Roberts Court

Content Section

From Newsweek

The Sweeping Impact of SCOTUS's Campaign-Spending Decision

I rarely attend a Supreme Court argument, but I did last fall for a "rehearing" of the campaign-spending case. I wrote a column about it, predicting that the Roberts Court would sweep away long-established restrictions on spending by corporations. The most vivid image I saw was the red-faced Chief Justice John Roberts, veins popping on his neck as he vibrated with disgust at the idea that government could limit what a corporate entity could do or say in the political arena.

The 5–4 opinion issued Thursday by the Roberts Court—written by swing voter Anthony Kennedy—was even more sweeping than I had imagined and predicted.

It's nothing short of revolutionary. Here's how I add up the possible consequences:

  • It adds to Republican chances of pickups in red states with small, cheap media markets.
  • It turns the cottage industry of campaign consulting into a Hollywood-lucrative major media sector.
  • It reduces candidates and political parties to mere appendages in their own campaigns.
  • It will turn corporate boardrooms into political cockfighting pits, since that is where the key decisions will be made.
  • It gives President Obama a populist issue, if he has the cojones and imagination and sense of injustice to take it on.
  • It rips the veil of "conservatism" from this court, which just rendered one of the most wildly "activist" opinions in decades. It makes a mockery of the legal theory of "original intent." The Founders would be rolling over in their graves.

 Other than that, it's not much of a story.

You can read Newsweek’s exclusive interview with Justice Anthony Kennedy who wrote the decision here 
And you can view our gallery on other Supreme Court Justices here

View As Single Page