Rubio to Give the State of the Union Response
It's a hard speech to give well. Can Rubio do it right?
So Marco Rubio is going to give the official Republican response to the State of the Union. Jonathan Bernstein says, "Marco Rubio is going to give the Republican response to Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address this year. My only question: Why? Why would he want to do that?" Kevin Drum adds "If I were a rising political star, I would run, not walk, if party leaders asked me to give the SOTU response. My kid has a piano recital that night. It's my anniversary. Anything. I think you'd have to be nuts to agree to do this."
I agree that the SOTU response is very hard to give well--I once described a responder, current HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius, as having looked and sounded like an early-model Cylon. But I think there's a bigger mystery than why people agree to deliver the response, since the answer to that is obvious (politicians have huge optimism bias, or they'd never have started down this road in the first place). The real question is why they give such terrible responses.
The primary reason that SOTU responses are terrible: while the president is talking to a room full of people, the responder is talking to a camera. And unless you are really extraordinarily talented, talking to a camera looks robotic.
But there is an easy fix for this--two of them, in fact. The first is to practice the hell out of your response. And the second is to deliver it to a room full of people. This is how the only two decent responses in living memory--Barack Obama's, and Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell's--managed to transcend the traditional, disastrous, voder-vocoder style of the form.
No, they didn't match the full-on pageantry of the President's address, and of course, they suffered to some extent from speech-fatigue. But they brought themselves to the public's attention, marking themselves in peoples' memories as one of the young faces to watch come the next election cycle.
If Rubio is smart, he will use both these techniques: find a location where he can plausibly deliver the response, and fill it with people. And then deliver a speech that he has practiced for weeks, with every emotional gesture and more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger finger wag carefully choreographed by a team of crack media consultants. But if history is any guide, he will probably drone into the camera instead, and count it a victory if he narrowly avoids falling asleep in the middle of his own speech.
About the Author
Megan McArdle
Megan McArdle is a special correspondent for Newsweek and The Daily Beast covering business, economics, and public policy. A former senior editor at The Atlantic and writer for The Economist, Megan has a diverse work history including three small startups and a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero.
More from The Daily Beast
Full Politics Coverage
Eye in the Sky
Drawing the Lines on Drones
‘Love Is the Law’
How Minnesota Won Gay Marriage
Civil Liberties
They’ll Come for You Next
SERIOUSLY IRONIC
Don’t Pretend You Care
Debating Obama's Immigration Announcement
Did Obama lock down the independent vote with his move to reform immigration law? Newsweek and The Daily Beast’s Michael Tomasky and David Frum debate the liberal and conservative perspective on the latest immigration reform.




Comments