Content Section

Newt's Very Bad Night

Was6171262

Paul J. Richards / Getty Images

That was not the debate I expected at all.

I expected a debate that featured a war between Gingrich's intellect and his instincts. Gingrich would try to act the front-runner, to play it cool, to refrain from outbursts.

But (I again expected) he would fail. The barrage of attacks from former allies today—and maybe even more, the needling from the Romney campaign suggesting that Gingrich was erratic and unreliable—would (I expected) goad Gingrich irresistibly.

I was completely wrong.

Gingrich arrived with no plan at all except to repeat his now-famliiar stunt of denouncing the question. This time, though, the stunt failed. Wolf Blitzer asked Gingrich to justify the accusations he'd flung about Romney's finances. Gingrich tried to treat the question as an impertinence. Blitzer pointed out he was only repeating Gingrich's own words. That opened the way for Romney's shiv: wouldn't it be nice if people couldn't make accusations somewhere else if they weren't able to defend it?

That encounter broke Gingrich's nerve and his performance sagged through the evening. He got drawn into an unproductive exchange on space exploration: a dog biscuit at which he should not have snapped, a vivid demonstration of his lack of self-discipline. The evening culminated in a series of brutal Mitt-slaps: one when Romney pointed out that Gingrich had invested in the same Fannie and Freddie securities that Gingrich had attacked Romney for investing in— and without the excuse of having his affairs in a blind trust; the second when Romney powerfully accused Gingrich of offering every state in which he campaigned a major federal giveaway: a new powerline for New Hampshire, a new port for South Carolina, and finally and most fantastically a new moon project for Florida's Space Coast.

Even the one encounter where Gingrich had the chance to have the best of it— when Blitzer refused to accept Romney's claim "I haven't seen that ad"—ended in bad news for Gingrich when Romney entrapped Gingrich into repeating his claim that yes languages other than English were the language of the ghetto.

Gingrich seemed to just stop fighting, beaten not only on points, but psychically.

What happens now? Does Gingrich wake up tomorrow morning in a rage, then give the order to unleash a new barrage of negative Super PAC ads? Or does he stumble onward, hoping for a miracle on Tuesday—to worry later about what to do if the needed miracle fails to materialize?

Related Stories

Comments

subscribe-to-david-frum

David Frum Bio

David's Book Club

From The Daily Beast

Santorum Faces a Grilling

Santorum Faces a Grilling

Howard Kurtz on the challenges Santorum faces at the CNN debate defusing some explosive social issues.

Audacity of Mitt?

Can Careful Mitt Go Bold on Taxes?

Fox vs. the Rabbis

FrumForum Archive

Kirsten Gillibrand Takes On the 'War on Women'

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand talks to Newsweek/The Daily Beast's Tina Brown about the controversy over Super PACs, the culture war over birth control and the crucial role of women in the 2012 election.

  1. Bailout Stance the Subject of Anti-Romney Ad Play

    Bailout Stance the Subject of Anti-Romney Ad

  2. Andrew's Favorite Gay-Themed Film Play

    Andrew's Favorite Gay-Themed Film

  3. Can Romney Avoid a Campaign Death Trap? Play

    Can Romney Avoid a Campaign Death Trap?