Obama Considered—and Rejected—Military Custody for Accused Underpants Bomber
President Obama and senior advisers last month considered—and rejected—the notion that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the accused Christmas Day underpants bomber, should be handed over to the U.S. military for interrogation and detention, NEWSWEEK has learned.
President Obama and senior advisers last month considered—and rejected—the notion that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the accused Christmas Day underpants bomber, should be handed over to the U.S. military for interrogation and detention, NEWSWEEK has learned. The subject of whether Abdulmutallab should be transferred to military custody came up at a meeting the president held in the White House Situation Room in early January, shortly before the Justice Department announced it would proceed against him in the civilian court system, according to little-noticed statements made by one or more "senior administration officials" who gave a background briefing to White House reporters on Feb. 2.
According to a transcript of the briefing, the subject of whether Abdulmutallab ought to be turned over to the military came up at a Situation Room meeting that appears to have been held on Jan. 5, the day before the accused underpants attacker was formally charged with terrorist offenses under federal law. During the meeting, according to a White House briefer, Attorney General Eric Holder announced: "I'm going to charge him tomorrow." At that point, according to the briefer, "there was a discussion about whether or not in fact there was going to be any type of change in his custodial disposition."
Later in the media briefing, the "senior administration official" elaborated, saying that what came up in this discussion were "questions ... about whether or not he should in fact go to Law of War detention status." But according to the official, "Nobody advocated for that position. People were comfortable throughout this process that it was going in the right direction and that given what we can do in a military commission, what we can do in the criminal-justice system, there was full unanimity on the part of the seniors that this was the right way to go."
The White House briefers then went on to discuss both the political and legal consequences of continuing to move Abdulmutallab through the civilian-justice system. "The ones who were advocating that [the administration's handling of the case in civilian courts] was a disaster claim that if you put them into Law of War detention, that, all of the sudden, is going to open up this Pandora's box of intelligence. There are people who have been in Law of War detention, including Guantánamo, that have not given anything whatsoever.
"And so the main difference between conducting the debriefing under Law of War detention as opposed to within the criminal-justice system is that the debriefer wears a military uniform. And it was the professional, considered judgment of the individuals who had access to Abdulmutallab that putting him in front of somebody with a military uniform would have made him even more opposed to any type of cooperation; that the way to get to him is to use family members who are going to be supportive of what we're trying to do, which is to get him to cooperate," the White House briefer stated. The official also claimed that in light of revelations—explained in detail at the same briefing—that Abdulmutallab had recently been spilling his guts to investigators, the administration's decision to keep him in the civilian-justice system had been "vindicated."
Most, if not all, news reports generated by this White House background briefing focused on details that the briefers offered about how Abdulmutallab had begun cooperating again after he was urged to do so by family members, who had been brought to the U.S. from their native Nigeria by the FBI.
Prominent conservatives argue that Abdulmutallab should have been processed as a military detainee and treated as an enemy combatant (with some particularly avid defenders of Bush administration policies even suggesting that he should have been subjected to "enhanced interrogation" methods which the current administration has eschewed). The White House and its political supporters have argued that their handling of the case has been entirely appropriate, and that a cooperative Abdulmutallab is now providing valuable intelligence, including possible information on other plots by Al Qaeda's Yemen-based affiliate that might be in the pipeline.
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
Mark Hosenball joined Newsweek as an investigative correspondent in November 1993, covering a range of issues for the National Affairs department. Most recently, he has written and reported numerous stories on terrorism and the Sept. 11 attacks on America. He has also covered campaign finance, the Monica Lewinsky controversy, the death of Princess Diana, Whitewater, the crashes of EgyptAir flight 990 and TWA flight 800, as well as related air safety issues.
Hosenball came to Newsweek from "Dateline NBC," where he worked as an investigative producer. He also worked extensively as a print journalist, writing for a number of British and American publications, including the London Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard, Time Out, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New Republic. In addition, he has done commentaries for American Public Radio.
Hosenball has been honored with a number of prestigious awards. Most recently, along with a team of Newsweek correspondents, he was awarded the Overseas Press Club's most prestigious honor, the 2002 Ed Cunningham Memorial Award for best magazine reporting from abroad for Newsweek's coverage of the war on terror. His reporting and that of his colleagues earned Newsweek the prestigious National Magazine Award for General Excellence in 2002 for its coverage of September 11 and its aftermath. And a story he co-authored was highlighted in a citation Newsweek received by the White House Correspondents' Association when it awarded the magazine the 2002 Edgar A. Poe Award for "excellence on a story of national or regional importance. "Newsweek's September 11 coverage started long before the attacks. An article in the magazine's February 19, 2001 issue warned with chilling accuracy: 'The threat posed by (Osama) bin Laden is growing -- and coming ever closer to home."
Hosenball was a contributor to the CANAL + TV documentary, "L'Argent de la Drogue" (Drug Money), which was awarded the "Sept D'Or," the French equivalent of an Emmy. He also contributed to NBC News' coverage of the BCCI scandal, which earned a 1991 Peabody Award.
He attended the University of Pennsylvania and Trinity College in Dublin. He lives in the Washington, D.C. area with his wife and son.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments