Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2010
2
9
FEBRUARY 2010
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
 
123456
789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bailout

Obama’s Salary Cap

Wall Street’s uber-rich CEOs may have to prepare for a future of mere ordinary richness: The Obama administration plans to cap executive compensation at $500,000 for companies receiving federal bailout dollars. Executives will also be prohibited from receiving a bonus of more than their base pay. At a press conference with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner this morning, Obama said “In order to restore our financial system, we’ve got to restore trust ... And in order to restore trust, we’ve got to make certain that taxpayer funds are not subsidizing excessive compensation packages on Wall Street.” Geithner said, “There is a deep sense across the country that those who are not responsible for this crisis are bearing a greater burden than those who were."

Posted at 1:31 PM, Feb 4, 2009
Save it
|
Email
|
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
print
|
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()

connie47

I can hear the cries, "Socialism!" already, like completely unrestrained capitalism isn't what got us here. I say God bless Obama for inserting some common sense into this mess.

|
|
Reply
7:12 am, Feb 4, 2009

cyberwriter

I can't believe that they people in the business of handling business did not do this themselves. Although there are contracts with some of these "professionals", this should not have to be the governments job. Apparently and unfortunately, someone has step in and do it other then those who should know better.

|
|
Reply
7:34 am, Feb 4, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--tavallai
|
|
Reply
9:40 am, Feb 4, 2009

delljody

tavallai nailed it. In what bizarro world do you get paid more for destroying your company?

The salaries should DECREASE as the company's worth does. That would be the incentive for a CEO to do well by their employees and make long-term decisions.

as cyberwriter said, these goons won't do anything on their own. They're entitlement whores. Time to knock a few heads together and change the "business culture."

|
|
Reply
9:49 am, Feb 4, 2009

AmiBlue

How about saying no bonuses until the company is making a profit and can repay the American people for what we have invested?

|
|
Reply
10:10 am, Feb 4, 2009

Bertilak

This has made my day: thank you, President Obama! After all, do you know how many jobs those extra millions could pay for? Everyone who makes multiple millions per year should look around and consider the number of ordinary middle-class salaries that revenue could pay for.

|
|
Reply
10:58 am, Feb 4, 2009

sonofloud

stock options, golden parachutes, and the like.
a salary gap will have no effect.
they will just get the money in other ways.

|
|
Reply
10:58 am, Feb 4, 2009

slemay

Watch carefully. We've impose IRS and other legal restrictions on executive pay, but they have found many ways around those. In fact, the tax treatment of CEO pay may have helped to inspire some of the excesses.

Few would argue with tying pay to performance. Many of us live with that and even welcome it; part of the problem has been that CEOs benefit greatly on the upside, but pay no penalty on the downside.

Still, if the cap really is a cap, it makes sense in these circumstances.

|
|
Reply
11:26 am, Feb 4, 2009

rightconservative

Junket to Vegas.....not pay taxes......what's the difference? Nothing. Both are unethical.

|
|
Reply
11:45 am, Feb 4, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--Cooper727
|
|
Reply
3:20 pm, Feb 4, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--Cooper727
|
|
Reply
3:22 pm, Feb 4, 2009

fallston



CEO salaries and bonuses are such a small amount($'s)
when you look at the 'stock awards packages' that are distributed to CEO's and other executives, directors and managers in any given year. These stock awards are like
stealing from the company and putting dollars directly into
their pockets-free and clear. All do to the compensation
boards appointed by the CEO's themselves. Where's the
oversight from the SEC and Congress?




|
|
Reply
3:55 pm, Feb 4, 2009

jedsky22

When I was working as a corporate CFO I was once brought in as part of a management team to turn around a failing business. One of the first things we looked at and set limits on was executive compensation. In fact, the "money guys" insisted on such limits. Why isn't the federal government just as legitimate in imposing such requirements on companies taking federal bailout funds? I for one am glad to see Obama representing the "money guys" - you and me, the taxpayers in this country - in this way. It's not socialism; it's good business!

|
|
Reply
5:44 pm, Feb 4, 2009

buckeyedgal

Obama's acceptance of tax cheats: now that's shameful. Issuing his ethics rules against lobbyists in his administration & then hiring a bunch of 'em while Gibbs stammers & stumbles : risible. The Lincoln emulator importing his personal chef from the Hyde Park manse 'cause chef knows how the prez likes his arugula dressed while dissing fat cat CEOs... I'm not feeling it.

|
|
Reply
6:53 pm, Feb 4, 2009

hammer

The nearly $18 billion in bonuses paid out to TARP funded banks was entirely paid to the level below the top five to ten executives. If Obama was paying attention he would have found the Ken Lewis of BofA, Blankfein of Goldman, John Mack of Morgan Stanley, Vikram Pandit of Citi, Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan, Thain of Merrill and Stumpf of Wells all announced they weren't going to take bonuses for 2008. Their annual salary ranges from $600,000 to $1MM. Many of their direct reports also received no bonuses. The $18BN went to the traders, IBankers, MDs and was spread around. Overall, the bonus was only down 44% from the record 2007 payout and the sixth largest of all time.

This bill will do nothing to control year-end compensation overpayment. The new regulations sound good in a 30 second bit, but are totally ineffective.

|
|
Reply
8:57 pm, Feb 4, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
View Full Cheat Sheet