The Kabul Cable
Are more U.S. troops the answer in Afghanistan?
Britain's top diplomat in Kabul believes events in Afghanistan are deteriorating so rapidly that it may take an "acceptable dictator" to rescue the country, according to a leaked French diplomatic cable.
The publication of the classified cable by a French newspaper also cast doubt on the conventional wisdom in Washington—echoed by Barack Obama and John McCain, as well as U.S. commanders—that more U.S. and NATO troops can contain the alarming Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan.
Just this week, Army Gen. David D. McKiernan, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, told reporters that he needed additional troops "as quickly as possible" to cope with the increasing violence. "We're in a very tough fight," McKiernan said. "The idea that it might get worse before it gets better is certainly a possibility." In an unusually blunt assessment, McKiernan added: "I'm not even looking at an exit strategy."
Not everyone shares this prescription. Though he agrees that the security situation in Afghanistan is worsening, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, Britain's ambassador to Afghanistan, recently warned a senior French diplomat that the growing number of U.S. and NATO troops in the country is only making things worse. "The reinforcement of military means ... could be having perverse results," Cowper-Coles and his top deputy told France's deputy ambassador to Afghanistan at a meeting Sept. 1, according to the leaked French cable. One unintended consequence of recent military reinforcements in Afghanistan: the number of "targets" for insurgent attacks has "multiplied," the British diplomat reportedly argued.
The secret French telegram, dated Sept. 2, details an alleged conversation between France's deputy ambassador to Afghanistan, Jean-Francois Fitou; Cowper-Coles, one of Britain's most esteemed professional diplomats; and Cowper-Coles's deputy, Andrew Patrick. The Paris weekly that obtained the document, Le Canard Enchainé , has a long history of publishing government leaks. In the past it has been the target of secret anti-leak investigations by the French government.
In the cable, the British diplomats describe the current situation in Afghanistan as "bad ... Security is worsening, but so is corruption and the government has lost all credibility." They also raise questions about the public statements made by American and other Western officials, who have tried to put a positive face on the Afghan conflict.
The British diplomats are quoted as saying that Islamic insurgents continue to make life "more and more difficult" throughout the country, "including in the capital city ... The presence, particularly military, of the [U.S.-led] coalition is a part of the problem, not of the solution." In another passage, the diplomats argue that "Foreign troops are assuring the survival of a regime which, without [the troops' presence], would rapidly fall apart." The diplomats are quoted as concluding that it would be better if Afghanistan were "governed by an acceptable dictator" for the next five to 10 years. "This is the only realistic outlook ... and we must prepare public opinion [in our home countries] to accept it."
According to Le Canard's story, the message goes on to quote the British officials telling their French counterpart that "We can only support the United States in Afghanistan, but we must tell them that we want to be part of a winning strategy, not a losing one."
A spokesman for the French Embassy in Washington said his government never comments on diplomatic communications. British officials have not challenged the authenticity of the cable but say that it seriously misrepresents the views of the government of Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Britain's Foreign Office and Cowper-Coles.
A State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that the United States shares Cowper-Coles's alleged concerns about the resurgent Taliban and Afghan corruption, but said Washington disagrees with the "hopeless" tone of the British assessment depicted in the cable. From Washington's point of view, the official said, Cowper-Coles's fears about the future are "overly pessimistic."
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Mark Hosenball joined Newsweek as an investigative correspondent in November 1993, covering a range of issues for the National Affairs department. Most recently, he has written and reported numerous stories on terrorism and the Sept. 11 attacks on America. He has also covered campaign finance, the Monica Lewinsky controversy, the death of Princess Diana, Whitewater, the crashes of EgyptAir flight 990 and TWA flight 800, as well as related air safety issues.
Hosenball came to Newsweek from "Dateline NBC," where he worked as an investigative producer. He also worked extensively as a print journalist, writing for a number of British and American publications, including the London Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard, Time Out, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New Republic. In addition, he has done commentaries for American Public Radio.
Hosenball has been honored with a number of prestigious awards. Most recently, along with a team of Newsweek correspondents, he was awarded the Overseas Press Club's most prestigious honor, the 2002 Ed Cunningham Memorial Award for best magazine reporting from abroad for Newsweek's coverage of the war on terror. His reporting and that of his colleagues earned Newsweek the prestigious National Magazine Award for General Excellence in 2002 for its coverage of September 11 and its aftermath. And a story he co-authored was highlighted in a citation Newsweek received by the White House Correspondents' Association when it awarded the magazine the 2002 Edgar A. Poe Award for "excellence on a story of national or regional importance. "Newsweek's September 11 coverage started long before the attacks. An article in the magazine's February 19, 2001 issue warned with chilling accuracy: 'The threat posed by (Osama) bin Laden is growing -- and coming ever closer to home."
Hosenball was a contributor to the CANAL + TV documentary, "L'Argent de la Drogue" (Drug Money), which was awarded the "Sept D'Or," the French equivalent of an Emmy. He also contributed to NBC News' coverage of the BCCI scandal, which earned a 1991 Peabody Award.
He attended the University of Pennsylvania and Trinity College in Dublin. He lives in the Washington, D.C. area with his wife and son.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments