Content Section
In Newsweek Magazine

Ceo's: A Downside To Being An Insider

It's been a hectic year for America's chief executives. In the first seven months of 2005, 777 CEOs left their jobs, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. That's 90 percent ahead of 2004's pace. To replace them, boards are turning to outsiders with increasing frequency. While inside candidate Robert Iger won the year's highest-profile CEO derby by replacing Michael Eisner at Disney, in the last year directors at Nike, HP and Boeing have each hired outsiders for the top job.

While shareholders want boards to pick the best candidate, imported talent inevitably costs more. During the book tour for his recent best seller "Winning," former General Electric chairman Jack Welch has pointed out the irony that when he chose among three GE subordinates to replace him, the two men he passed over (Bob Nardelli, now at Home Depot, and James McNerney, now at Boeing) wound up making better money than Jeff Immelt, GE's current chairman. Welch says if more companies developed future CEOs in-house, their paychecks might not be so outsized. Compensation researcher Paul Hodgson of The Corporate Library agrees that the preference for outside hires "is one of the many driving forces behind the exponential rise in CEO pay."

The numbers tell the story. Thirty-four percent of S&P 500 companies that replaced a CEO in the first half of 2005 hired an outsider, according to recruiting firm Spencer Stuart. Recent research by consultants at Pearl Meyer & Partners examined pay for CEOs hired between 2001 and 2004. They found that outside CEOs earned 24 percent more than the bosses they replaced, while insiders earned 6 percent less than the departing chief. "My experience is, most [insiders] are just so thrilled to be named CEO" that they don't push for more money, says Claude Johnston, a Pearl Meyer managing director. Don't feel bad for the underpaid insiders, though; after a few years on the job, their seven-digit pay stubs usually catch up to the external hires. At the highest rungs of corporate life, there are very few losers.

View As Single Page

Related Stories

Comments