U.S. Expectations Modest for Pakistani Terror Crackdown
The U.S. government has been putting heavy pressure on Pakistan's military to wipe out Islamic insurgents in the border region of Waziristan since George W. Bush was president. But while the Obama administration is delighted that Pakistan's Army has finally launched a large-scale crackdown, expectations in Washington are modest as to what it will achieve.
Several current and former U.S. counterterrorism officials who have been following the operation's progress (and asked for anonymity when discussing sensitive information) said that among the least likely results they expect from the clearout is the capture or killing of Osama bin Laden and/or senior lieutenants like Ayman al-Zawahiri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, who some Western experts believe has now assumed the role of Al-Qaeda's "general manager." The officials said that Pakistani authorities have been preparing such an operation and signaling its likely commencement for so long that high-level Qaeda figures such as bin Laden, who at some point might have hidden in Waziristan, have had plenty of time to move well away from the area. U.S. officials say they would be shocked if anyone close to bin Laden's stature in Al Qaeda or the Taliban movement were swept up (or cut down) in the operation. The current sweep does not target other areas of Pakistan known in the past to have harbored top Qaeda fugitives, such as Karachi and Quetta. (Quetta is believed to be a major refuge for exiled leaders of the Afghan Taliban movement.)
Despite their low expectations, officials in Washington nonetheless say it is time that the Pakistanis moved ahead with the Waziristan crackdown, whose principal objective is to clear out—decimate if possible—tribal areas that have been used by Pakistan's native Taliban movement. There they have recruited and train new fighters and launched increasingly aggressive terrorist-style attacks on Pakistani government targets, such as a series of recent bombings and a hostage-taking at Pakistani Army headquarters in Rawalpindi. "Even if they don't manage to clear and hold [the border areas the Pakistani Army is sweeping], clearing the area is at least a start," said one American official. Others noted that in the two years that he has been the top U.S. military official, Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has visited Pakistan 13 times. Encouraging Pakistan to launch an operation like the current one has been a key element of his message.
Among the reasons American expectations are so low is that U.S. experts believe the Pakistani Army is not well equipped to conduct an effective clearout of a hostile and geographically challenging area like Waziristan. According to a former senior U.S. counterterrorism official, two specific disadvantages facing Pakistani forces are that it is too "road-bound" and too reliant on heavy artillery. Being road-bound means troops have to expose themselves to roadside assaults by irregular forces and IEDs; the Pakistanis simply don't have enough airlift capability—from helicopters—to circumvent these hazards. Heavy reliance on artillery means Army troops are not so exposed when they lob ordnance from a distance against Taliban targets, but they also face much greater risks of causing civilian casualties—which ultimately produce more recruits for the insurgency. Current and former U.S. officials say that while the U.S. has periodically offered Pakistani authorities access to advanced U.S. equipment, including helicopters and possibly drone aircraft, the Pakistanis have often turned such aid down because the Americans have demanded that the U.S. maintain some control over the equipment’s operations—a requirement that Pakistani officers regard as an infringement of their independence.
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Mark Hosenball joined Newsweek as an investigative correspondent in November 1993, covering a range of issues for the National Affairs department. Most recently, he has written and reported numerous stories on terrorism and the Sept. 11 attacks on America. He has also covered campaign finance, the Monica Lewinsky controversy, the death of Princess Diana, Whitewater, the crashes of EgyptAir flight 990 and TWA flight 800, as well as related air safety issues.
Hosenball came to Newsweek from "Dateline NBC," where he worked as an investigative producer. He also worked extensively as a print journalist, writing for a number of British and American publications, including the London Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard, Time Out, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New Republic. In addition, he has done commentaries for American Public Radio.
Hosenball has been honored with a number of prestigious awards. Most recently, along with a team of Newsweek correspondents, he was awarded the Overseas Press Club's most prestigious honor, the 2002 Ed Cunningham Memorial Award for best magazine reporting from abroad for Newsweek's coverage of the war on terror. His reporting and that of his colleagues earned Newsweek the prestigious National Magazine Award for General Excellence in 2002 for its coverage of September 11 and its aftermath. And a story he co-authored was highlighted in a citation Newsweek received by the White House Correspondents' Association when it awarded the magazine the 2002 Edgar A. Poe Award for "excellence on a story of national or regional importance. "Newsweek's September 11 coverage started long before the attacks. An article in the magazine's February 19, 2001 issue warned with chilling accuracy: 'The threat posed by (Osama) bin Laden is growing -- and coming ever closer to home."
Hosenball was a contributor to the CANAL + TV documentary, "L'Argent de la Drogue" (Drug Money), which was awarded the "Sept D'Or," the French equivalent of an Emmy. He also contributed to NBC News' coverage of the BCCI scandal, which earned a 1991 Peabody Award.
He attended the University of Pennsylvania and Trinity College in Dublin. He lives in the Washington, D.C. area with his wife and son.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments