Cheat Sheet
The Best In Brief
Hillary's 'Mixed Record'
What's the state of the secretary of State? Time magazine's Joe Klein takes a look at the first 10 months of Hillary Clinton's tenure and finds a "mixed record." Clinton has three traits that could make her term "memorable," Klein writes: Her "vision of departmental reform," her political acumen, and, "most important," her "international celebrity." Those assets combined for a knockout trip to Pakistan, where Clinton made herself available to hostile lines of questioning and gave candid and honest answers to her audiences. But her overly blunt recent pronouncements on Israeli settlements are "perplexing," says Klein, and at this point it's still unclear whether the White House's foreign-policy goals are being advanced. Hillary, Klein writes, "will have to become a more sure-handed negotiator, and, most important, a trusted adviser to a president who knows where he wants to go in the world but hasn't quite figured out how to get there."





We have a celebrity president and a celebrity secretary of state. However, celebrity without substance will leave a legacy of nothing but failures and broken promises.
STFU you gasbag! The only thing you know about celebrity is that you want to be one!
You don't have the right to talk to people like that. Were someone, in the flesh, say to someone else, "STFU" the next word spoken would lead to a punch in the face. That is over the top, should not be tolerated.
michaelslevinson.com
Hey Plant: while waiting in line at the checkout I spotted a story in the "Globe" which reported that Obama had exploded in rage and Michelle had been reduced to tears. How come you didn't jump on this "story" in one of your comments? It's about the proper level you operate at.
When the administration is capable of defining its position on the peace process, Hillary will be capable of communicating more directly, more persuasively, and more intelligently than anyone else. Mr. Klein should find his way to Ohio, not get a plumbing license, and badger presidential candidates from his driveway. Let the big girls play in the big leagues, Joe. There's plenty of space for you in the minors.
You make a good point jbrendan. Hillary is very bright and once this administration defines where it wants to go, she will be out in the front taking it there. I am pro-Obama but I am puzzled by his lack of action. Too many promises, not enough follow thru.
Defines where it wants to go? I thought that was already supposed to be decided.
I really wonder if Hillary would have been as bad as Obozo? Thinking she knows fewer Maoists & Marxists... still, she is in close contact now at State. One saving grace: ol' BJ is usually out of the news, and that's refreshing.
I doubt Joe Kline can get the bus started. Hillary's been out of the country for ever. She's not in the mood & she's miles ahead.
I don't think Obama wants another political element mad at him.
Joe Klein? Really? Is The Daily Beast now competing with the Weekly Standard and the National Review for who can promote the most failed pundits?
While Klein is wrong almost as often as Bill Kristol is, which is quite a feat, at least Kristol stays on one side of the fence. Klein claims to be a liberal, but is an inept center-right bumbler. Klein is bipundit; he wants to claim liberal bona fides while sucking up to the rightwing media and his corporate overlords at Time.
The only problem is, Klein was outed years ago for being the media whore he is. The question is, why does anyone a)employ him, b) read his drivel and c) take anything he has to say seriously?
I jotted down what I thought his column would say based on the headline, and then read it. Not surprisingly, I was right on the money. If I were a sellout media whore, I too could get a job at Time. Well, at least for the next year, until it goes out of business.
Klein states Hilary's "most important" trait is her international celebrity? Do people give a damn about celebrity?
Do people care about celebrity!? In Joe Klein's world--and one could add, in Tina's (it's the same world)--that's all they give a damn about.
Its all a bit surreal. Hilary knows better than to say the crap she says. So.... I have to assume Obama's plan is to play good cop, bad cop.
Since many people don't like Hilary anywy, she really doesn't have anything to lose.
America is totally biased towards Israel and obviously the 23 % of the World that is Islamic is totally aware of it.
Shamefully too is the large presence of Jews in American's Middle East "team" and elsewhere.
Arabs ,Muslim and Christian have to negotiate with Israeli Jews via American Jews negotiating on behalf of the US.
Negotiations with out preconditions while Israel continues to steal Palestinian land ????
Not again please -- The Israeli Peace Plan has never been serious and only a ploy while the theft continues.
This -- below--is how the Israeli Peace Process works
" We must define our position and lay down basic principles for a settlement.
Our demands should be moderate and balanced, and appear to be reasonable.
But in fact they must involve such conditions as to ensure that the enemy rejects them.
Then we should manoeuvre and allow him to define his own position, and reject a settlement on the basis of a compromise position.
We should then publish his demands as embodying unreasonable extremism."
By: Yehoshafat Harkabi--Date: 2 November 1973 ! ! ! !
Holocaust denied: the lying silence of those who know
http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=519
.
Wanted to ask this question for a long time. If the Arabs want a Palestinian state so badley why don't some of those big landholders unass some of that land and give it to the palestinians and let them set up. Why does it have to be in Isreal's back yard where they can sling rockets etc into isreal??
Housebird!
Get back in your cage and stop crapping all over the furniture.
michaelslevinson.com
I cant believe im going to say this but Hillary would have been a much better leader then Oboma. i hope she runs in 2012
NewyorkerR: Why can't you believe it. We really screwed up or at least the party did. We had the chance to put a capable woman in the whitehouse and because of that scuzball Pelosi she was sand bagged by the party. I think Pelosi is Obama's Monica. Hillary was much better qualified than big ears but Pelosi knew she could't control her. Hillary wouldn't have kept her ass glued in Air Force one and having her face plastered on TV all the time. Hell the guy don't have time to work. Believe you said it!!!
NewyorkerR is a Republican, he is not a "we". They LOVE Hilllary, as long as she is NOT in the White House. Before she even started the campaign, they made "Hillary the movie" to try and eliminate her.
Hillary Clinton's qualifications came from her husband and Pelosi is not the reason she lost so please stop your delusional thinking. She ran a bad campaign that's why she lost. She ruined all her opportunities and ended up deep in debt. She started out with all three elements needed to succeed:
1) The most money
2) Name recognition
3) Support of the establishment
You can bash President Obama all day long but what has Hillary Clinton accomplished as SOS so far? Were she Condi Rice, you and the press would be accusing her of being a complete failure. Last time I checked Hillary has spent more time in planes than President Obama. But don't let the facts get in the way of your delusions.
i may be a R but im also a nabor of the Clinton's. and she was 10 times more qualified to do this job the that jimmy walker wanna be ever will be. and thats a fact
NewyorkerR you are the very same people who attacked Hillary Clinton for EIGHT YEARS while she was in the White House and attacked her when you thought she might end up back in the White House. You only claim to support her because you found someone else that you hate more. Try selling your B.S. somewhere else, no one is buying your Republican lies.
Spell check, PLEASE! There is no reason not to. You are on a computer. Typing nabor immediately gets underlined in red and you right click to change it to neighbor. I know you are old, New yorker, but please you the technology so you don't look illiterate.
Hillary could have made it, But," Bill " once again with his baggage and" BIG MOUTH " could'nt let his wife ,be her own women,He hurt her with his NAFTA policy and his freemason agenda.ain't that right "BILL" you did your part in the New Global Oder did'nt you Bill with the deregulation and NAFTA ,you hurt america just as much as Bush did....! Hillary you should be on your own and you could surpass your wifeswapper husband................! If you decide to run again don't go with the same old players to run your campaign, Go with young fresh minds,"NOT" the old same old crap out the old in with new.........! By paul and james its time to go
ha
time is already protecting obama by trashing someone who is obviously more qualified than he
Hill should run for pres in 2012
Hill is too deeply embedded in the DC mindset and terror industrial complex. Can't we do better than Hill? Where is that third party candidate who is not all gooed up and slimy, dealing with power brokers and influential lobbyists? Or, are you a right winger and just offering your comment as a distraction? As a distracting decoy?
O.K. Laughorcryagain,
please list for us Hillary Clinton's accomplishments to date. Take all the time you need.
Wait I'm thinking um um um um um um I give up!
No, we are still not interested in what 90's throwback Joe Klein opines.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.