Missiles and Messages
The U.S. strikes at Al Qaeda as its No. 2 addresses Obama.
In the latest example of a sharp escalation of U.S. airstrikes inside Pakistan, an unmanned U.S. drone killed an alleged Al Qaeda fixer and four associates along the Afghan-Pakistan border, according to reports from the region and a Western counterterrorism source.
The Saudi, known as Abdullah Azzam al-Saudi, was regarded by intelligence agencies as a cog, rather than a big wheel, in the network that facilitates the movement of would-be jihadi fighters to indoctrination and training encampments in the loosely governed Pakistani border region known as FATA (federally administered tribal areas). According to news reports from Pakistan, al-Saudi was one of five militants killed when what is believed to have been a missile fired early Wednesday by an unmanned U.S. Predator drone hit a house in northwest Pakistan. The target house reportedly was located in Indi Khel, a village in the Pakistani district of Bannu, which is outside the FATA territories.
According to the Long War Journal, a military blog, the Bannu action is the first such attack to take place outside the FATA and the deepest strike inside Pakistani territory yet carried out against a jihadi target by a U.S.-operated missile. Two Western counterterrorism sources, who asked for anonymity when discussing sensitive information, acknowledged that an attack had occurred and that al-Saudi is believed to have been killed during the assault. The Bannu attack is the latest in a series of increasingly regular strikes against suspected militant encampments in Pakistan—most of which are believed to be sheltering people considered by Western intelligence agencies to be "foreign fighters." The airstrikes have proven controversial inside Pakistan, triggering public protests and complaints from the country's leaders. After the new chief of the U.S. Central Command, Gen. David H. Petraeus, flew to Islamabad for meetings with senior Pakistani officials earlier this month, President Asif al-Zardari released a public statement criticizing the raids. "Continuing drone attacks on our territory, which result in loss of lives and property, are counterproductive and difficult to explain by a democratically elected government. It is creating a credibility gap," he said. But there is no indication that the Bush administration intends to scale back the raids. In fact, from all indications, they are increasing dramatically. In addition, the drones are being used against a far broader range of targets. "Originally, this was a 'high-value target' technique," said John Pike, director of Global Security, a think tank that tracks the war on terror. "Now it's business as usual." As NEWSWEEK reported last summer, President Bush approved more relaxed rules of engagement for U.S. forces along the Afghan-Pakistan border. The Pentagon once required "90 percent" confidence on the part of intelligence agencies that a "high-value target" was present before approving Predator strikes inside Pakistan. Under the revised rules, U.S. officials on the ground now need only 50 to 60 percent confidence to shoot at compounds suspected of sheltering foreign fighters, according to knowledgeable U.S. sources who would speak of sensitive matters only anonymously. U.S. forces in the region gradually began stepping up the rate of such attacks earlier this year, as NEWSWEEK reported last March following visits to Pakistan by several high-ranking American officials, including intelligence czar Mike McConnell, CIA director Michael Hayden and Adm. William Fallon, then the commander of U.S. forces in the region. U.S. and Pakistani sources said at the time that the increased attacks were at least partly the result of agreements—reached by the American visitors with Pakistan's now-departed president, Pervez Musharraf, and other top Pakistani officials—which gave the U.S. virtually unrestricted authority to attack targets in border areas, on the understanding that Pakistan would later have to deny complicity in the attacks and might have to condemn them for domestic political purposes. Western officials knowledgeable about the attacks, which since last summer have come almost weekly, say that most of the targets were "foreign fighters"—including some midlevel Al Qaeda "facilitators" like the latest suspected attack target, al-Saudi. But at least one top Qaeda operative has been killed in the Predator strikes. After a missile hit a home in North Waziristan last January, reportedly killing 10 militants, U.S. officials confirmed that among the dead was Abu Laith al-Libi, a top field commander who was believed to be a liaison between Qaeda's fugitive leaders and Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. In the days since the Nov. 4 U.S. presidential election, reports from the region have recorded two suspected American missile strikes inside Pakistan in addition to the one that reportedly occurred today. On Nov. 7, only three days after the election, missiles fired from a U.S. drone hit a village in North Waziristan along Pakistan's Afghan border, allegedly killing five foreigners and several more locals, according to The New York Times. Then on Nov. 11, six foreign fighters and five others were killed in another suspected U.S. missile strike in North Waziristan, according to The Washington Post. President-elect Barack Obama spoke during his campaign about the need to bolster U.S. forces fighting Al Qaeda and their Taliban allies inside Afghanistan and the possibility of expanding U.S. operations against militants who use Pakistan as a safe haven. Two days after his election, Obama began receiving regular intelligence briefings by a team of officers from the CIA and the intelligence czar's office, but it is unclear how much detail about current U.S. operations against targets inside Pakistan has been discussed. The latest suspected U.S. missile strikes occurred as Al Qaeda's No. 2 leader, the Egyptian Ayman al-Zawahiri, released the first post-election comment by a high-ranking jihadi leader about the results of the American election. In his message—an audio track which was laid in over a montage of graphics and file tape, including pictures of the late Black Muslim leader Malcolm X—Osama bin Laden's deputy accused Obama of being a "captive to the same criminal American mentality toward the world and toward the Muslims" that the Bush administration displayed. Zawahiri went on to describe Obama, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice as "house Negroes." A U.S. counterterrorism official said that the insults hurled at the president-elect and other esteemed African-Americans demonstrated how "out of touch Al Qaeda is with the rest of the world."
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Michael Isikoff has been an award-winning investigative correspondent for Newsweek since 2004. He has written extensively on the U.S. government's war on terrorism, the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, presidential politics and other national issues. His book, "Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War," co-written with David Corn, was an instant New York Times best-seller when it was published in September, 2006. The book was hailed by the New York Times Book Review as "fascinating reading" and "the most comprehensive account of the White House's political machinations" in the run up to the war in Iraq. Since January 2009, Isikoff has been an MSNBC contributor, making regular appearances on the Rachel Maddow Show and Hardball w/ Chris Matthews.
Ever since the events of September 11, Isikoff has broken repeated stories about the U.S. government's war on terror and won numerous journalism awards. His blog "DeClassified: Investigative Reporting in Real Time," which appears regularly on Newsweek's Web site and is written with MarkHosenball, has become a must-read for senior U.S. intelligence officials. Isikoff and Hosenball won the 2005 award from the Society of Professional Journalists for best investigative reporting online.
Isikoff's June 2002 Newsweek cover story on U.S. intelligence failures that preceded the 9-11 terror attacks, along with a series of related articles, was honored with the Investigative Reporters and Editors top prize for investigative reporting in magazine journalism. He was honored, along with a team of Newsweek reporters, by the Society of Professional Journalists for coverage of the Abu Ghraib scandal. For that coverage, Isikoff obtained exclusive internal White House, Justice Department and State Department memos showing how decisions made at the highest levels of the Bush administration led to abuses in the interrogation of terror suspects. Isikoff was also part of a reporting team that earned Newsweek the National Magazine Award for General Excellence in 2002, the highest award in magazine journalism, for their coverage of the aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks.
Isikoff's exclusive reporting on the Monica Lewinsky scandal gained him national attention in 1998, including profiles in The New York Times and The Washington Post and a guest appearance on "Late Show with David Letterman." His coverage of the events that lead to President Bill Clinton's impeachment earned Newsweek the prestigious National Magazine Award in the Reporting category in 1999. Isikoff's reporting also won the National Headliner Award, the Edgar A. Poe Award presented by the White House Correspondents Association and the Gerald R. Ford Journalism Prize for Reporting on the Presidency. In 2001, Isikoff was named on a list of "most influential journalists" in the nation's capital by Washingtonian magazine.
Isikoff is the author of "Uncovering Clinton: A Reporter's Story," a book that chronicled his own reporting of the Lewinsky story and was hailed by a critic for The Washington Post-Los Angeles Times news service as "the absolutely essential narrative of the scandal with revelations that no one would have thought possible." The book, also a New York Times bestseller, was named Best Non-Fiction Book of 1999 by the Book of the Month Club.
Isikoff came to Newsweek from The Washington Post, where he had been a reporter since September 1981. There he covered the Justice Department and the Persian Gulf War, reported on international drug operations in Latin America and worked on the Post's financial news desk. Isikoff graduated from Washington University with a B.A. in 1974 and received a Masters in Journalism from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism in 1976.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments