RuPaul Book Pulled From Library Shelves Over One Parent’s Fury

A children’s biography of drag queen extraordinaire RuPaul has been temporarily pulled from the shelves of a Connecticut library after a single parent complained about its “sexually provocative drawings”—a decision that was met with a torrent of backlash.

“The book contains sexually provocative drawings in which the parent found offensive. The book in question was immediately removed from circulation,” Colchester First Selectman Andreas Bisbikos posted on his Facebook page Monday.

The first selectman, an elected official who acts as the town’s chief executive officer, said he received an emailed complaint about the children’s book—Who Is RuPaul? by Nico Medina—by a parent who felt it wasn’t “in an age-appropriate section” in the Cragin Memorial Library in Colchester. He claimed in the same post that he’d instructed the library’s director to review other books that may be inappropriate for kids.

“The book was temporarily removed from circulation until it is decided what the best place is to put it for circulation,” Bisbikos told The Daily Beast. “The book is still available for anyone in the public to review, it is just not located in the children’s section.”

But Bisbikos’ swift decision to have the book pulled from shelves didn’t sit right with the library’s director, Kate Byroade.

She said the book—which is fairly new to the library and had never been checked out —was part of a display for Pride Month. It was an illustration in the book of an old makeup advertisement that didn’t sit right with the parent, she explained. The image included women in thigh-high boots and bustier tops, spelling out “VIVA” with their bodies, similar to what fans do at sporting events.

In a phone call with The Daily Beast, Byroade, who is against book banning, said each librarian reads a book “in its entirety” when someone officially files a complaint. After the parent voiced his concerns to Bisbikos directly, he filed a complaint with the library, then they pulled the book for an internal review. Byroade claimed Bisbikos tried to disrupt the process when he immediately requested the book to be taken off the children’s shelves.

“He completely bypassed how you’re supposed to handle things,” Byroade said. “This is the exact definition of censorship.”

The Connecticut Library Association said in a statement, “Colchester’s First Selectman Andreas Bisbikos acted unilaterally in an attempt to remove a children's book title from the library's collection. In doing so, Bisbikos chose to ignore long-standing town policies and procedures, and to subvert due process. He took to social media to express his personal views, calling on Colchester residents to target the library’s collection.”

Bisbikos told the Beast that “no book is being censored or banned” and the work will undergo a thorough review process.

“The question is whether we can find a more age-appropriate section of the library for the book with the consideration of the sexually provocative image that is being displayed,” he added.

He also said the decision to remove the book had nothing to do with sexual orientation or any social issues.

“None of the other Pride Books were pulled,” he said. “If this…image was found in a book about George Washington in the children’s section, there would have been an identical response.”

Nonetheless, the Connecticut Library Association condemned the move, calling it an “egregious act of governmental overreach.”

Bisbiko’s initial Facebook post announcing the temporary removal received more than 200 comments by Wednesday afternoon. Some members of the Colchester community agreed with the move, equating the biography to “garbage” and “pornography.”

Others, however, were quick to condemn its removal and alleged it was targeted discrimination.

“Why are you having any involvement in this?” Colchester resident Lauren Kelly Talanian asked under the Facebook post. “Leave it to the professional librarians.”

“Parents can always say no to a book they don’t approve of,” Amston, Connecticut-resident Carolyn Damarjian wrote. “This sounds like book banning and I’m not in favor of that!!”

In a subsequent Facebook post, Bisbikos reiterated that the removal was not about censorship, but to review books that parents were uncomfortable with their children reading.

Jaen Andrews from West Hartford, Connecticut, told the first selectman that his statement contradicted his actions.

“You stated: ‘The book in question was immediately removed from circulation.’ Now you state that it was never about censorship,” she said. “To me, your original statement IS about censorship.”

“If someone was offended by that picture... I hope they never watch the Superbowl half time show or look at famous pieces of art,” Colchester resident Meredith Eisenberg said.

Bisbikos told The Daily Beast that the library’s children’s section will undergo a full review to check all books in its inventory for age-appropriateness.

“[Being a librarian] is stressful, it’s chaotic, it’s hectic,” Byroad said. “But it’s not hard to do the right thing.”

Reps for RuPaul did not immediately respond to The Daily Beast’s request for comment Wednesday.