A Game of Survivor
Hillary takes Texas and Ohio, setting back Obama and staying alive. But with McCain securing the Republican nomination, will the continuing battle between the two Democrats cost them the White House?
Hillary Clinton's day at the polls was not unlike her bumpy plane ride from Texas to Ohio earlier Tuesday: everyone on board had white knuckles, but in the end she survived. The New York senator snapped Barack Obama's 12-state winning streak, decisively taking the key state of Ohio—a likely must-win state for Democrats in the fall—by a significant margin, and eking out a narrow win in Texas. She also handily won Rhode Island. Those three wins made it probable the Democratic battle would go on for some time to come despite Obama's seemingly insurmountable lead in pledged delegates and Clinton's loss in Vermont on Tuesday.
Clinton, in her victory speech in Columbus after a 54 percent to 44 percent triumph, made it clear she wasn't going anywhere and twice referred to Ohio's historical status as a state that successful presidential candidates must win. "You know how the saying goes: 'As Ohio goes, so goes the nation,'" she told her supporters. "Well, this nation's coming back and so is this campaign. … For everyone here in America and in Ohio who's ever been counted out but refused to be knocked down … this one's for you." The Clinton campaign will now argue that her victory in major states that would undoubtedly be the cornerstone of a Democratic victory in the fall—including New York, California and New Jersey, along with Ohio and Texas—has shifted momentum in her direction.
The mixed results, however, did not bode well for the Democrats in the general election, especially after John McCain became the presumptive Republican nominee Tuesday night with the departure of his last GOP rival, Mike Huckabee, from the race. McCain, who was scheduled to meet with George W. Bush in the Rose Garden on Wednesday, quickly took advantage of the Democratic disarray, saying Americans no longer had patience for an "uncivil brawl over the spoils of power." McCain declared: "The contest begins tonight."
For McCain it certainly will. And he knows that the fierce rivalry between Obama and Clinton-which is likely to continue through the Pennsylvania primary on April 22 and could potentially last until the final primary in Puerto Rico in June—opens the way for him to define the terms of the fall campaign. That's what happened to John Kerry in 2004. In that election Kerry actually secured the Democratic nomination in March, but stayed silent while the Republican machine branded him a flip-flopper—waiting for what one of his aides called the "regular campaign season." By the time of that summer's Democratic convention, Kerry had been painted into a corner from which he never emerged.
The problem for Obama and Clinton: by ratcheting up their attacks on each other, they risk weakening the eventual nominee in the general election against McCain. They are certainly supplying the Republicans with a priceless amount of free advertising. Clinton's "red phone" ads raising questions about Obama's preparedness to be commander-in-chief, and Obama's counterattack commercials challenging Clinton's judgment, are likely to be re-aired by GOP politicos into the fall if she somehow manages to emerge as the nominee. Indeed, one reason for Clinton's success on Tuesday appeared to be her campaign's decision to attack Obama's integrity and honesty—raising questions about his relationship with a Chicago real estate magnate charged with extortion and his reported waffling over the NAFTA trade pact-as well as his readiness; exit polls showed that late deciders broke decisively for the New York senator.
McCain, in a somewhat tepid victory speech, continued to emphasize his credentials as the only candidate with the experience necessary to deal with threats abroad, saying that "America is at war in two countries and involved in a long and difficult fight with violent extremists who despise us, our values and modernity itself." McCain also sought to neutralize Obama's efforts to tout his early opposition to the unpopular Iraq war. All the candidates, the presumptive GOP nominee said, should avoid "relitigating the decisions of the past." Americans, McCain said, "know the next president doesn't get to remake the decisions. We're in Iraq. The next president must explain how he or she intends to bring that war to the swiftest possible conclusion" without destabilizing the Middle East and undermining U.S. security. He also attacked both Democrats for what he characterized as protectionist pandering.
Still, McCain's chief vulnerability will be exposed anew when he stands side by side with President Bush on Wednesday. This is the perception, which Obama has sought to flesh out, that McCain's presidency would represent in effect a third term for the unpopular Bush. McCain, Obama said in another rousing speech to his followers in San Antonio, Texas, "has seen where George Bush has taken our country and he promises to keep us on the very same course."
Despite her clutch victories, Clinton did not rack up the kind of margin in Texas she needed to seriously cut into Obama's lead among pledged delegates following his 11 straight victories prior to the March 4 vote. Indeed, Democratic counting rules, which apportion delegates to each candidate based on the margin of the vote rather than granting candidates a winner-take-all victory (the GOP method), made it likely that Obama and Clinton would gain close to the same number of delegates from Tuesday's four contests. But Clinton supporters argued that a shift of voter sentiment her way, and new doubts about Obama's credentials, could tilt the party's 300 or so undecided superdelegates into her column. Obama is well-positioned to prevail in the next two contests (Wyoming and Mississippi). The next big test: the Pennsylvania primary.
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Michael Hirsh covers international affairs for NEWSWEEK reporting on a range of topics from Homeland Security to postwar Iraq. He co-authored the November 3, 2003 cover story, "Bush's $87 Billion Mess," about the Iraq reconstruction plan. The issue was one of three that won the 2004 National Magazine Award for General Excellence.
Hirsh writes a column on Newsweek.com entitled "The World from Washington" focusing on foreign policy issues and serves as Washington Web Editor for Newsweek. He also edited NEWSWEEK's "Issues 2007" special issue, which explores all facets and issues of globalization.
Hirsh was the magazine's Foreign Editor from January 2001 to January 2002, and helped guide Newsweek's award-winning coverage of the September 11 attacks and the war on terror. Before that he was a Senior Editor/Chief Diplomatic Correspondent in the Washington bureau, writing about foreign affairs and international economics. Hirsh was also managing editor for the Newsweek International special issue "ISSUES 2001," the second in a series of three annual reviews of the global economy in the new century.
From September 1998 to December 1999, as Diplomatic Correspondent, Hirsh covered foreign policy, the State Department and the Treasury. He moved to the Washington D.C. bureau in May 1997, previously serving as a senior editor of Newsweek International, covering the same beat.
Prior to joining NEWSWEEK in October 1994 as a New York-based senior writer, Hirsh served as the Tokyo-based Asia Bureau Chief for Institutional Investor from 1992 to 1994. Previously, he was a correspondent for the Associated Press in Tokyo and a National Editor in New York.
Hirsh was co-winner of the 2002 Ed Cunningham Award for best magazine reporting from abroad for Newsweek's terror coverage and contributed to the team of Newsweek reporters who earned the magazine the prestigious 2002 National Magazine Award for General Excellence, also for the magazine's coverage of the war on terror. Hirsh also won a Deadline Club Award in 1997 for investigative reporting on his expose of the IRS's abusive practices, and was one of five finalists for a 1994 Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business and Financial Journalism for his article, "China's Financial Revolutionaries." It profiled the new generation of mainland Chinese businessmen who are striving to build a capitalist financial system from scratch. Hirsh is the author of the nonfiction book "At War with Ourselves" (Oxford University Press, 2003) which explores America's foreign policy and its global role.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments