Poland's President Kaczynski: Flying in the Face of Danger?
Russian authorities begin to examine the crash site. (Maxim
Malinovsky/ AFP-Getty Images)
The Russian-made Tupolev Tu-154 that wiped out Poland’s
leadership this
weekend is hardly the first aircraft of its kind to have wreaked havoc
on a nation. It is a creaky old Soviet-era aircraft, designed in the
mid-1960s, responsible for a huge raft of crashes, often in bad
weather. Usually, this is blamed on the age of the fleet; former Polish
prime minister Leszek Miller (a helicopter-crash survivor himself)
voiced those sentiments when he told Polish news that he predicted
Poland’s leadership "will one day meet in a funeral procession, and
that is when we will take the decision to replace the aircraft fleet."
But
age
may not be the problem. Steve Lott, a spokesman for the
International Air Transport Association (IATA), told NEWSWEEK after
another Tupolev crash last year, "It has been proven time and again
that there is no link between fleet age and accident rate." Turns out
it's not how old the plane is that determines the safety of your
flight, but where the plane was made and where it's operated, according
to an IATA report. The association indexes aircraft accident rates by
region of manufacture and region of operation. Companies like America's
Boeing, Europe's Airbus, and even Brazil's Embraer are considered
Western-built jets. Makers like Tupolev are of the Eastern-built
variety, which are almost all designed in the former Soviet republics
or China.
The IATA data show that Western-built jets crash at a
rate of 0.81, which means that there is one loss per 1.2 million
flights; among turboprops the number is 2.43. Eastern-built planes are
not broken down among plane type (jets and props are calculated
together), but in any case the crash rate is a whopping 12.11, which
works out to one accident per 83,000 flights.
Obviously,
correlation does not prove causality (the Polish president’s plane
didn't crash because it was made in Russia). And where you fly has
an even greater impact on air safety, since some countries have
stricter regulations, more sophisticated aviation infrastructures, and
better air-control systems than others—although presumably the nation’s
official fleet is as well kept as it can be. In fact, usually those
places with lax controls are the very places where Eastern-built
aircraft are operated, which is why parts of Africa, Southeast Asia,
Latin America, the Middle East, and the former Soviet republics remain
more dangerous places to fly. It's worth putting all these safety
qualms in perspective: if you were to take one flight each day on an
Eastern-built aircraft, you could expect to go, on average, 226 years
without incident. But, statistically speaking, odds say you're better
off steering clear of planes that carry a MADE IN RUSSIA label.
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.




Comments