How Good Is Abu Zubaydah's Information?
Bush Administration officials are uncertain what to make of the dialogue U.S. interrogators now appear to have established with Abu Zubaydah, the highest-ranking Al-Qaeda leader currently in U.S. custody. Gravely injured in a shootout with the Pakistani and American forces who captured him in a Pakistan safe-house in March, Zubaydah's gunshot wounds to the stomach and groin are now healing well and he is talking more than U.S. investigators initially expected-and is providing detailed information for the "fight against terrorism," according to a senior U.S. official. Other officials indicate Zubaydah has provided specific information, such as names and addresses, about possible Al Qaeda networks and operations.
The problem: how much, if any, of Abu Zubaydah's information can and should U.S. officials believe? Administration officials think Zubaydah is still a committed member of a terror group that holds Western values in contempt and trains operatives to resist interrogations. U.S. intelligence sources say this means that investigators have to take anything Zubaydah says with a great deal of skepticism. Some wonder whether he's trying to mislead investigators or frighten the American public. Nonetheless, officials say, some of the information Zubaydah has provided has matched up with intelligence collected earlier in the war on terrorism.
Because Zubaydah's information appeared to be supported by intelligence from other sources, the Administration last week issued two domestic terrorism warnings. One concerned possible attacks on banks or financial institutions in the Northeastern United States. That warning appears to fit with repeated statements by Al Qaeda leaders about the need to attack the U.S. economy, a mission that Osama bin Laden himself touted in a recently discovered home video. Another tip from Zubaydah warned that Al Qaeda operatives could be planning attacks on U.S. supermarkets and shopping malls. Some U.S. intelligence analysts for months have been quietly warning officials of potential suicide bombings at malls, where federal security experts say anti-terrorism precautions are lax to non-existent. These analysts believe the possibility of suicide attacks on U.S. shopping malls has only been increased by the recent standoff between Israel and the Palestinians, and Abu Zubaydah's information has bolstered their arguments.
U.S. officials say that a third piece of information from Abu Zubaydah, about Al Qaeda's interest in obtaining or manufacturing a crude atomic device known as a "dirty bomb," also matches up with earlier U.S. intelligence. For the past several years, U.S. intelligence has been collecting evidence about the bin Laden organization's efforts to obtain both the know-how and materials to make primitive atomic weapons. U.S. officials do not seem to believe that Al Qaeda was anywhere close to acquiring or making a real atomic bomb. But Zubaydah has told U.S. interrogators that the bin Laden network was deeply involved in efforts to put together a "dirty bomb" (known to U.S. atom scientists as a "radiological dispersal device"), a simple atomic weapon in which radioactive materials of any kind are packaged together with ordinary high explosives and then detonated. Such a weapons would cause limited immediate casualties, but spread fear and disruption due to the radioactive contamination of a wide area. Zubaydah's information about Al Qaeda's interest in "dirty bombs" dovetails with other evidence gathered by U.S. forces from terror camps and hideouts inside Afghanistan.
How close did Al-Qaeda get to actually building a "dirty bomb"? U.S. officials say Abu Zubaydah has not said that the bin Laden organization actually built one, only that it was trying to do so. U.S. officials say that some evidence has been collected by U.S. forces in Afghanistan demonstrating that Al Qaeda assembled the kind of laboratory and manufacturing equipment necessary to make unidentified forms of biological weapons, though the Al Qaeda facilities were not sophisticated enough to constitute a bio-weapons production line. By contrast, U.S. officials say that there has been no confirmed discovery of any Al-Qaeda operation to assemble "dirty bombs." According to U.S. officials, the only confirmed case of radioactive material being found in Afghanistan is the discovery of Cobalt-60, an isotope widely used in medical procedures, in an Afghan hospital. U.S. experts say Cobalt-60 is a deadly substance that would cause serious contamination if used in a dirty bomb. Sources say that the director of the Afghan hospital where the Cobalt-60 was found hid it after Al-Qaeda operatives came to the hospital looking for radioactive material.
Other evidence that Al Qaeda was looking actively for "dirty bomb" components includes reports that the bin Laden organization was scammed at least once by suspected Russian gangsters peddling a legendary (but bogus and useless) Soviet atomic substance known as "red mercury" and reports that border guards in Uzbekistan in 2000 stopped two trucks carrying suspicious radioactive materials to Pakistan. Since September 11, NEWSWEEK has also learned, U.S. Customs inspectors twice searched containers on ships coming into the ports of New York and Charleston, S.C. looking for "dirty bomb" components or other weapons of mass destruction. Nothing suspicious was found. Despite the lack of evidence that Al-Qaeda ever succeeded in obtaining or building a "dirty bomb," fears of such a contingency remain a factor in federal security measures which still keep Vice President Dick Cheney away from the White House complex for extended periods and require top government officials to rotate in and out of nuclear war bunkers located north and west of Washington.
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Mark Hosenball joined Newsweek as an investigative correspondent in November 1993, covering a range of issues for the National Affairs department. Most recently, he has written and reported numerous stories on terrorism and the Sept. 11 attacks on America. He has also covered campaign finance, the Monica Lewinsky controversy, the death of Princess Diana, Whitewater, the crashes of EgyptAir flight 990 and TWA flight 800, as well as related air safety issues.
Hosenball came to Newsweek from "Dateline NBC," where he worked as an investigative producer. He also worked extensively as a print journalist, writing for a number of British and American publications, including the London Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard, Time Out, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New Republic. In addition, he has done commentaries for American Public Radio.
Hosenball has been honored with a number of prestigious awards. Most recently, along with a team of Newsweek correspondents, he was awarded the Overseas Press Club's most prestigious honor, the 2002 Ed Cunningham Memorial Award for best magazine reporting from abroad for Newsweek's coverage of the war on terror. His reporting and that of his colleagues earned Newsweek the prestigious National Magazine Award for General Excellence in 2002 for its coverage of September 11 and its aftermath. And a story he co-authored was highlighted in a citation Newsweek received by the White House Correspondents' Association when it awarded the magazine the 2002 Edgar A. Poe Award for "excellence on a story of national or regional importance. "Newsweek's September 11 coverage started long before the attacks. An article in the magazine's February 19, 2001 issue warned with chilling accuracy: 'The threat posed by (Osama) bin Laden is growing -- and coming ever closer to home."
Hosenball was a contributor to the CANAL + TV documentary, "L'Argent de la Drogue" (Drug Money), which was awarded the "Sept D'Or," the French equivalent of an Emmy. He also contributed to NBC News' coverage of the BCCI scandal, which earned a 1991 Peabody Award.
He attended the University of Pennsylvania and Trinity College in Dublin. He lives in the Washington, D.C. area with his wife and son.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments