conversation with Betsy Markey. I don't know if Betsy is around here. There she is right there. (Applause.) Betsy is in a tough district. The biggest newspaper is somewhat conservative, as Betsy described. They weren't real happy with health care reform. They were opposed to it. Betsy, despite the pressure, announced that she was in favor of this bill. And lo and behold, the next day that same newspaper runs an editorial saying, you know what, we've considered this, we've looked at the legislation, and we actually are pleased that Congresswoman Markey is supporting the legislation. (Applause.)

When I see John Boccieri stand up proud with a whole bunch of his constituencies -- (applause) -- in as tough a district as there is and stand up with a bunch of folks from his district with preexisting conditions and saying, you know, I don't know what is going on Washington but I know what's going on with these families -- I look at him with pride.

Now, I can't guarantee that this is good politics. Every one of you know your districts better than I do. You talk to folks. You're under enormous pressure. You're getting robocalls. You're getting e-mails that are tying up the communications system. I know the pressure you're under. I get a few comments made about me. I don't know if you've noticed. (Laughter.) I've been in your shoes. I know what it's like to take a tough vote.

But what did Lincoln say? "I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true." Two generations ago, folks who were sitting in your position, they made a decision -- we are going to make sure that seniors and the poor have health care coverage that they can count on. And they did the right thing.

And I'm sure at the time they were making that vote, they weren't sure how the politics were either, any more than the people who made the decision to make sure that Social Security was in place knew how the politics would play out, or folks who passed the civil rights acts knew how the politics were going to play out. They were not bound to win, but they were bound to be true.

And now we've got middle class Americans, don't have Medicare, don't have Medicaid, watching the employer-based system fray along the edges or being caught in terrible situations. And the question is, are we going to be true to them?

Sometimes I think about how I got involved in politics. I didn't think of myself as a potential politician when I get out of college. I went to work in neighborhoods, working with Catholic churches in poor neighborhoods in Chicago, trying to figure out how people could get a little bit of help. And I was skeptical about politics and politicians, just like a lot of Americans are skeptical about politics and politicians are right now. Because my working assumption was when push comes to shove, all too often folks in elected office, they're looking for themselves and not looking out for the folks who put them there; that there are too many compromises; that the special interests have too much power; they just got too much clout; there's too much big money washing around.

And I decided finally to get involved because I realized if I wasn't willing to step up and be true to the things I believe in, then the system wouldn't change. Every single one of you had that same kind of moment at the beginning of your careers. Maybe it was just listening to stories in your neighborhood about what was happening to people who'd been laid off of work. Maybe it was your own family experience, somebody got sick and didn't have health care and you said something should change.

Something inspired you to get involved, and something inspired you to be a Democrat instead of running as a Republican. Because somewhere deep in your heart you said to yourself, I believe in an America in which we don't just look out for ourselves, that we don't just tell people you're on your own, that we are proud of our individualism, we are proud of our liberty, but we also have a sense of neighborliness and a sense of community -- (applause) -- and we are willing to look out for one another and help people who are vulnerable and help people who are down on their luck and give them a pathway to success and give them a ladder into the middle class. That's why you decided to run. (Applause.)

And now a lot of us have been here a while and everybody here has taken their lumps and their bruises. And it turns out people have had to make compromises, and you've been away from families for a long time and you've missed special events for your kids sometimes. And maybe there have been times where you asked yourself, why did I ever get involved in politics in the first place? And maybe things can't change after all. And when you do something courageous, it turns out sometimes you may be attacked. And sometimes the very people you thought you were trying to help may be angry at you and shout at you. And you say to yourself, maybe that thing that I started with has been lost.

But you know what? Every once in a while, every once in a while a moment comes where you have a chance to vindicate all those best hopes that you had about yourself, about this country, where you have a chance to make good on those promises that you made in all those town meetings and all those constituency breakfasts and all that traveling through the district, all those people who you looked in the eye and you said, you know what, you're right, the system is not working for you and I'm going to make it a little bit better.

And this is one of those moments. This is one of those times where you can honestly say to yourself, doggone it, this is exactly why I came here. This is why I got into politics. This is why I got into public service. This is why I've made those sacrifices. Because I believe so deeply in this country and I believe so deeply in this democracy and I'm willing to stand up even when it's hard, even when it's tough.

Every single one of you have made that promise not just to your constituents but to yourself. And this is the time to make true on that promise. We are not bound to win, but we are bound to be true. We are not bound to succeed, but we are bound to let whatever light we have shine. We have been debating health care for decades. It has now been debated for a year. It is in your hands. It is time to pass health care reform for America, and I am confident that you are going to do it tomorrow.

Let's get this thing done.

|
|
Reply
|
10:40 pm, Mar 20, 2010

AlanD2

Obama's a great speaker. Thanks for posting this, CommonSensePleeze.

|
|
Reply
|
1:25 am, Mar 21, 2010

yourmama

AlanD2-and that is all he is,a good speaker but onlt when it is written in front of him.

|
10:57 am, Mar 21, 2010

AlanD2

yourmama, for this particular speech, Obama used neither notes nor teleprompter.

He had notes (you can see him put them on the podium), but I never saw him looking down at them during his speech - except when he was reading the Abraham Lincoln quote.

|
11:48 am, Mar 21, 2010

ZTHEZS

He used ateleprompter for this speech. My uncle who is a liberal all the way was there, and he said there was a teleprompter.

|
3:37 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

I agree, it was an amazing speech. And please drop the teleprompter talking point. This is the same guy who destroyed John McCain in the debates, and McCain had a reputation as a great debater.

It's hilarious to hear this point repeated by people who supported Reagan and Bush Jr. Neither of those guys could speak off the cuff at all, or field difficult questions either.

|
3:48 pm, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

obama is a weak president & is destroying this country.

|
4:40 pm, Mar 21, 2010

AlanD2

You're just a poor loser, iamone3.

Cheer up. There are lots of other battles ahead. Get ready to fight against cap-and-trade.

|
7:35 pm, Mar 21, 2010

THINKNIUM

iamone3, just as you righties told liberals during the bush years, "don't like it, move out of the country.

|
8:45 pm, Mar 23, 2010

Johnnyappleseed

The messiah and his pilgrimage to the the Mount, I'm so choked up I can hardly keep from crying, WE ARE SAVED,..... say halleluja!

|
|
Reply
|
2:35 pm, Mar 21, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
8:48 pm, Mar 23, 2010

HollyK64

it is Jim Jones.

|
|
Reply
|
11:21 pm, Mar 20, 2010

Johnnyappleseed

It is Jim Jones, the kool ade is next.

|
|
Reply
|
2:36 pm, Mar 21, 2010

THINKNIUM

Right, go drink some with your tea party nut tea.

|
8:46 pm, Mar 23, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
8:49 pm, Mar 23, 2010

yourmama

THINKNIUM-just like you did with the bribery arm twisting plane riding gutless slug leftwing nuts right?

|
7:51 am, Mar 24, 2010

S-von-K

John Boner has the look of a man who doesn't care about anyone but himself. Michael Steal projects the aura of a con-man who might well be wearing a sign that reads "I'm Corrupt". Sarah Palin is now seen as the money-grabbing "quitter on twitter" whose greed is only matched by her stupidity....and the TeaParty looks like the Clan.........and all of this will add up to victories for the GOP? hahahahahaha ROMNEY is screwed. If he stands with theTeaBaggies he's perceived as a Hypocrite, and if he condemns them he splits the vote........perfect!

SvK

|
|
Reply
|
11:33 pm, Mar 20, 2010

yourmama

S-von-K-nope,that is obama that has the look and is a man who doesn't careabout anyone but himself.And obama might as well be wearing a sign saying "I'm corrupt" and it would be fitting considering he had to buy votes.

|
|
Reply
|
11:02 am, Mar 21, 2010

THINKNIUM

buy votes?, you mean like the bush tax cuts given us back $300 to $600 back from income tax returns, that kind of buying votes?

|
8:49 pm, Mar 23, 2010

yourmama

THINKNIUM-not even close to the corrupt ,cheap underhanded,way these crooks bought votes to pass a bill,and you know it.

|
7:54 am, Mar 24, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
|
8:50 pm, Mar 23, 2010

yourmama

furiouskittens-when you do not get what you are so hoping for with this bill,come back and let us know how awesome obama is.

|
7:57 am, Mar 24, 2010

CheckerboardStrangler

I am NOT endorsing, but I AM predicting that there will be
one of the following tomorrow:

(A) Possible "faked" terror alert.
(B) False flag op.
(C) Tea Bagger violence feat. some sort of "Tea Party Tim McVeigh" character.

Repeat, I am NOT endorsing nor am I calling for the above actions or events, I am simply convinced that the GOP will stop AT NOTHING.
I am wagering that should one or more of the above take place, it will later be learned that there was involvement at top RNC levels, but that the perpetrators will walk scot free.

|
|
Reply
|
1:09 am, Mar 21, 2010

uranus

ok kreskin, see you tomorrow. go ahead and have your apology ready. west of the rockies, you're on the air.

|
|
Reply
1:36 am, Mar 21, 2010

Johnnyappleseed

Looks like you have already had some kool ade.

|
|
Reply
|
2:37 pm, Mar 21, 2010

THINKNIUM

He can't have any, you already drank it all.

|
8:50 pm, Mar 23, 2010

uranus

2.5% of your gross income penalty and still not have coverage? sounds fair. to quote ed bradley, "this is gonna be a blanking disaster." i think he was quoting someone else. whatever.uranus is not happy.

|
|
Reply
1:09 am, Mar 21, 2010

octavio


After 40 years of allowing the crooks in the USA health care industry steal the money from the tax payers.Finally there is
going to be some health care reforms.The crooks in the health
care industry are so corrupted that any change is welcomed.

|
|
Reply
|
2:56 am, Mar 21, 2010

Johnnyappleseed

The corrupt, helping the corrupt, congress and healthcare insurers...We've been had.

|
|
Reply
|
2:38 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

So you are against these reforms - what do you support instead? Single payer? That would have been great, but this is a good start.

|
3:51 pm, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

Pay cash, I know thats a new concept for liberals. You have more bargaining power with cash.

|
4:43 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Veronica L. Sumrall

I wonder if this would really help us in having a better lifestyle.

(http://ringtonesforcellphones.info)

|
|
Reply
6:34 am, Mar 21, 2010

nortonclybourn

How anyone can get hysterical about these modest reforms is beyond me. Oh no, government regulation of insurance! Maybe the fear is that the Federal Government will take over Medicare, Medicaid, TriCare and the Veterans Health Administration?

|
|
Reply
|
8:27 am, Mar 21, 2010

Anthonyn

Hey Norton,
Interesting that you chose to highlight government run programs that A) all cost far more than they were projected to, and B) are essentially bankrupt. Those are the fears that I have about ANY government run program.As this health care reform bill seems to be inevitable,it is time to find out what is in the fine print so that we can react to its provisions.

|
|
Reply
|
10:56 am, Mar 21, 2010

nortonclybourn

They are not "essentially bankrupt." Medicare funding was hijacked by Congress, but the money belongs with Medicare. ALL American healthcare costs way too much, that's why we need reform, before everybody is bankrupt. If only Employers provide insurance, the employers will go bankrupt, as GM did. Then you will have to get private insurance--good luck affording that if you have any medical conditions or are over 40. By the way, Anthonym, who provides YOUR medical insurance?

|
4:23 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Anthonyn

I pay for my own insurance Norton, and always have as I operate my own business. I am 50, it costs me $200. a month, $5000. deductible. And you made my point for me,...congress has a nasty habit of expanding programs beyond their initial intent, making the programs cost more than forecast,or congress takes any surplus out and spends it on another "want."
I agree with you that healthcare costs too much, and that we need reform.I just don't see what this bill does to address those costs.
Since the Government doesn't have the money for the IOU's to SS and medicare the programs are,in my opinion,essentally bankrupt.

|
10:10 pm, Mar 21, 2010

ittybittykitty

I know, it is pretty amazing. People in the rest of the world must think we are a bunch of rubes.

|
|
Reply
|
11:38 am, Mar 21, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
2:16 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

You've obviously never gotten out and talked to people in the rest of the world. They think the entire American medical system is insane. The bills are out of this world and the fact that families are denied coverage because someone is sick seems like some sort of a conspiracy theory to make Americans look heartless. Honestly, I live in Taiwan where everyone is covered and many people don't believe me when I tell them that in America you can lose your house and all of your savings, even if you had bought insurance because a company can decide that they don't want to pay. They can't believe that working people can't get treatment because they have no money. It goes against everything that they have heard about America being such a great country.

|
3:57 pm, Mar 21, 2010

iamone3

Try cash, I`ve been using cash for over 60 years and think you are foolish to pay insurance company your money , then have to hope they will pay when you need them . aWhat a cruel joke on the American people that bought that kool-aid.

|
4:47 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

iamone - that's your solution?! Pay cash? Seriously?

My friend's baby just spent 5 months in the hospital on life support. Because this country had medical support he won't be broke for the rest of his life. Many people would be bankrupted by that kind of event.

Your solution only works for those with a lot of money or minor medical problems. To those without cash - it sounds like a "let them eat cake" type responce.

|
12:53 pm, Mar 22, 2010

iamone3

Cymatic, Get your priorities straight. You can certainly make payments, I put my families well being ahead of buying a bigger house & new cars. People think nothing of paying for 30 years on a house or 5 years on a car. I have one friend that wrote a monthly check to the Dr. for 35 years, till they sent his last check back & a Paid in full note. I raised children, had serious medical expenses along the way and made payments many times. If your child was important to you , you wouldn`t worry about having to pay for their care, just have to keep what matters most first in your life.

|
2:56 pm, Mar 23, 2010

verycold

A few items were left out and some mentioned need some clarifying.

Doctors get a lower reimbursement for MEDICAID - about 20 percent less than MEDICARE. Since MEDICAID is being greatly expanded they want doctors to take those patients and so the plan to give a pay raise to primary care doctors. I believe by 2014 they want both reimbursements to be on par.

BTW, the federal government will pay for all MEDICAID expansion for the first 3 years and then who knows. Oh, VT and Maine currently have adults without children on Medicaid and that bill will now be paid by the feds. Does that qualify as a deal?

The donut hole which is significant will be closed with a 250 credit this year. Now patients before the donut hole pay about 940.00 out of pocket, then many thousands before they reach the catastrophic plan of Part D. So really 250.00 is a drop in the bucket.

The 50 percent reduction in some name brand drugs will start next year. What name brand drugs? Unless that drug is under patent with no competition, there are already generics that are far cheaper that any sane patient/doctor would prescribe as well. Actually pharmacists are quick to point that out. Also 50 percent from what starting point? Does that amount keep changing?

BTW, big pharma's payment of 23billion is delayed until 2011. The excise tax on medical devices is delayed until 2013. All this administered by the IRS. Is this another deal?

The high quality insurance plans that hit the unions is delayed until 2018. Why is that? The Kaiser group says this lacking of funding will cut revenue to the feds for this program by 80 percent. Remember it was a 40 percent excise tax which is huge.

The Advantage plan will be cut more now by 132b over 10 years. Currently feds pay 14 percent more for this plan vs FFS. Funding is being shifted depending on region.

So please correct me if I am wrong, but exactly how is this huge expansion of government being paid for when many of the necessary payments are being delayed. We haven't even spoken about the doctor fix that will need to be dealt with this fall.

I do see a lot of subsidy increases, more expense for the government, but I fail to see anywhere near enough money to pay for this.

To pay for this .9 percent will be added to medicare payroll tax for individuals above 200,000 and families above 250,000. However MEDICARE is already being diverted to the supposed MEDICARE fund and so are they planning to make yet another fund for this .9 percent?

2013- those in this bracket will pay 3.8 percent tax on all investments.

|
|
Reply
|
10:23 am, Mar 21, 2010

Johnnyappleseed

Well! We will just have to print more money.....simple, problem solved.

|
|
Reply
11:28 pm, Mar 21, 2010

EtienneEtoile

Such a bitter-sweet outcome assuming it passes.

Without the public option there will be millions of loopholes that the wealth-care system will take advantage of so they can continue to pay their multi-million dollar compensation packages to their do nothing non-value added corporate money mongers.

The sweet part is that there might be a crack in the door to work towards socialized medicine and cover ALL legal medical procedures.

The cherry on top is the doomsday whining that has already started. I can't wait for the calls for secession from certain states.

God forbid the federal government wants to look to the "general welfare" of the people.

|
|
Reply
|
10:27 am, Mar 21, 2010

WestVillager

I couldn't agree more with the spirit of your comment. It's a bill for moderates at best. I'm not anti-wealth or as fatalistic about our union, but health care/insurance shouldn't be so complex. The gov't could do this if disciplined. It just seems fair.

|
|
Reply
12:30 pm, Mar 21, 2010

hahail

Obama, the amateur that he is, will have to change the McCarran Ferguson Act, that was passed in 1945, giving the states the right to government insurance, not the Federal Government! And, as for the passage of Johnson's Medicare bill in 1965...how much fraud and waste is there with Medicare? Billions! Thanks, Obama, you're creating another "entitlement" program that folks will simply say...the more you give, the more we'll take! What a clown.

|
|
Reply
|
10:52 am, Mar 21, 2010

pennsykid2000

If Medicare is so terrible, why doesn't the GOP campaign on a platform to repeal it? If they dislike "socialized medicine" why don't they promise to get rid of the VA, the ultimate single-payer govt health care program? You'd see how popular GOP ideas would be then. If the GOP ideas on how to fix the health care system was so great, why didn't they pass it when they were in charge? The answer is their policies stink and are very unpopular. They also just don't care about the problems of working people without health care; that's not their constituency. And anyone who voted for the ultimate clown, W, has no right to call any other politician a clown.

|
|
Reply
|
12:43 pm, Mar 21, 2010

Cymatic

I agree - all this hot air about how the GOP actually cares about preexisting conditions.

Reagan had 8 years did nothing.

Bush Sr. did nothing in his 4 years.

Clinton tried very hard and was defeated by the Republicans on his health care reform.

Bush Jr. absolutely nothing in 8 years.

So where do they get off acting like they care when their only contribution in the last 28 years is opposing the Democrat's attempts to change things. They don't care at all, they are in the pocket of big insurance, just like the blue dogs.

|
4:04 pm, Mar 21, 2010

trueconserv

Medicare is terrible.
Medicare is the biggest denier of health benefits.
People with medicare have to buy supplemental health insurance.
The GOP has offered good bills but the democrats have denied it to be put out of committee and offered on the floor.
All you do is insult without any good arguments.

|
10:23 pm, Mar 21, 2010

robertell

President of the United Sates of America....

Your lack of respect for our nation suggests that you are the clown.

Obama is the Pres. How's your career going?


|
|
Reply
2:38 pm, Mar 21, 2010
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

YOUR FRIENDS