Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2009
7
9
JULY 2009
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
 
 
 
1234
56789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
Ponzi

Bernie Still At Large

A second attempt by federal prosecutors to have Bernard Madoff jailed as he awaits trail has failed. After reviewing a 49-page document arguing that Madoff could not be trusted, U.S. District Judge Lawrence McKenna allowed the ponzi schemer to remain free this afternoon. The judge said prosecutors failed to make a compelling argument that Madoff is a flight risk or a danger to the community—the two main requirements to revoke bail. Madoff's defense said prosecutors are using "inflammatory rhetoric and hyperbole" to make a weak argument. He will await trial under house arrest.

Posted at 6:53 AM, Jan 14, 2009
Save it
  |  
Email
  |     |  
print
  |  
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()
kayakman

I find it unthinkable that the judge in this case can allow"Bernie" to be out on bail in a $7 million penthouse, attempt to send millions of dollars to friends and family,while those he "conned out " of their life savings are forced to sell their homes etc. The fact that his victims were greedy in their plan to make much higher returns notwithstanding, his utter lack of remorse in what he did to people and foundations that were forced to close should be cause enough to have him in a 7 foot cell with out all his "nice things " to keep him happy.

|
|
Reply
10:34 am, Jan 14, 2009
bezvodka

The federal judge's compassion for a senior citizen is heart-warming. And the Chief Justice (of the U.S.) wants their salaries raised! Why? So they can invest with Madoff?

|
|
Reply
1:54 pm, Jan 14, 2009
Stromko

This is more about preferential treatment for a public figure, the Madoff case is famous, and I'm sure the guy has a crack legal team. So the judge is going strictly by the book, perhaps to avoid a mistrial down the road.

One of the reasons his lawyers think it's best to keep him out of jail is he's so 'well known and disliked' that he couldn't go anywhere. Bulls***, money talks louder than ethics in this world.

|
|
Reply
2:33 pm, Jan 14, 2009
intothegarden

Just who posted his bail ? All the money he has is stolen money. And if one says 'innocent until proven guilty' I am sure the money can be frozen as 'evidence'. The high costs involved in his home-confinement again...he can't pay for that [or his lawyers for that matter] with the funds held for 'evidence'. Why are we worried about the health of a man who has brought heath-threatening stress on all the people he has cheated out of money? He looks quite robust to me, anyway. We all know that his lawyers can stall his trial for years. . meanwhile, he's sitting on his throne in a seven-million-dollar apartment. phtaw !

|
|
Reply
2:52 pm, Jan 14, 2009
Siouxie921

Let me guess. Mr. Madoff has friends in high places? How else do you explain that this man is not in prison already?

Why didn't his many victims' attorneys get together to petition the court to revoke his bail? Who is protecting Bernard Madoff?

|
|
Reply
5:30 pm, Jan 14, 2009
jackrussell

This is a great example of "white law". Madoff STOLE money from hundreds if not thousands of people. What is the legal system waiting for to place this animal in jail?
It is very scary how the "white law" works, if you are not white, and rich, you go to jail as simple as that!!!!!!!!

|
|
Reply
6:19 pm, Jan 14, 2009
mavin1620

If someone steals $250 of stuff in WA St they arrested and go to jail. The poor go to jail and the righ go free.

|
|
Reply
6:26 pm, Jan 14, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
7:05 pm, Jan 14, 2009
hockeydog

The key here would be the definition of "community" to which this jerk would be a danger or menace. Perhaps the community-at-large would not be at risk, but certainly the community-which-was-swindled-and-retains-hope-of-being-reimbursed is in danger.

Bernie has outsmarted them again! Way to go Bernie-boy!

And, no, the judge cannot be jailed for alleged complicity.

|
|
Reply
6:07 am, Jan 15, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
9:38 pm, Jan 15, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

View Full Cheat Sheet