Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2009
11
21
NOVEMBER 2009
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
Wall Street

Bank Bonuses Up 40 Percent

Bonuses are back on Wall Street and now the numbers are out to prove it: projections from a compensation consulting firm in New York predict that incentive pay will increase 40 percent this year at investment banks. Other financial firms, like hedge funds, are expected to see declines of 15 percent to 30 percent. Wall Street must worry about political pressure as well as perception that their year-end bounties come at the expense of tax-payers. "Governments are taking this very seriously," said one recruiting firm head. Still, The Wall Street Journal reports, some bankers are complaining about two straight years of disappointing compensation.

Posted at 5:51 AM, Nov 5, 2009
Save it
  |  
Email
  |  
Facebook
  |  
Twitter
  |  
Digg
  |     |  
print
  |  
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()
Fentro

I'm about ready to get some guns and star blasting at these damn crooks. Who's with me??

|
|
Reply
|
6:49 am, Nov 5, 2009
slmpirate

I dont think your going to find anyone that would argue your position on this one Fentro.
I'm sure there are plenty of folks (including me) who have given it a passing thought.

|
|
Reply
7:01 am, Nov 5, 2009
hockeydog

Fentro, guns won't cut it.
We need to hang em high
In the public square.

Watch em swing
While the blue-bottles
Swarm

|
|
Reply
7:08 am, Nov 5, 2009
TWBBug

Of course they are up...they have Obama, they finance him. The folks at the Fed got us here and they have offices in the government with close ties to Goldman-Sachs. Obama is their BOY.

|
|
Reply
8:42 am, Nov 5, 2009
JTR55408

It seems fairly obvious that if a bank or financial firm received federal support and has not repaid every penny of it, there should be no large, over-the-top bonuses for anyone, period. Many of the firms reporting huge profits are only able to do so because they received tens of billions in government-backed assurances as to their continued liquidity, and yet they also continue to conduct their business in a restrictive, no-loans-to-any-but-those-with-unblemished-credit-or-significant-colleratal manner. So why shouldn't they see huge profit gains?! Fine ... take your profits and enjoy them ... but do NOT make the mistake of rubbing the faces of the American people in your duplicity and unfeigned joy at pulling-one-over on the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department ... and more importantly, the voters. Doing so is at your own peril. If the banks and financial institutions thought they had a populist uprising following news of AIG's bonus boondoggle, just let those financial institutions reaping the benefits of governmental largesse gloat a bit more, and you'll find the voters calling for, nay, demanding, legislation which could very well end bonus practices as we know them.

|
|
Reply
9:20 am, Nov 5, 2009
NewyorkerR

Obama's inaction is showing.
Get your ass to work OBAMA

|
|
Reply
9:45 am, Nov 5, 2009
manticore1223

I'm not sure the pay czar is doing his job. It might be inherently impossible to stop them from bleeding the banks. I still thing the Government should do what Britain did, for the bailed out ones to split up. Tinier banks would have less capital to kick back to their CEOs.

|
|
Reply
|
9:57 am, Nov 5, 2009
democracyforall

I agree totally about splitting up the failed banks. No bank should ever be too big to fail.

The pay czar is getting paid, without results. Investment banks need more regulating.
Obama, this is happening under YOUR watch!

|
|
Reply
11:05 am, Nov 5, 2009
slmpirate

This administration is showing me "not so much" when it comes to regulating these whores on wall street.. I am with most everyone on this issue..Do something for crying out loud.. If you dont have the balls to regulate them then you dont deserve another term.

|
|
Reply
10:22 am, Nov 5, 2009
winston1

This administration is in cahoots with the Fed's and Wall Street. Don't you get it by now?

|
|
Reply
2:01 pm, Nov 5, 2009
democracyforall

and small businesses only got 0.5% of the stimulus so far. No wonder there aren't more jobs!

|
|
Reply
2:12 pm, Nov 5, 2009
neo0071

when it's all gone who is going to be left the bill and with nothing....the people.

back to the middle ages of subsistence farming and bartering

|
|
Reply
2:27 pm, Nov 5, 2009
bezvodka

Greed has no limits.

|
|
Reply
3:40 pm, Nov 5, 2009
laughorcryagain

the problem is this...

the owners of these companies are protected by laws that allow them make decisions that they see as being in the interest of the sharelholders.

If the government does something stupid like give them free money with no strings to it, well that is very much in the interest of the shareholders.

you can't just confiscate private property because you are pissed off

my advice... sell any stock you own and live within your means and let them go to hell

|
|
Reply
|
8:13 pm, Nov 5, 2009
artois

Actually, from a policy perspective, there was simple and elegant solution. The TARP money should have ONLY gone to guarantee deposits (even ones that exceeded FDIC limits). And bank management should have been left to their own devices. To the extent bank management needed to unwind transactions the threat of indictment should have been a sufficient incentive to get these parasites to comply.

|
|
Reply
8:23 pm, Nov 5, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

View Full Cheat Sheet