What Exactly Would Barack Obama Do With a Second Term?
Doug Mataconis points out that we don't know. Except not be Mitt Romney. To be sure, there are billions of other people who could also not be Mitt Romney, but only one of them is running for president of the United States from a major political party, so if you want someone to not be Mitt Romney, but also, be president, you're pretty much going to have to pull the level for Obama.
This is really fairly remarkable. Lots of presidential candidates have run on a platform of Not The Incumbent, but Obama may be the first to define himself entirely as Not the Challenger. One of Romney's pollsters suggested to USA Today that this has been a costly decision, as the Mitt Romney people are seeing in the debates doesn't look much like the horrific, granny-killing, woman-hating GOP monster that Obama has been running against. Which may be why the gender gap, which has been giving Obama a big advantage, has started to close:
"In general, women tend to be later decision-makers than men and the Obama campaign has gone out of their way to run a negative campaign against Governor Romney among women," Newhouse says. "The first debate had a significant impact on these voters as they watched it and Governor Romney appeared nothing like the candidate that was essentially a caricature in the advertising by the Obama campaign. It's these voters who began to realize that the picture being painted of him was not reality."
Of course, this is Romney's campaign talking, so take that with a big grain of salt. However, I suspect that the core implication is correct: Obama is not going to make it across the finish line solely on the basis of who he isn't. He needs to set out some sort of affirmative vision for the second term, however low the chances that he will actually see that agenda into legislation.
The problem, I suspect, is that after four years, Obama knows all too well how unlikely Hope and Change actually are. And if he just repeats the stuff he promised the first time around, voters are likely to ask "Why didn't you do that already?"
Reagan and Bush could argue that they'd done popular things in their first term that they needed to follow through to the end. Very stupid popular things, in the case of the Iraq War, but this is neither here nor there. What can Obama say that about? Obamacare? Voters would rather he not, thanks. The stimulus? Best not bring it up. As long as voters thought Mitt Romney inauthentic, yet a terrifyingly rabid right-wing ideologue, Obama didn't need an agenda; he could just run against the terrible things that Romney would do. But over the last few weeks, that hasn't been working as well.
What's sort of interesting is what everyone's not talking about: the Supreme Court. For party activists, this is probably the biggest issue, as a couple of justices can be expected to retire next term. And yet, neither side seems interested in bringing it up.
I suspect that Obama's advisors knew all this months ago, and just figured it was too difficult to come up with a second term agenda that was both plausible and novel. Of course, it'll be even harder now. So Obama had better nail it in tonight's town hall.