S&P: Downgrade Analysis 'Objective'

    epa02824987 (FILE) A file photograph shows a view of the offices of Standard and Poor's in New York, New York, USA, on 29 April 2010. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services on 14 July became the second credit agency this week, after Moody's, to threaten a downgrading of US long-term bonds.  EPA/JUSTIN LANE

    Justin Lane / EPA-Corbis

    Standard & Poor’s is defending its decision to strip the U.S. of its top credit rating. A blog on the Treasury’s website said the decision was “based on a $2 trillion mistake.” In an interview, S&P president Deven Sharma said there was debate over which discretionary-spending projections the firm should use in its decision, but it eventually used the projections that Treasury officials requested. Sharma said, “There was a change in assumption, but the dynamics of the near term and the medium term are still the same: The debt trajectory will continue to increase.” He added that the Obama administration’s resistance is “the same you would get from any other country or company. We are supposed to be objective, and others are always trying to convince us why the risk is less than we think it is.”

    Read it at The Wall Street Journal