The Rearview Recovery
Why losing 84,000 jobs last month isn't as bad as it seems.
In December, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the economy shed 84,000 jobs, dashing hopes that the nation's long employment nightmare has ended. But the report did contain one bit of succor for the employment sooner-rather-than-later crowd. The U.S. did, in fact, break its string of 23 straight months of job losses … in November, that is. The BLS revised the original report of 11,000 jobs lost in the 11th month to a gain of 4,000.
This speck of moisture in the long-running jobs drought highlights a larger dynamic in the economic data flow. The recovery, frustratingly slow as it seems, looks better through the rearview mirror than through the windshield. Consider how far we've come in the past year. The U.S. economy, which shrunk at a 6.4 percent annual rate in the first quarter, grew at a 2.2 percent rate in the third quarter. That's a turnaround of 8.6 percentage points in six months. Looking back, with the government having lifted many of its market guarantees, the price of the financial rescue was much smaller than originally thought—and it continues to shrink with every TARP repayment.
The same holds for employment. In the first quarter of 2009, employees cut an average of 691,000 jobs per month. But things have been looking up, or at least looking not so down, since the summer. And with each passing month, the recent past looks a little better. The BLS first reported October's job losses as 190,000. Last week, that were revised to a loss of 111,000—bad, but not nearly as bad. In coming months, December's loss of 84,000 jobs could easily be revised upward to a gain. Why? Job gains and losses are based on surveys: number crunchers plug data from employers into assumptions about what's happening in the economy at large. And for much of the past year, economists have underestimated the pace of the recovery.
What's more, the data points within the employment report that presage job growth continue to point in the right direction. Wages rose in December. Businesses hire temporary workers before they commit to long-term relationships with full-time workers. In December, 47,000 temporary jobs were added; since August, the number of such jobs has risen 10 percent.
Optimists can point to several pieces of employment-related data published in the first week of January that were overshadowed by the jobs report. Challenger, Gray & Christmas said job cuts in December were the lowest since December 2007. And the Conference Board said the number of online-advertised vacancies rose by 255,000 (7.5 percent) in December. Translation: less firing, more hiring.
Macroeconomic Advisers, which provides real-time economic tracking, estimates that the economy grew at a 4.9 percent rate in the recently completed fourth quarter. That would be the most robust period of growth since early 2006. But, as is the case with December's employment numbers, we won't know how strong (or weak) the economy was last month until the numbers are revised in February and March.
Daniel Gross is also the author of Dumb Money: How Our Greatest Financial Minds Bankrupted the Nation and Pop!: Why Bubbles Are Great For The Economy.
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Daniel Gross is one of the most widely read financial and economic writers working today. He is a senior editor at Newsweek, where he writes the "Contrary Indicator" column. He writes the twice-weekly "Moneybox" column for Slate, which also appears on Newsweek.com.
Before joining Newsweek in the spring of 2007, Mr. Gross wrote the "Economic View" column in the New York Times, was a contributing writer to New York, and contributed regularly to magazines such as Fortune and Wired. From 1998-2007, Gross served as the editor of STERNBusiness, a semi-annual academic magazine on economics and management published by the New York University Stern School of Business.
A native of East Lansing, Michigan, Mr. Gross graduated from Cornell University in 1989, with degrees in government and history, and holds an A.M. in American history from Harvard University (1991). He worked as a reporter at The New Republic and Bloomberg News, and has contributed hundreds of features, news articles, book reviews and opinion pieces to over 60 magazines and newspapers. Areas of expertise include: economic and tax policy, the links between business and politics, the rise of the investor class, the culture of Wall Street, and business history.
He is the author of four books: "Forbes Greatest Business Stories of All Time" (Wiley, 1996), which was a New York Times Business bestseller and a finalist for the Financial Times "Lex" award, given to the best business history book of 1996. Translations have been published in Spanish, German, Czech, Polish, Portuguese, Bulgarian, Chinese, Turkish, and Japanese; "Bull Run: Wall Street, the Democrats, and the New Politics of Personal Finance" (PublicAffairs, 2000); "The Generations of Corning: The Life and Times of an American Company," co-authored with Davis Dyer, (Oxford University Press, 20010; and "Pop! Why Bubbles Are Great for the Economy," (HarperCollins, May 2007).
Mr. Gross appears frequently in the media. A regular guest on CNBC, MSNBC, and National Public Radio, he has also appeared on CNN, Fox News Channel, The Newshour with Jim Lehrer, Bloomberg Television, C-SPAN, BBC, and Reuters TV, and on more than 50 radio programs and talk shows.
Mr. Gross lives in Westport, Conn., with his wife and two children.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments