'I Can't Just Sit Back'
The moment is still frozen in Ted Olson's mind. The U.S. Solicitor General was sitting in his office-watching with horror the news of the World Trade Center on TV-and fretting about the safety of his wife, Barbara. Barely an hour earlier, he had spoken to her just before she boarded her American Airlines flight to Los Angeles from Washington's Dulles airport. Now Ted Olson was terrified: Could Barbara's plane have been hijacked to New York? Could that have been the one that just crashed into the second tower of the World Trade Center? Then the phone rang. It was Barbara calling collect. "My first reaction was, 'Thank God, you're OK'," he recalled.
What happened next-how Barbara Olson, the feisty conservative author and TV pundit, informed her husband that her plane too was being hijacked-has become one of the multitude of harrowing stories that surround the events of Sept. 11. As Olson related to NEWSWEEK, Barbara was calm and collected as she told him how hijackers had used boxcutters and knifes to take control of the plane and had herded the passengers and crew to the back. "Ted, what can I do?" she asked him. "What can I tell the pilot?" Then, inexplicably, she got cut off. Olson frantically called Attorney General John Ashcroft's private line-and got no answer. Olson then called the Justice Department command center: "I want you to know there's another plane that's been hijacked," he told them. "My wife is on it." Barbara called back-and gave still more information: how the plane was circling around and then appeared to be heading in a northeasterly direction. Finally, the line went dead moments before American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.
That night, a grieving Olson was surrounded by friends and family at the couple's home in Great Falls, Va. When he finally went upstairs to bed, he found something that Barbara had left him that morning on his pillow. It was a note wishing him a Happy Birthday. It was Olson's 61st.
In the weeks since his wife's death, Olson has sought to channel his grief-and his anger at what the hijackers did-into what he views as a productive purpose: he's become a leading advocate for the Justice Department's current push for broader powers to crack down on terrorists. It is a role that has raised some eyebrows. As chief advocates for the U.S. government before the Supreme Court, Solicitors General have long had a tradition of staying above the political fray-and avoiding lobbying Congress on behalf of legislation they might one day have to defend before the Justices. But Olson says he feels compelled to take a different course. "I have a direct personal stake that people understand," says Olson. Even more, he says, it is a course that he is convinced that his wife would have wanted him to pursue. "I can't just sit back," he said. "I can't just pretend this isn't happening. Barbara and I both always felt that if there was something you can do, you have to do it. We're not spectators."
Last week, Olson-after reviewing the anti-terrorism bill with top Justice officials-accompanied Ashcroft to Capitol Hill when the A.G. testified for the measure. Olson also has defended the proposal on TV talk shows. Among its provisions: easing restrictions on FBI wiretaps, giving the Justice Department new powers to seize assets, and allowing the indefinite detention of suspected terrorists during deportation proceedings. The proposals have drawn criticism from an unlikely coalition of liberal and conservative groups, many of whom fear that Ashcroft and his deputies are using the current crisis to restrict civil liberties. "It's like they went through their desk drawers and just submitted a prosecutors' wish list," charges Grover Norquist of the Americans for Tax Reform. Norquist, who is helping to mobilize conservative opposition to the proposals, insists there is little relationship between some of the Justice proposals and fighting the terrorists who executed the Sept. 11 assault.
But Olson-perhaps the country's best known conservative legal advocate-says he is baffled at the arguments of the opponents. "I don't understand the objections," Olson said. Consider the debate over indefinite detention of illegal aliens the Justice Department is seeking to deport. In the current case, he says, the policy makes sense if the United States has evidence that a deportable alien might have been involved in plotting a terrorism act-such as another hijacking-but lacks the proof needed to bring charges in court. "What are we going to do if we can't convict them?" he asks, noting that even Supreme Court liberals have agreed that "national security" concerns should be taken into account in such circumstances. Olson also emphasizes that the proposals to loosen restrictions on wiretaps and make it easier for prosecutors to use evidence gathered by foreign governments abroad would only change current U.S. statutes-and would not in any way diminish constitutional protections.
Amid his personal grief, Olson also has made another decision that could raise questions from some quarters. After consulting with his late wife's closest friends, he has given the greenlight to Regnery, the conservative publishing house, to proceed with plans to publish the manuscript Barbara Olson finished just before her death. Like her first book, "Hell to Pay," the new tome-entitled "The Final Days: The Last Desperate Abuse of Power by the Clinton White House"-is a fierce attack on Bill and Hillary Clinton. It is due out in a couple of weeks and will include an envelope seeking funds for a Barbara Olson scholarship fund recently set up at her alma mater, the Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University. (It's one of several such posthumous honors: The Federalist Society has just set up a lecture series in her name as well.)
Although the book is sure to stir controversy, Olson said there was never any question that his wife would have wanted it to come out. "For me to tell Barbara that her voice would be silenced because she was murdered by terrorists-I couldn't have lived with myself, and Barbara could not have tolerated that," he said. The book's inscription: "To my best friend, Ted."
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Michael Isikoff has been an award-winning investigative correspondent for Newsweek since 2004. He has written extensively on the U.S. government's war on terrorism, the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, presidential politics and other national issues. His book, "Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War," co-written with David Corn, was an instant New York Times best-seller when it was published in September, 2006. The book was hailed by the New York Times Book Review as "fascinating reading" and "the most comprehensive account of the White House's political machinations" in the run up to the war in Iraq. Since January 2009, Isikoff has been an MSNBC contributor, making regular appearances on the Rachel Maddow Show and Hardball w/ Chris Matthews.
Ever since the events of September 11, Isikoff has broken repeated stories about the U.S. government's war on terror and won numerous journalism awards. His blog "DeClassified: Investigative Reporting in Real Time," which appears regularly on Newsweek's Web site and is written with MarkHosenball, has become a must-read for senior U.S. intelligence officials. Isikoff and Hosenball won the 2005 award from the Society of Professional Journalists for best investigative reporting online.
Isikoff's June 2002 Newsweek cover story on U.S. intelligence failures that preceded the 9-11 terror attacks, along with a series of related articles, was honored with the Investigative Reporters and Editors top prize for investigative reporting in magazine journalism. He was honored, along with a team of Newsweek reporters, by the Society of Professional Journalists for coverage of the Abu Ghraib scandal. For that coverage, Isikoff obtained exclusive internal White House, Justice Department and State Department memos showing how decisions made at the highest levels of the Bush administration led to abuses in the interrogation of terror suspects. Isikoff was also part of a reporting team that earned Newsweek the National Magazine Award for General Excellence in 2002, the highest award in magazine journalism, for their coverage of the aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks.
Isikoff's exclusive reporting on the Monica Lewinsky scandal gained him national attention in 1998, including profiles in The New York Times and The Washington Post and a guest appearance on "Late Show with David Letterman." His coverage of the events that lead to President Bill Clinton's impeachment earned Newsweek the prestigious National Magazine Award in the Reporting category in 1999. Isikoff's reporting also won the National Headliner Award, the Edgar A. Poe Award presented by the White House Correspondents Association and the Gerald R. Ford Journalism Prize for Reporting on the Presidency. In 2001, Isikoff was named on a list of "most influential journalists" in the nation's capital by Washingtonian magazine.
Isikoff is the author of "Uncovering Clinton: A Reporter's Story," a book that chronicled his own reporting of the Lewinsky story and was hailed by a critic for The Washington Post-Los Angeles Times news service as "the absolutely essential narrative of the scandal with revelations that no one would have thought possible." The book, also a New York Times bestseller, was named Best Non-Fiction Book of 1999 by the Book of the Month Club.
Isikoff came to Newsweek from The Washington Post, where he had been a reporter since September 1981. There he covered the Justice Department and the Persian Gulf War, reported on international drug operations in Latin America and worked on the Post's financial news desk. Isikoff graduated from Washington University with a B.A. in 1974 and received a Masters in Journalism from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism in 1976.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments