Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2009
11
23
NOVEMBER 2009
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
Odd Couples

Obama Rebukes Biden

Barack Obama, Joe Biden
Gerald Herbert / AP Photo

So Joe Biden misspoke again—that’s no surprise. But it is surprising that President Obama has decided to step in and correct him. When asked by NBC News’ Chuck Todd about Biden’s statement that “we misread how bad the economy was,” Obama said, “I would actually—rather than say misread, we had incomplete information. What we always knew was that a) this recession was gonna be deep, and b) it was gonna last for a while.” He also told ABC News, when asked about the stimulus, "There's nothing that we would have done differently. We needed a stimulus and we needed a substantial stimulus."

Posted at 10:42 AM, Jul 7, 2009
Save it
  |  
Email
  |  
Facebook
  |  
Twitter
  |  
Digg
  |     |  
print
  |  
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()
allonfla

ooooh! Obama really tore into Biden on that one. me: rolling eyes.

|
|
Reply
|
10:49 am, Jul 7, 2009
rapierwits

well, how do you like it when your boss rips you in front of everybody?

or

was that supposed to be meta-criticism to the Beast's come-on headline?

'cause I could totally see the second one...

|
|
Reply
|
12:02 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

It was sarcasm rapier, he didn't rip him at all.

|
12:17 pm, Jul 7, 2009
TavernWench

"Rebuke" is the new "Respond"!!

I bet TDB headline writers make extra!

|
|
Reply
6:06 pm, Jul 7, 2009
nick1936

Why is it that when Joe speaks the truth our Weak kneed president jumps in instead of keeping mum and allow things to pass. Speaking of passing what is he doing about single payer or the public option for health care seem he's about to cave on this one . OH MY we should have stuck with Hillary she has balls and wouldn't be kissing the repuk's asses like Obama some Change.

|
|
Reply
11:06 am, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

LMAO!!!!! If Buffet says it's bad it's worse than that and O has tripled plus the deficit and he's calling for another stimulus on printed money. Of big note, O didn't say Biden has misspoke about Israel bombing Iran. LOL

|
|
Reply
|
11:07 am, Jul 7, 2009
Plantagenet

Obama's economic advisors have failed---- they are too stupid and too politically blind to understand the US economy. Its time for Obama to drop Orzag and the other dopes who misread the economy and get some people in there who can accurately model the economic problem and who understand the damaging effects of massive deficits. Instead, it looks like Obama is sticking with the clowns who came up with wrong-headed programs like the stimulus that has just made things worse, and will soon request ANOTHER stimulus that will add ANOTHER trillion dollars to the deficit and will make the US economy even sicker.

|
|
Reply
|
11:49 am, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

Your right Plant! There is nothing he can do but sit back and wait it out. The mechanism is there, it just needs time to work. If he truly wanted to make the economy work he would hand out massive money to tax payers or home owners, something along those lines and let the people stimulate the economy. He won't do that! He would rather stick with his clowns, as you say, and that doesn't bode well for econ0mic health, country wise and individually. He might finally be doing the math!!!!!!
The transition from manufacturing to information has been a bumpy one and it's not over yet. As we settle into global competition we are going to find out we are at a disadvantage with everyone else with cheap labor and Americans want to think they are worth so much more. If we can't be a country of entrepreneurs and info/tech then those who remain uneducated will have to line up to compete with lower pay and benefits. Note that didn't happen with Chrysler and GM. LOL They are going to fail. Might take a while to realize that, just like this time, but it will happen.

|
12:07 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

Apparently you flunked Econ 101 or you would like most adults recognize that anyone who claimed to have sufficient information to predict the extent of the economic free fall was lying to you. Economic is an inexact science that renders educated guessess which are more often than not inaccurate. Biden told the truth as he usually does. Obama said almost the same thing recently but because the media wasn't looking hard for something they could call a gaffe, it slid right under the radar. Obama consulted the presumed best and brightest economic and financial consultants from the left, right and middle. He settled on the consensus. Krugman et al predicted that a much, much greater amount was necessary to prevent a depression. It will remain a moot point because there is no way in he** that congress would have ever approved anything of that size. Krugman has back off his doom and gloom forecast as the economy began to stablize. Stablize does not mean recover. Most predict that by the fourth quarter of this year the economy will begin a slow process of recovery but unemployment will continue to rise into next year. Grow up. There are no crystal balls, no ecomomic mystics and no magic wands. What are you doing to contribute to improving the economy. Since undoutedly you have multiple advanced degrees in economics to consider yourself qualified to call someone like Orzag a dope?!?, what is your solution other than give all the money to you. By the way, none of the so called experts read the extent of the downfall correctly because it was unreadable until it stopped. It is always that way. Grown people know that.

|
3:13 pm, Jul 7, 2009
travlr009

hi squiggs...im back.....lol.....you are correct about the israel remark......highly dangerous, and amateurish,,,,,,,
the last time a high level us spokesman made a mistake like that, it was april glaspie, to saddam, and six months later hed destroyed kuwait, and had 1000 tanks on the saudi border and we had squat to oppose him. The only reason we had the time to counter, was that he inexpicably stayed put.
Thes two amateurs (obama and Biden), are highly dangerous to the future safety of this country.......in the space of two weeks,,,,they refuse to take a moral stand on the rights of any people to demand better govt, until dragged kicking and screaming to do so, and at the same time lightly invite another country to invade a third , and drag us right into it......
like i said...these two are hazardous to our health

lol

|
|
Reply
2:07 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

Since you do not seem to know the difference between a fiscal year and the calendar year, Obama inherited a 1.2 trillion dollar deficit for this fiscal year when he took office. It is now approximately 1.7 trillion. Thirty-seven percent of this years deficit is attributed to the economic contraction which began in December, 2007, 33% is attributed to Bush Tax cuts to the top 5% (bankers and CEOs who collected millions while driving their respective institutions over the cliff) 20% is attributed to Bush/Obama for the continued middleclass tax cuts, and 10% is attributed to Obama. The media is the only source calling for a second stimulus. Obama clearly stated that is was premature to talk about a second stimulus when only 10% of the first stimulus was out the door.

|
|
Reply
2:54 pm, Jul 7, 2009
oliverckerr

Skip the issue of Biden. In fact the Bail Out Stimulus was a Ladle Out to the states - money to keep teachers, police, and firemen (and fire women) on the job. But keeping these people on the job didn't stimulate the economy - the "Ladle Out" merely protected the government service status quo.

The population would be looking to throw the whole Congress out were the local police and fire people at home unemployed instead of on the job.

Levinson, the poet of michaelslevinson.com is writing an essay on stimulating the economy. I'm waiting for him to send it along.

|
|
Reply
|
11:09 am, Jul 7, 2009
akcita

Mr. Kerr is correct, but the local infrastructure projects do not stimulate quickly, and the state services funds do stimulate at all, rather they enable the business environment that currently exists.

So, Allowing Congress to craft the stimulus bill rather than directing it themselves was the new administration's first colossal screw-up. Much of the first stimulus still remains unspent. great work.

So, let's get into more debt, and keep piling on the debt to my kids!

|
|
Reply
12:55 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

Where was your concern for your kids for the 8 years during which Bush doubled the national debt. In 8 years the Bush administration incurred more debt than the cumulative debt incurred by all previous administrations. Only 10% of the stimulus has gone out. The tax cuts have begun, the extended unemployment benefits and Cobra supplements have gone out to states as well as supplements for medicaid, teachers, fireman and police. If you want it to go out faster, call your governor and find out why your state hasn't gotten the necessary documentation in to qualify for the local infrastucture projects.

|
|
Reply
|
3:20 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Carole65

And now Obama plans to outspend all previous administrations, combined. The stimulus plan seems to be going to hiring czars and other government workers. The "shovel-ready" projects are still on the shelf. What tax cuts?? There were tax rebates this past year, not tax cuts. Don't expect your $250.00 next year. You can probably expect a tax increase. And don't forget inflation that is coming to bite you in your wallet to pay for all this massive spending.

|
5:00 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Zero001

Why does every Obama apologist begin with where was your outrage when Bush..... you can fill in the blank as it encompasses everything Bush ever did. As I recall there was a great deal of outrage when things went too far. Remember when the Congress went Democrat in the 2006 elections? I would also like to know how the last 8 year statment passes as fact when the Dems controlled Congress when they took their seats following the 2006 elections. And they did exactly what again? I cannot believe that there are only Dems and Repubs and they cannot see past a party label to do what is right for the country. We need real leaders, but the system is broken, and if we all keep electing the same fools, we have the country we deserve.

|
5:04 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Slamlander

Zero001: That was a line from Heinlein.

xlntcat et al: I am a Repulican that agrees with you. Bush was a moralizing religious right numbskull who spent more time on holidays at the crawford ranch than doing his job.

My blog shows that I called the current FUBAR over three years ago. The current stimulus package will not be enough, even if doubled. It should have been handled during the jobless recovery, which was a symptom of underlying problems. That was entirely under Bush's watch.

For now, Obama is exactly correct. We need to see what the current stimulus does and then act accordingly. It may require spending piles more money. But maybe not (I doubt it).

I am the only Slamlander (tm).

|
5:39 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

Obama has out done him! Aren't you proud? LOL

|
6:38 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

slamlander, I shored up my finances and mortgage before things struck, helped my parents and spoke with friends. Economics is not rocket science. The writing was on the wall starting 911. Housing bubble was a no brainer, made money and put it away for this rainy season, good for you if you were on top of it too. I think rather than throwing more money at the problem it is time to let the market play it out but only if banking and health care regs are put into place. He's got the advantage of doing that to make the come back benefit everyone.

|
6:42 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Konstantin

So in this case Obama is Felix and Biden is Oscar

|
|
Reply
11:12 am, Jul 7, 2009
mattbenzor

I am beginning to "WONDER" who side Joe is on. We must remember Mr.Biden is one of those old school politician's who makes me kinda question Who Mr.Biden hangs out with outside of washington.If Mr.Biden has any tie's to any secret societies that we should know about.Hmmmmmmmmm; I beginning question Mr.Biden's loyalty to the president.......!

|
|
Reply
|
11:39 am, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

No mystery there matt, Biden said O was clean and articulate. That is old skool for sure! LOL

|
|
Reply
|
11:49 am, Jul 7, 2009
rapierwits

Mornin Squig; Hey has anyone ever voiced the theory that Biden meant "free from corruption" when he said "clean"?

Because that's what I think it means in politics, as opposed to "dirty"

|
12:09 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

morning rapier, how goes it? I don't think that is what old skool was talking about. Chicago politics have never been clean and that is old skool as well.

|
12:19 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

You are just buying into media hype. Biden told the truth. Obama has said almost the same thing recently but the media wasn't looking for something they could call a gaffe so it just slid past them unnoticed. Today's media chooses more often than not to make news rather than report news. Biden offsets Obama well and most of the hoopla over supposed gaffes cause no friction in the administration. Biden is too verbose but most of the time he is telling truth. The media insults your intelligence by assuming you can't handle what is often just accurate information. Biden's statement about the N1H1 virus was a reflection of how a great many people felt at the time, but it didn't exactly benefit the airlines who are struggling to survive. Truthfully, politicians overestimate their influence on public behavior. We aren't sheep. It is unlikely that anyone cancelled a necessary flight because of what Biden said.

|
|
Reply
3:30 pm, Jul 7, 2009
allonfla

Only 10% of the sitmulus has been spent.

|
|
Reply
|
11:39 am, Jul 7, 2009
AiriqS

why

|
|
Reply
|
12:05 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

Allocated means that the funds have been set aside specifically for a certain project in a certain state but the state must furnish necessary documentation to verify that a real project is in the works with a real contractor who will hire real people. The money doesn't go out until the project has met all of the specifications required by a particular state.

|
3:40 pm, Jul 7, 2009
rapierwits

A lot more than that has been allocated however, including more than 80 mil to John Boehners district

http://www.recovery.ohio.gov/

|
|
Reply
|
12:07 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

Does allocated mean spent? Real question, no sarcasm!

|
12:20 pm, Jul 7, 2009
rapierwits

No, it means that it's at the disposal of those who will administer the allocation.

|
6:09 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

Thanks rapier, I wasn't sure and I didn't get a chance to read about it.

|
6:43 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

There is no more money!!!!!!!! It will be printed if he gives out anymore!!!!

|
|
Reply
12:07 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

Response to why only 10% of stimulus has gone out to the states.

Because your governor has to submit the necessary documentation to verify that the money is going to ligimate, infrastruture projects that will produce jobs versus into a politicians pocket which is where a volume to the pork funds end up. If the administration started throwing money out the door the fraud would be rappant. Most of the governors who claimed they wanted to turn down stimulus money stated as their first objection was having to account for where the money went. They didn't want the federal government knowing what they were doing with the money.

|
|
Reply
3:36 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Ozone69

Biden is a tool and President Obama is probably regretting picking this "veteran" of the Beltway.

|
|
Reply
|
12:02 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

Amen!

|
|
Reply
6:43 pm, Jul 7, 2009
mcmchugh99

Obama said many times that this is the worst crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s, and he is correct that massive deficit spending and easy money policies from the Fed are the only known ways of alleviating it, if not ending it. That would require World War II levels of deficit spending.

It's not clear that all this money is being spent in the right ways or the right places. A stimulus bill that gave a few hundred dollars in tax relief to every family was not worth much. It wasn't the true public investment program that's needed, but Congress isn't a good place to work out things like that.

The TARP program was a huge mistake and only kept some of these private banks afloat, but it was designed to meet their needs rather than the public interest. So was the cap and trade, which as far as I can tell was designed to give away hundreds of billions of dollars in pollution credits to big business interests.

All in all, I do not see much for the average person in all this,although I agree that without all this spending the depression would be even worse.

|
|
Reply
12:04 pm, Jul 7, 2009
rapierwits

I think it's disingenuous of our president to say he wouldn't have done anything differently. The truth is that his admin wanted a bigger stimulus and they got the biggest on they could. The Dems had to trade away A LOT to get those three Republican senators.

|
|
Reply
|
12:05 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

Yes he did but he ran out of money. And we all know that Congress, both sides are rotten to the core!!!! LOL

|
|
Reply
12:21 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

It isn't disingenuous when you balance what you might want with what you can realistically get. He was already looking a 1.2 trillion dollar deficit inherited from Bush and the Omnibus Bill, the Bush budget for this fiscal year which should have been signed in the fall had been pushed forward until after he took office. If one side would quit trying to blame the other side for what is one he** of mess that both sides took part in making, the public might be able to get clarity on the reality of the situation and quit moaning and groaning and try to help pull the nation out of the ditch. I am getting sick of both parties.

|
|
Reply
|
3:47 pm, Jul 7, 2009
rapierwits

You made my point. Our President wanted more & got less than he wanted but now he says that he wouldn't have changed anything.

|
6:11 pm, Jul 7, 2009
maryfrost2

President Obama gave these reasons why the stimulus bill must be passed immediately--like yesterday. l. That the economy was the worst it has been since the Great Depression. 2. That unemployment would rise above 8% if it was not passed right now. 3. That the economy was nearing being a castrophe. Well, he now says that the economy was worse than he thought when he made those statements. My question is: What words would you, Mr. President, use to describe the economy at that time now, if he had all of the info. that you now say you did not have???

|
|
Reply
|
12:58 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Plantagenet

Obama is lying about not having all the data. Obama and his advisors had every bit of economic data----they were just too stupid to understand what it meant.

|
|
Reply
|
1:04 pm, Jul 7, 2009
shortcourse

I remember another president having incomplete data...and searching for WMDs that may or may not have been there....BHO is searching for a way out of this mess and just digging himself into a deeper hole....

|
2:09 pm, Jul 7, 2009
xlntcat

Be specific, give examples. Tell us exactly what you understood and where you got your expertise. So in your infinite wisdom, you understood what no one else on the globe understood. You had access to the books of every financial institution and every corporation in the U S. which is what it would take to have all the data. I'd settle just for your full understanding of AIG and it's global connection to multiple financial institutions, a nightmare that you are surely the only one on the globe truly understands to date.

|
3:53 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Plantagenet

Obama and his economic guru Orzag predicted that the stimulus would keep unemployment below 8% and by now the US would be adding jobs and we'd back to 7% unemployment. Instead, the US continues to lose jobs and unemployment just hit 9.5%. The stimulus has clearly FAILED to deliver the "millions of jobs" that Obama promised. But rather then face this reality, Obama wants to pretend that the dog ate his homework, i.e. he didn't have all the data. Meanwhile, more honest and competent economists at the CBO using exactly the same data as the BOers have in the White House, correctly predicted the economic downturn and correctly predicated that Obama's massive spending on pork would produce a 2 trillion dollar deficit----a much higher deficit then the dishonest BOers would admit to.

Its time for the White House dishonesty to end.....the BOers still haven't revised their crazy economic prediction that we would be at 7% unemployment now....its time for Obama to come back to the US from his world-girdling apology tours and get to work on the economy instead of making ludicrous excuses for his failure.

|
5:24 pm, Jul 7, 2009
rowland

So Obama claims he doesn't have all the data AND only 10% of the first stimulus has been spent. So how on earth have people determined we need a second stimulus?

|
7:23 pm, Jul 7, 2009
maryfrost2

Biden needs to learn that you never tell it "as it is", when it comes to bad news. He must learn to "spin" better.

|
|
Reply
1:00 pm, Jul 7, 2009
maryfrost2

Squiggy, I agree with you. BOTH sides are rotten to the core. I bet we could pick people off the street to do a better job. I'm so fed up with them all and I hope they all get tossed on election day.

|
|
Reply
|
1:01 pm, Jul 7, 2009
squiggy

I am going to vote out incumbents until they are all gone in my state, right down to city council! I am tired of this crap! Until they make their job taking care of people who live and work and have needs I am done with them all!

|
|
Reply
1:05 pm, Jul 7, 2009
maryfrost2

If the economy was worse that a castrophe or a crisis, or worse that the Great Depression, pray tell, how bad could it be?????

|
|
Reply
|
1:03 pm, Jul 7, 2009
mcmchugh99

The End. The Weimar Republic. That is what's waiting at the bottom of a depression like this one.

|
|
Reply
|
1:16 pm, Jul 7, 2009
whipmawhopma

Are you suggesting that the Republicans are turning into Nazis and the Democrats into Communists? Personally I think we're slowly turning into Argentina.

|
6:47 pm, Jul 7, 2009
maryfrost2

I hope we all wake up before it's too late, and I feel that time is fast approaching, unless all of the spending is stopped. Even President Obama said that we had to stopped the deficient spending, but I guess those are words people like to hear, but action is what we want.

|
|
Reply
|
1:06 pm, Jul 7, 2009
whipmawhopma

The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. ~ Kosh

|
|
Reply
6:50 pm, Jul 7, 2009
finderj

Good lord.
McCain chose Palin.
Obama chose Biden.
Maybe McCain and Obama should have chose each other.

|
|
Reply
1:16 pm, Jul 7, 2009
maryfrost2

No allocated does not mean spent. It means that it has been set aside for a certain purpose, but that does not mean that it's purpose cannot or will not be changed.

|
|
Reply
1:34 pm, Jul 7, 2009
MaliciousDisorder

Why aren't you watching Michael Jackson ?

|
|
Reply
2:32 pm, Jul 7, 2009
DreddBlog

Biden has been turned in to the science police.

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/07/science-police.html

|
|
Reply
3:47 pm, Jul 7, 2009
JonShank

Biden will sink this presidency yet! What a clown! Stop talking Joe!!!

|
|
Reply
4:24 pm, Jul 7, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
4:35 pm, Jul 7, 2009
connie47

Give me a few honest miscues and walk backs to a bunker-mentality White House any day.

|
|
Reply
4:48 pm, Jul 7, 2009
amapola101

You all are much smarter than me.I am terrible in economics.All I can tell everyone here,people are not spending,buss are unemploying.Jobs are not being created.People are serving hotdogs,instead of the steaks.People are scarred,afraid,counting their money,cancelling vacations,spending,outings.and these are the people doing good,or are in good financial situations.The ones who are foreclosed,loosing their credit lines,have moved their children out of college,are going on antideppressants.

|
|
Reply
5:55 pm, Jul 7, 2009
amapola101

I really think SP should have been Pres Obamas VP.since she is concidered such an idiot,ignorant,and stupid,incoherent.

|
|
Reply
6:48 pm, Jul 7, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
7:36 pm, Jul 7, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

View Full Cheat Sheet