Content Section

Michelle Goldberg on Ron Paul’s Debate Points

There’s much to dislike about the libertarian upstart. But his evisceration of Gingrich as a chicken hawk Saturday night was fun to watch. By Michelle Goldberg

Saturday night’s debate was worse than most—it was dull, unilluminating, and changed the dynamic of the race not at all. We learned that Rick Perry wants to reinvade Iraq. Mitt Romney either demonstrated or feigned ignorance of Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court decision outlawing state bans on contraception that served as a precedent for Roe v. Wade. And Rick Santorum, who has a page on his website titled “Santorum Hopes to Rebuild Middle Class,” claimed that using the term “middle class” is a sort of divisive class warfare.

GOP Candidates Campaign in New Hampshire

Charles Ommanney for Newsweek

The one bright spot of the evening was Ron Paul. I’ve often been impatient with liberals who have a soft spot for Paul, given his roots in the extreme right, his crankish goldbuggery and the way his libertarianism stops short of women’s authority over their own bodies. During the debate, he said that Martin Luther King Jr. was one of his heroes, but his newsletter called the civil rights leader a “pro-Communist philanderer.” Nevertheless, watching Paul eviscerate Newt Gingrich as a chicken hawk and then, a few minutes later, give an impassioned, righteous speech about the drug war, it was tempting to forget everything that makes him unsavory. 

“Look at the percentages,” he said. “The percentage of people who use drugs are about the same with blacks and whites, and yet blacks are arrested way disproportionately. They’re prosecuted and imprisoned way disproportionately. They get the death penalty way disproportionately. How many times have you seen a white rich person get the electric chair?” Those truly concerned about racism, he said, should “look at the drug laws which are being so unfairly enforced.” He’s absolutely right, and no other prominent person in either party is willing to be so vocal on such a crucial issue. The fact that such views got airtime on a major network almost made the night's whole plodding exercise worthwhile. No wonder so many lefties love him despite themselves.

You Might Also Like

Comments

What the GOP Women Are Up To

GOP women put together an ad to tell voters where they come from-and where they'd like the country to go.

  1. Stop the Ridiculous SuperPAC Ads Play

    Stop the Ridiculous SuperPAC Ads

  2. Powell: 'No Problem' with Gay Marriage Play

    Powell: 'No Problem' with Gay Marriage

  3. Who is Mitt Romney? Play

    Who is Mitt Romney?

Too Close to Call?

A Tight Election Has Disaster Potential

The Looming Electoral Armageddon?

The Looming Electoral Armageddon?

What if Obama wins the popular vote, but not the Electoral College? Michael Medved’s nightmare scenario.

A-List Donors

Will Hollywood Save Private Ryan?

The Swamps of Jersey

How Much Will Booker's Comments Matter?

Skeletons

Blasts from the Past Wound Romney

Gay Marriage

Obama Knows Better

 

 

 

NBC News

Courtesy of our partners @ NBC News

Michael Tomasky

Shame on You, Booker

Shame on You, Booker

Leaders are important; so are followers. That’s a lesson Cory Booker and Richard Grenell need to learn.

Our Broken Economy

Our Broken Economy

mitt-romney-press-kurtz

Romney’s Off-Limits Campaign

With Bain, Romneycare, and Mormonism off the table, what can Mitt talk about? By Howard Kurtz.