Michael Slater on the Great Dickens Scandal
The author of a new biography chronicles how the writer’s affair with a much younger actress was revealed to the world only after the death of Dickens’s last surviving child.
Shortly before Christmas 1933 Dickens’s last surviving child, the 84-year-old judge Sir Henry Fielding Dickens, was knocked down by a motorcyclist. He died a few days later. For years he had striven to ensure that the story of his father’s 12-year relationship with Ellen Ternan, an actress 27 years his junior, should be kept under wraps. It had been mentioned in the press, on both sides of the Atlantic, when Dickens and his wife legally separated in 1858. The following year, however, Ellen left the stage and disappeared altogether from public view. In 1870 Dickens died, mourned by the whole nation as a truly great and good man, and was buried in Westminster Abbey. Six years later Ellen, after deducting 10 years from her actual age, married a schoolmaster and became the mother of two. She died a highly respectable widow in 1914. Fourteen years later she figured in a novel called This Side Idolatry, depicting Dickens’s life up to 1858. He discovers Ellen behind the scenes at a theater weeping with shame over the scantiness of her stage costume and quickly becomes infatuated with her. This is the last straw for his long-suffering wife and the novel ends with her denouncing him and telling him to go to his “painted actress.”
The author of this terrible novel was a journalist called Carl Bechhofer Roberts who worked for The Daily Express. The publishers were Mills & Boon who, for all the notorious ripped bodices of their more recent fiction, have never produced a book that has created quite such a sensation as this one did. Roberts himself said that the book could not have been more violently attacked if it had “preached cannibalism or unnatural vice as a desirable social reform.” This was due to his highly negative presentation of Dickens throughout rather than because of anything to do with Ellen. But the reader is certainly left to speculate on how Dickens’s relationship with her might have developed. Sir Henry Dickens, besieged by the press for comment, took refuge in condemning the book as utterly unworthy of notice and gradually the fuss died down (though it was only last year that Portsmouth City Library lifted its ban on this slur on one of Portsmouth’s most famous sons). It was, after all, a work of fiction.
Sir Henry had not been many months dead, however, before The Daily Express published a startling piece by an elderly writer of rather gossipy biographies of literary figures called Thomas Wright. He stated that when he had begun researching a life of Dickens in the 1890s he had interviewed a distinguished Anglican clergyman, Canon Edward Benham. Benham, who died in 1910, had known Ellen as a married woman. According to Wright, she had confided in Benham when he was her local vicar, and she had reluctantly yielded to Dickens’s passion some time after his separation from Catherine. Now, she had told him, she “loathed the very thought of the intimacy.” It had made both her and Dickens unhappy, Wright reported, and he believed that Dickens’s unhappiness was “reflected in his later books.” His article seems to have made little impact compared with Bechhofer Roberts’s novel. A few months later, however, his revelations were incorporated into a revisionist life of Dickens by the widely read biographer Hugh Kingsmill. It was Kingsmill, acting on Wright’s hint, who began the game of seeing Dickens’s relations with Ellen reflected in his later heroines—cold and tormenting Estella in Great Expectations, mercenary Bella Wilfer in Our Mutual Friend and passionate Helena Landless in The Mystery of Edwin Drood.
This was all still hearsay and the Dickens Fellowship, which had taken over Sir Henry’s role as defender of their hero’s reputation, vehemently denounced it as such. Then came Wright’s discovery, revealed in his posthumously published autobiography in 1936, that Dickens had, under an assumed name, paid the rates on a villa in Peckham between 1867 and 1870. Wright was put on the scent by a Mrs. Mackie whose mother had had a charlady who claimed that she had worked for Dickens while he lived at the villa with his “unofficial wife.”
Barely had incensed Dickensians time to recover from this shock than they had to suffer a worse one. A book was published in 1939 called Dickens and Daughter. It was written by a former actress called Gladys Storey who had been a close friend of Dickens’s younger daughter Kate Perugini during the last years of the latter’s long life. Kate had died at the age of 90 in 1929, having been a revered vice president of the Dickens Fellowship. In her book Storey included notes of conversations she had had with Kate about Dickens and Ellen. This young girl, Storey quoted Kate as saying, had come “like a breath of spring into the hard-working life of Charles Dickens—and enslaved him.” Thomas Wright’s bald assertion in a letter to the secretary of the fellowship that “there were children” had been mocked in the fellowship’s magazine The Dickensian. But it was less easy to dismiss Storey’s words, based as they were on intimate talks with Dickens’s daughter. “More tragic and far-reaching in its effects,” writes Storey, “was the association of Charles Dickens and Ellen Ternan and their resultant son (who died in infancy) than that of Nelson and Lady Hamilton and their daughter.” Here, surely, was authentic confirmation that Ellen had been Dickens’s mistress? Attempts to discredit it by the argument that Kate had been in her dotage when confiding in Storey were countered by no less a personage than George Bernard Shaw. He wrote to The Times Literary Supplement that he had talked with Kate about her parents’ marital problems only four months before her death and her mind had not been in the least enfeebled.
These new revelations about Dickens and Ellen attracted the attention of the hugely influential and prestigious American man of letters Edmund Wilson, a devoted Freudian. His 1941 essay “Dickens: The Two Scrooges” presented Dickens as a man leading a double life which had profound consequences for his art. The subject of Dickens’s secret life with Ellen immediately became of the greatest interest to American literary scholars. Aided by infrared photography, they began poring over manuscripts of Dickens letters and other documents to recover blacked-out references to Ellen. Soon afterwards, amateur sleuths in Britain began discovering Dickens hideaways in both Britain and France that, in one case at least, clearly related to Ellen. Then in 1990 Claire Tomalin published her celebrated biography The Invisible Woman, a vivid and fully documented life of Ellen before, during, and after her association with Dickens. Mysteries and uncertainties still remain regarding the exact nature of their relationship, however. The public’s fascination with the subject shows no signs of abating and will be considerably stimulated, no doubt, by the forthcoming BBC feature film of The Invisible Woman directed by and starring Ralph Fiennes.
Excerpted and adapted from The Great Charles Dickens Scandal by Michael Slater. Copyright © 2012 by Michael Slater. Used by permission of Yale University Press. All rights reserved.