Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2010
2
10
FEBRUARY 2010
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
 
123456
78910
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
Response

Jindal: GOP Lost 'Principles'

CS - Jindal

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal's rising star may have hit a hitch last night: His response to Barack Obama's speech was "childish" and "amateurish" even according to the commentators on Fox News. Part of his problem may have been that he had to follow President Obama. "Jindal didn’t have a chance. He follows Obama, who in making speeches, is in a league of his own," Charles Krauthammer said. Jindal attacked Obama over the stimulus in his speech: "Instead of trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money, they passed the largest government spending bill in history - with a price tag of more than $1 trillion with interest. While some of the projects in the bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending."

Posted at 10:46 PM, Feb 24, 2009
Save it
|
Email
|
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
print
|
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()

krechsd

Where are we getting these guys in the Repub party. He's an out of touch mutant. What was that craziness about Katrina?

|
|
Reply
4:33 am, Feb 25, 2009

Redhead5050

How could a supposedly"bright, upcoming Repug star" bring up the failures of Katrina??? Apparently, he did not read President Obama's speech prior to delivering a "response". He proved to be a dreadful speaker lacking in any new or creative ideas to move forward....

|
|
Reply
6:38 am, Feb 25, 2009

bablue

If he is the "brightest" star among upcoming Repubs, they are in more serious trouble than originally thought. His delivery like something from "Reading Rainbow". It was like he was reading a story to children. Any minute I expected him to say, "And then, the big bad wolf"... This guy wants to be President, no way!

|
|
Reply
7:55 am, Feb 25, 2009

realbluesky

I have never seen Bobby speak before. My very first thought when seeing him appear was of a cartoon. Then he started to speak. If this is the best the republicans have to offer, bring 'em on. What could possibly have possessed the good people of Louisiana to elect such a moron.

|
|
Reply
8:08 am, Feb 25, 2009

scott1607

I missed the speech but, wow, if even Fox thought it was bad it must have been a major disaster. Youtube here I come...

|
|
Reply
8:19 am, Feb 25, 2009

sweetmoses

Jindal has totally missed the point of why Katrina was so disastrous. It's not because we had too much government, it's because the government we had was unresponsive, unintelligent, underfunded, and grossly unprepared. We don't need less government, we just need competent government. During Katrina, only the military and the federal government had the resources to help the citizens of the Gulf Coast. No private company or group of citizens could have done the job because they were all under water.

Repubs are always stuck on the notion that government is bad. That's like an abusive parent saying parents are bad. Which doesn't mean that parents themselves are evil or unnecessary, it just means that you happen to be a bad parent. During Katrina, we didn't need FEMA to get out of our way, we needed someone better than a horse beauty contest judge calling the shots. We needed a better parent.

Gov. Jindal, if you want less government, start with ending the practice of telling me what I can't do, who I can't marry, what I can't smoke, and what technologies we can't develop. If you and your GOP cohorts think we can accomplish the goals of the stimulus for half the price, only accept half the money. But shut up while the rest of us reap the benefits of all the tax dollars we've put into the system.

|
|
Reply
8:19 am, Feb 25, 2009

Issywise

Right.........if we were just a little more ideological, the unnecessary war, the tanking economy and the rampant corruption of our officials wouldn't be counted against us.

|
|
Reply
8:35 am, Feb 25, 2009

DonDavis

Looks like Jindal outlined his "plan" for the next 'Katrina':
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=6354

|
|
Reply
8:39 am, Feb 25, 2009

BernieO

I was stunned by Jindal's poor performance, having seen him several times on talk shows. And the content of his speech was even worse than the delivery.

I agree with the other posters that bringing up Katrina was completely looney! On top of reminding people yet again that we can't trust anti-government Republicans to run government, and that we really need government in a crisis, Jindal and the sheriff he praised are both ..........GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS!! Nothing like going on TV and saying you can't trust people like us. Brilliant and bizarre!

|
|
Reply
9:06 am, Feb 25, 2009

mobius1ski

Colbert said it best at Bush's press dinner: "I believe the government that governs best is the government that governs least, and by that standard, this government is doing an outstanding job in New Orleans."

It never ceases to amaze me how Republicans are all anti-"big government" and anti-porkbarelling so long as they're the opposition. Once they're in charge, though, hold onto your hats, because you don't know from government spending until you've seen Republicans spend.

|
|
Reply
9:26 am, Feb 25, 2009

jazzgrrrl25

it was amateur night.

pathetic. tragic. painful to watch.

couple this with his fabrication of actually being there with lee, his misinformed slight, regarding magnetic rail and disneyland, talking to the public as if they are a nation of 10 year olds and the republican standard of "us v. them", and it is safe to say that, with due respect to bob dylan, the republicans are headed "90 miles an hour down a dead end street".

at least palin was entertaining.

|
|
Reply
9:56 am, Feb 25, 2009

apostleis

Let's see... the new republican poster children are an Indian(Jindal), a black man(Steele) and a woman(Palin).

Do they really think we don't see the rich white guys behind the curtain?

These guys want raped women to endure pregnancy(no exceptions to abortion being illegal), more of the same give to the rich failed policies and less regulation.

Yeah that's worked so well.

|
|
Reply
10:04 am, Feb 25, 2009

quick2no

The republicans are searching hard for an intellectual with vision to come up from the rear and represent the party. Jindal was put out front to see if he could cut the mustard. It was worth a try. After the failure of of the McCain/Palin ticket the party realizes it cannot base itself on the thought process of the Republican Right low information voter block and their previous oracle, Mr. Bush.

|
|
Reply
10:18 am, Feb 25, 2009

AmiBlue

You lead the beast with Jindal???

|
|
Reply
10:23 am, Feb 25, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
10:26 am, Feb 25, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
View Full Cheat Sheet