Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2009
11
21
NOVEMBER 2009
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
Update

Jamie Foxx to Play Sinatra?

Jamie Foxx
Mark J. Terrill / AP Photo

In the running for the lead role in Martin Scorsese’s upcoming biopic of Frank Sinatra are George Clooney, Leonardo di Caprio, Harry Connick Jr., Justin Timberlake, and … Jamie Foxx? The Telegraph reported that Foxx was in the running this morning, but Gawker said today that it was kidding when it started the rumor. Let us hope that Justin Timberlake is also someone's joke. 

Posted at 7:02 AM, May 18, 2009
Save it
  |  
Email
  |  
Facebook
  |  
Twitter
  |  
Digg
  |     |  
print
  |  
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()
Banjo1

No, I think they want the movie to succeed despite any considerations of political correctness.

|
|
Reply
8:46 am, May 18, 2009
SpeakEnglish

Unbelievable.

|
|
Reply
9:13 am, May 18, 2009
flyoverland

I hear Matt Damon is up for the Sammy Davis, Jr. role.

|
|
Reply
|
9:38 am, May 18, 2009
Saphes

lol lol lol gotta love it !!!

|
|
Reply
1:22 pm, May 18, 2009
melpowell

The filmmakers have already stated the actor will not be singing - the producers have licensed the rights to Sinatra recordings. Nice try Jamie, get your agents to try planting another rumor.

|
|
Reply
9:44 am, May 18, 2009
exoevolution

Foxx plays Sinatra? David Spade plays Sammy Davis Jr.?

|
|
Reply
9:44 am, May 18, 2009
Fentro

Harry Connick is the right call on this - as much as Foxx is the 'arture de jour' and talented (although his original work is culturally wan and trend-following, not leading), unless Foxx were to play it in 'white face', the public wouldn't buy it. But like Robert Downey in the yang version of 'white in black', Foxx could no doubt do a convincing 'black in white' role. But still, Connick is the right choice.

|
|
Reply
9:51 am, May 18, 2009
guiltybystander

I think Wanda Sykes for Sinatra, or maybe Lucy Liu

|
|
Reply
9:55 am, May 18, 2009
Fentro

Now here's a REAL challenging role for Foxx: Lucy Liu
Imagine Jamiee playing a Chinese woman. Foxx playing Sinatra - $20 mil; Foxx plating Liu - priceless!

|
|
Reply
9:59 am, May 18, 2009
Womentoo

I just love this....only in America. Foxx is a super actor. The makeup that is being used today, the artist can change freddie kruger into Lucille Ball. If anyone can be soft singing ole blue eyes is Jamie Foxx. He has the talent and can mimick anyone. GO GO JAMIE

|
|
Reply
10:13 am, May 18, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
10:35 am, May 18, 2009
Issywise

An overrated actor playing an overrated singer--it is perfect.

|
|
Reply
|
10:41 am, May 18, 2009
Saphes

ouch.

|
|
Reply
1:23 pm, May 18, 2009
Bender

Well, regardless of his being a good actor, Jamie Foxx's idea of playing Sinatra is just stupid. Whoever this "unnamed source" is needs electroshock. Just a pretty dumb idea.

love Jamie's acting, but the concept of his playing Sinatra is just idiotic.

|
|
Reply
10:45 am, May 18, 2009
flyoverland

Hollywood seems to love to do these things. Like casting Morgan Freeman, a fine actor, as Lucas Davenport, of the the John Sandford "Prey" series. Davenport, who has always been described in the books as a Nordic former hockey player, from Minnesota and bears absolutely no resemblace to Freeman. What do they think? We see it and say, "ah, isn't that creative...what a twist...they are so smart?" No, we just say, "that's just stupid." Maybe its like Elmore Leonard said in a speech I heard recemtly, "when you sell a novel to Hollywood, you just cash the check and hope for the best and if you sell it, cash the check and they tell you the star is someone called Cedric the Entertainer, you just cash the check."

|
|
Reply
|
10:56 am, May 18, 2009
Bunx05

I think it's a little different when talking about adapting a novel and doing a bio-pic. I read the Prey series and watched the subsequent movies. I don't think anyone could have done a better job bringing the essence of the Davenport character to screen than Freeman.

But Foxx playing Sinatra . . . That's a little silly at best. My vote is Harry Connick Jr.

|
|
Reply
11:52 am, May 18, 2009
beej1094

I nominate Dakota Fanning. Nuff said.

|
|
Reply
11:26 am, May 18, 2009
squiggy

I think the Jamie Foxx part gives added dimension and texture to Sinatra's life story. It is about Sinatra, right, not Jamie Foxx?

|
|
Reply
11:52 am, May 18, 2009
ohys123

None of the actors seem right to portray such a great icon. Luis Miguel would be perfect for the role he looks a little like Frank, he's an amazing singer, and has great respect for Sinatra. Pick Luis Miguel!!

|
|
Reply
11:55 am, May 18, 2009
PoliticsMajor

unless everyone here is the casting director for this movie, aren't you all jumping the gun and assuming jamie foxx cannot do this?

the part should go to the best actor, not the one who looks most like the man. i suppose anyone playing jesus should be jewish, and only argentinians should take a che guevara role... crossed and crossed.

until we get a peek at what makes Jamie so "perfect" for this role we should probably figure there is at least something keeping him in the running.

|
|
Reply
12:12 pm, May 18, 2009
flyoverland

It ruined it for me. It was done for gratuitous reasons that were not faithful to the novels.

|
|
Reply
12:16 pm, May 18, 2009
ArielAZ

If nothing else, whoever plays Ole Blue Eyes has got to have blue eyes. Or are we to stare at electric blue contacts throughout the movie, sort of like a Children of the Damned Chairman of the Board?

|
|
Reply
12:20 pm, May 18, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
12:22 pm, May 18, 2009
ArielAZ

Who will play Dolly, Iman?

|
|
Reply
|
12:36 pm, May 18, 2009
squiggy

They could be interchanged under the new social rule, right?

|
|
Reply
12:42 pm, May 18, 2009
ohys123

Luis Miguel would be perfect for the role.

|
|
Reply
1:01 pm, May 18, 2009
Saphes

Only another crooner...Harry Connick Jr.

|
|
Reply
1:37 pm, May 18, 2009
recentlyparoled

Hmmm. I've posted two comments advising that this story is false and simply lifted from a joke on Gawker.com. They were up for about ten minutes and both removed. Are you too embarrassed to admit that you got taken in as well? And you're willing to let your readers carry on posting comments to cover for it? C'mon people, own up, put forth a correction and move on.

But you probably won't post this comment either. Or you will and remove it ten minutes later....

|
|
Reply
|
3:13 pm, May 18, 2009
mslewis

I guess people who read Daily Beast don't read Gawker!!! Gawker mentioned Jamie Foxx as an obvious joke that people replying on Gawker knew was a joke and replied accordingly. I'm amazed that so-called "reporters" are actually writing about this as if it were a fact. It boggles the mind . . . at least my mind!!!

|
|
Reply
4:57 pm, May 18, 2009
mslewis

Jamie Foxx had nothing to do with this!!!

|
|
Reply
4:57 pm, May 18, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

View Full Cheat Sheet