Content Section

Ailes and Petraeus

Bob Woodward's scoop today about Roger Ailes's overture to David Petraeus is well worth your time. 

If you haven’t yet read it: Ailes, through a Fox “reporter” (who once ran against Hillary Clinton for Senate), suggested to Petraeus that he resign from the Army, accept a potential position as head of the joint chiefs but turn down any other job, such as the one he was offered at CIA; then, having left government, run for president as a Republican, with Ailes running his campaign and Murdoch potentially bankrolling it (though there’s no evidence that Murdoch knew about any of this).

Woodward got a digital recording of the Kabul chat between Petraeus and Fox’s Kit McFarland:

 “Tell him if I ever ran,” Petraeus said, and then laughed, “but I won’t . . . but if I ever ran, I’d take him up on his offer. . . . He said he would quit Fox . . . and bankroll it.”

“Bankroll it?” asked McFarland, who served as a senior aide to Henry Kissinger and later as a Pentagon spokeswoman in the Reagan administration.

“Or maybe I’m confusing that with Rupert,” Petraeus said.

“I know Roger, he’s done okay,” McFarland replied, “but . . . no, I think the one who’s bankrolling it is the big boss.”

“That might be it,” Petraeus said.

“Okay,” McFarland said, “the big boss is bankrolling it. Roger’s going to run it. And the rest of us are going to be your in-house.”

“Yeah, right, okay,“ Petraeus said.

“We’re all set.”

“It’s never going to happen,” Petraeus said. “You know it’s never going to happen. It really isn’t.

“My wife would divorce me,” he added. “And I love my wife. . . . We have a beautiful house.” Both Petraeus and McFarland laughed. “With his-and-hers bathrooms, believe it or not. I just want to live in it. I’ve never spent a night in it.” 

Well, that last graf is pretty rich, given what we now know. Guess he still won’t be living in it. But let’s stick to Fox here. “The rest of us are going to be your in-house.”

Let’s imagine that John McCain were president, and Phil Griffin, the head of MSNBC, directed Chris Jansing or someone to go to Colin Powell with such an offer. The right would ensure that this would become a huge scandal. Some scalps would be demanded and probably received.

But with respect to Fox, standards and expectations are so low that it’s just another “Well, that’s Fox for you” story. Anyway this would never happen at MSNBC, which is obviously liberal in outlook but is not an arm of the Democratic Party in remotely the way Fox is an arm of the GOP. There’s a difference between having clear ideological leanings and being a propaganda machine. And so Fox will roll on unscathed. The only solace for the rest of us is that we increasingly know they’re just talking to themselves, their rhetorical onanism no longer having any impact on the real world. 

You Might Also Like

About the Author

Author headshot

Michael Tomasky

Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent Michael Tomasky is also editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas.

- Advertisement -

Sexual Arousal for O'Reilly?

On Wednesday's 'Daily Show,' Jon Stewart asked Bill O'Reilly what type of joy he feels when there's a legitimate reason to criticize President Obama. O'Reilly didn't give, but he did say that Stewart pulls his material 'out of your butt.'

  1. Mark Sanford, Rob Ford, Marion Barry ... and Anthony Weiner? Play

    Mark Sanford, Rob Ford, Marion Barry ... and Anthony Weiner?

  2. Insert Weiner Joke Here Play

    Insert Weiner Joke Here

  3. Colbert Unveils 'Obama Scandal Booth' Play

    Colbert Unveils 'Obama Scandal Booth'

See More

From the Daily Beast

Obama: I Make the Drone Decisions

Obama: I Make the Drone Decisions

How the military tried to get more control over drone targeting decisions—and lost. By Daniel Klaidman.

The IRS Scandal

Just Say No (Special Prosecutor)

The IRS’s Competence Scandal

Hard Times

An Unforgiving America

Arming Rebels

Obama Gets Syria Rebuke