Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2009
11
21
NOVEMBER 2009
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
UH OH

GOP Leader Takes on Limbaugh

CS - Eric Cantor
Kevin Wolf / AP Photo

Is a Republican leader actually standing up to Rush Limbaugh or is another apology inevitable? Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), the only Jewish Republican member of Congress, went after the conservative radio giant in an interview with Bloomberg News for comparing President Obama to Adolf Hitler, who Limbaugh said in a recent broadcast "also ruled by dictate." Said Cantor: "Do I condone the mention of Hitler in any discussion about politics? No, I don't, because obviously that is something that conjures up images that frankly are not, I think, very helpful." A spokesman for Cantor also decried a poster at an anti-health-care rally attended by Republican leaders in Washington earlier this week, which graphically compared Holocaust victims to Americans under Democrats' health-care plan. Previous Republican leaders who have criticized Limbaugh for going too far, most notably RNC Chairman Michael Steele, have apologized to the radio host within days.

Posted at 7:51 AM, Nov 7, 2009
Save it
  |  
Email
  |  
Facebook
  |  
Twitter
  |  
Digg
  |     |  
print
  |  
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()
slmpirate

Wow those are really harsh words " I dont condone" instead of "I condemn" what a passive agressive milbatoast Eric Cantor is.. How do you straddle that fence Eric?
He has always reminds me of a more refined version of Dan Quayle. Not so bright....

I can understand why the conservatives like Rush. may not agree with what he says, but at least he says it (tongue in cheek) with conviction

Cantor will be the next apologizing to Rush....tic-toc, tic-toc, he has 24 hours..

|
|
Reply
|
8:19 am, Nov 7, 2009
BipartisanCurious

Agree strongly with your first paragraph----Cantor's statement comes across like a wet noodle. The crazies that are trying to conjure up images of the Holocaust in current political debate are irresponsible Americans and should be harshly chastised.

Are you allowed to fire a guy who holds up a holocaust health care sign if you're his boss? You know, for being a general douche.

|
|
Reply
8:47 am, Nov 7, 2009
Quietplease

Bravery: I don't condone the movie "Men Who Stare at Goats". I don't condone Jay Leno's last show. I don't condone Sarah Palin's new book. I am taking this brave stand because I haven't seen the movie or the show and the book isn't out yet. They might be good, they might be bad, but I am bravely proclaiming that I have no firm leanings one way or another. And Eric Cantor is equally brave. He is aperson to be celebrated. Can I get an "Amen Brother"?

|
|
Reply
|
10:06 am, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

LOL...... Amen Brother!

|
10:31 am, Nov 7, 2009
hfb1053

What on earth is wrong with you? Rush is held in such high esteem that he can make people apologise to him just for speaking their opinion. And he is such a hateful person but he has a lot of power. There is nothing wrong with what Eric Cantor said. He doesn't condone Rush Limbaugh's portrayal of Obama. Should he have threatened him? That's what your posts suggest. Maybe he should have pistol whipped him (my personal favorite). Instead, he took a reasoned and educated approach and didn't sink to the level of the Rush Limbaughs in the world (include yourselves here).

|
4:04 pm, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

hfb..

No he should not have threatened him. He should have said that he "condemns" any and all hate speach. He did not have to single out Rush, Glenn Beck, Move-On DailyKos or anyone else... By taking the panzy way out (reasoned and educated approach, as you put it ) he tacitly condones hate speach. It's the wink wink effect..

Condone definition:
To overlook, forgive, or disregard (an offense) without protest or censure.

Codemn definition:
To express strong disapproval of:

|
9:26 pm, Nov 7, 2009
madame48

when will people stand up and say STOP ? We are seeing this country get more and more polarized that will only lead to eventual violence. I saw the guy with the gun at the Portsmouth speech( water the tree...with blood" reference) they people talking about armed insurrection and spilling blood. Has this country gone mad? The hate, vitriol and lies people spread to gain for themselves will damage this country in the end. I think we will see more bloodshed if things don't change. And those who are silent are just as much to blame as those who fan the flames. As the families of those police officers in Pittsburg. Fear will make people do things they wouldn't do in saner times. sad.

|
|
Reply
|
8:30 am, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

A large part of our society thrives on the 24 hour "News?? cycle". Terror, Fear, and Confusion SELLS!!

Rush just happens to be the most adept at manipulating/exploiting and promoting these visceral emotions in his listening audience. Oh.....and along the way has learned how to make LOTS of money.

|
|
Reply
|
9:05 am, Nov 7, 2009
newswoman

I suspect Rush doesn't really care about the stuff he talks about on his radio show. He is an 'entertainer' who is supposed to be controversial because it brings in the money. And he does that. He knows there are racists out there in radioland who don't like Obama so he plays up that aspect and puts Obama down every chance he gets. Beck does the same on Faux News. It's called "ShowBiz". Oh, yeah, and hate speech.

|
9:50 am, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

news...

You are 100% correct about Limbaugh and his 'beliefs.'

It's his job to make controversy... and his followers eat it up.

|
10:21 am, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

I agree newswoman.. I view Rush and Beck as entertainers. I have and often listen to them both. They are over the top on many domestic and international issues and that makes then controversial. Controversy brings in viewers which makes money for Rush and Fox.

|
10:41 am, Nov 7, 2009
hfb1053

And the very fact that you mentioned LOTS of money tells me that is what matters. Not right or wrong....just LOTS of money. And then you have the nerve to decry the behavior of anyone else. Where did you get your morals and your ethics...out of a cereal box?

|
4:05 pm, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

hfb.. You have all the right in the world to interpret what I am posting in your own twisted sanctimonious way.

Lots of money is what motivates Rush and Beck.
Is it moraly reprehensible? Sure it is.
Do I feel compeled to draw attention to their specific nastiness everytime I post?NO Wouldnt that be redundant?

I think you are reading far to much into what I am writing and you should back away and reconsider your self righteous post.
Perhaps before going off on your rants and working off your own myopic assumptions, you should ask in a reasoned tone..Hey slmpirate, that disturbs me what are you saying?

|
6:45 pm, Nov 7, 2009
ThinkAgain

You mean like the leftwing trying to scare you about Rush and Beck and religion etc.

There's plenty of hate and fear spewed by the left, they just use different forums. Moveon and DailyKos used the Hitler thing on a regular basis with Bush so don't pretend that this is one sided and you're on the good side.

|
|
Reply
|
9:46 am, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

I was pointing out the reality of why Rush is THE most succesful and how the whole system works. I personally dont buy into either right or left marginalizing tactics..You clearly do...

|
9:57 am, Nov 7, 2009
Aranxa

Bush actually killed people, a lot of people. Any Hitler reference is offensive when not speaking of genocide, but Bush comes a lot closer.

|
10:57 am, Nov 7, 2009
manticore1223

Pretty much any reference comparing your opponent to nazi's or hitler is concession of the argument, in my opinion. It's mental laziness.

|
12:36 pm, Nov 7, 2009
Dreamer4Ever

"Move On and the Daily Kos used the hitler thing on a daily basis."

Flat-out not true.

|
12:53 pm, Nov 7, 2009
ThinkAgain

Not daily basis, regular basis. Do you need proof? I believe we have some archives that we can pull up if you need to refresh your memory?

|
1:13 pm, Nov 7, 2009
hfb1053

slm - your response to thinkagain is so typical of your kind. You turn the question back on the questioner and accuse them of the very thing you're guilty of; in this case it would be hate speech. I think we all know "how the whole system works" and don't need a person of your low ethics to point it out.

|
4:08 pm, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

hfb,
I dont see anything I posted that referred to hate speach.. Think began to draw a line of distinction between my position and his. As if he actually knew my position..

As to my ethics, I am really impressed that you can discern my ethics from a few post. You must be a genious!

|
6:12 pm, Nov 7, 2009
irsslex

Exactly correct and well said. This looks like Germany in the 1920s and 30s. We are all Good Germans if we say and do nothing about the people whose vitriol spreads like wildfire and which cannot help but cause the whack-jobs (remember Timothy McVeigh?) to come crawling out from under the rocks where they live and do violence. I'm as big a fan of the first amendment, but with freedom comes responsibility. Eric Cantor's wimpy statement is just reflective of how normal people in the Republican Party have to kowtow to the nutbag wing of that party, the party of nothing.

|
|
Reply
|
11:57 am, Nov 7, 2009
hfb1053

I think you're painting Eric Cantor with the wrong brush. Of course, you can believe anything you like regardless of whether it is reasonable, true, hateful, etc. But convincing yourself of the accuracy of your remark is considerably different than convincing people who think and are reasonable. If Mr Cantor had ranted about how bad Rush is, then everyone would have come down on him for that.

|
4:11 pm, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

So hfb, It's OK for Mr Cantor to not take a moral stance against Rush, but those of us on DB dont get the same pass..Where did you get your morals and ethics... Out of cereal box?

|
7:12 pm, Nov 7, 2009
redstatebluedude

Oh yeah .. this morning Rush is polishing up a nice spot on his ample posterior for Eric's lips.

|
|
Reply
8:32 am, Nov 7, 2009
co-intheknow

Cantor - what a waste of skin. He's such an enuch and fraidy cat of Rush that his 'take on' of Rush is more like a not-so-sternly worded rebuke, without the rebuke part.

Another republic pussy who's afraid of the big fat jackass who runs the republics - Oxy Rush.

|
|
Reply
|
8:43 am, Nov 7, 2009
ThinkAgain

What are you, about 10? That's about the age when most people get over appreciating clever name calling. Grow up and maybe someone will give a damn what you think.

|
|
Reply
|
9:51 am, Nov 7, 2009
co-intheknow

WFT - are you blowing Cantor and Rush?

Cantor's another emasculated republic who's too damn afraid to stand up for his religion and face the wrath and scorn of OxyRush.

Your just another unenlightened rightie that postures for the party, another of the braying herd of idiots. And obviously you gave a damn - you're the asshole who responded to my post, dumbass.

|
11:03 am, Nov 7, 2009
ThinkAgain

I'm sure your sophomoric name calling is considered "enlightened" among your liberal co-horts but once you get out of that tiny demographic it's recognized as a sign of an immature mind.

|
11:50 am, Nov 7, 2009
hfb1053

co- while you on the other hand are erudite, well spoken, polite, and reasonable.

|
|
Reply
|
4:13 pm, Nov 7, 2009
co-intheknow

I'm plenty reasonable, hfb. But I have to laugh at the gutless 'take on' of Rush in Cantor's word. He's unable or unwilling to condem all of the garbage displayed during the Bachmann "press conference".

I stand by my remarks about Cantor since he's shown he's too chickenshit to take a firm stance against signs and slogans that clearly disparage his religion. If he can't stand up for himself and the religion in which he was raised and still practices today, then he's the ball-less wonder that I thought him to be; his spokesperson gave a more condemning response than Cantor did himself.

Flame me all you want - I call 'em as I see 'em and I see a pussy, or whipped republic, if that helps your tender sensibilities, who's afraid to stand up to or speak out against the bloviating gas-bag that is Rush.

|
7:28 pm, Nov 7, 2009
MaliciousDisorder

What a fool Cantor is turning out to be. He's playing up to the bs hype from the msm that a big tent is needed. Only principal Eric, not bs.

|
|
Reply
|
9:10 am, Nov 7, 2009
nortonclybourn

And only screamers, not voters. Good luck with that.

|
|
Reply
9:28 am, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

You know what is surpring.... We all agree Lib's, Moderates and Conservatives that Our elected officials are tools, our government is a mess, we have multiple internal and external threats to our constitutional rights. We just cant agree on how to fix it.
What I call moral conviction you might call radical socialism. Could it not be something in between?
There doesnt seem to be any forum for rational debate. I see no value in promoting a cause with marginalizing our opponents via scare tactics and misinformation.

|
|
Reply
|
9:29 am, Nov 7, 2009
EtienneEtoile

But remember, ours is the best political system in the world, we have the best health care system in the world, we have the best insurance companies in the world, we have the best banks in the world.
Now remove any influence from lobbyists (make lobbying illegal) strip corporations of their human rights and it would be even better.

|
9:34 am, Nov 7, 2009
estcruzer

when did corporations get the vote (ask the Republican leadership)?

|
10:15 am, Nov 7, 2009
AlanD2

Rational debate, slmpirate? This is the DB!

|
12:18 pm, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

Thanks for the reality check AlanD2..My bad...

|
12:25 pm, Nov 7, 2009
angels81



I agree with you 100%. I think you folks should keep working to have the smallest tent you can get. Its a great idea that you stick to your, all white guy party of teabaggers and let the rest of the country go about doing what needs to be done. That way you guys can stand on the sidelines and rant and rave to your hearts content.

|
|
Reply
|
9:32 am, Nov 7, 2009
ThinkAgain

The smallest group of all are the hard core liberals. Look who is trying like crazy to force their ideas on the democrats agenda in Wa. Indepedents are running in droves away from the democrats because of that.

Maybe you should pay a little attention to your own tent!

|
9:55 am, Nov 7, 2009
estcruzer

by definition? Is it the "hard core liberals" that tromped McCain and elected a black man as president - or was it the rest of us - 53% minority that we are - that gave Obama his charter to get this country back on track?

|
10:18 am, Nov 7, 2009
Hippievet

@ThinkAgain,

First, can you see into my tent?

When you do; do you see a democrat? Or a liberal? Because I feel comfortable estimating that 95% of all liberals are democrat, and I'm both.

At this point in the history of the "Conservative" party... NONE of them are republican.

|
10:19 am, Nov 7, 2009
AlanD2

ThinkAgain: I think we're doing fine, thank you. Our tent is a bit bigger than yours:

43% Democrat or lean Democrat
17% Independent
31% Republican or lean Republican

From the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal Survey [10/25/09]:

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/wsjnbc-10272009.pdf

|
12:21 pm, Nov 7, 2009
ThinkAgain

estcruzer - the problem is that he hasn't gotten it back on track, he's digging a bigger hole for us to get our of.

|
3:36 pm, Nov 7, 2009
EtienneEtoile

Treat him as a Somali adulterer! How dare he criticize Rush!

And did anyone catch Jon Stewart's parody of Beck the other night, sinful just sinful!

These criticisms of the Republican Guard must stop immediately!

|
|
Reply
|
9:27 am, Nov 7, 2009
estcruzer

why?

|
|
Reply
10:18 am, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

The Daily Show skit on Beck was GENIUS.

|
|
Reply
|
10:24 am, Nov 7, 2009
Aranxa

It was absolute genius. I laughed out loud, and I was watching it alone!

|
11:01 am, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

LOL... the TRUE sign of comedic cleverness!

|
11:28 am, Nov 7, 2009
Dreamer4Ever

SHAME ON YOU JON STEWART. Now w

|
|
Reply
12:57 pm, Nov 7, 2009
CosmoKramer

Cantor will get his name in the news twice in one week. I would imagine that is more than normal for him. The first time for making a very weak comment and the second time when he appears on that radio show to kiss the fat mans ass.

I have yet to figure out why everyone is so afraid of offending limbaugh. The only rational explanation is that they are truly a bunch of pussies.

|
|
Reply
9:35 am, Nov 7, 2009
clearthinker

No way...more stories about Rush Limbaugh. Isn't there a negative story around here about Sarah Palin too? No way. How predictable. These two really piss Tina off.

|
|
Reply
|
9:40 am, Nov 7, 2009
estcruzer

riding the coattails...

|
|
Reply
10:19 am, Nov 7, 2009
nortonclybourn

They're both freakshow guilty pleasures, like watching people eat bugs on "reality" TV. Just because people like to watch doesn't mean that they take it seriously.

|
|
Reply
10:33 am, Nov 7, 2009
AlanD2

A negative story around here about Sarah Palin? No way! We liberals love Sarah.

Palin for President in 2012 - the Democratic dream!

|
|
Reply
12:23 pm, Nov 7, 2009
johnie2xs

I find myself torn between the elation, brought on by knowing the damage that will be wrought upon the Rethuglican Party for having let this grotesque genie out of its bottle, and the damage it is ultimately doing to our country.
The posturing and behavior of this low-information rabble is bad enough, but when it is further fostered by the hyperbolic
intonations of a major political party which seems to be totally devoid of ideas, and whose only stance is to say "No", to anything and everything put forward by the President and his administration, we have a government machine, which at best, is spinning its wheels, if not sliding backward.
Cantor is just one of many on the Rethuglican side of the aisle, whose name could be put in contention for the distinction of being one of the king pins, in what may end up being considered by history, a deliberate slow boil coup d'etat,
for the singular purpose of bringing down The President, and his dully elected government, at the behest of a run amok party and its Monotheistic Domionist supporters.
Unless, and until, these treasonous, duplicitous, subversives to our Democratic system of government are outed and shown to the world, as to what they really are, and intend, our situation will not only not progress from the morass we are in, but will be destroyed. IMHO

Oh yeah, by the way. Cantor will be on his
knees to Rush, by Monday evening, the latest.

|
|
Reply
|
9:44 am, Nov 7, 2009
EtienneEtoile

Will he bring his kneepads?

|
|
Reply
|
9:58 am, Nov 7, 2009
johnie2xs

He'll just bring a copy of the Rethuglicans Health-Care Bill,and kneel on it.
If that's not enough (which it's not), he'll put their Budget Bill atop it.

|
10:03 am, Nov 7, 2009
AlanD2

I think that in the current Limbaugh idiom, Cantor will bend over and grasp his ankles. Gross...

|
12:24 pm, Nov 7, 2009
cstrehl

If you in fact did/could remove all of the "Treasonous, duplicitous, subversives to our Democratic system of government", there would not be anyone left in Washington DC period, and there would not be much of the Media left either... Not that I would complain if it were to happen... But to suggest that either party cares more or even as much about the country or our constitution than they do about themselves, would just be furthering the ignorance of our current reality...

|
|
Reply
|
10:05 am, Nov 7, 2009
johnie2xs

You have a point that is basically hard to argue with, but you would be hard pressed to show where, in this single-minded assault by the Rethuglicans, can be found an iota of concern for anything other than themselves and their corporate, and lobbying,masters. Sen Coburn, for example, recently held up a bill in the Senate, anonymously (which is perfectly legal, if not devious), that would have benefited our military and their families, in order to push an amendment to further excoriate ACORN, it's red herring dejour.
Lobbying, and the inordinately unfair influence of corporations in this country, is a scourge both parties have to answer for, I agree. But their influence is more egregiously effective amongst Rethuglicans than Democrats. I'm sure you may not agree with that, but if you were to look at their influence honestly, through time, I think you would see that I am right.

|
10:18 am, Nov 7, 2009
estcruzer

I beg to differ - there is no competition when it comes to the Republican devotion to Global Big Business and disdain of Americans.

|
10:22 am, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

BINGO!!!

|
10:25 am, Nov 7, 2009
newswoman

Jon Stewart's parody of Beck was reminicent of Monty Python, only an American version. He nailed it.

|
|
Reply
|
9:52 am, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

I LOVED it.

|
|
Reply
10:25 am, Nov 7, 2009
manticore1223

GODWINNNNED!

|
|
Reply
10:30 am, Nov 7, 2009
briansays

He probably ran the text past Rush
Thats why its watered down

|
|
Reply
10:49 am, Nov 7, 2009
sippewissett

What a WIMP. Cantor's language is so 'guarded', to be charitable as to have no effect. " don't, because obviously that is something that conjures up images that frankly are not, I think, very helpful." Helpful? Try "I think, poisonous."

Sounds like he was trying to straddle outrage from Jewish Americans with not wanting to be on Limbaugh's bad side. That kind of disingenuous waffling doesn't win and points out what a jerk Cantor is. There should be NONE of the poisonous comparisons of our president or our country to get a TV camera pointed your way. Period. Let's fight on issues, not blind hatred. Probably too much to ask.

|
|
Reply
10:52 am, Nov 7, 2009
MaliciousDisorder

You people watch too much TV.

|
|
Reply
|
11:26 am, Nov 7, 2009
AlanD2

At least it's not Fox News, Mal, which is why we have a better grasp on reality than you do.

|
|
Reply
12:26 pm, Nov 7, 2009
Downriver

Oxy Rush is gonna be pissed.........Cantor is toast!

|
|
Reply
11:52 am, Nov 7, 2009
Johnnyappleseed

You bloggers need to get a grip on it, there is way too much vitrol in all your comments...now tone it down.
So the Rush man uses the word Hitler, right away press makes a story out of it...not even news.
Then the press finds a microphone and a Jewish congressman to speak on the use of that word, still not news.
My grandfather had it pegged, there is no difference between a republican or a democrat, they both want your money, it justs take the republicans longer to get it.

|
|
Reply
|
12:27 pm, Nov 7, 2009
manticore1223

Notice also, neither can call the parties by their actual names, they have to use the dumb insult/buzzword they cleverly came up with. I'm all for trolling and harassing those that yell and scream and are generally unreasonable, but this is ridiculous. Might as well be 4chan, really.

|
|
Reply
|
12:41 pm, Nov 7, 2009
clearthinker

yeah, I agree. These attacks are dribble for children. To call the Republicans, ReTHUGlicans is truly original. How about DUMBocrats, that is so smooth. We all no who Rush is and what he is about. We know who Keith Olberman is and what he is about as well as Glenn Beck and so on and so on. There is nothing substantial about this debate other than "wee wee" us up.

|
12:57 pm, Nov 7, 2009
nortonclybourn

Tell it to the Republicans who are unaware that the majority party in America is not the "Democrat" Party.

|
1:26 pm, Nov 7, 2009
RomeoHotel

Regarding calling the Democratic Party the "Democrat Party":

I think this is a regional thing. Southerners have always called it the Democrat Party. They called it the Democrat Party when most of them were Democrats, and they call it the Democrat Party now that most of them are not.

As a Southerner, I can tell you it's a little surprising to hear this objection, since it wasn't heard back in the old days. When we say "the Democrat Party", there's no malice intended, but, yes, technically we should say "the Democratic Party". I don't think that's a really high priority for us though.

And we'll probably still say "Yankee" in preference to "culturally-challenged person".

|
2:36 pm, Nov 7, 2009
AlanD2

Well, this brings to mind Baddie, who likes "0bama" (with a zero). Conservatives here have lots of put-downs for Democrats / liberals.

|
3:34 pm, Nov 7, 2009
matthewbenzor

America your being tricked by this tyrant behind the microphone Rush Limbaugh and his Re-publican Secret society friends,did you know Mr.Limbaugh is supporting a socialist movement clothed is lies and deceit,In September,21,1992 in a speech to the united nations President George Bush announced that foreign troops would occupy America and train for a New World Order army .He stated, and Rush Limbaugh supports this kinda talk from the Re-publican secret society powerstructure and President George Bush in a speech to congress September ,11, 1990 (9/11) Said this ,{ The war in Iraq is} A rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation out these troubled times a New World Order can emerge........! America there you have it "NOW" who is the real Dicatorship George Bush Jr continued where daddy left off and ran his New World Order regime along with Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney who now calls it the New Global Order which she stated on CNN, the covers are being pulled off there agenda and Rush Limbaugh is behind them helping them push it through his radio show along with FOX NEWS ....!
America the Re-publican party and its powerstructure have been under secret society rule since the beginning of this countrys creation we have been under Freemason rule since George Washington and don't forget about the queen of england who knighted both Bush's with knighthood, America prepare yourselves its getting ugly out there and thats what they want, The Re-publican Party is falling apart and Evangelics is Rush Limbaugh the man you want to leading on the second coming of your Lord and Savior Jesus the Christ if so your going to get "LEFT BEHIND" ........! don't fall for trickery Children of the Most High God ,they only care about you when its time to vote, Break yourselves free from the tyrants hands of the Re-publican party and its Secret Society agenda.........!

|
|
Reply
|
1:39 pm, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

*sigh*

There is no 'New' World Order.

The world has been ordered and run by the same people for a thousand years or more.

Watch Esoteric Agenda, Kymatica, and Zeitgeist... and don't believe it all. Use research and contemplation to determine what is to be believed and what is a bit overblown.

Or don't believe any of it... but at least WATCH.

|
|
Reply
2:04 pm, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

And the Dems are just as complicit in any and all 'conspiracies.'

The money stays in the hands of those who have had it down through the years, just as the power never really changes hands.

|
|
Reply
2:08 pm, Nov 7, 2009
RomeoHotel

The Teabagging Media (formerly the "MSM") is transparently and hilariously obvious.

The TBM's meme of the year is "the Republicans are attacking each other -- the GOP is coming apart at the seams!"

Meanwhile, Democrats are never asked by the TBM to explain why scores of their own Congressional members won't vote for the Pelosi-Obama administration's signature legislation.

The Question that the TBM will never ask: "If the Democratic Party isn't coming apart at the seams, how is it that with filibuster-proof majorities, it can't pass its own health care bill?"

|
|
Reply
|
2:18 pm, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

The Bluedogs are leveraging their position. Once they individually get what they want, they will vote the party line.

Just politics.

The republicans have been "rope a doped" through the whole process

|
|
Reply
|
2:43 pm, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

LOL!

EXCELLENT observation!

|
2:59 pm, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

Think they didn't know that these loonies would be out in numbers, armed, with idiotic signs and rhetoric, making it next to impossible for real civilians to go along with their tripe?

You are REALLY on to something!

|
3:04 pm, Nov 7, 2009
slmpirate

jaydeekay,

I dont underestimate the strategist on President Obama's staff. HealthCare reform is a populous issue, and most americans support a reform that has meaning.

The republicans have been demonizing the president way before he became pres. The manner in which the RNC and Palin specifically tolerated and were complicit with the the extreme elements on the campaign trail was a huge turnoff to moderate americans.
These would be the same people who would come out and support the far right during this process. Those signs during the rally the other day were so predictable.... Dont you think that Rahm Emanuel is just chuckling to himself.

|
9:04 pm, Nov 7, 2009
AlanD2

RomeoHotel: It's pretty clear that conservative Democrats (and those from conservative districts / states) are concerned about their chances of being reelected if they vote for health care reform.

Republicans / conservatives have thoroughly poisoned the health care issue, putting party interests ahead of what is good for America.

|
|
Reply
|
3:38 pm, Nov 7, 2009
RomeoHotel

Given the Democrats' near-total control of the media, how can anyone "poison the health care issue"? All the Democrats need to do is to publish their bill(s) and show how great it's gonna work. All the networks (ok, except maybe Fox) will give them hours of free air time to explain.

The long, hot summer for the Democrats started when they came home to townhall meetings and were questioned about the health care legislation. Things didn't go to Hell in a handbasket for them until that (1) none of them had read the legislation (many of the citizens knew more of the details than did the Congressmen) and (2) they were going to vote for it anyway.

Btw, what happened to Pelosi's promise to put the bill up for public discussion "at least 72 hours before voting on it"?

|
4:47 pm, Nov 7, 2009
jaydeekay

Near total control of the media?

Fox News IS the mainstream media.

|
10:09 pm, Nov 7, 2009
jojo12

Cantor finally grew a pair in his stand against Limbaugh. But as a previous poster said, the clock is ticking & within 24 hours Cantor will apologize to Limbaugh. He will then be another eunuch in Limbaugh's closet.

|
|
Reply
3:37 pm, Nov 7, 2009
periscope

Flush and Beck are not "entertainers." They are habitual, histrionic and destructive liars. While they are both highly paid to feed the ignorant and hateful the lies they want to hear, there is also something intrinsically malicious and evil in people like Beck and Flush. They actually get off lying, and then being praised for it by the fools that listen to them.
The Republican Party has long been in bed with mediawhores like Flush and Beck. And now the party's "leaders" are too intimidated and compromised to reject the racism, warmongering and other stupidities that issue daily from Flush and Fake News.

|
|
Reply
3:38 pm, Nov 7, 2009
RomeoHotel

Headlines you'll see in the Teabagging Media 20 times a year:

"GOP LEADER TAKES ON LIMBAUGH"

"Is a Republican leader actually standing up to Rush Limbaugh?"

What you'll never see in the TBM:

"DEMOCRAT LEADER TAKES ON OLBERMANN"

or

"Is a Democratic leader actually standing up to Michael Moore?"

When Olbermann wants an NFL gig, the TBM isn't going to publicize false quotations. And Michael Moore is going to keep getting to sit with top Democrat official at the nominating conventions.

And DailyBeast is going to keep being so transparently in the TBM circle.

|
|
Reply
|
7:01 pm, Nov 7, 2009
periscope

You're so stupid it's a wonder your brain can operate your autonomic nervous system allowing you to breath. Limbaugh is a proven and habitual liar with vile opinions. Olbermann and Moore deal in facts and simply have opinions that run counter to the Special Interests that want to profiteer at the expense of the American people.

|
|
Reply
|
7:44 am, Nov 8, 2009
AlanD2

You tell 'em, periscope!

|
1:08 pm, Nov 8, 2009
Woody007

Jeez, El 'FATSO' finally is unveiled as a BIG FAT ANTI-SEMITE!! Go ERIC Go.
Rusty is also RACIST, FACIST and a MISYGONOUS MORON!!!

|
|
Reply
10:43 am, Nov 13, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

View Full Cheat Sheet