Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2010
2
9
FEBRUARY 2010
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
 
123456
789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
vacancy

Souter Giving Up Gavel

The liberal justice conservatives love to hate is leaving the Supreme Court: David Souter, who was appointed by President Bush in 1990, will retire after this year’s term, according to NPR. At 69, Souter is only the Court’s fifth-oldest judge, but apparently he dislikes Washington and wants to return to his home state of New Hampshire. According to NPR, “Souter was apparently satisfied that neither the court's oldest member, 89-year-old John Paul Stevens, nor its lone woman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who had cancer surgery over the winter, wanted to retire at the end of this term. Not wanting to cause a second vacancy, Souter apparently had waited to learn his colleagues' plans before deciding his own.”

Posted at 5:41 AM, Apr 21, 2009
Save it
|
Email
|
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
print
|
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()

allonfla

LOL!! = This. Is. Teh. Awesome. - GOP is going to go nuts.

|
|
Reply
|
10:17 pm, Apr 30, 2009

socialworklady

Oh, yah. Count on it :)

|
|
Reply
12:20 am, May 1, 2009

IsidoroRDL

"Power is the great evil with which we are contending. We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. However, where is the check on the power of the judiciary? If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny." - Patrick Henry

|
|
Reply
|
9:52 am, May 1, 2009

AlanD2

But remember that Patrick Henry hated our Constitution. (See http://www.rense.com/general79/patri.htm.) He would doubtless have supported the South in the Civil War.

|
2:26 pm, May 1, 2009

Progressive2

Hmm hopefully we'll have another that knows how to uphold the law.

|
|
Reply
10:18 pm, Apr 30, 2009

squiggy

Now we'll see if the GOP in congress have a backbone, win or lose.

|
|
Reply
10:34 pm, Apr 30, 2009

flyoverland

Any bets? The legal counsel for the ACLU or Acorn. Which one gets it?

|
|
Reply
|
10:37 pm, Apr 30, 2009

maxpower1013

I don't see what's wrong with lawyers from the ACLU.

|
|
Reply
12:52 am, May 1, 2009

muddog

Acorn?......Please.....

|
|
Reply
10:04 am, May 1, 2009

Ritarita

fly-
That's just
Dumb.
You don't usually
Sound that dumb.

|
|
Reply
|
10:59 am, May 1, 2009

cbeenthere

You mean flyover never baits?? Huh?? Besides look who else is considering retirement. So what is the threat about the court changing. It just won't be stacked like it could have been. Whew!

|
12:25 pm, May 1, 2009

AndreainNY

Can Obama nominate himself? What with all that audacity...

|
|
Reply
10:50 pm, Apr 30, 2009

socialworklady

Everything is breaking Obama's way! Hee Hee.

Let teh games begin!

|
|
Reply
|
12:20 am, May 1, 2009

Ritarita

It's so true.
He's not just
Smart
He's lucky.
It's amazing.

|
|
Reply
|
8:22 am, May 1, 2009

AlanD2

You call being in charge of the second great depression and two unwinnable wars lucky? (Swine flu being an optional extra. :-)

|
2:29 pm, May 1, 2009

TavernWench

I would like to take this opportunity to thank George H.W. Bush for the appointment of Justice Souter.

Bet he wishes he could take that one back. :-) Way to go, Poppy! Thanks!!!

Thank you for your dedicated service, Justice Souter!

|
|
Reply
|
2:21 am, May 1, 2009

AndreainNY

Yes, it's always about Bush, right?

|
|
Reply
|
8:23 am, May 1, 2009

Ritarita

It's going
To take years
To wash that
Oily slime from
The public memory
Andrea
Better get a strategy
To handle it.

|
9:24 am, May 1, 2009

cbeenthere

That is exactly what I was thinking.

|
|
Reply
12:27 pm, May 1, 2009

cbeenthere

Tavern Wench

|
|
Reply
12:27 pm, May 1, 2009

Ozone69

Hopefully, President Obama will nominate a judge who is fair, competent and adheres to the Constitution. Or am I just whistling in the dark?

|
|
Reply
|
7:21 am, May 1, 2009

AlanD2

Well, this kind of judge wouldn't fit in very well with the current conservative Supreme Court justices, unfortunately.

|
|
Reply
2:31 pm, May 1, 2009

dennisl59

I nominate William Ayers for Supreme Court. Alternate: Chris Matthews. 2nd Alternate: Nancy Pelosi.

|
|
Reply
|
8:22 am, May 1, 2009

AndreainNY

Why not Kerry to bring that European perspective?

|
|
Reply
8:27 am, May 1, 2009

Zorkadork

Regardless of politics, Justice Souter's intelligence was probably unmatched on the panel. His decisions cut both directions, and were generally well-respected.

It is sad, though, that Clarence "Uhhh" Thomas hasn't yet decided to step down from the bench.

|
|
Reply
8:32 am, May 1, 2009

Banjo1

GHWB, father of the well-know frat-boy flop, appointed this mama's boy hoping the Democrats would like him. They LOVED him instead. I hope Jeb Bush isn't entertaining any hopes of national office. We've had enough of that country-club clan. The country couldn't survive another.

|
|
Reply
9:03 am, May 1, 2009

Martyz42

Please make the person 45 or under, Please make "her" a female person of color. (Any color), Please make her come from a VERY poor family, Please make her know the feeling of being poor, Please make her understand what it means to be an underclass person.

|
|
Reply
|
9:47 am, May 1, 2009

cbeenthere

I don't think you are being honest. Naughty, naughty

|
|
Reply
12:29 pm, May 1, 2009

cbeenthere

Look everybody, Marty is really Lou Dobbs!

|
|
Reply
12:52 pm, May 1, 2009

muddog

LOL!!!!! G.O.P. is going bonkers!!!.

1st the Presidency.
Then get killed in in the House and Senate.
Then there approval ratings drop ( and contineu to do so ).
Then Spector defects.
Now this..

Got a love it!

|
|
Reply
|
10:07 am, May 1, 2009

Ritarita

It is fun
To gloat
But we need two
Parties
To run a real
Democracy.

|
|
Reply
11:01 am, May 1, 2009

Banjo1

People have short memories in this attention deficit society. As soon as GWB begins to fade from the national consciousness GOP fortunes will rise.

|
|
Reply
10:29 am, May 1, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
10:33 am, May 1, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
View Full Cheat Sheet